Book a demo

Electrode Drying Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Electrode Drying Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electrode-drying-and-solvent-recovery-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Battery Manufacturing Equipment
Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery Patents: Filing Trends and White Space
  • Four assignees account for all 26 records in scope, meaning the entire ranked field — not just the top tier — sits with a small group of filers.
  • F26B (drying) and H01M (batteries) each cover 69.2% of records, confirming that claims are drawn as much from thermal-process engineering as from cell chemistry.
  • Filing peaked at 12 records in 2023, with the most recent year understated by the usual publication lag rather than a genuine slowdown.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
26
Published Records
EP
Leading Jurisdiction
2023
Peak Filing Year
F26B
Lead IPC Subclass

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Electrode drying governs how fast a coated electrode can move through an oven without cracking its active layer or letting binder migrate to the surface, and NMP solvent recovery determines how much of the process solvent used in cathode coating is captured rather than vented or destroyed. Patents in this space sit at the intersection of drying-process control and cell manufacturing, which is why the IPC composition below spans thermal engineering classes as heavily as battery classes. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent filing year is always undercounted relative to where it will eventually land.

The 26 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, concentrated among a small number of assignees rather than spread across a long tail of single-filing entrants.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1LG Energy Solution Ltd.17
  2. 2LG Chem Ltd.6
  3. 3Northvolt AB2
  4. 4SK On Co., Ltd.1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 26 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims are drawn from.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from a standing start toward a peak of 12 records in 2023, then move into a data window that will fill in further as later-filed applications publish; treat the tail years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing trend, 2017-202603691202017201820192020202120221220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

F26B (drying) and H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) each cover 69.2% of the 26 records, with H01L (semiconductor devices) at 23.1% and H10K (organic semiconductors, including OLED) at 19.2% showing that drying-process claims are frequently drafted broadly enough to read across adjacent coated-film manufacturing. G05D (control of non-electric variables) at 15.4% and B05C (coating apparatus) at 3.8% mark the thinner, more specialised ends of the classification spread.

IPC subclass compositionF26B · Drying1869.2%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells1869.2%H01L · Semiconductor devices623.1%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…519.2%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…415.4%B05C · Coating apparatus13.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 26 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electrode drying and solvent recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative Filing
EP4668347A12025-12-24

Electrode drying system and electrode drying method

LG Energy Solution Ltd.

The present application provides an electrode drying system and an electrode drying method that number adjustment of first drying zones and heat quantity compensation in drying zones around the first drying zones can be automatically performed by determining locations of first drying zones in a constant rate section state, to which a drying target electrode moves, based on an electrode surface temperature, and adjusting the desired adhesive force and drying rate of the drying target electrode.Filed by LG Energy Solution Ltd., published 2025-12-24 as EP4668347A1.

EP4668347A1 — patent drawing 1EP4668347A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1KR1020250062140AElectrode drying system and electrode drying method4
2US20200135946A1Method for manufacturing organic solar cell and organic solar cell manufactured using same3

Citation counts reward older records simply for having had more time to be cited; read them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (2 of 2 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three read-outs from the composition and concentration figures above, translated into what they mean for a team deciding where to file.

Concentration
100% of 26 records
held by the ranked leaders

The whole field sits with four assignees

The top 5 and top 4 combined figures are identical at 26 of 26 records, because only four assignees appear in the ranking at all. There is no long tail of small filers to route around here; anyone entering this space is filing directly against a small, concentrated set of holders.

Assignee ranking, 4 companies
Technology mix
69.2% / 69.2%
F26B and H01M share of records

Drying-process claims dominate as much as battery claims

F26B (drying) and H01M (batteries) each cover the same 69.2% share of the 26 records, showing that most filings claim the thermal process itself, not just its application to a cell. That overlap is where cross-industry drying patents (coating, OLED manufacture) become relevant prior art.

IPC composition, 26 records in scope
Momentum
Peak: 12 in 2023
highest single-year filing count

Activity peaked in 2023, not in the latest window

The filing trend rises to a peak of 12 records in 2023 before the most recent years, which are understated by publication lag rather than a real drop-off. Recent-year momentum by assignee shows flat or declining counts, but this reflects the reporting window more than a cooling field.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electrode drying and solvent recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Leading assignees and where they are not yet claiming

Four assignees make up the entire ranked field for this search, with LG-affiliated entities filing most heavily and two other assignees showing no filings in the latest year.

Leader
17 records
leading assignee

LG-affiliated filers lead by a wide margin

The leading assignee holds 17 of the 26 records in scope, making it the dominant filer in electrode drying and solvent recovery claims within this dataset. Its representative filing, EP4668347A1, claims automatic zone-based heat compensation tied to electrode surface temperature.

Assignee ranking
Momentum
0 in latest year
across all four assignees

No assignee shows fresh activity in the latest year

Recent-year momentum is flat at zero for every ranked assignee, with two showing a -100% year-over-year change. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is expected rather than a sign that the field has gone quiet.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Field structure
4 assignees, 26 records
entire ranked field

A small, closed set of holders

With only four assignees returned by the ranking and all 26 records accounted for among them, this is not a fragmented field with room for a quiet entry — any new filer is negotiating claim space directly against these holders.

Top 4 combined, 100.0% of 26 records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where the IPC composition and citation data suggest thinner coverage relative to the core drying and battery classes.
Condensation-based NMP recovery loopsIn-line crack-formation detection during dryingBinder-migration compensation controlCoating-apparatus integration (B05C overlap)Energy-per-square-metre oven optimisation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LG Energy Solution Ltd.0
LG Chem Ltd.0
Northvolt AB0-100%
SK On Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above describe the shape of the field; the next steps depend on whether you are clearing a filing or scouting a gap.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's claims

With one assignee holding 17 of 26 records, a freedom-to-operate review should start with its zone-based drying and heat-compensation claims before looking elsewhere.

Explore claims in Eureka

Map the white space chips against your process

The under-claimed branches above are starting points, not conclusions; a closer read of the underlying claims will show whether they are truly open or simply under-indexed by this search string.

Run a deeper search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about electrode drying and solvent recovery patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electrode Drying and Solvent Recovery in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electrode drying and solvent recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.