Electrochemical Grinding Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
Electrochemical Grinding and Deburring Patents: Who Holds the Ground
44.1% concentration. The top 5 of 84 ranked assignees together hold 100 of the 227 records in scope — a narrow, contestable core rather than a fragmented field. Annual filings rose to a peak of 17 in 2021 before falling to 3 by 2024, an 82% decline over that three-year span. The 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent bars understate real activity rather than confirming a continued decline.
- 1SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB26
- 2LIVENT USA CORP25
- 3THE INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL & CHEMICAL RESEARCH20
- 4MORTON CO18
- 5GENERAL ELECTRIC CO11
See the full electrochemical grinding and deburring analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about electrochemical grinding patents
What is the difference between electrochemical grinding and electrochemical deburring?
Electrochemical grinding combines anodic dissolution with mechanical abrasion from a conductive wheel to remove material and shape a surface, typically used for hard-alloy stock removal and mirror-finish work. Electrochemical deburring uses the same anodic-dissolution principle but without significant mechanical contact, targeting burr removal from edges and holes where a purely mechanical tool would risk stress or damage. Both processes appear together in this dataset because they share electrolyte chemistry, current control and electrode-design claim language, even though their end applications differ.
Who are the leading patent holders in electrochemical grinding and deburring?
The ranking covers 84 assignees, with the leader holding 26 of the 227 records in scope and the top 5 combined accounting for 44.1% of all records. That leaves a real gap between the top of the field and the rest, since fifth place holds only 11 records and tenth place just 5. Reviewing the leader’s specific claims alongside the next four ranked assignees is the fastest way to understand where the contested ground actually sits.
Is patent filing activity in this field growing or shrinking?
Filings peaked at 17 in 2021 and had fallen to 3 by 2024, an 82% decline over that span, and several previously active assignees show no filings in the most recent tracked year. That said, publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as confirming a continued slide. A fair read is that the field cooled from a 2021 peak, with the most recent trend still unresolved.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Grinding and Deburring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.