Book a demo

Electrical Steel Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Electrical Steel Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electrical-steel-and-magnetic-materials-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Metals & Alloys
Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials Patents
  • Filing has cooled since 2020. Annual filings peaked at 418 in 2020 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 296 — a flat-to-declining trend rather than an expanding one.
  • Core loss and coating claims dominate the IPC mix. C21D heat treatment (4,733 records) and C22C alloys (3,878) dwarf adjacent clusters like coatings (C23C, 1,031) and motor/generator integration (H02K, 150).
  • Momentum is shifting even among the top filers. POSCO's recent-year filings are up 8% YoY while Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal and JFE Steel are all down sharply — 68%, 80% and 82% respectively.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
5,317
Published Records
76%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-30%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (313 records) with 2024 (218) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 5,317 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families addressing grain-oriented and non-oriented electrical steel, filtered to filings that explicitly claim core loss, magnetic induction, insulation coating, texture control or thin-gauge processing. The search spans 5,317 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, concentrated under IPC classes C22C (alloys), H01F (magnets, inductors and transformers) and C21D (heat treatment). Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2026 figure in any trend line is necessarily incomplete.

The technology sits at the intersection of metallurgy and electromagnetics: steelmakers control the alloy composition and annealing steps that determine core loss and permeability, while a smaller set of filings extends into coating chemistry and motor-integration claims. Receiving-office data shows filing activity spread across Europe, the United States, India, Japan, South Korea and China, reflecting a genuinely global supply chain for silicon steel used in transformers, motors and generators.

Filing activity by year and technology cluster
  1. 1NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION1,729
  2. 2JFE STEEL CORP1,214
  3. 3POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD650
  4. 4KAWASAKI STEEL CORP228
  5. 5BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO LTD222
  6. 6ARCELORMITTAL SA170
  7. 7NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP165
  8. 8POSCO HLDG INC111
  9. 9ARMCO INC109
  10. 10THYSSENKRUPP ELECTRICAL STEEL GMBH55
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC distribution reveal where claim density has built up and where the field has plateaued.

A peak in 2020, then a pullback

Filings rose from 207 in 2017 to a peak of 418 in 2020, then eased toward 296 at the 2022 midpoint and 41 in the partial 2026 count. The shape points to a maturing claim space rather than a technology still in an expansion phase — though the most recent years are understated by publication lag.

A peak in 2020, then a pullback0125250375500207201720182019418202020212022202320242025412026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Heat treatment and alloy claims lead by a wide margin

C21D (heat treatment, 4,733 records) and C22C (alloys, 3,878) are the two largest clusters, confirming that most contested claim territory is metallurgical rather than electromagnetic. H01F (3,017) captures the magnetic-component side, while coating chemistry (C23C, 1,031; C09D, 136), rolling (B21B, 289), joining (B23K, 182) and motor/generator integration (H02K, 150) are comparatively thin — smaller absolute filing counts in adjacent branches that touch the same steel.

Heat treatment and alloy claims lead by a wide marginC21D · Heat treatment of metals4,73389.0%C22C · Alloys3,87872.9%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…3,01756.7%C23C · Coating & surface deposition1,03119.4%B21B · Metal rolling2895.4%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing1823.4%H02K · Electric motors & generators1502.8%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks1362.6%Other80615.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 5,317 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electrical steel and magnetic materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative filing
US20180094331A12018-04-05

High magnetic induction and low iron loss non-oriented electrical steel sheet with good surface state and manufacturing method therefor

BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO., LTD.

The filing discloses a non-oriented electrical steel plate with tightly bounded chemistry — carbon capped at 0.004%, silicon between 0.1% and 1.6%, manganese 0.1%-0.8%, aluminium 0.1%-0.6%, titanium capped at 0.0015%, with the combined silicon-plus-aluminium content held between 0.2% and 2.0% — paired with a full process route from liquid iron pretreatment through converter smelting, RH refining, casting, hot rolling, pickling, cold rolling, annealing and coating.Filed by Baoshan Iron & Steel; the composition and process claims sit squarely inside the C21D/C22C cluster that dominates this landscape.

US20180094331A1 — patent drawing 1US20180094331A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1JP2000169972AChromium-free surface treating agent for grain oriented silicon steel sheet, and manufacture of grain oriente…176
2JP1990008346AHigh tensile electrical steel sheet and its manufacture160
3JP2003027194AGrain-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent film characteristics and magnetic property, and its manu…159
4US20090202383A1Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet and Production Process Thereof135
5JP2000204450AGrain oriented silicon steel sheet excellent in film characteristic and magnetic property and its production118
6WO2004083465A1Grain-oriented magnetic steel sheet excellent in magnetic characteristic and its manufacturing method111
7JP2000169973AChromium-free surface treating agent for grain oriented silicon steel sheet, and manufacture of grain oriente…109
8US4468551ALaser treatment of electrical steel and optical scanning assembly therefor108
9JP1989290716AUltrarapid heat treatment of particulate directional silicon steel107
10JP1999209891AFormation of insulated film on silicon steel sheet102

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later claim drafting, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and receiving offices are read together.

Filing trend
418 in 2020 → 41 (partial 2026)
Peak vs. latest partial year

The field has passed its filing peak

Annual filings rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked at 418 in 2020, and have since declined toward the 2022 midpoint of 296. New entrants filing broad composition claims now compete against a decade of dense C21D and C22C prior art.

Read alongside the 18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 trend is likely softer still than the raw count shows.
Technology mix
4,733 records in C21D
Heat treatment subclass share

Metallurgy, not electromagnetics, is where claims are dense

Heat treatment (C21D) and alloy composition (C22C) together account for the large majority of records, ahead of magnetic-component claims under H01F. Coating chemistry and motor/generator integration remain comparatively lightly claimed.

A high count in C21D signals occupied claim space, not that further improvement is technically closed off.
Geography
1,433 EPO filings
Leading receiving office

Filing activity is genuinely global

Europe leads receiving-office counts, ahead of the United States (960), India (700), Japan (528), South Korea (450) and China (244). That spread reflects electrical steel's role as an input to transformer and motor manufacturing worldwide, not a single home market.

Receiving-office counts reflect where protection was sought, not where R&D originated.
Assignee momentum
POSCO +8% YoY
Only major filer still growing

Momentum has diverged even among incumbents

POSCO's latest-year filings grew 8% year-on-year while Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal and JFE Steel each posted double-digit declines. A single co-assignee pairing between Nippon Steel and its machinery-design affiliate also stands out as the strongest collaboration link in the dataset.

Declining filing counts at long-standing leaders can mean a maturing product line as much as a strategic pullback.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electrical steel and magnetic materials, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Ranking by patent family count shows concentration at the top among a handful of integrated steelmakers, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.

Leading filer momentum
+8% YoY
POSCO, latest year

POSCO is the only major filer still increasing output

Against a backdrop of declining filings from most established players, POSCO's latest-year count grew 8% year-on-year, and it also appears in the strongest internal co-assignee pairing alongside its research institute.

Sustained growth against a shrinking field suggests active claim-building rather than routine maintenance filing.
Incumbent pullback
-68% to -93% YoY
Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal, JFE, Baoshan

Long-standing leaders are filing far less than they were

Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal, JFE Steel and Baoshan Iron & Steel all show sharp year-on-year declines in the latest period, ranging from -68% to -93%. This pattern is consistent with a claim space where the core composition and heat-treatment routes are already densely covered.

A pullback at the top does not open the space automatically — existing claims still stand as prior art.
Collaboration structure
10 co-assignee pairs
Internal R&D links

Collaboration is mostly internal, not cross-company

The strongest co-assignee pairings link a steelmaker to its own research institute or engineering affiliate — Nippon Steel with its machinery design arm, POSCO with its industrial science research institute — rather than joint filings between competing steelmakers.

Cross-company co-filing is rare in this dataset, which limits opportunities to track alliance formation through co-assignee data alone.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas carry materially fewer records than the core alloy and heat-treatment clusters, based on IPC subclass counts.
Thin-gauge cold-rolling process controlInsulation coating chemistry (C09D)Motor/generator lamination integration (H02K)Welding and joining of finished steel sheetChromium-free surface treatment routes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
POSCO14+8%
Nippon Steel Corporation10-68%
ArcelorMittal10-80%
JFE Steel Corporation4-82%
Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.1-93%
Kawasaki Steel Corporation0
NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP0
AK Steel Corporation (formerly Armco Inc.)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and ranking data point to specific next questions for an R&D or IP team working in this space.

Map the white space before drafting

With C21D and C22C this dense, a first-filed composition claim is unlikely to clear. Coating chemistry and motor-integration claims carry far fewer records and may offer more room to establish a defensible position.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the diverging incumbents

POSCO's growth against declining filings from Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal and JFE Steel is worth monitoring over the next few publication cycles, since the 18-month lag means the most recent shift is not yet fully visible.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka

Check citation lineage on core claims

The most-cited records in this set are predominantly older Japanese filings on grain-oriented steel film characteristics; any new filing on insulation coatings or magnetic property control should be checked against this lineage directly.

Run a citation analysis in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about electrical steel patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electrical steel and magnetic materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.