Electronic-Waste Recycling Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- A small, concentrated field. 13 records in scope, with the top 5 assignees already covering 61.5% of all filings and the top 10 covering the entire set.
- Filing peaked in 2022 at 4 records and has not repeated that level since, though the most recent year is still partial and understated by publication lag.
- Solid waste disposal (B09B) dominates the claim space at 38.5% of records, while metal extraction (C22B) and polymer processing (C08J) each sit at 23.1%.
Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 13 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
A niche, India-heavy corner of e-waste recycling IP
Electronic-waste recycling patenting captured by this search string is small in absolute terms: 13 published records spanning 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. The receiving-office picture is unusually concentrated for a global technology theme — India accounts for 10 of the filings, with South Africa and the United States making up the rest. That skew matters for anyone reading the ranking: it reflects where these particular applicants filed, not where electronic-waste recycling activity is happening worldwide.
The technical centre of gravity sits on mechanical and chemical separation of waste streams rather than on semiconductor-level device recovery. Solid waste disposal (B09B) is the single largest IPC subclass by record count, with metal extraction and polymer processing close behind — consistent with a field still working through pre-processing and material-recovery steps rather than downstream component reuse.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 13 records: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry. Because a single record can be tagged with several classes, the subclass shares add up to more than the record total.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings run from zero in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2022, with 3 recorded in 2026 so far. Treat the final year as a floor, not a ceiling: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 will both fill in further as more applications publish.
IPC subclass distribution
B09B (solid waste disposal) leads at 38.5% of the 13 records in scope, followed by C08J (polymer processing) and C22B (metal extraction) at 23.1% each. B07C (sorting), C08L (polymer compositions), H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuit assemblies) each appear in 15.4% of records, with A61B present in a single filing.
Shares are the percentage of the 13 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronic-waste recycling patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative technical approach
Method for microwave-assisted alcoholysis of polyurethane from discarded refrigerators
The invention describes a process for recovering polyurethane from discarded refrigerators using microwave-assisted alcoholysis. Mechanically crushed and screened polyurethane particles are combined with an alcoholysis agent and catalyst in a microwave reactor; after solid-liquid separation, the product undergoes reduced-pressure distillation to yield a target alcoholysis product. The disclosed process runs at a microwave power of 200-600 W and an alcoholysis temperature of 185 degrees Celsius.Filed as ZA202201649B, dated 2022-04-28.
View full filingPut your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
The dataset is too small for broad market conclusions, but three patterns stand out clearly enough to act on.
A small leader group, not a fragmented field
The top 5 assignees combined account for 61.5% of all 13 records in scope, and the top 10 cover the entire set. For a field this size, that means the ranked leaders effectively define the visible claim space — there is no long tail of obscure filers still to discover.
Activity has not been steady
Filings started from zero in 2017, rose to a peak of 4 in 2022, and have not sustained that pace since. With fewer than four complete years once publication lag is factored in, a growth rate cannot be reliably stated from this dataset.
Mechanical and chemical separation dominates
B09B (solid waste disposal) is the most common IPC subclass, ahead of C08J (polymer processing) and C22B (metal extraction), both at 23.1%. Semiconductor- and circuit-level classes (H01L, H05K) each appear in only 15.4% of records, suggesting device-level recovery is still lightly claimed relative to bulk material separation.
Collaboration is limited and academic
Only 6 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the strongest linking two individual researchers on two records. This points to a field still organised around small research groups and individual inventors rather than corporate joint filing programmes.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronic-waste recycling patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space
The ranked list covers 16 companies and institutions, counted in records, with 13 total records in scope — this is the complete ranking the dataset returns, not a filtered top tier. Filing is dominated by Indian academic and research institutions, alongside one Chinese university entrant tied to the representative filing above.
A narrow lead at the top
The leading assignee holds 2 of the 13 records in scope, only slightly ahead of the rest of the ranked group. With fifth place already down to a single record, the gap between the top spot and the mid-table is thin.
India-centred applicant base
Indian universities and deemed universities make up most of the ranked assignees, with South Africa and the United States accounting for the remaining receiving-office activity. Readers benchmarking against a specific jurisdiction should note this skew before drawing conclusions about global e-waste recycling filing activity.
Recent activity has thinned out
Only one tracked assignee recorded a filing in the latest year; several previously active assignees, including one with a -100% year-on-year change, show no filings in the same period. That is consistent with a field where individual research groups file in bursts rather than on a steady annual cadence.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| RAJ KUMAR P | 1 | — |
| Shanghai Second Polytechnic University | 0 | — |
| RITA KHANNA | 0 | — |
| DR PS MUKHERJEE | 0 | — |
| Battelle Memorial Institute | 0 | — |
| RAJU HRUSHIKESAVA S | 0 | -100% |
| MRS SEEMA VIJAY MANDORA | 0 | -100% |
| MR VIJAY MANSINHBHAI MANDORA | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this next
This landscape is a starting point for freedom-to-operate and whitespace scoping, not a substitute for a full search.
Map claims against your own process route
Compare your specific separation, extraction or recovery steps against the IPC clusters here, particularly B09B, C08J and C22B, to see which claim language is already occupied.
Explore in EurekaTrack the thin-momentum assignees
Several previously active filers have gone quiet in the latest year; a renewed filing from any of them would be an early signal worth monitoring before it shows up in aggregate statistics.
Set up monitoring in EurekaScope the under-claimed branches
Semiconductor- and circuit-level recovery classes remain lightly claimed relative to bulk material separation, which may be where a new filing has the most room to establish a first position.
Run a whitespace search in EurekaCommon questions about electronic-waste recycling patents
Based on the 13 records in scope, the ranked leader holds 2 records, with the field otherwise spread thinly across 16 ranked assignees. The top 5 assignees together account for 61.5% of all records, and the top 10 account for the entire dataset, so there is no long tail beyond the ranked group. Most of these assignees are Indian universities or research institutions rather than large corporations, which is unusual for a global recycling technology and reflects the specific search scope used here rather than the industry as a whole.
The dataset shows filings rising from zero in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2022, the highest single year recorded, with 3 filings recorded so far in 2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts will likely increase as more applications become public. A precise growth rate cannot be stated from this data because fewer than four complete years remain once that lag is accounted for.
Solid waste disposal methods (IPC class B09B) appear in 38.5% of the 13 records, making it the most common technical area, followed by polymer processing (C08J) and metal extraction and refining (C22B), each at 23.1%. Sorting technology, polymer compositions, semiconductor devices and printed circuit assemblies each appear in a smaller share of records. This mix suggests the claimed technology is concentrated on bulk material separation and chemical recovery steps rather than on component-level or device-level reuse.
Semiconductor-grade material recovery and printed-circuit-board-specific extraction processes appear in only 15.4% of the 13 records each, well below the coverage of bulk solid-waste and polymer processing claims. Automated sorting for mixed e-waste streams and secondary feedstock quality certification also show thin representation in this dataset. A first filing that claims process control or yield specifications in these narrower branches would face less directly overlapping prior art than one targeting bulk mechanical separation.
ZA202201649B claims a microwave-assisted alcoholysis process for recovering polyurethane specifically from discarded refrigerators, using mechanical crushing, an alcoholysis agent and catalyst inside a microwave reactor operating at 200-600 W and around 185 degrees Celsius, followed by solid-liquid separation and reduced-pressure distillation. It does not block alcoholysis of polyurethane from other appliance types, nor does it claim non-microwave heating methods or different catalyst chemistries. Anyone working on polyurethane recovery outside these specific process parameters and this specific waste stream would sit outside its literal claim scope, though a full claims analysis is needed before relying on that as a design-around.
Research Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole electronic-waste recycling patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.