Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed look at electronics heat spreader patents: who holds the largest families, how filings have moved since 2017, and where the technology claim space still has room.
Filing growth = 2021 (224 records) → 2024 (103); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 3,756 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
Electronics heat spreaders sit at the intersection of semiconductor packaging and thermal engineering: a component tasked with moving heat away from a die or module fast enough to keep the surrounding electronics within spec. This landscape covers 3,756 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from a search that combines title mentions of electronics heat spreaders with claims language tying heat spreading to electronic devices. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the unit used for the assignee ranking, which neutralises the effect of aggressive continuation filing or multi-jurisdiction refiling by any single applicant.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional rather than as evidence of a slowdown.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 3,756-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.
Filings ran from 182 in 2017 to a peak of 224 in 2021, then declined to 103 by 2024 — a 54% fall over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 are undercounted because publication has not caught up with filing yet, so this should not be read as evidence of a permanent decline.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuits and assemblies) anchor the corpus at 45.8% and 39.5% of the 3,756 records respectively, with H10W close behind at 37.0%. Heat-exchanger-specific classes F28F and F28D sit far lower, at 6.5% and 4.4%, which points to most heat spreader innovation being claimed as part of a semiconductor package or circuit assembly rather than as a standalone thermal component. A record can carry more than one class, so these shares add to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 3,756 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronics thermal management: electronics heat spreader patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn electronic package built around a first substrate, a second substrate, and at least one standoff substrate positioned and affixed between them so as to form a defined clearance. The standoff substrate carries through-substrate vias running its full thickness, a portion of which connect electrically between the two outer substrates — a construction aimed at scalable interposer integration for dense packaging.Filed by Broadpak Corporation, published 2019-12-24.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5216278A | Semiconductor device having a pad array carrier package | 900 |
| 2 | US6577013B1 | Chip size semiconductor packages with stacked dies | 587 |
| 3 | US6407922B1 | Heat spreader, electronic package including the heat spreader, and methods of manufacturing the heat spreader | 500 |
| 4 | US20140063721A1 | Chassis with separate thermal chamber for solid state memory | 374 |
| 5 | WO2010129369A2 | System and methods for inductive charging, and improvements and uses thereof | 341 |
| 6 | US6229216B1 | Silicon interposer and multi-chip-module (MCM) with through substrate vias | 308 |
| 7 | US20170095667A1 | Method and apparatus for neuromodulation treatments of pain and other conditions | 290 |
| 8 | US6282095B1 | Method and system for controlling radio frequency radiation in microelectronic packages using heat dissipatio… | 283 |
| 9 | US20120020026A1 | Microelectronic elements with post-assembly planarization | 281 |
| 10 | US6246108B1 | Integrated circuit package including lead frame with electrically isolated alignment feature | 273 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references within the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on subsequent filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →The ranking and the trend line together tell a story of a field with a recognisable set of large filers, a long tail of smaller entrants, and technology sub-branches that remain thin relative to the semiconductor-packaging core.
The five largest assignees combine for 894 records, 23.8% of the 3,756 in scope. That leaves more than three-quarters of filings spread across a long tail of single- and double-digit filers, which means the field is more open to a well-drafted new entrant than the leader's raw count (416) might suggest on its own.
Filings rose to a peak of 224 in 2021 before falling to 103 by 2024, a 54% decline over that span. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, 2025-26 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as a continuation of that fall — the true 2025 filing level will only be visible once those records finish publishing.
H01L (semiconductor devices) covers 45.8% of the 3,756 records and H05K covers 39.5%, while heat-exchanger-specific classes F28F and F28D sit at 6.5% and 4.4% respectively. Most heat-spreader innovation is being claimed as an element of a semiconductor package or circuit assembly, leaving dedicated heat-exchange hardware claims comparatively underworked.
The United States receives 2,083 filings in this dataset, well ahead of the EPO (535), WIPO/PCT (435) and South Korea (142). That skew suggests the US is still the primary venue where competitive positions in electronics heat spreader technology are being established and defended.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronics thermal management: electronics heat spreader patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Foxconn Technology Co., Ltd. | Fu Zhun Precision Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | 63 |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | LIN ZUCHEN | 10 |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | XU SHENGQING | 5 |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | SHEPHARD NICK EVAN | 5 |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | LILES DONALD | 5 |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | ELAHEE G M FAZLEY | 5 |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | BHAGWAGAR DORAB EDUL | 5 |
| Dow Silicones Corporation | BHAGWAGAR DORAB | 5 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and one pair — a precision-industry manufacturer filing jointly with its affiliated precision-industry subsidiary — accounts for the great majority of that co-filing activity, at 63 shared records. Co-assignment elsewhere in the field is rare, running at single digits per pair.
The figures above describe the shape of the field. The next step is testing a specific claim, design or filing strategy against it.
Run a candidate heat spreader construction against the most-cited records in this set to see which claim elements are already occupied and which are open.
Open Patsnap EurekaF28F, F28D and G02B sit far below H01L and H05K in record share — worth checking whether that gap reflects genuine technical difficulty or simply less filing activity.
Explore with Patsnap EurekaConcentration at the top means a handful of assignees are worth monitoring individually rather than only at the aggregate trend level.
Start monitoring in Patsnap EurekaThis dataset covers 3,756 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from a search combining title mentions of electronics heat spreaders with claims language linking heat spreading to electronic devices. The true figure is somewhat higher because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years are still filling in. Patent families rather than raw document counts are the fairer way to compare filers, since families neutralise repeated continuation and multi-jurisdiction filing by the same applicant.
The ranking covers 100 companies, with the leader holding 416 records and the fifth-placed filer holding 78. The top 5 filers combined account for 894 records, 23.8% of the 3,756 in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 30.8%. That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail of smaller entrants rather than concentrated at the very top, which is worth checking against the ranked table directly rather than assuming a single dominant player.
Filings rose from 182 in 2017 to a peak of 224 in 2021, then fell to 103 by 2024, a 54% decline over that three-year span. Figures for 2025 and 2026 look lower still, but that is an artefact of publication lag rather than a real drop — records filed in those years are still being published. The honest read is that 2021 marked a high point and 2022-2024 cooled from it, with the most recent trend not yet fully visible.
H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuits and assemblies) are the two largest IPC subclasses, covering 45.8% and 39.5% of the 3,756 records respectively, with H10W close behind at 37.0%. Heat-exchanger-specific classes such as F28F and F28D sit much lower, at 6.5% and 4.4%. That pattern indicates most heat-spreader innovation is being claimed as part of a semiconductor package or circuit assembly rather than as standalone thermal-exchange hardware, which matters when deciding which class to search or file against.
US10515886B2, assigned to Broadpak Corporation and published in December 2019, claims an electronic package built around a first and second substrate joined by at least one standoff substrate that forms a defined clearance and carries through-substrate vias connecting the outer substrates. It sits among the representative records in this landscape as an example of interposer-style packaging integration rather than a dedicated heat-spreader material claim. Anyone designing around it should look closely at the standoff-substrate and via-connection language specifically, since that is the structural element the claim turns on, and compare it against the other most-cited records in the same corpus before finalising a design.
Go past this page: query the whole electronics thermal management: electronics heat spreader patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.