https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electronic-interconnects-and-connectors-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electronic Interconnects & Connectors
Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Claims
  • 31.8% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 212 of 666 records in scope, a level of concentration that narrows where a new entrant can file without colliding with existing claims.
  • Filing has pulled back from its 2020 peak. Volume peaked at 45 records in 2020 and, on the last complete year of data, fell 37% from 30 records in 2021 to 19 in 2024 — a real pullback, not a data-lag artefact.
  • H01L and H05K dominate, but overlap with H10W and A61B is notable. 30.9% of records sit in semiconductor devices (H01L) and 25.7% in printed circuits (H05K), while a meaningful share also touches diagnosis/surgery (A61B) and H10W classes — signalling cross-over into medical and wireless-adjacent hardware.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
666
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-37%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (30 records) with 2024 (19) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 666 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape draws on 666 published records matching electronic interconnects and connectors claim language — bonding pads, package substrates, thermal interfaces, electrical connections, package reliability and solder joints — filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. The scope spans core packaging and connector hardware as well as adjacent fields, since a meaningful share of records also touch diagnosis and surgery and wireless/H10W classifications, reflecting how interconnect and bonding claims get reused across medical devices and RF hardware.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real filing activity. Treat 2024 as the last complete year for growth comparisons, and read 2025-2026 figures as still filling in rather than as a genuine slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF ILLINOIS75
  2. 2KX TECHNOLOGIES LLC43
  3. 3NORTHWESTERN UNIV37
  4. 4LIFELENS TECH INC31
  5. 5TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE26
  6. 6NANTERO INC23
  7. 7SICILY MERGER SUB II INC22
  8. 8BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST19
  9. 9CLINICAL MICRO SENSORS INC18
  10. 10INTEL CORP17
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 666-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the composition shares sum to more than 100% of records.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose to a peak of 45 records in 2020, then eased; comparing the last complete years, 2021 (30 records) to 2024 (19 records) is a 37% decline. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as confirming a continued drop.

Filing trend, 2017-2026013253850212017201820194520202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H01L (semiconductor devices) leads at 30.9% of the 666 records, followed by H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) at 25.7%. Optical elements (G02B, 14.3%), H10W (13.2%) and diagnosis/surgery (A61B, 12.2%) each carry a double-digit share, showing that interconnect claims spread well beyond core packaging into optical, wireless and medical-device hardware.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH01L · Semiconductor devices20630.9%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies17125.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems9514.3%H10W8813.2%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery8112.2%G01N · Material analysis & testing609.0%H01R · Connectors & current collectors588.7%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…527.8%Other794119.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 666 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronic interconnects & connectors patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative early claim

Representative record
US5445306A1995-08-29

US5445306A — Wedge wire bonding tool tip (Motorola, 1995)

MOTOROLA, INC.

A wedge bond tool tip for bonding electronic interconnects to bonding pads of a semiconductor device enables fine-pitch non-orthogonal wire bonding. The tip's front face is chamfered or rounded to a reduced area narrower than the tool's overall width, cutting the contact distance to a previously made adjacent bond while keeping the structural integrity needed for acceptable wedge bonds.Filed in 1995, this record predates the bulk of the dataset and illustrates how foundational fine-pitch wire-bonding geometry claims were staked out well before the 2015-2026 filing window this landscape tracks.

US5445306A — patent drawing 1US5445306A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040053290A1Devices and methods for biochip multiplexing631
2US6800930B2Semiconductor dice having back side redistribution layer accessed using through-silicon vias, and assemblies626
3US20150351690A1Modular physiologic monitoring systems, kits, and methods474
4US20150335288A1Modular physiologic monitoring systems, kits, and methods468
5US7355273B2Semiconductor dice having back side redistribution layer accessed using through-silicon vias, methods456
6US20050053525A1Sensor platform using a horizontally oriented nanotube element243
7US20130140649A1Transient devices designed to undergo programmable transformations237
8US20110230747A1Implantable biomedical devices on bioresorbable substrates235
9US20050186705A1Semiconductor dice having backside redistribution layer accessed using through-silicon vias, methods226
10US20170343695A1Magneto-Optical Detecting Apparatus and Methods217

Ranked by citation count within this corpus. Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations, so treat this as a signal of influence rather than of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three figures matter most when deciding where to file next: how concentrated ownership already is, how filing volume has moved, and which classes carry the density.

Concentration
31.8%
of 666 records held by top 5 assignees

Ownership is concentrated but not closed

The five leading assignees hold 212 of the 666 records in scope (31.8%), and the ranked ten hold 46.7% (311 records). That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, so the field is concentrated at the top without being a closed shop.

Based on the 100-company ranked assignee list
Filing momentum
-37%
2021 to 2024, complete-year comparison

Volume has pulled back from its 2020 peak

Filings peaked at 45 records in 2020, then declined; the last full-year comparison shows 30 records in 2021 falling to 19 in 2024, a 37% drop. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete and should not be read as extending that trend further.

Peak year: 2020, 45 records
Class density
30.9%
of records classified under H01L

Semiconductor and printed-circuit classes carry the bulk of claims

H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) together account for the largest shares of records, at 30.9% and 25.7% respectively. Dense claim coverage here means new filings in core bonding-pad and substrate geometry face heavier prior art than filings that touch the lighter H01R connector class at 8.7%.

Shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronic interconnects & connectors patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked list covers 100 companies scored by record count, not a curated top-10 or top-50 — read it as the full set the data endpoint returns. Co-assignee pairings point to a small cluster of university and research partners filing jointly, distinct from the corporate leaders.

Leader
75
records

A single filer sits well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 75 records, more than double the fifth-place holder at 26 and well ahead of tenth place at 17 — a steep drop-off rather than a gradual taper.

Gap from 1st to 5th: 75 to 26 records
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Research partnerships cluster around a few institutions

The strongest co-filing pairs involve university research groups working jointly rather than corporate co-development, with the closest pairing appearing 31 times across shared filings.

Ten distinct co-assignee pairs in scope
Momentum
0
latest-year filings for several tracked assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet for past leaders

Several of the historically active assignees show zero recorded filings in the latest tracked year, including one with a reported 100% year-on-year decline — consistent with the broader publication lag rather than necessarily a real stop in R&D.

Momentum reflects publication lag, not confirmed inactivity
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with lighter filing density relative to the core packaging classes
fine-pitch wedge-bond tool geometrythrough-silicon-via redistribution layersthermal interface material at solder jointsconnector-level package reliability testingmultiplexed biochip interconnect assemblies
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois0
KX Technologies LLC0
Northwestern University0
TRICORD HOLDINGS LLC0
Nantero, Inc.0
Sicily Merger Sub II, Inc.0-100%
LifeLens Technologies, Inc.0-100%
Trustees of Tufts College0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the question is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or where to file.

Check freedom-to-operate before filing in H01L or H05K

With 30.9% and 25.7% of records respectively, these two classes carry the densest prior art in this landscape. A claim search against the leading assignees' portfolios in these classes is worth doing before drafting.

Run a claim search in Eureka →

Track the leader's recent filings, not just its historical count

A 75-record lead is built on history; recent-year momentum figures suggest activity has cooled for several top filers. Watching what a leader files now matters more than its cumulative total.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →

Explore the under-claimed connector and thermal-interface branches

H01R (connectors) sits at 8.7% of records, notably lighter than the semiconductor and printed-circuit classes. That gap is worth a deeper white-space pass before assuming it is simply less commercially relevant.

Map white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electronic Interconnects & Connectors Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electronic interconnects & connectors patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.