Book a demo

Electronic Toll Collection Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026

Electronic Toll Collection Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electronic-toll-collection-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Intelligent Transportation
Electronic Toll Collection Systems: mapping who holds the patents and where filing has gone flat
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. the field peaked at 11 records in 2021 and sat at 9 by the 2022 midpoint, with no clear resumption of growth since.
  • The top of the field is genuinely concentrated. five assignees account for 37.0% of all 165 records in scope, and the leader alone holds 20 records against a fifth-place figure of just 7.
  • Almost nine in ten records touch fare-registering hardware. 88.5% of records carry a G07B classification, while image-based recognition (G06V) appears in only 3.6% — a wide gap between the ticketing core and the vision layer.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
165
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-18%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the electronic toll collection patent record actually shows

Electronic toll collection (ETC) patenting sits at the intersection of fare-registering hardware, traffic-control logic and, increasingly, vehicle recognition. The dataset in scope covers 165 published records filed against a search spanning 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, classified under IPC codes for ticket and fare-registering apparatus (G07B), traffic control systems (G08G) and image/video recognition (G06V). Filing activity is not evenly spread: a small group of assignees files repeatedly while a long tail files once or twice, and the technical content is dominated by fare-registering and lane-control claims rather than by the license-plate-recognition and interoperability layers that get more public attention.

Publication normally lags filing by roughly eighteen months, so the most recent year in any trend understates real activity; treat the final year on the chart as a floor, not a ceiling. Family-level counting is used throughout so that continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates in a single program do not inflate any one assignee's apparent footprint.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM AG20
  2. 2NEOLOGY INC15
  3. 3CHUNGHWA TELECOM CO LTD11
  4. 4DE JONGE WIEBREN8
  5. 5KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM IVHS7
  6. 6MARK IV INDUSTRIES CORP7
  7. 7Suzhou Guoxuan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.4
  8. 8KIA CORPORATION4
  9. 9IND TECH RES INST4
  10. 10HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Toll Collection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 165 records: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

A decade of flat, not rising, activity

Annual filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2021, then held near that level through the 2022 midpoint of 9 before easing off — a pattern consistent with a mature claim space rather than an emerging one. The 2026 figure of 1 reflects the publication lag and should not be read as a collapse.

A decade of flat, not rising, activity03691282017201820192020112021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Fare-registering dominates; recognition and connectivity are thinner

G07B (ticket and fare-registering) appears in 88.5% of records and G08G (traffic control) in 47.9%, confirming that most filing effort still targets core toll-transaction mechanics and lane management. Business-process claims under G06Q reach 15.8%, while data-recognition classes (G06K at 7.9%, G06V at 3.6%) and digital transmission (H04L at 4.2%) are comparatively under-claimed given how much commercial ETC discussion centres on license-plate recognition and connected-vehicle interoperability.

Fare-registering dominates; recognition and connectivity are thinnerG07B · Ticket & fare-registering14688.5%G08G · Traffic control systems7947.9%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…2615.8%G06K · Data recognition & presentation137.9%B60N · Vehicle seats & interior95.5%H04L · Digital information transmissi…74.2%G06V · Image/video recognition63.6%G07C · Time/attendance & checking dev…63.6%Other4124.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 165 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Toll Collection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electronic Toll Collection Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronic toll collection systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in the field

Representative Filing
US20090202105A12009-08-13

Automatic license plate recognition system integrated in an electronic toll collection system (US20090202105A1)

BRISA-AUTO ESTRADAS DE PORTUGAL, S.A.

Filed by BRISA-Auto Estradas de Portugal, this record integrates an ALPR (Advanced License Plate Recognition) pipeline directly into an electronic toll collection system, covering single-lane free-flow, multi-lane open-road tolling, manual and semi-automatic lanes. The claims cover panoramic rear-vehicle imaging, automatic recognition of both rear and front plates, and generation of a standardized photographic record for enforcement.One of the field's most-cited records, at 110 citations within the searched corpus.

US20090202105A1 — patent drawing 1US20090202105A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20020072963A1Traffic information & pricing (TIP) system210
2US8587454B1System and method for providing electronic toll collection to users of wireless mobile devices155
3US20090202105A1Automatic license plate recognition system integrated in an electronic toll collection system110
4CN101350109A多车道自由流视频车辆定位和控制方法84
5US20100085213A1High occupancy vehicle status signaling using electronic toll collection infrastructure74
6US20090231161A1Real-time vehicle position determination using communications with variable latency74
7US20070268140A1Method of enabling two-state operation of electronic toll collection system65
8US8384560B2Real-time vehicle position determination using communications with variable latency58
9US20080278347A1Electronic toll collection system with multi-beam antennas56
10US8730066B2Real-time vehicle position determination using communications with variable latency53

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Toll Collection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three read-throughs from the filing and citation data that matter more than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
37.0% of 165
held by the top 5 assignees

The top of the field is narrow, the tail is long

Five assignees account for 37.0% of all 165 records in scope, rising to 50.9% across the top ten. With a leader at 20 records and fifth place at only 7, the drop-off is steep — most of the remaining 83 ranked companies hold only a handful of filings each.

Ranking covers all 83 assignees the dataset returns.
Technology gap
88.5% vs 3.6%
G07B share vs G06V share

Vision-based recognition is thin relative to core ticketing

Fare-registering apparatus (G07B) shows up in 88.5% of records, but image/video recognition (G06V) appears in only 3.6%. Given how central automatic license-plate recognition is to modern free-flow tolling, this gap suggests the recognition layer is comparatively open relative to the ticketing core.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Momentum
Peak 11 (2021)
vs 1 in 2026 (partial year)

Activity has flattened since 2021

Filing rose to a peak of 11 records in 2021, held at 9 through the 2022 midpoint, and has not shown renewed growth since. Recent-year momentum figures for several established assignees sit at zero, consistent with a field where core claims are largely staked out.

2026 figure reflects an incomplete year and typical publication lag.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronic toll collection systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Toll Collection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gates sit

The ranked assignee list spans 83 companies, from a leader with 20 records to a long tail of single- and double-digit filers.

Leader position
20 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

One assignee sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 20 of the 165 records in scope, well ahead of a fifth-place figure of 7 and a tenth-place figure of 4. That gap between first and fifth is the clearest sign of where core claim territory is already staked.

Based on family-level counts across the full ranking.
Co-filing
5 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-assignment is rare and mostly automotive

Only five co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest link occurring between two automotive-group entities at four shared records. Most filing in this field happens under a single assignee name rather than through joint ventures.

Pair strength counted in shared records.
Geography
China 61 · US 37
leading receiving offices

Filing is split across two large markets

China and the United States are the two largest receiving offices by a wide margin, with Europe, Taiwan and Canada each contributing single-digit-to-low-double-digit shares. This split points to two separately evolving regulatory and interoperability environments rather than one global standard.

Receiving-office counts as supplied in the underlying dataset.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is comparatively low relative to the field's commercial relevance.
Cross-operator interoperability protocolsImage-based plate recognition under G06VConnected-vehicle transaction transmission (H04L)Enforcement-grade image standardizationBusiness-process tolling models (G06Q)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Kapsch TrafficCom AG0
Neology Inc.0
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.0
Mark IV Industries Corp.0
DE JONGE WIEBREN0
Kia Corporation0
Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI)0
Suzhou Guoxuan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Toll Collection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive monitoring.

Check claim scope before filing near the ticketing core

With 88.5% of records touching G07B, any new fare-registering claim is likely to sit close to existing art. A claim-by-claim comparison against the top-cited records is a reasonable first filter.

Explore claim charts in Eureka

Assess the recognition-layer gap

G06V representation at 3.6% is low relative to how much commercial attention license-plate recognition receives. That gap deserves a closer look before assuming the space is crowded.

Run a whitespace search in Eureka

Track the leading assignees' recent activity

Several established assignees show zero recent-year filings, which may mean a shift in strategy, a plateaued portfolio, or activity not yet published. Monitoring near-term filings from these entities will clarify which it is.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Toll Collection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about electronic toll collection patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic Toll Collection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electronic Toll Collection Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electronic toll collection systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.