Closed-Loop Geothermal Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
A data-backed look at closed-loop geothermal patents: 680 records, filing trends from 2017 to 2026, assignee concentration, IPC technology mix and the white space adjacent branches leave open.
Filing growth = 2021 (62 records) → 2024 (46); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 680 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
What this closed-loop geothermal patent set covers
This landscape covers 680 patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search targeting closed-loop geothermal systems specifically — sealed downhole heat exchange, rather than open-loop water extraction. Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 80 records and has since eased, though the most recent years are still filling in as publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months. The technology mix is anchored in geothermal systems classification (F24T) alongside drilling (E21B) and heat-exchange equipment classes, reflecting a field where the wellbore and the heat exchanger are the primary sites of claim activity.
Filing activity spans receiving offices led by the United States, with substantial volume also filed through the WIPO PCT track and at the European, Canadian, Australian and Indian offices — a spread consistent with a technology being commercialised across several distinct regulatory and resource geographies rather than concentrated in one jurisdiction.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
How closed-loop geothermal filings have grown and where they cluster
The filing trend and technology composition below are drawn directly from the 680 records in scope for this search, spanning receiving offices from the United States to WIPO's PCT track.
Filing activity, 2017-2026
Filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 80 in 2019, then eased; the 2021-to-2024 span shows a 26% decline (62 to 46), the most recent period reliable enough to compare given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication. 2025 and 2026 figures will continue to fill in as they publish.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
F24T (geothermal systems) covers 41.8% of the 680 records, well ahead of F03G (28.4%) and E21B drilling technology (24.9%). Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record base.
Shares are the percentage of the 680 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced geothermal systems: closed loop geothermal patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and the most-cited records in scope
Induced groundwater flow closed loop geothermal system
An induced groundwater flow closed loop geothermal system provides safety associated with closed loop geothermal systems (no mixing of surface water, closed system fluid, and groundwater) together with efficiency associated with open loop geothermal systems (increased heat transfer from groundwater flow). A heat exchanger connected to an external system sits in a hole below the groundwater level; a pump induces groundwater flow from the surrounding formation across the exchanger and back into the formation to enable thermal transfer.Filed by Woods Technologies, LLC, published 2018-06-21 as US20180172318A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20110126539A1 | Combined geothermal and solar thermal organic rankine cycle system | 141 |
| 2 | US6789608B1 | Thermally exposed, centrally insulated geothermal heat exchange unit | 139 |
| 3 | US20040031424A1 | Appratus for waste gasification | 112 |
| 4 | US20090217664A1 | Submerged Geo-Ocean Thermal Energy System | 101 |
| 5 | US20020017107A1 | Integrated system for heating, cooling and heat recovery ventilation | 100 |
| 6 | US6347527B1 | Integrated system for heating, cooling and heat recovery ventilation | 99 |
| 7 | US20130299123A1 | Geothermal System | 97 |
| 8 | US20110232858A1 | Geothermal well using graphite as solid conductor | 96 |
| 9 | US10527026B2 | Geothermal heat recovery from high-temperature, low-permeability geologic formations for power generation usi… | 94 |
| 10 | US20180224164A1 | Self-contained in-ground geothermal generator and heat exchanger with in-line pump used in several alternativ… | 93 |
Ranked by citation count within the 680-record search set; older filings tend to lead on raw citations regardless of current technical relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing data says before you commit R&D or legal spend
Four cross-cuts of the same 680-record dataset, read for what they mean for filing strategy rather than as raw counts.
The top of the field is contested, not closed
With the leading assignee at 149 records and the top 10 combined reaching 46.0% of the field, the core wellbore and cycle-integration claims are staked out by a small group. That leaves the remaining majority of records spread across a long tail — room to enter, but not through the same claim territory.
Activity cooled from its 2019 peak, not collapsed
The 2019 peak of 80 filings was unusually high; the comparable 2021-2024 window shows a real but moderate pullback. Because publication trails filing by about 18 months, 2025-2026 counts will keep rising as more families publish, so this decline should not be read as the field going cold.
Geothermal-systems claims dominate the class mix
F24T leads by a wide margin over F03G (28.4%) and E21B drilling (24.9%), meaning most contested claim space sits in system-level heat exchange rather than in drilling mechanics or downstream conversion equipment.
Older combined-cycle patents still anchor the field
The most-cited record pairs geothermal and solar-thermal organic Rankine cycle technology, filed well before the 2019 filing peak. High citation counts here reflect influence built up over time in a searched corpus, not that these designs remain the most current technical approach.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced geothermal systems: closed loop geothermal patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Geothermal Solutions LLC | XGS Energy Inc | 6 |
| Eavor Technologies Inc | TOEWS MATTHEW | 4 |
| Eavor Technologies Inc | ZATONSKI VSEVOLOD | 3 |
| Eavor Technologies Inc | SCHWARZ BAILEY | 3 |
| Eavor Technologies Inc | REDFERN JOHN | 3 |
| Eavor Technologies Inc | CAIRNS PAUL | 3 |
| PARRELLA MICHAEL J | GTHERM INC | 3 |
| PARRELLA MICHAEL J | DUBOW BRUCE H | 2 |
Cross-referencing the assignee concentration figures against the IPC composition shows the leading filers are active across F24T and E21B simultaneously, rather than each owning a separate slice — a useful check before assuming a competitor is confined to one technical route.
Where to take this analysis from here
The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is filing strategy, freedom-to-operate, or technology scouting.
Map the leading assignees' full portfolios
With the top 5 assignees holding 37.4% of the 680 records, understanding exactly which claim combinations each one owns — beyond the aggregate count — is the first step before filing adjacent to them.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaRun a freedom-to-operate check on induced-flow designs
Records combining sealed loops with active induced groundwater or forced-convection flow sit in the densest claim territory; a targeted FTO search here avoids the most contested prior art.
Start an FTO search in EurekaScout the thinner materials and controls branches
C09K materials (6.8% of records) and F24F air-conditioning integration (6.0%) show lower filing density and no dominant assignee, making them a more tractable entry point for new claims.
Scout white space in EurekaQuestions practitioners ask about closed-loop geothermal patents
Closed-loop systems circulate a working fluid through a sealed pipe or heat exchanger inside a borehole without that fluid mixing with groundwater, while open-loop systems draw groundwater directly through the surface equipment. Patent claims in the closed-loop space, which make up this 680-record dataset, tend to focus on sealed heat-exchanger geometry, borehole configuration and materials that withstand deep-well conditions. Open-loop claims more often concern water extraction, filtration and reinjection. Some records, such as US20180172318A1, blend the two by inducing groundwater flow across a sealed exchanger, which is why the boundary between the two claim types is not always sharp in practice.
The assignee ranking behind this dataset covers 100 companies, with the leading filer holding 149 of the 680 records in scope. The top 5 assignees combined account for 37.4% of all records, and the top 10 combined reach 46.0%, indicating meaningful concentration without a single company controlling the field outright. Beyond the leaders, filing count drops off quickly, leaving a long tail of entities with only a handful of filings each. This pattern is worth checking against the assignee table on this page rather than assumed, since it can shift as new families publish.
Filings peaked at 80 in 2019 and the reliable comparison window of 2021 to 2024 shows a 26% decline, from 62 down to 46 filings. This does not necessarily mean underlying R&D activity dropped by the same amount; publication lags actual filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in any filing trend are always understated until later data catches up. A cleaner read is that filing activity cooled from its 2019 peak but has not collapsed, and the 2025-2026 figures should be treated as provisional rather than a continuation of a downward trend.
F24T, covering geothermal systems generally, is the largest class at 41.8% of the 680 records, followed by F03G-classified spring and motor mechanisms at 28.4% and E21B earth and rock drilling technology at 24.9%. Downstream classes such as F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps, 15.3%) and F28D (heat-exchange apparatus, 11.5%) capture the equipment that turns extracted heat into usable output. Because a single patent record can be tagged with multiple IPC codes, these percentages overlap rather than sum to 100%, and a thorough freedom-to-operate search should span at least the top three or four classes rather than relying on F24T alone.
Enforceability depends heavily on the specific combination of elements claimed rather than the general closed-loop concept, which is too broad and long-established to be independently patentable. A record like US20180172318A1 blocks a fairly specific combination — a sealed loop plus a pump-induced groundwater sweep across the same exchanger — and would not reach purely conductive closed-loop designs or unrelated induction mechanisms such as thermosiphon effects. Anyone assessing risk should read the independent claims of the specific patents in their target class, particularly within the densely filed F24T and E21B classes, rather than assume broad blocking coverage from the concept alone.
Research Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole enhanced geothermal systems: closed loop geothermal patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.