https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electrodialysis-heavy-metal-removal-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Water & Environmental · Patent Landscape
Electrodialysis Patents for Heavy Metal Removal: Who Is Filing and Where the Claim Space Is Open
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. activity peaked at 21 families in 2024 after sitting near 10-12 through the middle of the decade — this is a mature, not an emerging, filing pattern.
  • No assignee is currently pulling ahead. every tracked leader shows zero filings in the latest full year, several down 100% year-on-year, which points to a leadership vacuum rather than a settled hierarchy.
  • China and the US dominate the filing offices. together with WIPO and EPO filings, this signals the commercially contested markets are concentrated in four receiving offices rather than spread globally.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
239
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+110%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (21) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 239 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the electrodialysis heavy metal removal patent record shows

Electrodialysis for heavy metal removal sits at the intersection of membrane separation and wastewater treatment, and the patent record reflects that overlap: filings cluster heavily in C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and B01D (separation processes), with smaller but persistent activity in metal extraction, inorganic chemistry, and polymer processing for membrane materials. This is not a single-technology field — it is a set of adjacent claim territories that a filer has to navigate together.

The dataset covers 239 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from a search anchored on electrodialysis, electrodialysis reversal, ED stacks, and selective ion separation for metal recovery. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will understate real filing activity — treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional floors, not final counts.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1ENVIRO WATER MINERALS COMPANY18
  2. 2TEXOPCO LLC14
  3. 3ENERGY EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES INC12
  4. 4EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC11
  5. 5AGC INC8
  6. 6INST OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT CHINESE ACAD OF SCI7
  7. 7MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH7
  8. 8UNIV GENT7
  9. 9FUJIFILM MANUFACTURING EUROPE BV5
  10. 10SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 239-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A flat-to-declining filing curve since the 2022 midpoint

Filings ran at 10 in 2017, rose to a peak of 21 in 2024, and sat at 12 by the 2022 midpoint — a curve consistent with a field that expanded once and has not found a second wave of growth. 2026 figures are partial and will revise upward as publications catch up.

A flat-to-declining filing curve since the 2022 midpoint0613192510201720182019202020212022202321202421202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and water treatment carry the field; metals and polymers are secondary

C02F and B01D together anchor the great majority of records, confirming that most filers are claiming the water-treatment or separation apparatus rather than the underlying chemistry. C01D, C22B, C01B, C08J, C25B and C07C each appear at much lower volume, marking narrower chemistry- or materials-specific claim territory that sits underneath the dominant process claims.

Separation and water treatment carry the field; metals and polymers are secondaryC02F · Water & wastewater treatment17472.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…16669.5%C01D · Alkali-metal compounds2610.9%C22B · Metal extraction & refining197.9%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…177.1%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions145.9%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…145.9%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds93.8%Other9138.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 239 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electrodialysis heavy metal removal and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The foundational filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US4246092A1981-01-20

US4246092A — Method and apparatus for the performance of selective electrodialysis

RESEARCH PRODUCTS REHOVOT LTD.

The invention provides a method for the performance of selective electrodialytic separation of a first group of charged ions from a solution containing other charged ions having the same sign and optionally the same valence as said first group, comprising applying a current to an electrodialysis unit comprising at least one thin, dense, non-porous charged electrodialysis membrane made of water-insoluble hydrophobic polymeric material, containing covalently bound ionizable groups, wherein said membrane separates at least one diluting compartment from at least one concentrating compartment in said unit.Filed by Research Products Rehovot Ltd. and granted in 1981, this is the earliest structurally significant filing in the field — its membrane-composition and compartment-separation language recurs across later selective-electrodialysis claims.

View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5681728AMethod and apparatus for the recovery and purification of organic acids118
2US6162361APlating waste water treatment and metals recovery system100
3US20100282689A1Low energy system and method of desalinating seawater57
4WO1993005186A1Process for the disposal of municipal waste and manufacture of fuel alcohol48
5CN106630040A一种选择性双极膜电渗析系统及其应用42
6US20080277341A1Method for Making Reverse Osmosis Permeate Water and Mineral Water From Deep Seawater37
7US3764503AElectrodialysis regeneration of metal containing acid solutions37
8US4326935AElectrochemical processes utilizing a layered membrane33
9JP2012055881AMethod for recovering lithium, and lithium recovering apparatus32
10WO1996041021A1Method and apparatus for the recovery and purification of organic acids31

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a measure of influence on later filers, not as a signal of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, citation, and office data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Filing Momentum
21 in 2024, 3 in 2026 (partial)
peak year vs. latest year

The field peaked recently but has not sustained it

A single peak year followed by an immediate drop-off is a weaker signal than a multi-year plateau at the top. Combined with the flat 2017-2022 stretch, this looks like one wave of filing interest rather than compounding growth — worth confirming against 2025-2026 filings once they finish publishing.

Trend data, 2015-2026
Citation Concentration
US5681728A cited 118 times
top-cited record

Influence sits with organic-acid recovery, not metal-specific claims

The most-cited record in the corpus concerns organic acid recovery and purification, not heavy metal removal directly — a reminder that citation counts here trace back to broader electrodialysis prior art rather than metal-selective technique. Later, more metal-specific filings such as the selective bipolar-membrane system cited 42 times sit well below that baseline.

Citation ranking
Filing Geography
China 66, US 60, WIPO 31, EPO 30
top receiving offices

Four offices carry almost all contested filing

China and the United States each host roughly a quarter of tracked filings, with PCT and European filings close behind. Japan and Australia trail well behind these four, suggesting that freedom-to-operate work should prioritise the top four jurisdictions before extending searches further.

Receiving office counts
Assignee Momentum
0 filings in latest year across tracked leaders
recent-year activity

No incumbent is currently active

Every assignee with a meaningful filing history in this dataset — including MIT and Ghent University — shows zero filings in the most recent full year, with at least one down 100% year-on-year. That is consistent with either a lull ahead of new filings still in the publication pipeline, or a genuine pause in R&D investment across the field's historical leaders.

Recent-year momentum tracking
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electrodialysis heavy metal removal, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where the gaps sit

The assignee ranking runs across academic institutions, water-treatment specialists and industrial conglomerates rather than a single dominant filer — and the strongest co-assignee links in the dataset are limited to isolated pairs rather than a filing network.

Academic Filers
MIT, Ghent University tracked
research assignees

Universities hold foundational claims, not recent ones

Institutions such as MIT and Ghent University appear in the historical assignee ranking but show no filings in the latest year, consistent with a pattern of early foundational work followed by licensing rather than continued in-house prosecution.

Assignee momentum data
Water-Treatment Specialists
Multiple dedicated water-tech assignees tracked
sector concentration

Specialist water-treatment firms anchor the mid-tier

Firms built specifically around water and membrane treatment occupy a consistent share of the ranking, reflecting the field's proximity to municipal and industrial wastewater compliance work rather than pure metals recovery.

Assignee ranking
Co-filing Patterns
2 co-assignee pairs identified
collaboration density

Almost no cross-assignee collaboration

Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the entire 239-family dataset, both linking closely related corporate entities rather than independent collaborators. This is a field of solo filers, not joint ventures — a contrast worth noting for anyone scouting for licensing or JV partners.

Co-assignee pair data
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with filing activity but no dominant claim holder, based on the secondary IPC subclasses in this dataset
Selective bipolar-membrane stack designMetal-selective ion-exchange membrane chemistry (C08J overlap)Electrodialytic metal recovery from mixed-valence brinesEnergy-recovery integration for ED desalination (C25B overlap)Acid/alkali co-production from waste-metal streams
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Enviro Water Minerals Company0
MAGNA IMPERIO SYST0
Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc.0
Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. (AGC Inc.)0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)0-100%
Ghent University0
Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences0
Siemens Water Technologies Corp.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or R&D prioritisation.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the top four offices

With China, the US, WIPO and EPO carrying almost all contested filing, a targeted FTO search across those four offices will catch the great majority of blocking claims before wider searches are needed.

Explore in Eureka

Watch for the 2025-2026 publication catch-up

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent drop-off after 2024 may partially reverse as pending applications publish — worth re-checking this trend line in the next data cut.

Explore in Eureka

Investigate the under-claimed membrane-chemistry branches

Selective bipolar-membrane design and metal-selective ion-exchange chemistry show filing activity without a dominant holder — a closer prior-art review here could surface a genuine filing opportunity.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electrodialysis Heavy Metal Removal in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electrodialysis heavy metal removal corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.