Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (30 records) with 2024 (19) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 666 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape draws on 666 published records matching electronic interconnects and connectors claim language — bonding pads, package substrates, thermal interfaces, electrical connections, package reliability and solder joints — filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. The scope spans core packaging and connector hardware as well as adjacent fields, since a meaningful share of records also touch diagnosis and surgery and wireless/H10W classifications, reflecting how interconnect and bonding claims get reused across medical devices and RF hardware.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real filing activity. Treat 2024 as the last complete year for growth comparisons, and read 2025-2026 figures as still filling in rather than as a genuine slowdown.
Two views of the same 666-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the composition shares sum to more than 100% of records.
Filings rose to a peak of 45 records in 2020, then eased; comparing the last complete years, 2021 (30 records) to 2024 (19 records) is a 37% decline. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as confirming a continued drop.
H01L (semiconductor devices) leads at 30.9% of the 666 records, followed by H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) at 25.7%. Optical elements (G02B, 14.3%), H10W (13.2%) and diagnosis/surgery (A61B, 12.2%) each carry a double-digit share, showing that interconnect claims spread well beyond core packaging into optical, wireless and medical-device hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 666 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronic interconnects & connectors patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA wedge bond tool tip for bonding electronic interconnects to bonding pads of a semiconductor device enables fine-pitch non-orthogonal wire bonding. The tip's front face is chamfered or rounded to a reduced area narrower than the tool's overall width, cutting the contact distance to a previously made adjacent bond while keeping the structural integrity needed for acceptable wedge bonds.Filed in 1995, this record predates the bulk of the dataset and illustrates how foundational fine-pitch wire-bonding geometry claims were staked out well before the 2015-2026 filing window this landscape tracks.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040053290A1 | Devices and methods for biochip multiplexing | 631 |
| 2 | US6800930B2 | Semiconductor dice having back side redistribution layer accessed using through-silicon vias, and assemblies | 626 |
| 3 | US20150351690A1 | Modular physiologic monitoring systems, kits, and methods | 474 |
| 4 | US20150335288A1 | Modular physiologic monitoring systems, kits, and methods | 468 |
| 5 | US7355273B2 | Semiconductor dice having back side redistribution layer accessed using through-silicon vias, methods | 456 |
| 6 | US20050053525A1 | Sensor platform using a horizontally oriented nanotube element | 243 |
| 7 | US20130140649A1 | Transient devices designed to undergo programmable transformations | 237 |
| 8 | US20110230747A1 | Implantable biomedical devices on bioresorbable substrates | 235 |
| 9 | US20050186705A1 | Semiconductor dice having backside redistribution layer accessed using through-silicon vias, methods | 226 |
| 10 | US20170343695A1 | Magneto-Optical Detecting Apparatus and Methods | 217 |
Ranked by citation count within this corpus. Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations, so treat this as a signal of influence rather than of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three figures matter most when deciding where to file next: how concentrated ownership already is, how filing volume has moved, and which classes carry the density.
The five leading assignees hold 212 of the 666 records in scope (31.8%), and the ranked ten hold 46.7% (311 records). That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, so the field is concentrated at the top without being a closed shop.
Filings peaked at 45 records in 2020, then declined; the last full-year comparison shows 30 records in 2021 falling to 19 in 2024, a 37% drop. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete and should not be read as extending that trend further.
H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) together account for the largest shares of records, at 30.9% and 25.7% respectively. Dense claim coverage here means new filings in core bonding-pad and substrate geometry face heavier prior art than filings that touch the lighter H01R connector class at 8.7%.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronic interconnects & connectors patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked list covers 100 companies scored by record count, not a curated top-10 or top-50 — read it as the full set the data endpoint returns. Co-assignee pairings point to a small cluster of university and research partners filing jointly, distinct from the corporate leaders.
The top-ranked assignee holds 75 records, more than double the fifth-place holder at 26 and well ahead of tenth place at 17 — a steep drop-off rather than a gradual taper.
The strongest co-filing pairs involve university research groups working jointly rather than corporate co-development, with the closest pairing appearing 31 times across shared filings.
Several of the historically active assignees show zero recorded filings in the latest tracked year, including one with a reported 100% year-on-year decline — consistent with the broader publication lag rather than necessarily a real stop in R&D.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois | 0 | — |
| KX Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| Northwestern University | 0 | — |
| TRICORD HOLDINGS LLC | 0 | — |
| Nantero, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Sicily Merger Sub II, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| LifeLens Technologies, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Trustees of Tufts College | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the question is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or where to file.
With 30.9% and 25.7% of records respectively, these two classes carry the densest prior art in this landscape. A claim search against the leading assignees' portfolios in these classes is worth doing before drafting.
Run a claim search in Eureka →A 75-record lead is built on history; recent-year momentum figures suggest activity has cooled for several top filers. Watching what a leader files now matters more than its cumulative total.
Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →H01R (connectors) sits at 8.7% of records, notably lighter than the semiconductor and printed-circuit classes. That gap is worth a deeper white-space pass before assuming it is simply less commercially relevant.
Map white space in Eureka →The ranked assignee list covers 100 companies, and it is concentrated at the top: the leading assignee holds 75 of 666 records in scope, with a steep drop to 26 records at fifth place and 17 at tenth. Together the top five hold 31.8% of all records and the top ten hold 46.7%, which leaves a substantial long tail of single- or few-filing entrants. This pattern means a new filer is unlikely to face a single dominant blocker, but should expect dense coverage from a handful of established players in the core semiconductor and printed-circuit classes.
Filing activity peaked at 45 records in 2020 and has since pulled back; comparing the last two complete years available, 2021 (30 records) to 2024 (19 records), volume fell 37%. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in this dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as continuing that decline. The honest read is that activity cooled after 2020 through 2024, with the most recent one to two years simply not yet fully reported.
Semiconductor devices (H01L) lead at 30.9% of the 666 records in scope, followed by printed circuits and assemblies (H05K) at 25.7%. Optical elements (G02B, 14.3%), the H10W class (13.2%) and diagnosis and surgery (A61B, 12.2%) each hold double-digit shares, showing the field's claims spill into optical, wireless, and medical-device hardware rather than staying confined to packaging. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% of records and should not be read as parts of a single pie.
US5445306A, assigned to Motorola and dated 1995, claims a wedge bond tool tip with a chamfered or rounded front face narrower than the tool's overall width, designed to reduce the contact distance to an adjacent bond during fine-pitch wire bonding. It predates the 2015-2026 window this landscape tracks and reflects foundational tooling geometry rather than a currently active claim boundary for most modern package designs. It remains useful as a reference point for how early fine-pitch bonding tool claims were structured, but freedom-to-operate work should focus on the denser, more recent filings in H01L and H05K.
Relative to the 30.9% and 25.7% shares held by the semiconductor (H01L) and printed-circuit (H05K) classes, the connector class H01R sits noticeably lighter at 8.7% of the 666 records in scope. Sub-areas such as connector-level package reliability testing, thermal interface materials at solder joints, and multiplexed biochip interconnect assemblies show lighter filing density than the core bonding-pad and substrate branches. That gap does not guarantee an open field — it may reflect narrower commercial demand — but it is worth a dedicated claim search before assuming the space is closed.
Go past this page: query the whole electronic interconnects & connectors patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.