Book a demo

Electrocatalysis Process Intensification Patent Landscape 2026

Electrocatalysis Process Intensification Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Electrocatalysis Process Intensification Patent Landscape in 2026

The electrocatalysis process intensification field is in an active growth phase, with a 174% increase in recent filing activity and a corpus of 285 patent families dominated by electrolytic compound production (C25B). De Nora Elettrodi leads among industrial filers, while Chinese universities and global research institutions are the fastest-rising new entrants.

285
Patent families in scope
19%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+174%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

De Nora leads a fragmented field where academia is rapidly closing the gap

De Nora Elettrodi SPA holds the top position with 21 patent records, followed by Eltech Systems at 15 and Bayer AG at 12. Zhejiang University and the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University are tied at 11, signaling that academic institutions are major contributors alongside established industrials.

The top five filers account for 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating a moderately fragmented competitive structure with no single dominant player commanding an outsized share. A clear tier gap separates the top two industrial incumbents from the dense middle tier of universities and niche specialists.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1De Nora Elettrodi SPA21
2Eltech Systems15
3Bayer AG12
4Zhejiang University11
5Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University11
6INEOS Technologies Limited10
7Industrie De Nora SPA10
8Governing Council of the University of Toronto9
9Dalian University of Technology9
10William Marsh Rice University8
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11University of Sydney7
12City University of Hong Kong7
13NewSouth Innovations Pty Ltd7
14Daiki Engineering Co., Ltd.6
15RenewCO2 LLC6
16International Academy of Optoelectronics at Zhaoqing, South China Normal University6
17Diamond Shamrock Technologies5
18Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)5
19Diamond Shamrock Corporation5
20KUNMING UNIV OF SCI & TECH5
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The industrial leaders’ positions reflect decades of electrode and chlor-alkali technology accumulation, but the rapid entry of universities — particularly from. China, Australia, and North America — signals that fundamental catalyst and reactor design knowledge is being generated broadly and could erode incumbents’ technical differentiation.

Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are understated due to patent publication lag; the apparent plateau in those years should not be interpreted as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings have grown sharply since 2019, anchored by electrolytic compound production

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that has accelerated markedly over the past six years and is concentrated in a single dominant IPC class, with a long tail of adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings grew from 2 in 2017 to a recorded high of 60 in 2024, reflecting a sustained multi-year expansion. The 2025 and 2026 figures are understated by publication lag and should not be read as a decline; the underlying growth trajectory remains intact.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 60 in 2024.220175201812201915202030202142202254202360202459202562026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) dominates the technology mix by a wide margin, reflecting the field’s core focus on electrode-driven synthesis. B01J (chemical and physical processes and catalysis) and H01M (batteries, cells, and fuel cells) form a secondary cluster, while C25C, B82Y, and C01B represent smaller but potentially adjacent branches worth monitoring.

Technology compositionC25B · Electrolytic production of compounds leads with 388; B01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis 50.C25B · Electrolytic prod…388B01J · Chemical/physical…50H01M · Batteries, cells …50C25C · Electrolytic meta…30B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…27C01B · Non-metallic elem…23C25D · Electroplating & …21C23C · Coating & surface…19↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2025245525A1Published 2025-11-27

Unlocking new reaction pathways for electrocatalyt…

Yale University

A combined plasma-electrocatalysis CO2/CO conversion system and method of using the same is described. The reactor platform is capable of delivering non-thermal plasma-activated CO2/CO to a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) to enable electrocatalytic conversion of reactive plasma species while avoiding quenching in the aqueous electrolyte. Using a co-fed… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Unlocking new reaction pathways for electrocatalyt… — patent drawingUnlocking new reaction pathways for electrocatalyt… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electrode with electrocatalytic surface101
2Carbon-cloth-based electrocatalytic gas diffusion …79
3Novel cathode and bipolar electrode incorporating …78
4Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution and biomass up…69
5Process for the electrolysis of technical-grade hy…64
6Initiation and Control of Nanothermal Plasmonic En…43
7Electrodes for electrolytic processes41
8Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation and Hydrodeoxygenat…37

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape where new investment is most likely to find differentiated space or encounter entrenched competition.

Growth

Growth stage: annual volume still expanding, not yet mature

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth, with annual filings rising consistently and no confirmed peak. The 174% recent-window increase confirms that the technology window is still open for foundational patents in electrode design, reactor architecture, and catalyst formulation. Entrants filing now can still establish meaningful prior-art positions.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Moderate fragmentation creates room for focused challengers

The top five filers hold 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — a modest share that reflects no single player locking up the field. Industrial incumbents (De Nora, Eltech, Bayer) dominate by volume, but the dense mid-tier of universities and startups means that a narrowly focused challenger can accumulate a defensible position in an adjacent sub-domain without confronting a monopoly.

Concentration: Moderate
Collaboration

Industry-academia partnerships are the dominant co-filing pattern

The most active co-filing pairs are De Nora Elettrodi with Bayer AG (9 joint filings) and TotalEnergies Linked Technologies with the Governing Council of the University of Toronto (9 joint filings). Zhejiang University appears in five separate collaboration pairs, including with Sinopec Nanjing Chemical Industry Research Institute and China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, indicating a hub role for Chinese academic-industrial consortia in this field.

Collaboration: Active
Geography

China leads filings; the US and EPO remain essential validation routes

China accounts for the largest share of patent records filed, followed by the United States, WIPO PCT, and the European Patent Office. India and Australia also appear as notable secondary jurisdictions. The PCT and EPO presence indicates that leading applicants are pursuing broad international protection, making freedom-to-operate analysis across at least three jurisdictions essential for any new entrant.

Lead Office: China
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
De Nora Elettrodi SPABayer AG9
TotalEnergies Linked TechnologiesGoverning Council of the University of Toronto9
Zhejiang UniversitySinopec Nanjing Chemical Industry Research Institute Co., Ltd.2
Zhejiang UniversityChina Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)2
Zhejiang UniversityZhejiang University Quzhou Research Institute1
Zhejiang UniversitySinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Branch1
Zhejiang UniversitySinopec Group Nanjing Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.1
Bayer AGIndustrie De Nora SPA1
Industrie De Nora SPACovestro AG1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data in the electrocatalysis process intensification corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

De Nora anchors industrial leadership; universities are the fastest-moving new entrants

The applicant ranking is led by an Italian electrode specialist with deep chlor-alkali roots, while a cohort of universities across. China, North America, and Australia have entered recently and are filing at pace.

Leader · De Nora Elettrodi SPA

De Nora Elettrodi SPA

De Nora Elettrodi SPA leads with 21 patent records, concentrated in C25B 11 (electrolytic production of compounds), B01J 27 (catalysis and chemical processes), and C01B 7 (inorganic compounds). Its filing history reflects decades of industrial electrode know-how. Applicant momentum data does not flag De Nora as a recent new entrant, consistent with a mature incumbent maintaining an established portfolio rather than surging anew.

families: 21
Challenger · Zhejiang University

Zhejiang University

Zhejiang University ranks fourth with 11 patent records and is classified as a new entrant in the recent filing window, with 10 recent filings — the highest recent count among the momentum-tracked applicants. Its focus spans C25B 11, C25B 1, and C25B 3, covering a broad range of electrolytic compound production sub-classes. Its active collaboration with multiple Sinopec entities signals a pathway from academic research to industrial deployment.

families: 11
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the ranked list of all 100 applicants with filing trends, technology focus, and collaboration links.
INEOS Technologies LimitedDalian University of Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Zhejiang University10▲ new entrant
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University1▲ new entrant
Eltech Systems2▲ new entrant
Dalian University of Technology6▲ new entrant
Governing Council of the University of Toronto9▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent record counts from the applicant ranking; momentum reflects recent-window filing activity.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant C25B core

Several IPC classes appear in the corpus at low relative volume despite plausible technical overlap with electrocatalysis process intensification; these are observations of sparsity and should be assessed for technical fit before treating them as entry points.

H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells

H01M accounts for 50 patent records — only 7% of the IPC-level distribution — despite the direct technical relevance of fuel cell electrocatalysis and electrolyzer membrane-electrode assemblies to process intensification objectives. The sparse coverage relative to C25B suggests that cross-domain work linking intensified electrocatalytic processes to fuel cell architectures is underrepresented. An entrant with expertise in membrane or electrode stack design could address this gap, though competitive overlap with dedicated fuel cell portfolios outside this corpus must be verified.

Search this in Eureka →

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications

B82Y appears in 27 patent records (4% of the IPC distribution), reflecting early-stage interest in nanomaterial-enabled electrocatalysts — a technically well-grounded direction given the known influence of nanostructure on catalyst turnover frequency and selectivity. The low count relative to C25B indicates that nanotechnology-specific claims within process intensification workflows are not yet densely filed. Researchers working on nanostructured electrode materials could build positions here, with the caveat that B82Y is a cross-sectional classification applied unevenly across patent offices.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served IPC branches, filing density by year, and suggested search strategies for each gap.
C25C · Electrolytic metal productionC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch counts are at the patent-record level; a single record may carry multiple IPC codes.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across C25B sub-classes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC25B 11 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 1 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 3 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 9 · Electrolytic production of compoundsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
De Nora Elettrodi SPAStrong · 20Moderate · 7AbsentModerate · 7Moderate · 7
Bayer AGStrong · 11Strong · 9AbsentStrong · 9Strong · 9
Eltech SystemsStrong · 10Strong · 10AbsentStrong · 8Absent
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior UniversityStrong · 11Strong · 11AbsentAbsentAbsent
Zhejiang UniversityStrong · 10Strong · 7Moderate · 5AbsentAbsent
Governing Council of the University of TorontoAbsentAbsentStrong · 9Strong · 8Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own electrocatalysis process intensification landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.