Book a demo

PCB Delamination Recycling Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

PCB Delamination Recycling Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electronic-waste-recycling-printed-circuit-delamination-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Updated 2026
Printed Circuit Delamination Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Claim Space
Get a prior-art report on your approach
799
Published Records
21%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+53%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (17 records) with 2024 (26) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 799 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Printed circuit delamination sits at the intersection of two very different patenting traditions: mechanical and thermal separation of laminate layers, and the polymer chemistry that determines how strongly those layers bond in the first place. The 799 records in scope span both, from die-attach adhesion methods to the additive chemistry inside the laminate itself, and from circuit-board fabrication through to the semiconductor packaging that eventually has to survive board-level rework or, at end of life, be pulled apart for recovery.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION49
  2. 2SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS CO LTD41
  3. 3ELITE ELECTRONIC MATERIAL (KUNSHAN) CO LTD33
  4. 4SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD26
  5. 5SHELDAHL INC21
  6. 6ASK SA (FR)18
  7. 7ELITE ELECTRONIC MATERIAL(ZHONGSHAN)CO LTD17
  8. 8AT & S AUSTRIA TECHNOLOGIE & SYSTEMTECHNIK AG17
  9. 9GUANGDONG SHENGYI SCI TECH15
  10. 10HUNTSMAN ADVANCED MATERIALS AMERICAS LLC15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 799 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight. Both use the full record set as the denominator, so subclass shares add up to more than 100% because a single record can carry several classifications.

A growth phase after an early peak

Filings ran from 28 in 2017 up to a peak of 44 in 2019, before easing into a lower base that has since grown again: 2021's 17 records rose to 26 by 2024, a 53% increase over that three-year span. Read the 2025–2026 tail as incomplete rather than declining, given the usual publication lag.

A growth phase after an early peak013253850282017201844201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Circuit and semiconductor classes dominate; polymer chemistry is thinner

H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) touches 52.1% of the 799 records and H01L (semiconductor devices) 21.0%, confirming that most claims are written around the board or the package rather than the material. B32B (layered products) at 13.1% and the polymer-composition classes C08L, C08J, C08K and C08G each sit at or below 11.3%, which is where composition-of-matter claim space is comparatively open.

Circuit and semiconductor classes dominate; polymer chemistry is thinnerH05K · Printed circuits & assemblies41652.1%H01L · Semiconductor devices16821.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates10513.1%C08L · Polymer compositions9011.3%H10W8410.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions749.3%C08K · Use of additives in polymers637.9%C08G · Condensation polymers577.1%Other54868.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 799 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronic-waste recycling: printed circuit delamination patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing

Representative recent filing
US20170194170A12017-07-06

US20170194170A1 — Printed adhesion deposition to mitigate integrated circuit delamination

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED

The application, assigned to Texas Instruments, describes applying a die attach material to a die pad, mounting the integrated circuit die via that material, then printing a separate adhesion deposition material at the die-to-pad interface specifically to mitigate delamination between the die and the pad.Filed 2017-07-06. The claim sits at the interface-engineering layer rather than the bulk material, which is a narrower and more defensible position than a composition claim covering the die attach material generally.

US20170194170A1 — patent drawing 1US20170194170A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4882245APhotoresist composition and printed circuit boards and packages made therewith352
2US5696666ALow profile exposed die chip carrier package320
3US6121689ASemiconductor flip-chip package and method for the fabrication thereof265
4US6248199B1Method for the continuous fabrication of access control and identification cards with embedded electronics or…184
5US9161448B2Laser assisted transfer welding process154
6US20090008142A1Porous Film and Multilayer Assembly Using the Same146
7US5527998AFlexible multilayer printed circuit boards and methods of manufacture145
8US4800461AMultilayer combined rigid and flex printed circuits129
9US5800650AFlexible multilayer printed circuit boards and methods of manufacture114
10US6406935B2Manufacturing process of a hybrid contact-contactless smart card with an antenna support made of fibrous mate…112

Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records such as the 1990s photoresist and flip-chip packaging patents lead this table by volume of citations received, not by current relevance to active filing.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the ranking, the trend and the technology mix, aimed at where to file next rather than restating what the chart already shows.

Concentration
21.3%
of all 799 records held by the top 5 filers

A leader, not a lock

The top filer holds 49 records against a fifth-place figure of 21 and a tenth-place figure of 15 — a real lead, but the top 5 combined only reach 21.3% of the 799 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 31.5%. That leaves the majority of the field outside the leading group, with room for a well-drafted claim to matter.

Based on the 799-record assignee ranking
Growth
+53%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

The field is expanding again after its 2019 peak

Filings peaked at 44 in 2019, dropped, then climbed from 17 in 2021 to 26 in 2024 — a 53% rise over that span. Treat 2025 and 2026 counts as undercounted rather than as evidence the growth has stopped, given the roughly 18-month publication lag.

2021–2024 complete-year comparison
Technology mix
52.1%
of records touch H05K printed-circuit claims

Board-level claims dominate; material claims are thinner

H05K and H01L together cover the board and package layers most densely. Polymer classes such as C08L (11.3%), C08J (9.3%), C08K (7.9%) and C08G (7.1%) are each claimed in a minority of records, which is where composition and formulation claims have more room to be written without colliding with dense prior art.

Shares of all 799 records; a record may carry several IPC classes
Receiving offices
245
US filings, the largest single office in scope

Filing is concentrated in the US and South Korea

The United States (245) and South Korea (150) together account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, ahead of EPO (70), WIPO/PCT (58), Japan (55) and China (46). A freedom-to-operate review that skips Korean-language filings will miss a substantial share of the record.

Receiving office counts across the 799 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronic-waste recycling: printed circuit delamination patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the question is who to watch, where to file, or what blocks a given design.

Map the white space in polymer composition classes

C08L, C08J, C08K and C08G each sit under 12% of records despite the field's overall growth, suggesting formulation-level claims around adhesive and laminate chemistry are less crowded than board-level claims.

Explore composition claims in Eureka

Track the leading filer's recent activity against the long tail

A 49-record leader combined with a long tail below the top 10 means competitive monitoring needs both a name-watch on the leader and a scan for new entrants filing single records.

Build an assignee watchlist in Eureka

Check interface-engineering claims before filing die-attach work

US20170194170A1 stakes out the die-to-pad interface specifically; any new die-attach delamination-mitigation filing should be checked against it before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electronic-waste recycling: printed circuit delamination patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.