Book a demo

Two-Phase Cold Plate Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Two-Phase Cold Plate Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electronics-thermal-management-two-phase-cold-plate-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electronics Thermal Management
Two-Phase Cold Plate Patents: Where Filing Is Concentrated and Where It Is Not

A data-backed view of two-phase cold plate patenting: filing trends through 2024, IPC composition across 8 subclasses, assignee concentration, and the most-cited prior art shaping electronics thermal management.

1,053
Published Records
17%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+43%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (51 records) → 2024 (73); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 1,053 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Two-phase cold plates move heat by evaporating and condensing a working fluid inside a sealed loop rather than relying on single-phase liquid flow alone. The approach matters because it can pull substantially more heat per unit area than conventional cold plates, which is why it shows up in patent filings tied to high-density processors, data-centre racks, and power electronics. This landscape covers 1,053 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026-08-31 data cut-off, spanning assignees from oil-and-gas majors to chipmakers to industrial thermal specialists.

The dataset is read at the family level wherever concentration and ranking figures are quoted, so continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates do not inflate any single assignee's position. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will understate actual filing activity and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO51
  2. 2JFE STEEL CORP40
  3. 3NVIDIA CORP38
  4. 4BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO LTD26
  5. 5POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD24
  6. 6BAIDU USA LLC23
  7. 7INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION20
  8. 8ARAMCO SERVICES CO20
  9. 9VERTIV CORP19
  10. 10PARKER HANNIFIN CORP18
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,053-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing activity, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 30 in 2017 to a peak of 78 in 2022, then held in a comparable range through 2024, including the +43% climb from 51 filings in 2021 to 73 in 2024. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates, so the apparent tail-off should not be read as declining interest.

Filing activity, 2017–20260204060803020172018201920202021782022202320242025142026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) leads at 27.0% of all 1,053 records, roughly two-and-a-half times the next subclass, C22C (alloys) at 10.9%. Heat-treatment and semiconductor-device classes (C21D, H01L) each sit near 9%, while the refrigeration and heat-exchange classes (F25B, F28D) each cover roughly 8.5% — evidence that claims are split fairly evenly across packaging, materials and thermodynamic-apparatus framings rather than concentrated in one discipline.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH05K · Printed circuits & assemblies28427.0%C22C · Alloys11510.9%C21D · Heat treatment of metals969.1%H01L · Semiconductor devices938.8%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps908.5%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus888.4%H10W807.6%F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation706.6%Other99794.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,053 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electronics thermal management: two-phase cold plate patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and citation leaders

Representative Record
US20250393166A12025-12-25

Method and apparatus for controlling two-phase cold plate liquid cooling system, and system (US20250393166A1)

SUZHOU METABRAIN INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

The filing describes active control of a two-phase cold plate loop: extracting gaseous medium from an evaporator outlet during operation, condensing it back to liquid in a condenser, and controlling a spray nozzle to redistribute the condensed medium. It is a control-and-apparatus claim on the operating cycle itself, filed by Suzhou Metabrain Intelligent Technology, rather than a claim on the cold plate's physical structure.Published 2025-12-25 — recent enough that its practical scope is still being tested against prior art.

US20250393166A1 — patent drawing 1US20250393166A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6327994B1Scavenger energy converter system its new applications and its control systems421
2US6828675B2Modular cooling system and thermal bus for high power electronics cabinets183
3US20100328889A1Cooled electronic module with pump-enhanced, dielectric fluid immersion-cooling169
4US6397618B1Cooling system with auxiliary thermal buffer unit for cooling an electronics module163
5US20170092565A1Micro Heat Transfer Arrays, Micro Cold Plates, and Thermal Management Systems for Cooling Semiconductor Devic…150
6US4833567AIntegral heat pipe module124
7US20070193303A1Scalable capacity liquefied natural gas plant121
8US6784837B2Transmit/receiver module for active phased array antenna116
9US6508301B2Cold plate utilizing fin with evaporating refrigerant112
10US20070227470A1Lightweight Portable Electric Generator with Integrated Starter/Alternator101

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; treat this table as a signal of influence on the field, not a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Four figures from this dataset that should shape where a team files next, and where it should expect to fight over prior art.

Concentration
17.0%
of 1,053 records held by top 5 assignees

The field is not owned by a handful of players

The five most active assignees together account for 17.0% of all 1,053 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach only 26.5%. That leaves the majority of the claim space held by single- or few-filing entrants, which is unusual for a thermal management niche this active and suggests genuine room to establish a defensible position rather than license around an entrenched leader.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Growth
+43%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Filing momentum is real and recent

Filings climbed from 51 in 2021 to 73 in 2024, a +43% rise over three years, after peaking at 78 in 2022. That growth tracks the same period data-centre and AI-accelerator thermal loads pushed past what single-phase cold plates could handle, and it is the most reliable trend read available since 2025-onward counts are still incomplete.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Composition
27.0%
of records classified under H05K

Packaging claims outnumber refrigeration claims

H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) covers 27.0% of the 1,053 records, more than double the next-largest subclass, C22C (alloys) at 10.9%. Refrigeration-specific classes such as F25B and F28D each sit near 8.5%, meaning most applicants are claiming the cold plate as an electronics-packaging component rather than as a standalone refrigeration apparatus.

IPC subclass distribution, 8 classes shown
Filing venue
378
US-filed records, the largest receiving office

Filing is US-centred with a strong PCT and EPO tail

The United States receives more filings than any other office at 378 records, with Europe (EPO) at 153 and WIPO/PCT filings at 97 behind it. India, China and Canada each carry meaningfully smaller counts, indicating that applicants pursuing broad protection are routing through PCT before selecting the US and Europe as primary destinations.

Receiving office distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electronics thermal management: two-phase cold plate patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or tracking a competitor.

Map claim scope against the most-cited prior art

Start from the highest-citation records in this dataset and work forward to see which later filings design around them versus which sit on the same claim territory. This is the fastest way to find out whether a planned filing is walking into dense prior art.

Explore prior art in Eureka →

Track the assignees moving fastest, not just the largest

Because concentration is low, year-over-year movement among mid-ranked assignees is often more informative than the leader's absolute count. Watching who is accelerating filings in H05K versus F25B reveals where competitive pressure is building.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka →

Stress-test white space claims before filing

Subclasses below H05K and C22C in this composition — F25J and H10W among them — carry meaningfully lower filing density and may offer room for a first-mover claim, but that needs verification against full claim text, not just IPC counts.

Run a white-space search in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about two-phase cold plate patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electronics Thermal Management: Two-Phase Cold Plate Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electronics thermal management: two-phase cold plate patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.