Book a demo

Electricity Distribution Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Electricity Distribution Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electricity-distribution-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Smart Grid & Power Systems
Electricity distribution patents: who is filing, what they claim, and where the field is still open
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees combined hold 35.0% of all 1,402 records in scope, and the ten leading assignees hold 43.9% — with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them.
  • Filing is climbing, not cooling. Complete-year filings rose from 38 in 2021 to 53 in 2024, a 39% increase over that span; 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates.
  • Power supply and grid systems dominate the claim space. H02J appears on 53.6% of the 1,402 records, more than three times the next largest subclass, meaning most new filings still have to work around dense core-grid prior art.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,402
Published Records
35%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+39%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (38 records) with 2024 (53) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,402 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the electricity distribution patent record actually shows

The search set covers 1,402 published records filed against grid frequency, power dispatch, voltage profile, load forecasting, voltage regulation and frequency control claims tied to electricity distribution, spanning 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 94 records and has continued at a meaningful pace since, with the most recent complete year, 2024, sitting well above 2021 levels. Because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months, the 2025 and 2026 counts shown in the trend chart understate real filing volume and should not be read as a slowdown.

Reading the field by patent family rather than raw document count matters here: a single underlying invention can generate several published records through continuations or parallel jurisdiction filings, so family-level counts give a fairer picture of how many distinct inventions are actually competing for claim space in grid frequency and voltage regulation control.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD179
  2. 2REACTIVE TECH164
  3. 3OTSUKA MEDICAL DEVICES63
  4. 4PANORAMIC POWER44
  5. 5THIRD EQUATION LTD40
  6. 6UNIV COLLEGE DUBLIN NAT UNIV OF IRELAND DUBLIN29
  7. 7CENTRICA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS BELGIUM NV29
  8. 8KONA MEDICAL INC23
  9. 9ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG23
  10. 10UTILIDATA22
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,402-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which technical classes carry the bulk of the claim language.

A rising filing curve through the last complete year

Annual filings ran from 88 in 2017 to a peak of 94 in 2019, before rebuilding to 53 in 2024 — up 39% from the 38 filed in 2021. Treat 2025 and 2026 as incomplete rather than declining.

A rising filing curve through the last complete year0255075100882017201894201920202021202220232024202562026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Grid control and measurement classes carry the field

H02J (power supply and grid systems) touches 53.6% of the 1,402 records, with G01R measurement and G05B control systems the next largest blocks at 15.5% and 10.1%. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100% and should be read against the 1,402-record total, not against each other as a closed pie.

Grid control and measurement classes carry the fieldH02J · Power supply & grid systems75153.6%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement21815.5%G05B · Control & regulating systems14110.1%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…1208.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1128.0%H04L · Digital information transmissi…987.0%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)976.9%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…745.3%Other86461.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,402 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electricity distribution patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A recent grid-frequency claim worth reading closely

Filed 2025
US12301004B22025-05-13

System for responding to frequency fluctuations in an energy grid (US12301004B2)

CENTRICA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS BELGIUM N.V.

A method of controlling assets connected to an electricity distribution grid operating at a predetermined grid frequency is disclosed. Assets supplying or consuming electrical energy are configured to adjust energy flow in an aggregate response to frequency fluctuations, with individual adjustments combined to counteract a fluctuation in grid frequency across the group.Assigned to Centrica Business Solutions Belgium N.V., filed as a continuation-style grid frequency response claim.

US12301004B2 — patent drawing 1US12301004B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090281674A1Method and system for managing a power grid327
2US20130035802A1Power management device and system316
3US20090281673A1Method and system for managing a power grid301
4US20110288692A1Malicious attack detection and analysis254
5US20110092781A1Energetic modulation of nerves235
6US20130173807A1Energy service delivery platform233
7US20110208366A1Utility grid command filter system226
8US20070059986A1Monitoring electrical assets for fault and efficiency correction221
9US20100152910A1Power grid outage and fault condition management212
10US20110092880A1Energetic modulation of nerves196

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Read

What the filing pattern tells a strategy team

Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and citation data — useful for deciding where to file next and whose portfolio to watch.

Concentration
35.0% / top 5
share of 1,402 records

A small group holds over a third of the field

The five leading assignees account for 490 of the 1,402 records in scope, and the ten leading assignees for 616. That leaves a long tail of the remaining ranked assignees and unranked filers holding single-digit counts each — a pattern typical of a field with an established core and many opportunistic entrants.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Momentum
+39% (2021-2024)
complete-year filing growth

Filing rebuilt through the last complete year

After the 2019 peak of 94, annual filings dipped before climbing back to 53 in 2024 from 38 in 2021. Because 2025-2026 counts are still being published, this growth should be read as the field's real recent trajectory, not the visibly lower 2025-2026 bars.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim density
53.6% H02J
share of all records

Core grid-systems claims dominate the space

More than half of all 1,402 records touch H02J power supply and grid systems, meaning a new filer in that subclass is almost certain to face dense prior art. G01R measurement and G05B control classes sit far behind at 15.5% and 10.1%, suggesting comparatively more room to differentiate there.

IPC composition, 8 subclasses shown
Jurisdictional spread
359 US filings
leading receiving office

Filing is US-anchored but genuinely international

The United States leads with 359 records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 206 and WIPO/PCT at 145, with the United Kingdom, India and Australia each in the 76-86 range. That spread indicates freedom-to-operate work needs to check multiple offices, not just the US docket.

Receiving offices, six shown
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electricity distribution patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

Leaders, collaboration patterns and where activity has gone quiet

The ranked assignee list covers 100 companies scored by family count, led by a filer at 179 records with the fifth-place holder at 40 and tenth place at 22 — a steep drop-off that signals a concentrated core surrounded by a long tail.

Leader gap
179 vs 22
leader vs. 10th place

The gap between first and tenth place is wide

The leading assignee's 179 records sit well above the fifth-place figure of 40 and the tenth-place figure of 22, meaning influence in this field is not evenly spread even within the ranked group — a handful of filers set the pace and everyone else follows at a fraction of the volume.

Assignee ranking, top of 100
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
recurring filing partnerships

Most filing happens without a named co-assignee

Only ten recurring co-assignee pairings appear across the dataset, the strongest linking a global services firm with a named inventor across seven records. That scarcity suggests most electricity distribution filings in this set are filed solo rather than through joint ventures.

Co-assignee pairs, 10 identified
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
for several ranked filers

Several previously active filers show no latest-year output

A number of assignees that appear in the ranking, including firms with historical activity in this space, show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is as likely to reflect pending applications not yet published as an actual pullback.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core grid-systems claim space.
Distributed load-forecast modellingSub-second frequency-response aggregationVoltage-profile sensing at feeder edgePower conversion for distributed assetsDigital-transmission grid telemetry
Rank all filers by momentum →
Filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Accenture Global Services Limited0
Reactive Technologies0-100%
Kona Medical, Inc.0
Panoramic Power Ltd.0
University College Dublin0
General Electric Company0
Faraday Grid Limited0
CENTRICA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS BELGIUM NV0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion — these are the natural next cuts.

Check freedom-to-operate against the H02J core

With 53.6% of records touching power supply and grid systems, any new filing in that subclass needs a claim chart against the densest part of the prior art before drafting.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track the assignees with zero latest-year output

Several ranked filers show no activity in the most recent tracked year; watching whether that reflects a pending pipeline or a genuine pullback matters for competitive monitoring.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed branches directly

Sub-second frequency response and feeder-edge voltage sensing show comparatively thinner filing density than the core grid-systems claims — worth a dedicated white-space search.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked

Questions practitioners ask about this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electricity Distribution Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electricity distribution patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.