Book a demo

Closed-Loop Geothermal Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Closed-Loop Geothermal Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/enhanced-geothermal-systems-closed-loop-geothermal-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Closed-Loop Geothermal
Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed-Loop Geothermal Patents

A data-backed look at closed-loop geothermal patents: 680 records, filing trends from 2017 to 2026, assignee concentration, IPC technology mix and the white space adjacent branches leave open.

680
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-26%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (62 records) → 2024 (46); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 680 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Landscape Overview

What this closed-loop geothermal patent set covers

This landscape covers 680 patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search targeting closed-loop geothermal systems specifically — sealed downhole heat exchange, rather than open-loop water extraction. Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 80 records and has since eased, though the most recent years are still filling in as publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months. The technology mix is anchored in geothermal systems classification (F24T) alongside drilling (E21B) and heat-exchange equipment classes, reflecting a field where the wellbore and the heat exchanger are the primary sites of claim activity.

Filing activity spans receiving offices led by the United States, with substantial volume also filed through the WIPO PCT track and at the European, Canadian, Australian and Indian offices — a spread consistent with a technology being commercialised across several distinct regulatory and resource geographies rather than concentrated in one jurisdiction.

Records by receiving office
  1. 1EAVOR TECH INC149
  2. 2GREENFIELD MASTER IPCO36
  3. 3GREENFIRE ENERGY INC30
  4. 4PARRELLA MICHAEL J24
  5. 5MCBAY DAVID ALAN15
  6. 6XGS ENERGY INC13
  7. 7PEELE GARY SCOTT12
  8. 8GEOVARME AS12
  9. 9NOVUS EARTH11
  10. 10LOCHTERRA INC11
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

How closed-loop geothermal filings have grown and where they cluster

The filing trend and technology composition below are drawn directly from the 680 records in scope for this search, spanning receiving offices from the United States to WIPO's PCT track.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 80 in 2019, then eased; the 2021-to-2024 span shows a 26% decline (62 to 46), the most recent period reliable enough to compare given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication. 2025 and 2026 figures will continue to fill in as they publish.

Filing activity, 2017-202602040608082017201880201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

F24T (geothermal systems) covers 41.8% of the 680 records, well ahead of F03G (28.4%) and E21B drilling technology (24.9%). Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record base.

Technology composition by IPC subclassF24T · Geothermal systems28441.8%F03G · Spring/weight & misc. motors19328.4%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)16924.9%F24J12718.7%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps10415.3%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus7811.5%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…466.8%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation416.0%Other46368.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 680 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced geothermal systems: closed loop geothermal patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Representative filing and the most-cited records in scope

Representative Filing
US20180172318A12018-06-21

Induced groundwater flow closed loop geothermal system

WOODS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

An induced groundwater flow closed loop geothermal system provides safety associated with closed loop geothermal systems (no mixing of surface water, closed system fluid, and groundwater) together with efficiency associated with open loop geothermal systems (increased heat transfer from groundwater flow). A heat exchanger connected to an external system sits in a hole below the groundwater level; a pump induces groundwater flow from the surrounding formation across the exchanger and back into the formation to enable thermal transfer.Filed by Woods Technologies, LLC, published 2018-06-21 as US20180172318A1.

US20180172318A1 — patent drawing 1US20180172318A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited closed-loop geothermal records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20110126539A1Combined geothermal and solar thermal organic rankine cycle system141
2US6789608B1Thermally exposed, centrally insulated geothermal heat exchange unit139
3US20040031424A1Appratus for waste gasification112
4US20090217664A1Submerged Geo-Ocean Thermal Energy System101
5US20020017107A1Integrated system for heating, cooling and heat recovery ventilation100
6US6347527B1Integrated system for heating, cooling and heat recovery ventilation99
7US20130299123A1Geothermal System97
8US20110232858A1Geothermal well using graphite as solid conductor96
9US10527026B2Geothermal heat recovery from high-temperature, low-permeability geologic formations for power generation usi…94
10US20180224164A1Self-contained in-ground geothermal generator and heat exchanger with in-line pump used in several alternativ…93

Ranked by citation count within the 680-record search set; older filings tend to lead on raw citations regardless of current technical relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the filing data says before you commit R&D or legal spend

Four cross-cuts of the same 680-record dataset, read for what they mean for filing strategy rather than as raw counts.

Concentration
37.4%
of 680 records held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is contested, not closed

With the leading assignee at 149 records and the top 10 combined reaching 46.0% of the field, the core wellbore and cycle-integration claims are staked out by a small group. That leaves the remaining majority of records spread across a long tail — room to enter, but not through the same claim territory.

Based on the 680-record assignee ranking.
Filing Trend
-26%
filings, 2021 to 2024 (62 to 46)

Activity cooled from its 2019 peak, not collapsed

The 2019 peak of 80 filings was unusually high; the comparable 2021-2024 window shows a real but moderate pullback. Because publication trails filing by about 18 months, 2025-2026 counts will keep rising as more families publish, so this decline should not be read as the field going cold.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Technology Mix
41.8%
of 680 records classified under F24T

Geothermal-systems claims dominate the class mix

F24T leads by a wide margin over F03G (28.4%) and E21B drilling (24.9%), meaning most contested claim space sits in system-level heat exchange rather than in drilling mechanics or downstream conversion equipment.

Classes overlap; a record can carry more than one IPC code.
Citation Signal
141 citations
on the most-cited record in this set

Older combined-cycle patents still anchor the field

The most-cited record pairs geothermal and solar-thermal organic Rankine cycle technology, filed well before the 2019 filing peak. High citation counts here reflect influence built up over time in a searched corpus, not that these designs remain the most current technical approach.

Citation counts favour older filings within the searched set.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced geothermal systems: closed loop geothermal patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Reading concentration alongside technology mix
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Geothermal Solutions LLCXGS Energy Inc6
Eavor Technologies IncTOEWS MATTHEW4
Eavor Technologies IncZATONSKI VSEVOLOD3
Eavor Technologies IncSCHWARZ BAILEY3
Eavor Technologies IncREDFERN JOHN3
Eavor Technologies IncCAIRNS PAUL3
PARRELLA MICHAEL JGTHERM INC3
PARRELLA MICHAEL JDUBOW BRUCE H2

Cross-referencing the assignee concentration figures against the IPC composition shows the leading filers are active across F24T and E21B simultaneously, rather than each owning a separate slice — a useful check before assuming a competitor is confined to one technical route.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis from here

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is filing strategy, freedom-to-operate, or technology scouting.

Map the leading assignees' full portfolios

With the top 5 assignees holding 37.4% of the 680 records, understanding exactly which claim combinations each one owns — beyond the aggregate count — is the first step before filing adjacent to them.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Run a freedom-to-operate check on induced-flow designs

Records combining sealed loops with active induced groundwater or forced-convection flow sit in the densest claim territory; a targeted FTO search here avoids the most contested prior art.

Start an FTO search in Eureka

Scout the thinner materials and controls branches

C09K materials (6.8% of records) and F24F air-conditioning integration (6.0%) show lower filing density and no dominant assignee, making them a more tractable entry point for new claims.

Scout white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked

Questions practitioners ask about closed-loop geothermal patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Closed Loop Geothermal Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole enhanced geothermal systems: closed loop geothermal patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.