Book a demo

Electronic-Waste Recycling Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Electronic-Waste Recycling Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electronic-waste-recycling-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electronic-Waste Recycling
Electronic-Waste Recycling Patents: Filing Trends, Leading Assignees and White Space
  • A small, concentrated field. 13 records in scope, with the top 5 assignees already covering 61.5% of all filings and the top 10 covering the entire set.
  • Filing peaked in 2022 at 4 records and has not repeated that level since, though the most recent year is still partial and understated by publication lag.
  • Solid waste disposal (B09B) dominates the claim space at 38.5% of records, while metal extraction (C22B) and polymer processing (C08J) each sit at 23.1%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
13
Published Records
62%
Top-5 Share of All Records
IN
Leading Jurisdiction
16
Active Filers Ranked

Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 13 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A niche, India-heavy corner of e-waste recycling IP

Electronic-waste recycling patenting captured by this search string is small in absolute terms: 13 published records spanning 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. The receiving-office picture is unusually concentrated for a global technology theme — India accounts for 10 of the filings, with South Africa and the United States making up the rest. That skew matters for anyone reading the ranking: it reflects where these particular applicants filed, not where electronic-waste recycling activity is happening worldwide.

The technical centre of gravity sits on mechanical and chemical separation of waste streams rather than on semiconductor-level device recovery. Solid waste disposal (B09B) is the single largest IPC subclass by record count, with metal extraction and polymer processing close behind — consistent with a field still working through pre-processing and material-recovery steps rather than downstream component reuse.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1SHANGHAI SECOND POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY2
  2. 2MUKHERJEE PS2
  3. 3KHANNA RITA2
  4. 4KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION1
  5. 5RAJU HRUSHIKESAVA S1
  6. 6KALINGA INST OF IND TECHKIITDEEMED TO BE UNIV1
  7. 7JYOTHI ENG COLLEGE1
  8. 8LAKSHMINARAYANA KODAVALI1
  9. 9CHHATRAPATI SHAHU JI MAHARAJ UNIV1
  10. 10MS ALWAZO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 13 records: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry. Because a single record can be tagged with several classes, the subclass shares add up to more than the record total.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings run from zero in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2022, with 3 recorded in 2026 so far. Treat the final year as a floor, not a ceiling: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 will both fill in further as more applications publish.

Filing trend, 2017-20260123402017201820192020202142022202320244202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

B09B (solid waste disposal) leads at 38.5% of the 13 records in scope, followed by C08J (polymer processing) and C22B (metal extraction) at 23.1% each. B07C (sorting), C08L (polymer compositions), H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuit assemblies) each appear in 15.4% of records, with A61B present in a single filing.

IPC subclass distributionB09B · Solid waste disposal538.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions323.1%C22B · Metal extraction & refining323.1%B07C · Postal & object sorting215.4%C08L · Polymer compositions215.4%H01L · Semiconductor devices215.4%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies215.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery17.7%Other1076.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 13 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronic-waste recycling patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative technical approach

Representative Patent
ZA202201649B2022-04-28

Method for microwave-assisted alcoholysis of polyurethane from discarded refrigerators

SHANGHAI POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY

The invention describes a process for recovering polyurethane from discarded refrigerators using microwave-assisted alcoholysis. Mechanically crushed and screened polyurethane particles are combined with an alcoholysis agent and catalyst in a microwave reactor; after solid-liquid separation, the product undergoes reduced-pressure distillation to yield a target alcoholysis product. The disclosed process runs at a microwave power of 200-600 W and an alcoholysis temperature of 185 degrees Celsius.Filed as ZA202201649B, dated 2022-04-28.

View full filing
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing pattern signals

The dataset is too small for broad market conclusions, but three patterns stand out clearly enough to act on.

Concentration
61.5%
of 13 records held by top 5 assignees

A small leader group, not a fragmented field

The top 5 assignees combined account for 61.5% of all 13 records in scope, and the top 10 cover the entire set. For a field this size, that means the ranked leaders effectively define the visible claim space — there is no long tail of obscure filers still to discover.

Ranking basis: 16 assignees, counted in records.
Filing trend
Peak: 2022 (4)
highest single-year filing count

Activity has not been steady

Filings started from zero in 2017, rose to a peak of 4 in 2022, and have not sustained that pace since. With fewer than four complete years once publication lag is factored in, a growth rate cannot be reliably stated from this dataset.

2026 figure is partial due to publication lag.
Technology mix
38.5%
of records tagged B09B

Mechanical and chemical separation dominates

B09B (solid waste disposal) is the most common IPC subclass, ahead of C08J (polymer processing) and C22B (metal extraction), both at 23.1%. Semiconductor- and circuit-level classes (H01L, H05K) each appear in only 15.4% of records, suggesting device-level recovery is still lightly claimed relative to bulk material separation.

Shares exceed 100% combined because records carry multiple IPC tags.
Co-filing
6 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

Collaboration is limited and academic

Only 6 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the strongest linking two individual researchers on two records. This points to a field still organised around small research groups and individual inventors rather than corporate joint filing programmes.

Strongest pair: 2 shared records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronic-waste recycling patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who holds the claim space

The ranked list covers 16 companies and institutions, counted in records, with 13 total records in scope — this is the complete ranking the dataset returns, not a filtered top tier. Filing is dominated by Indian academic and research institutions, alongside one Chinese university entrant tied to the representative filing above.

Leader
2 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

A narrow lead at the top

The leading assignee holds 2 of the 13 records in scope, only slightly ahead of the rest of the ranked group. With fifth place already down to a single record, the gap between the top spot and the mid-table is thin.

Fifth place: 1 record.
Institutional mix
10 filings
routed through the Indian receiving office

India-centred applicant base

Indian universities and deemed universities make up most of the ranked assignees, with South Africa and the United States accounting for the remaining receiving-office activity. Readers benchmarking against a specific jurisdiction should note this skew before drawing conclusions about global e-waste recycling filing activity.

Receiving offices: India 10, ZA 2, US 1.
Momentum
1 filing
by the most active assignee in the latest year

Recent activity has thinned out

Only one tracked assignee recorded a filing in the latest year; several previously active assignees, including one with a -100% year-on-year change, show no filings in the same period. That is consistent with a field where individual research groups file in bursts rather than on a steady annual cadence.

Latest-year data is partial due to publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas with thin or no coverage in the current filing set, based on IPC composition and abstract review.
Printed-circuit-board metal leaching kineticsMicrowave-assisted plastics depolymerisation scale-upSemiconductor-grade material recovery yield controlAutomated sorting for mixed e-waste streamsSecondary feedstock quality certification methods
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
RAJ KUMAR P1
Shanghai Second Polytechnic University0
RITA KHANNA0
DR PS MUKHERJEE0
Battelle Memorial Institute0
RAJU HRUSHIKESAVA S0-100%
MRS SEEMA VIJAY MANDORA0-100%
MR VIJAY MANSINHBHAI MANDORA0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this next

This landscape is a starting point for freedom-to-operate and whitespace scoping, not a substitute for a full search.

Map claims against your own process route

Compare your specific separation, extraction or recovery steps against the IPC clusters here, particularly B09B, C08J and C22B, to see which claim language is already occupied.

Explore in Eureka

Track the thin-momentum assignees

Several previously active filers have gone quiet in the latest year; a renewed filing from any of them would be an early signal worth monitoring before it shows up in aggregate statistics.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed branches

Semiconductor- and circuit-level recovery classes remain lightly claimed relative to bulk material separation, which may be where a new filing has the most room to establish a first position.

Run a whitespace search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about electronic-waste recycling patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electronic-Waste Recycling Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electronic-waste recycling patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.