Book a demo

Engine Health Monitoring (IoT) Patent Snapshot 2026

Engine Health Monitoring (IoT) Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Engine Health Monitoring (IoT) Patent Snapshot in 2026

IoT-based engine health monitoring is a mature, tightly held field dominated by a small cluster of aerospace OEMs and their corporate family members, with Rolls-Royce PLC holding the largest recorded position. Activity peaked in 2017 and has since eased, leaving a concentrated but relatively static assignee snapshot.

22
Patent families in scope
92%
Top visible applicants share
0%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Rolls-Royce and RTX lead a highly concentrated field

The top five filers collectively account for 92% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined patent records, a level of concentration that signals entrenched incumbency. Rolls-Royce PLC sits at the top of the applicant ranking, followed by RTX Corp and United Technologies Corp.

The tier gap between the leader and the rest is substantial: Rolls-Royce PLC’s record count is notably higher than the next-ranked applicant, RTX Corp. Beyond the top three, volume drops quickly, with Siemens Energy Inc and Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp holding smaller but non-trivial positions.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Rolls-Royce PLC16
2RTX Corp10
3United Technologies Corporation9
4Rolls-Royce Corporation6
5Siemens Energy Inc4
6PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP2
7Raytheon Technologies Corporation1
8General Electric Company1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect long-standing aerospace engine programs rather than recent IoT-first strategies — their filings are rooted in turbine control and gas-turbine plant IP, which gives incumbents broad defensive coverage against new entrants pursuing the same core hardware.

The most recent filing years are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; conclusions about recent competitive dynamics should be treated as provisional until more applications publish. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity peaked in 2017; turbine-centric IPC classes dominate

The annual trend and technology composition charts together show a field that established its foundational claims early and has not seen a sustained second wave of activity. The IPC mix confirms that coverage is overwhelmingly concentrated in gas-turbine and rotating-machinery subclasses.

Annual filing trend

Filing volume peaked sharply in 2017 and has eased since, consistent with a maturing field. Years from roughly 2024 onward reflect publication lag and should not be read as zero activity; any new filings in that window will appear as counts rise with time.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 13 in 2017.132017520182201902020020211202212023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F01D (turbines and non-positive engines) accounts for the largest share of IPC classifications, followed by F02C (gas-turbine plants) and G01M (machine and structure testing). IoT-oriented communication and electronics subclasses such as H04L and H04Q appear at the margins, indicating that network-layer and data-transmission claims remain relatively sparse within this corpus.

Technology compositionF01D · Turbines & non-positive engines leads with 49; F02C · Gas-turbine plants 28.F01D · Turbines & non-po…49F02C · Gas-turbine plants28G01M · Testing machine &…8F04D · Non-positive-disp…7F02K · Jet & reaction pr…6F16D · Clutches & brakes5H05K · Printed circuits …5B60R · Vehicles, parts &…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20180051587A1Published 2018-02-22

Gas turbine engine health monitoring system with s…

ROLLS-ROYCE Corporation

A controller for a gas turbine engine is disclosed. The controller is configured to measure a first rotational speed of a shaft of the engine at a first end of the shaft and to measure a second rotational speed of the shaft at a second end. The first end may be coupled to a turbine of the engine and the second end may be coupled to a compressor of the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Gas turbine engine health monitoring system with s… — patent drawingGas turbine engine health monitoring system with s… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Torque sensor monitoring for gas turbine engine100
2Device and method for controlling stator vane asse…42
3Engine Health Monitoring Using Acoustic Sensors26
4Gas turbine engine health monitoring system with s…25
5Auxiliary drive bowed rotor prevention system for …25
6Gas turbine engine bowed rotor avoidance system21
7Shaft anti-rotation device20
8Determining the deterioration of a gas turbine eng…16

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Rolls-Royce PLC

Rolls-Royce PLC

Rolls-Royce PLC leads the applicant ranking with 16 patent records, concentrated in F01D 21 (turbines and non-positive engines) and F02C 7 (gas-turbine plants). Their technology emphasis spans turbine fault detection and gas-turbine plant control, consistent with their civil and defence aero-engine programs. Momentum data shows a new-entrant signal in the most recent window, which at this base likely reflects publication timing rather than a genuine strategic shift.

patent records: 16
Challenger · RTX Corp

RTX Corp

RTX Corp holds 10 patent records and its technology focus, per the applicant-level IPC data for its predecessor United Technologies Corp, centres on F01D 21 and F02C 7 — broadly the same turbine-health subclasses as the leader. RTX Corp’s recent momentum also shows a new-entrant signal at low volume, reflecting the corporate restructuring and name changes within the Raytheon/United Technologies/Pratt & Whitney family rather than a late-stage market entry.

patent records: 10
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Siemens Energy IncGeneral Electric Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.