Book a demo

Electric Drivetrain for Marine Propulsion Patent Landscape

Electric Drivetrain for Marine Propulsion Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Electric Drivetrain for Marine Propulsion Patent Landscape in 2026

The electric drivetrain for marine propulsion space is a concentrated, growth-stage field dominated by GM Global Technology Operations, which holds the largest single-applicant position. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak and the most recent years are further understated by publication lag.

53
Patent families in scope
71%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+32%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

GM leads a tightly concentrated field with a thin challenger tier

GM Global Technology Operations LLC commands the top position with 31 patent records, more than double the next-ranked applicant, Rivian Holdings LLC at 15 patent records. The top five filers together account for 71% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling a highly concentrated competitive structure.

The gap between the leader and challengers is substantial: after Rivian, Aurora Flight Sciences Corp holds 6 patent records, Innovation Technologies Partners LP holds 5, and DIPP R AB and Nivalis Energy IP Holding LLC each hold 4. This two-tier structure — one dominant player and a sparse second tier — leaves the field open to displacement if challenger portfolios accelerate.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1GM Global Technology Operations LLC31
2Rivian Holdings LLC15
3Aurora Flight Sciences Corp6
4Innovation Technologies Partners LP5
5DIPP R AB4
6Nivalis Energy IP Holding LLC4
7NINGBO GEELY AUTOMOBILE RES & DEV CO LTD4
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
8Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.4
9Volvo Truck Corporation3
10Hyliion Inc3
11Dana Heavy Vehicle Systems Group LLC2
12Cummins Inc2
13Gillig LLC2
14Intertrust Technologies Corporation1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

GM’s scale advantage reflects early, systematic coverage of electric vehicle propulsion and battery systems; Rivian’s position, built as a new entrant, indicates that late arrivals can accumulate meaningful portfolios quickly in a young field. The thin mid-tier suggests most participants have not yet committed to broad portfolio strategies.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are under-counted due to patent publication lag; apparent softness in 20232024 activity should not be interpreted as a real slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth with a 2022 volume peak; propulsion and battery systems dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend and IPC technology composition together reveal a field that built momentum through 2022 and retains multi-year growth, with a technology base anchored in core propulsion and energy-storage classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible through 2017, then climbed from 2 records in 2018 to a peak of 14 in 2022 before easing to 9 in 2023 and 6 in 2024. The recent-window growth rate of 32% confirms the field is still expanding on a multi-year basis. The 2023–2025 counts are understated by publication lag and should not be read as a real decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 14 in 2022.0201722018620195202011202114202292023620240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion) is the dominant class with 60 patent records, followed by H02K (Electric motors and generators) at 22 and H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) at 21. B60K (Vehicle propulsion and drive) and H02J (Power supply and grid systems) form a secondary cluster. Lower-count classes including G01R, B60H, G01C, and B60W mark adjacent technical areas with sparser coverage.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 60; H02K · Electric motors & generators 22.B60L · Electric vehicle …60H02K · Electric motors &…22H01M · Batteries, cells …21B60K · Vehicle propulsio…17H02J · Power supply & gr…10G01R · Electric & magnet…8B60H · Vehicle heating &…7G01C · Distance, navigat…6↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US9419314B2Published 2016-08-16

Systems and methods for determining battery system…

Gm Global Technology Operations LLC

System and methods for determining battery system power capability in a vehicle are presented. Peak power capability estimation systems and methods disclosed herein may compensate regressed parameters in a battery system circuit model for an effect of current magnitude. Utilizing the disclosed methods for accurately estimating peak power capability of a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Systems and methods for determining battery system… — patent drawingSystems and methods for determining battery system… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Vehicle charging path optimization systems and met…185
2Systems and methods for determining battery system…30
3Battery section balancing methods and systems28
4Battery systems operable in a backup mode and rela…26
5Motor Cooling System And Method18
6Systems and methods for control of a current inter…18
7Vehicle charging path optimization systems and met…14
8Methods, apparatus, and systems for preventing ove…14

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — lifecycle stage, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape where risk and opportunity sit in this landscape.

Growth

Growth stage, past its 2022 annual peak

The field is classified as Growth stage. The recent three-year filing window sits 32% above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion. Annual volume peaked in 2022 at 14 patent records and has eased since, though publication lag amplifies the apparent recent dip. Entrants arriving now can still establish meaningful positions before the field matures into a consolidation phase.

Growth · past 2022 peak
Concentration

One dominant player; a sparse but active challenger tier

The top five filers hold 71% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, with GM alone at 31 patent records. Below GM, Rivian at 15 patent records is the only credible near-term challenger. The remaining applicants each hold single-digit patent records, meaning the competitive moat is concentrated in two entities and the mid-tier is thin. New entrants with focused, high-quality filings could disrupt the second-tier rankings relatively quickly.

High concentration
Collaboration

One active co-filer pair: Zhejiang Geely and Ningbo Geely

The only co-applicant pair identified in evidence is Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Ningbo Geely Automobile Research & Development Co., which share 4 jointly filed patent records. This intra-group collaboration suggests coordinated IP strategy within the Geely ecosystem. No cross-company or industry-academia co-filing activity is evident in the corpus, indicating that collaborative R&D at scale remains an under-exploited route in this field.

Limited co-filing
Geography

Strongly US-centric; minimal international protection

The United States leads with 61 patent records, far ahead of Europe (EPO) at 7, Canada and the United Kingdom at 4 each, and WIPO (PCT) at 4. Germany and Austria each hold 1 patent record. This heavily US-concentrated filing pattern suggests most applicants have not pursued broad international protection strategies, leaving significant jurisdictions — particularly Europe and Asia-Pacific — with sparse coverage that could be entered by competitors.

US-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.Ningbo Geely Automobile Research & Development Co., Ltd.4

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family can appear in multiple jurisdictions.Explore insights →
Leaders

GM anchors propulsion and battery systems; Rivian concentrates on motor hardware and drivetrain integration

The two dominant players occupy complementary technical positions: GM’s portfolio spans system-level propulsion, battery management, and charging infrastructure, while Rivian’s is anchored in motor hardware and mechanical drivetrain integration.

Leader · GM Global Technology Operations LLC

GM Global Technology Operations LLC

GM leads the corpus with 31 patent records, concentrated in B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion, 23 records), H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells, 10 records), and H02J (Power supply and grid systems, 9 records). The portfolio reflects a system-integrator strategy covering charging path optimization, battery state determination, and section balancing — all evidenced in the top-cited titles. GM entered the recent filing window as a new entrant in this specific sub-field, with 3 recent patent records, suggesting the bulk of its position was built in the prior period.

patent records: 31
Challenger · Rivian Holdings LLC

Rivian Holdings LLC

Rivian holds 15 patent records, focused on H02K (Electric motors and generators, 14 records), B60K (Vehicle propulsion and drive, 9 records), and B60B (Vehicle wheels and tyres, 3 records). This motor-hardware-first profile contrasts with GM’s system-level coverage. Rivian entered this sub-field as a new entrant with 12 recent patent records, indicating that nearly its entire position has been built in the most recent filing window — a rapid ramp that signals an aggressive and ongoing IP accumulation strategy.

patent records: 15
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 14 identified applicants, including momentum trends and technology emphasis for each.
Aurora Flight Sciences CorpInnovation Technologies Partners LP+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
GM Global Technology Operations LLC3▲ new entrant
Rivian Holdings LLC12▲ new entrant
Innovation Technologies Partners LP1▲ new entrant
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Ningbo Geely Automobile Research & Development Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Nivalis Energy IP Holding LLC2▲ new entrant
Hyliion Inc1▲ new entrant
Volvo Truck Corporation3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent record counts reflect the applicant ranking within the corpus; each applicant’s technology focus is derived from their top IPC sub-classes.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring in marine electric propulsion

Several IPC classes adjacent to the dominant B60L core have sparse coverage relative to their technical relevance to marine electric drivetrains. These represent observations of relative sparsity; entry viability depends on additional commercial and regulatory analysis.

H02J · Power supply and grid systems

With only 10 patent records and a 5% share among the top-IPC classes, power supply and grid integration is the largest under-served adjacent branch. For marine applications, shore-power connectivity, vessel-to-grid discharge, and multi-vessel charging infrastructure are plausible technical gaps. The modest filing density and the absence of a dominant incumbent in this sub-class suggest an accessible entry path for applicants with grid-integration expertise.

Search this in Eureka →

G01C · Distance, navigation and gyroscopes

G01C holds only 6 patent records at a 3% share, despite navigation and positioning being integral to autonomous and semi-autonomous marine vessel operation. The intersection of electric drivetrain control with inertial navigation and dynamic positioning is technically meaningful and largely unclaimed in this corpus. Innovation Technologies Partners LP is one of the few applicants active in this class, suggesting the area is not yet contested.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all five identified adjacent branches with filing density, share, and suggested entry queries.
G01R · Electric and magnetic measurementB60W · Hybrid and joint vehicle control+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. White-space branches are identified by low patent-record share within the corpus relative to their technical adjacency to the core topic.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB60L 11 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 50 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60K 1 · Vehicle propulsion & driveH02K 3 · Electric motors & generatorsB60L 58 · Electric vehicle propulsion
GM Global Technology Operations LLCStrong · 23Emerging · 4AbsentAbsentModerate · 5
Rivian Holdings LLCAbsentAbsentStrong · 9Strong · 14Absent
Nivalis Energy IP Holding LLCAbsentStrong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsent
Innovation Technologies Partners LPEmerging · 1Strong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
Hyliion IncAbsentStrong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsent
Ningbo Geely Automobile Research & Development Co., Ltd.AbsentModerate · 1AbsentAbsentStrong · 2
Cummins IncAbsentStrong · 1Strong · 1AbsentStrong · 1
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own electric marine propulsion landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.