PCB Delamination Recycling Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Filing growth compares 2021 (17 records) with 2024 (26) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 799 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Printed circuit delamination sits at the intersection of two very different patenting traditions: mechanical and thermal separation of laminate layers, and the polymer chemistry that determines how strongly those layers bond in the first place. The 799 records in scope span both, from die-attach adhesion methods to the additive chemistry inside the laminate itself, and from circuit-board fabrication through to the semiconductor packaging that eventually has to survive board-level rework or, at end of life, be pulled apart for recovery.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity and should not be read as a slowdown.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 799 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight. Both use the full record set as the denominator, so subclass shares add up to more than 100% because a single record can carry several classifications.
A growth phase after an early peak
Filings ran from 28 in 2017 up to a peak of 44 in 2019, before easing into a lower base that has since grown again: 2021's 17 records rose to 26 by 2024, a 53% increase over that three-year span. Read the 2025–2026 tail as incomplete rather than declining, given the usual publication lag.
Circuit and semiconductor classes dominate; polymer chemistry is thinner
H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) touches 52.1% of the 799 records and H01L (semiconductor devices) 21.0%, confirming that most claims are written around the board or the package rather than the material. B32B (layered products) at 13.1% and the polymer-composition classes C08L, C08J, C08K and C08G each sit at or below 11.3%, which is where composition-of-matter claim space is comparatively open.
Shares are the percentage of the 799 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronic-waste recycling: printed circuit delamination patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing
US20170194170A1 — Printed adhesion deposition to mitigate integrated circuit delamination
The application, assigned to Texas Instruments, describes applying a die attach material to a die pad, mounting the integrated circuit die via that material, then printing a separate adhesion deposition material at the die-to-pad interface specifically to mitigate delamination between the die and the pad.Filed 2017-07-06. The claim sits at the interface-engineering layer rather than the bulk material, which is a narrower and more defensible position than a composition claim covering the die attach material generally.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4882245A | Photoresist composition and printed circuit boards and packages made therewith | 352 |
| 2 | US5696666A | Low profile exposed die chip carrier package | 320 |
| 3 | US6121689A | Semiconductor flip-chip package and method for the fabrication thereof | 265 |
| 4 | US6248199B1 | Method for the continuous fabrication of access control and identification cards with embedded electronics or… | 184 |
| 5 | US9161448B2 | Laser assisted transfer welding process | 154 |
| 6 | US20090008142A1 | Porous Film and Multilayer Assembly Using the Same | 146 |
| 7 | US5527998A | Flexible multilayer printed circuit boards and methods of manufacture | 145 |
| 8 | US4800461A | Multilayer combined rigid and flex printed circuits | 129 |
| 9 | US5800650A | Flexible multilayer printed circuit boards and methods of manufacture | 114 |
| 10 | US6406935B2 | Manufacturing process of a hybrid contact-contactless smart card with an antenna support made of fibrous mate… | 112 |
Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records such as the 1990s photoresist and flip-chip packaging patents lead this table by volume of citations received, not by current relevance to active filing.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the ranking, the trend and the technology mix, aimed at where to file next rather than restating what the chart already shows.
A leader, not a lock
The top filer holds 49 records against a fifth-place figure of 21 and a tenth-place figure of 15 — a real lead, but the top 5 combined only reach 21.3% of the 799 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 31.5%. That leaves the majority of the field outside the leading group, with room for a well-drafted claim to matter.
The field is expanding again after its 2019 peak
Filings peaked at 44 in 2019, dropped, then climbed from 17 in 2021 to 26 in 2024 — a 53% rise over that span. Treat 2025 and 2026 counts as undercounted rather than as evidence the growth has stopped, given the roughly 18-month publication lag.
Board-level claims dominate; material claims are thinner
H05K and H01L together cover the board and package layers most densely. Polymer classes such as C08L (11.3%), C08J (9.3%), C08K (7.9%) and C08G (7.1%) are each claimed in a minority of records, which is where composition and formulation claims have more room to be written without colliding with dense prior art.
Filing is concentrated in the US and South Korea
The United States (245) and South Korea (150) together account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, ahead of EPO (70), WIPO/PCT (58), Japan (55) and China (46). A freedom-to-operate review that skips Korean-language filings will miss a substantial share of the record.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronic-waste recycling: printed circuit delamination patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the question is who to watch, where to file, or what blocks a given design.
Map the white space in polymer composition classes
C08L, C08J, C08K and C08G each sit under 12% of records despite the field's overall growth, suggesting formulation-level claims around adhesive and laminate chemistry are less crowded than board-level claims.
Explore composition claims in EurekaTrack the leading filer's recent activity against the long tail
A 49-record leader combined with a long tail below the top 10 means competitive monitoring needs both a name-watch on the leader and a scan for new entrants filing single records.
Build an assignee watchlist in EurekaCheck interface-engineering claims before filing die-attach work
US20170194170A1 stakes out the die-to-pad interface specifically; any new die-attach delamination-mitigation filing should be checked against it before drafting.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
This landscape covers 799 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, matched against a search string built around printed circuit delamination terminology. That figure counts patent families as recorded in the assignee ranking, which is the fairer unit than raw document counts because it removes double-counting from continuations and multi-jurisdiction filings of the same invention. The true current total is likely higher than 799, since publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months and the most recent one to two years of this dataset are still filling in.
The ranking covers 100 companies, with the leading filer holding 49 records, fifth place at 21 and tenth place at 15. The top 5 filers combined account for 21.3% of all 799 records in scope, and the top 10 combined account for 31.5%, so a majority of the field sits outside the leading group. That mix of a clear leader and a long tail of smaller filers means competitive monitoring needs to watch both the top names and new single-filing entrants.
Filing activity peaked at 44 records in 2019, the highest single year in this dataset, then eased before climbing again: 2021 to 2024 saw filings rise from 17 to 26, a 53% increase over that three-year span. The 2025 and 2026 figures in the raw trend look lower still, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than an actual slowdown, so those final years should not be read as declining activity.
H05K, the printed circuits and assemblies classification, touches 52.1% of the 799 records, and H01L, semiconductor devices, touches 21.0%, making board- and package-level claims the densest part of the field. B32B, layered products and laminates, sits at 13.1%, while the polymer chemistry classes C08L, C08J, C08K and C08G each account for 11.3% or less. Because a single record can carry more than one IPC classification, these shares add up to more than 100%, and they point to material-composition claims being comparatively less crowded than structural ones.
US20170194170A1, filed by Texas Instruments and published 2017-07-06, describes a method that applies a die attach material to a die pad, mounts an integrated circuit die to that pad through the die attach material, and then prints a separate adhesion deposition material specifically at the interface between the die and the pad to mitigate delamination. The claim is anchored at that interface rather than at the bulk composition of the die attach material itself. Anyone drafting a new die-attach delamination-mitigation method should check their approach against this interface-level claim before finalising a design.
Research Electronic-Waste Recycling: Printed Circuit Delamination Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole electronic-waste recycling: printed circuit delamination patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.