Electrical Steel Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2020. Annual filings peaked at 418 in 2020 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 296 — a flat-to-declining trend rather than an expanding one.
- Core loss and coating claims dominate the IPC mix. C21D heat treatment (4,733 records) and C22C alloys (3,878) dwarf adjacent clusters like coatings (C23C, 1,031) and motor/generator integration (H02K, 150).
- Momentum is shifting even among the top filers. POSCO's recent-year filings are up 8% YoY while Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal and JFE Steel are all down sharply — 68%, 80% and 82% respectively.
Filing growth compares 2021 (313 records) with 2024 (218) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 5,317 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families addressing grain-oriented and non-oriented electrical steel, filtered to filings that explicitly claim core loss, magnetic induction, insulation coating, texture control or thin-gauge processing. The search spans 5,317 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, concentrated under IPC classes C22C (alloys), H01F (magnets, inductors and transformers) and C21D (heat treatment). Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2026 figure in any trend line is necessarily incomplete.
The technology sits at the intersection of metallurgy and electromagnetics: steelmakers control the alloy composition and annealing steps that determine core loss and permeability, while a smaller set of filings extends into coating chemistry and motor-integration claims. Receiving-office data shows filing activity spread across Europe, the United States, India, Japan, South Korea and China, reflecting a genuinely global supply chain for silicon steel used in transformers, motors and generators.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Annual filing counts and IPC distribution reveal where claim density has built up and where the field has plateaued.
A peak in 2020, then a pullback
Filings rose from 207 in 2017 to a peak of 418 in 2020, then eased toward 296 at the 2022 midpoint and 41 in the partial 2026 count. The shape points to a maturing claim space rather than a technology still in an expansion phase — though the most recent years are understated by publication lag.
Heat treatment and alloy claims lead by a wide margin
C21D (heat treatment, 4,733 records) and C22C (alloys, 3,878) are the two largest clusters, confirming that most contested claim territory is metallurgical rather than electromagnetic. H01F (3,017) captures the magnetic-component side, while coating chemistry (C23C, 1,031; C09D, 136), rolling (B21B, 289), joining (B23K, 182) and motor/generator integration (H02K, 150) are comparatively thin — smaller absolute filing counts in adjacent branches that touch the same steel.
Shares are the percentage of the 5,317 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electrical steel and magnetic materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this space
High magnetic induction and low iron loss non-oriented electrical steel sheet with good surface state and manufacturing method therefor
The filing discloses a non-oriented electrical steel plate with tightly bounded chemistry — carbon capped at 0.004%, silicon between 0.1% and 1.6%, manganese 0.1%-0.8%, aluminium 0.1%-0.6%, titanium capped at 0.0015%, with the combined silicon-plus-aluminium content held between 0.2% and 2.0% — paired with a full process route from liquid iron pretreatment through converter smelting, RH refining, casting, hot rolling, pickling, cold rolling, annealing and coating.Filed by Baoshan Iron & Steel; the composition and process claims sit squarely inside the C21D/C22C cluster that dominates this landscape.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JP2000169972A | Chromium-free surface treating agent for grain oriented silicon steel sheet, and manufacture of grain oriente… | 176 |
| 2 | JP1990008346A | High tensile electrical steel sheet and its manufacture | 160 |
| 3 | JP2003027194A | Grain-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent film characteristics and magnetic property, and its manu… | 159 |
| 4 | US20090202383A1 | Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet and Production Process Thereof | 135 |
| 5 | JP2000204450A | Grain oriented silicon steel sheet excellent in film characteristic and magnetic property and its production | 118 |
| 6 | WO2004083465A1 | Grain-oriented magnetic steel sheet excellent in magnetic characteristic and its manufacturing method | 111 |
| 7 | JP2000169973A | Chromium-free surface treating agent for grain oriented silicon steel sheet, and manufacture of grain oriente… | 109 |
| 8 | US4468551A | Laser treatment of electrical steel and optical scanning assembly therefor | 108 |
| 9 | JP1989290716A | Ultrarapid heat treatment of particulate directional silicon steel | 107 |
| 10 | JP1999209891A | Formation of insulated film on silicon steel sheet | 102 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later claim drafting, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and receiving offices are read together.
The field has passed its filing peak
Annual filings rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked at 418 in 2020, and have since declined toward the 2022 midpoint of 296. New entrants filing broad composition claims now compete against a decade of dense C21D and C22C prior art.
Metallurgy, not electromagnetics, is where claims are dense
Heat treatment (C21D) and alloy composition (C22C) together account for the large majority of records, ahead of magnetic-component claims under H01F. Coating chemistry and motor/generator integration remain comparatively lightly claimed.
Filing activity is genuinely global
Europe leads receiving-office counts, ahead of the United States (960), India (700), Japan (528), South Korea (450) and China (244). That spread reflects electrical steel's role as an input to transformer and motor manufacturing worldwide, not a single home market.
Momentum has diverged even among incumbents
POSCO's latest-year filings grew 8% year-on-year while Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal and JFE Steel each posted double-digit declines. A single co-assignee pairing between Nippon Steel and its machinery-design affiliate also stands out as the strongest collaboration link in the dataset.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electrical steel and magnetic materials, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the field is still open
Ranking by patent family count shows concentration at the top among a handful of integrated steelmakers, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.
POSCO is the only major filer still increasing output
Against a backdrop of declining filings from most established players, POSCO's latest-year count grew 8% year-on-year, and it also appears in the strongest internal co-assignee pairing alongside its research institute.
Long-standing leaders are filing far less than they were
Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal, JFE Steel and Baoshan Iron & Steel all show sharp year-on-year declines in the latest period, ranging from -68% to -93%. This pattern is consistent with a claim space where the core composition and heat-treatment routes are already densely covered.
Collaboration is mostly internal, not cross-company
The strongest co-assignee pairings link a steelmaker to its own research institute or engineering affiliate — Nippon Steel with its machinery design arm, POSCO with its industrial science research institute — rather than joint filings between competing steelmakers.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| POSCO | 14 | +8% |
| Nippon Steel Corporation | 10 | -68% |
| ArcelorMittal | 10 | -80% |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 4 | -82% |
| Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. | 1 | -93% |
| Kawasaki Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP | 0 | — |
| AK Steel Corporation (formerly Armco Inc.) | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and ranking data point to specific next questions for an R&D or IP team working in this space.
Map the white space before drafting
With C21D and C22C this dense, a first-filed composition claim is unlikely to clear. Coating chemistry and motor-integration claims carry far fewer records and may offer more room to establish a defensible position.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack the diverging incumbents
POSCO's growth against declining filings from Nippon Steel, ArcelorMittal and JFE Steel is worth monitoring over the next few publication cycles, since the 18-month lag means the most recent shift is not yet fully visible.
Set up assignee alerts in EurekaCheck citation lineage on core claims
The most-cited records in this set are predominantly older Japanese filings on grain-oriented steel film characteristics; any new filing on insulation coatings or magnetic property control should be checked against this lineage directly.
Run a citation analysis in EurekaCommon questions about electrical steel patents
Filing activity is concentrated among a small group of integrated steelmakers, with Nippon Steel, POSCO, ArcelorMittal, JFE Steel and Baoshan Iron & Steel all among the more active recent filers. However, momentum has diverged sharply: POSCO's latest-year filings grew 8% year-on-year while the others posted declines of 68% to 93%. A ranking by raw count and a ranking by recent momentum tell different stories, so both are worth checking before assuming any one company is currently the most active.
Annual filings peaked at 418 in 2020 and have eased since, down to 296 at the 2022 midpoint and 41 in the still-partial 2026 count. This pattern is consistent with a claim space where the core alloy compositions and heat-treatment routes under C21D and C22C are already densely covered by prior art, making broad new claims harder to clear. It is also worth remembering that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years are understated in any raw count.
Grain-oriented steel patents concentrate on texture control and coating chemistry that align magnetic domains along a preferred rolling direction, which is why filings like chromium-free surface treatment agents for grain-oriented sheet rank among the most-cited records in this dataset. Non-oriented steel patents, such as the representative Baoshan Iron & Steel filing in this set, instead focus on balancing silicon, aluminium and manganese content with annealing conditions to achieve low iron loss and high magnetic induction without directional grain alignment. Both share the same IPC backbone in C21D and C22C but target different end uses — transformers favour grain-oriented sheet, while motors typically use non-oriented sheet.
The IPC composition shows heavy concentration in heat treatment (4,733 records) and alloy composition (3,878), against much thinner coverage in coating chemistry (C23C, 1,031; C09D, 136), rolling process control (B21B, 289), joining methods (B23K, 182) and motor or generator integration (H02K, 150). These smaller clusters are not necessarily technically exhausted — they simply carry far fewer claims relative to the core metallurgical routes, which makes them worth checking first for a defensible first-filed position. Thin-gauge cold-rolling control and lamination integration for motors stand out as specific candidates.
Core loss claims typically combine a bounded chemical composition — controlling carbon, silicon, aluminium, manganese and titanium content within narrow ranges — with a specific process sequence covering hot rolling, pickling, cold rolling, annealing and final coating, as seen in the representative non-oriented steel filing in this dataset. Because core loss depends on both microstructure and surface treatment, many of the most-cited patents pair a composition claim with an insulation coating or surface-treatment claim rather than covering either alone. This dual structure is a large part of why C21D and C22C dominate the IPC distribution rather than any single narrower subclass.
Research Electrical Steel and Magnetic Materials in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole electrical steel and magnetic materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.