Book a demo

Electric Machines & Drives Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Electric Machines & Drives Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electric-machines-and-drives-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electric Machines & Drives
Electric Machines & Drives Patents: Who Leads and Where the Filing Activity Sits
  • Concentrated but not locked down. the top 5 assignees hold 15.3% of all 17,652 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 23.0% — a leader plus a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 1,001 records and fell to 455 by 2024, a 455-from-1,001 (-55%) three-year decline; 2025 and later years are still filling in as publications lag filing by roughly 18 months.
  • Motors and generators dominate the claim space. H02K alone covers 67.7% of all records, while power conversion (H02M, 3.6%) and grid-side systems (H02J, 2.9%) remain comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
17.7K
Published Records
15%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-55%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,001 records) with 2024 (455) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 17,652 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the electric machines and drives filing record shows

The dataset covers 17,652 published records filed against electric machines and drives terminology — motor winding, magnetic flux, fault current, protection relay, drive circuit and electrical insulation — between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. Filing activity is not evenly spread: a handful of assignees account for a meaningful share of the total, while the majority of the ranked field files only occasionally. Patent families, rather than raw document counts, give the fairer read on where real R&D investment sits, because families strip out the inflation from continuations and multi-jurisdiction refiling of the same invention.

Technology composition skews heavily toward core motor and generator construction, with control electronics, magnetic components and vehicle propulsion claims forming a second tier. Filing offices split across the United States, Europe and the United Kingdom, with WIPO PCT filings indicating an internationally-minded subset of applicants seeking broad early coverage.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1GENERAL ELECTRIC CO711
  2. 2DENSO CORP596
  3. 3FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC503
  4. 4MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP459
  5. 5ABB AB439
  6. 6GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC357
  7. 7HOGANAS AB315
  8. 8ROLLS ROYCE PLC240
  9. 9HITACHI LTD224
  10. 10SIEMENS AG216
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 17,652 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

A 2021 peak followed by a real but partial decline

Filings ran from 849 in 2017 to a peak of 1,001 in 2021, then declined to 455 by 2024 — a -55% move over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are shown for completeness but should be read as undercounted, since publication typically lags the underlying filing by around 18 months.

A 2021 peak followed by a real but partial decline03006009001,20084920172018201920201,00120212022202320242025592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H02K dominates; control and conversion trail well behind

Electric motors and generators (H02K) appear in 67.7% of all 17,652 records, more than five times the share of the next largest class, control of motors and generators (H02P) at 13.6%. Magnets, inductors and transformers (H01F, 7.2%) and EV propulsion (B60L, 5.8%) form a middle tier, while power conversion (H02M), measurement (G01R), grid systems (H02J) and insulation/cabling (H01B) each sit under 4% — narrower, more specialized claim territory.

H02K dominates; control and conversion trail well behindH02K · Electric motors & generators11,94467.7%H02P · Control of motors & generators2,40913.6%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…1,2747.2%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion1,0275.8%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)6343.6%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement5653.2%H02J · Power supply & grid systems5192.9%H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators5012.8%Other6,95639.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 17,652 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electric machines & drives patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this dataset

Representative Filing
US20180109166A12018-04-19

Rotatable Electric Machines (US20180109166A1)

DYNACIRCUMOTION LTD.

Filed by Dynacircumotion Ltd. in 2018, this application describes a rotatable common shaft carrying multiple electric machines arranged so their disk assemblies co-rotate. The stated aim is reducing net cogging force imparted to the shaft by combining the machines' individual cogging torques in a configuration that cancels rather than compounds them.A mechanical-arrangement claim rather than a materials or control-electronics claim — it constrains how multiple machines are physically stacked on a shaft, not how any single machine is wound or driven.

US20180109166A1 — patent drawing 1US20180109166A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6936948B2Electric machine having an integrally continuous stator winding and stator slot bridges1,209
2US7583063B2Architecture for electric machine1,145
3US20080298784A1Method of Sensing Speed of Electric Motors and Generators775
4US20030066638A1Devices using a medium having a high heat transfer rate428
5US6512966B2System, method and computer program product for enhancing commercial value of electrical power produced from …403
6US10193429B2Air gap control systems and methods399
7US20100169030A1Machine condition assessment through power distribution networks377
8US6670721B2System, method, rotating machine and computer program product for enhancing electric power produced by renewa…334
9US7498080B2Ferromagnetic powder for dust core303
10US6952060B2Electromagnetic linear generator and shock absorber300

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favor older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting claims in this space.

Concentration
15.3%
of 17,652 records held by top 5 assignees

A leader plus a long tail, not a monopoly

The leading assignee holds 711 records, with the fifth-place holder at 439 and tenth place at 216 — a steep drop-off after the top few. The top 10 combined account for 23.0% of all records in scope, leaving the remaining three-quarters spread across the rest of the ranked field and unranked filers.

Useful for freedom-to-operate scoping: no single party controls the field outright.
Filing momentum
-55%
2021 to 2024 (1,001 → 455 records)

A real decline, but read the recent years cautiously

Filing volume dropped meaningfully from its 2021 peak through 2024, the last year that can be treated as complete. 2025 and 2026 figures in the trend are still filling in, since publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so they should not yet be read as continuing the decline.

Recheck this trend once 2025 filings finish publishing.
Technology mix
67.7%
of records classified under H02K

Core motor construction is heavily claimed; adjacent control layers less so

Electric motors and generators (H02K) dominate the corpus, while power conversion (H02M, 3.6%), grid-side systems (H02J, 2.9%) and cabling/insulation (H01B, 2.8%) are each claimed far less densely — a record can carry multiple IPC classes, so these figures are not mutually exclusive shares of one pie.

Narrower classes are worth a closer prior-art read before assuming they are crowded.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electric machines & drives patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity is cooling

Recent-year momentum diverges sharply from historical filing totals — several assignees with substantial historical portfolios show little or no activity in the latest tracked year.

Historical leader
711 records
leading assignee, all years

Largest single portfolio in the ranked field

The top-ranked assignee's 711 records set the pace for the whole dataset, roughly 60% larger than the fifth-place total of 439. Scale alone does not indicate current activity, however — recent-year momentum for several large historical filers has slowed sharply.

Check recent-year filing counts before assuming continued investment.
Recent-year momentum
-60% YoY
largest tracked assignee's latest-year change

Several established filers show near-zero recent output

Multiple assignees with substantial historical totals recorded 0-4 records in the latest tracked year, with year-over-year changes ranging from -60% to -100%. This pattern is consistent with the broader 2021-2024 volume decline rather than any single company exiting the field.

Momentum data should be paired with the 18-month publication lag caveat.
Collaboration signal
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the dataset

Co-filing is limited but concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pairing linked by 37 shared records — an individual inventor working consistently with one corporate assignee. Most filers in this field patent independently rather than through joint ventures.

Sparse co-filing suggests few structured cross-licensing arrangements to date.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core motor/generator claim space.
Fault-current-limiting drive topologiesGrid-side power conversion for motor drives (H02M/H02J overlap)In-situ winding insulation health monitoringMulti-machine shaft cogging cancellationCable and conductor insulation for high-voltage drives
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Denso Corp4-60%
Rolls-Royce plc2-67%
General Electric Co10%
Mitsubishi Electric Corp0-100%
Ford Global Technologies LLC0-100%
ABB AB0
Hoganas AB0
GM Global Technology Operations LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on core motor claims

With H02K covering 67.7% of records, any new motor or generator design should be checked against the densest part of this corpus before drafting, not just against the top assignees by volume.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Watch the 2025 filing data as it publishes

The 2021-2024 decline is real but the most recent years are still incomplete due to the typical 18-month publication lag; revisit the trend once 2025 filings finish appearing.

Track filing trends in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed branches before a competitor does

Power conversion, grid-side systems and insulation monitoring show comparatively low filing density relative to core motor construction — a starting point for whitespace claim drafting.

Map whitespace in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about the electric machines and drives patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electric Machines & Drives Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electric machines & drives patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.