Book a demo

Electrochemical Oxidation POP Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Electrochemical Oxidation POP Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electrochemical-oxidation-for-persistent-organic-pollutants-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Water & Environmental Treatment
Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants: Patent Trends
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. the trend runs from 37 filings in 2017 to a 2025 peak of 56, with the 2022 midpoint at 28 — a flat-to-declining trajectory once the 2026 dip is read as publication lag rather than a real drop.
  • Leadership is diffuse. the top 5 assignees hold just 13.5% of all 794 records and the top 10 only 22.0%, so no single filer controls the field the way concentration patterns do in adjacent battery or catalyst spaces.
  • Electrolytic production dominates the claim map. C25B accounts for 41.4% of records and C02F for 31.1%, meaning most patented value sits in the electrolysis cell and the water-treatment application, not in adjacent battery or plating uses.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
794
Published Records
13%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-26%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (34 records) with 2024 (25) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 794 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Electrochemical oxidation applies an applied potential — often across a boron-doped diamond anode — to break down persistent organic pollutants that resist conventional biological or chemical treatment. The search scope here pulls together three technical threads: the anode materials and cell designs that generate oxidants in situ, the electrochemical defluorination routes aimed at per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and the operating variables — current efficiency, mass transfer limitation, and unwanted bromate or perchlorate byproduct formation — that determine whether a design is commercially workable.

The 794 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawing filings across six major receiving offices. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1MACDERMID ACUMEN INC34
  2. 2BASF SE21
  3. 3KK TOSHIBA19
  4. 4JANSSEN PHARMA NV17
  5. 5CENT NAT DE LA RECH SCI (C N R S)16
  6. 6COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES15
  7. 7UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC14
  8. 8AECOM DELAWARE CORP13
  9. 9LEDDY JOHNA13
  10. 10BAYER AG13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 794 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

A decade of flat-to-declining activity

Annual filings ran from 37 in 2017 to a peak of 56 in 2025, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 28. Read together, the shape is closer to a plateau with a late bump than a sustained growth curve — worth noting before assuming this is a fast-expanding filing area.

A decade of flat-to-declining activity015304560372017201820192020202120222023202456202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Where the claims sit

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) touches 41.4% of records and C02F (water and wastewater treatment) touches 31.1%, confirming the field is anchored in cell electrochemistry applied to water. Smaller but non-trivial shares in H01M (13.7%), C07D (8.4%) and C25C (6.4%) show meaningful overlap with battery, heterocyclic-compound and metal-electrowinning patenting — a record can carry more than one class, so these shares add up past 100%.

Where the claims sitC25B · Electrolytic production of com…32941.4%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment24731.1%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells10913.7%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds678.4%C25C · Electrolytic metal production516.4%G01N · Material analysis & testing475.9%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds435.4%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming435.4%Other60576.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 794 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electrochemical oxidation for persistent organic pollutants and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative claim: coupling processes

Representative Record
US20220048801A12022-02-17

Electrocatalytic Fenton oxidation-electrochemical oxidation coupling process and apparatus (Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2022)

NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

The filing discloses a coupling process that pairs an electrocatalytic Fenton oxidation step with a separate electrochemical oxidation step, controlling cathode-anode spacing so oxygen generated at the anode reacts at the cathode to produce H2O2 in situ. That removes the need for external aeration or added H2O2 while aiming to keep COD removal efficient.Abstract trimmed for length; full claim language is available in the source record.

US20220048801A1 — patent drawing 1US20220048801A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5682043AElectrochemical light-emitting devices257
2US4780796ASolid electrolytic capacitor129
3US5965004AChlorine dioxide generation for water treatment107
4US20060144700A1Apparatus and process for mediated electrochemical oxidation of materials104
5EP1524678A2Electrolytic capacitors with polymeric outer layer98
6US20080053836A1Process for the production of diaryl carbonates and treatment of alkalichloride solutions resulting therefrom84
7US7116309B1Photowriting display device and photowriting display unit incorporating the same84
8US5879949AApparatus and method for rapid on-line electrochemistry and mass spectrometry84
9US20020061441A1Lithium battery and electrode83
10US4112199ALanthanum nickel hydride-hydrogen/metal oxide cell65

Citation counts favour older, well-indexed records and should be read as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data implies for filing strategy

Three patterns emerge once the numbers are set side by side: a plateau in overall activity, a technology mix skewed toward electrolytic and water-treatment claims, and a citation record dominated by older, adjacent-field patents.

Filing Momentum
56 in 2025
peak year filings

Growth has stalled since the early-2020s midpoint

With 2022 sitting at 28 filings and 2025 at 56, activity has not tracked a steady upward curve; the 2026 figure of 7 is a partial year and should not be read as a collapse given the usual 18-month publication lag.

Trend, 2017-2026
Ownership Spread
13.5% top 5
share of 794 records

No single assignee controls the field

The leader holds 34 records and the top 5 combined reach only 13.5% of all 794 records in scope — a much flatter concentration curve than fields with a dominant patent holder, meaning freedom-to-operate analysis has to look across many mid-sized filers rather than one gatekeeper.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Class Overlap
41.4% C25B
of 794 records

Electrolytic production claims anchor the field

C25B and C02F together touch the large majority of records, but the meaningful presence of H01M (13.7%) shows real overlap between electrochemical water treatment and battery-adjacent electrode work — a signal for teams scouting cross-application anode materials.

IPC composition
Citation Base
257 citations
on the top-cited record

Influential prior art predates the current wave

The most-cited records in this corpus include general electrochemical and capacitor patents rather than pollutant-specific filings, a reminder that citation counts here reward age and broad applicability more than current relevance to POP treatment.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electrochemical oxidation for persistent organic pollutants, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders span industrial chemical firms, university research foundations and public research institutes — a mix consistent with a field still being explored academically as much as it is being commercialised.

Leader
34 records
leading assignee

A modest lead, not a monopoly

The top-ranked assignee holds 34 records against a field of 794, and momentum data shows even long-standing filers posting zero filings in the latest year — consistent with a field where technical leadership changes hands rather than compounding.

Assignee ranking
Mid Tier
16 records
fifth-place assignee

A long tail below the top handful

Fifth place sits at 16 records and tenth place at 13, a gentle taper rather than a cliff — freedom-to-operate work in this space needs to clear a broad set of mid-sized portfolios, not just the leader.

Top 5 vs top 10 concentration
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest single pairing recorded at 16 joint records — most filers here are working alone rather than through joint-assignee structures.

Co-assignee analysis
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scouting
Branches with thinner filing density relative to the core electrolytic and water-treatment claims
bromate byproduct suppression chemistryelectrochemical PFAS defluorination cellsanode material longevity under mass-transfer limitsperchlorate formation control at scalecoupled Fenton-electrochemical reactor design
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by leading assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc1
MacDermid Acumen Inc0
BASF SE0
Janssen Pharmaceutica NV0
Toshiba Corporation0
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)0
CARSON ROGER W0
BREMER BRUCE W0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion — the flat filing trend and diffuse ownership both change how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace search should be scoped.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on anode claims

With ownership spread across many mid-sized filers rather than one leader, a targeted search across the top 10 assignees' active claims is more useful than a single-competitor teardown.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka →

Track the coupling-process sub-branch

Fenton-electrochemical coupling and defluorination claims sit in less-crowded corners of the IPC mix; monitoring new filings there flags emerging competitors early.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electrochemical Oxidation for Persistent Organic Pollutants in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electrochemical oxidation for persistent organic pollutants corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.