Book a demo

Electrospun Nanofiber Coating Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Electrospun Nanofiber Coating Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/electrospun-nanofiber-fiber-coating-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Textiles, Fibers, Pulp & Paper
Electrospun nanofiber fiber coating patents: who holds the claims and where the field is still open

A patent landscape review of electrospun nanofiber fiber coating technology: who holds the leading families, how filings have trended since 2017, which IPC subclasses concentrate the claim space, and where white space re

11
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
2017
Peak Filing Year
D01D
Lead IPC Subclass

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the electrospun nanofiber fiber coating dataset covers

This landscape draws on 11 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, matched against Cooperative and International Patent Classification codes for man-made filament spinning and textile chemical treatment (D01, D03, D04, D06M). Coverage spans multiple receiving offices, with the United States accounting for the largest single share of filings, followed by smaller counts across Australia, Europe, Canada, China and the WIPO PCT route. The scope is narrow by design: it isolates fiber coating work specific to electrospun nanofiber structures rather than nanofiber production or textile coating in general.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in the trend line is understated and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling. The picture that emerges is one of a small, technically dense field: a handful of assignees hold the majority of the ranked activity, and the classification profile shows the work sitting squarely between fiber spinning and biomedical or sterilising applications rather than spreading across general textile chemistry.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1BOARD OF RGT UNIV OF NEBRASKA10
  2. 2UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AS REP BY THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS4
  3. 3WUHAN TEXTILE UNIV1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 11-record dataset: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the records cluster into.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak followed by a decline

Filings rose to 8 records in 2017, the peak year for this dataset, then fell off toward zero by 2026. With fewer than four complete post-lag years available, no reliable growth rate can be stated — but the shape does not resemble a technology still in its filing ramp.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak followed by a decline02468820172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: spinning and biomedical classes dominate

D01D (man-made filament spinning) appears in all 11 records in scope, and A61L (sterilising and disinfecting) and A61K (medicinal preparations) each cover the large majority of records — 10 and 9 respectively. D06M (textile chemical treatment) reaches under half the records, and D06N (coated and impregnated fabrics) and D01F (chemical filament and fibre features) cover a smaller minority. Because a single record can carry several classes, these shares add to more than 100% of the 11-record total and should be read as overlap, not as a partition.

IPC composition: spinning and biomedical classes dominateD01D · Man-made filament spinning11100.0%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting1090.9%A61K · Medicinal preparations981.8%D06M · Textile chemical treatment545.5%D06N · Coated & impregnated fabrics218.2%D01F · Chemical filament & fibre feat…19.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 11 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about electrospun nanofiber fiber coating patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this dataset

Representative record
CN112522809A2021-03-19

Elastic electrically-driven thermochromic sensing fiber with a sheath-core structure

武汉纺织大学

A sheath-core structured elastic, electrically-driven thermochromic sensing fiber, produced by first pre-treating a polyurethane fiber substrate to improve surface adhesion, then ultrasonically depositing graphene exfoliated from cellulose nanocrystals in an ordered coating on that substrate to give a flexible, stretchable, conductive fiber. Polyurethane nanofibers carrying different thermochromic inks are then electrospun onto the surface of this elastic fiber to form the finished sheath-core sensing fiber, which combines mechanical durability with electro-thermal performance and force-electric synergistic enhancement of its color-change response.Filed by Wuhan Textile University, published 2021-03-19.

CN112522809A — patent drawing 1CN112522809A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20190209732A1Nanofiber Structures and Methods of Use Thereof20
2CN112522809A一种皮芯结构弹性电驱动热致变色传感纤维及其制备方法11
3WO2018064281A1Nanofiber structures and methods of use thereof9
4US11318224B2Nanofiber structures and methods of use thereof8
5US20220226537A1Nanofiber Structures and Methods of Use Thereof3

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citers within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field's early claim structure, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the assignee ranking, the filing trend and the classification overlap.

Concentration at the top
10 records
leading assignee's count

One filer dominates a thin ranked field

The assignee ranking returned by this dataset lists only three companies, and the leader holds 10 of the records tracked in that ranking. A fifth-place position is not resolved by the data, which itself tells you the tail is short rather than long.

Ranked leaders, not a top-50 or top-100 list.
Filing momentum
2017 → 0
peak year to latest year

Activity peaked in 2017 and has since tapered

Filings reached 8 records in 2017, the highest single year in the dataset, and declined toward the 2026 cut-off. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the final year or two is always undercounted, but the multi-year downward slope predates that lag window.

Fewer than four complete post-lag years, so no growth rate is stated.
Classification overlap
100% D01D
share of 11 records

Every record touches filament spinning; most also touch biomedical use

D01D covers all 11 records in scope, while A61L and A61K each cover the large majority. That overlap places most of this landscape at the intersection of spinning process claims and biomedical or sterilising application claims, rather than in general textile coating chemistry.

Class shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to electrospun nanofiber fiber coating patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated leader position and a classification profile skewed toward biomedical application. Two natural next steps follow from that.

Map the leader's claim boundaries

With one assignee holding the bulk of the ranked records, understanding exactly what its granted claims cover — and where they stop — is the fastest way to find defensible space nearby.

Explore claims in Eureka

Test under-claimed branches

D06N and D01F cover only a small minority of records despite sitting adjacent to the dominant spinning and biomedical classes. That gap is worth probing before assuming the field is fully occupied.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about electrospun nanofiber fiber coating patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Electrospun Nanofiber Fiber Coating Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole electrospun nanofiber fiber coating patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.