Book a demo

Enhanced Oil Recovery Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Enhanced Oil Recovery Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/enhanced-oil-recovery-enhanced-oil-recovery-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oil, Gas & Subsurface
Enhanced oil recovery patents: who holds the ground in CO2, chemical and thermal EOR
  • Filings peaked in 2019 at 99 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 35 — a mature field being consolidated rather than expanded.
  • Earth & rock drilling (E21B) and EOR materials (C09K) dominate the IPC mix, while digital-monitoring and solar-thermal subclasses stay in the double digits, marking them as peripheral rather than core.
  • The strongest co-filing pair sits inside one corporate family, at 20 shared filings, well ahead of the next closest pairing — a sign of tightly held internal collaboration rather than open industry partnership.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,156
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (32 records) with 2024 (32) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,156 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A field with occupied core claims and a shrinking filing rate

Enhanced oil recovery patenting covers three broad technical routes — thermal methods such as steam and cyclic injection, chemical methods including polymer and surfactant flooding, and gas-based methods such as CO2 flooding. Across 1,156 patent families filed since 2015, the claim space concentrates heavily in well-construction mechanics (E21B) and recovery-fluid formulations (C09K), with thermal-equipment and polymer-chemistry subclasses forming a secondary tier.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2019, and has trended down since — the 2022 midpoint of 35 filings sits well below peak, and the most recent year is necessarily undercounted because publication lags filing by around 18 months. Read the decline as a market that has already staked its core positions, not as one that has lost commercial relevance.

Filing trend, 2017–2026 (most recent year partial)
  1. 1CHEVRON USA INC86
  2. 2SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO68
  3. 3SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV59
  4. 4SHELL OIL CO47
  5. 5GLASSPOINT SOLAR INC37
  6. 6BASF SE36
  7. 7BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST31
  8. 8CONOCOPHILLIPS CO28
  9. 9KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS24
  10. 10DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC23
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,156-family dataset: filings by year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

A peak-and-decline curve, not a plateau

Filings ran from 76 in 2017 to a peak of 99 in 2019, then fell toward a 2022 midpoint of 35. The final year in the chart is partial by construction — treat any apparent cliff at the right edge as a reporting artefact, not a market signal.

A peak-and-decline curve, not a plateau0255075100762017201899201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Two subclasses carry most of the claim weight

E21B (well drilling and construction) appears in 975 records and C09K (recovery-fluid materials) in 696 — between them they cover the bulk of the corpus. Polymer chemistry (C08F), thermal equipment (F22B, F01K) and monitoring/digital subclasses (G06F) each stay under 110, marking them as supporting rather than primary claim territory.

Two subclasses carry most of the claim weightE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)97584.3%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…69660.2%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)1028.8%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds464.0%F22B · Steam generation & boilers464.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…272.3%F24S · Solar heat collectors262.2%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants242.1%Other37032.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,156 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced oil recovery enhanced oil recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this corpus

Representative filing
US20090288826A12009-11-26

US20090288826A1 — Enzyme enhanced oil recovery (EEOR) for cyclic steam injection

GRAY, JOHN L.

The present disclosure relates to the release or recovery of subterranean hydrocarbon deposits and, more specifically, to a system for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), by utilizing stabilized enzymatic fluid and cyclic injection of steam or heated fluid into subterranean formations.Filed by GRAY, JOHN L. — an example of a chemical-thermal hybrid claim combining enzymatic fluid treatment with cyclic steam injection, rather than either mechanism alone.

US20090288826A1 — patent drawing 1US20090288826A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4694907AThermally-enhanced oil recovery method and apparatus464
2US5082055AGas fired radiant tube heater364
3US5020596AEnhanced oil recovery system with a radiant tube heater300
4US5103909AProfile control in enhanced oil recovery225
5US4199025AMethod and apparatus for tertiary recovery of oil223
6US4762543ACarbon dioxide recovery213
7WO2001081723A1Enhanced oil recovery by in SITU gasification202
8US6805194B2Gas and oil production161
9US20100282467A1Sulfonated internal olefin surfactant for enhanced oil recovery149
10WO2007068682A1Enhanced oil recovery process and a process for the sequestration of carbon dioxide142

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — read this table as a map of influential prior art, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells a competitive-intelligence read

Three signals worth acting on before you plan a filing or a design-around in this space.

Filing trajectory
99 → 35
peak (2019) vs. 2022 midpoint

The core is already staked

A peak-then-decline curve, with the 2022 midpoint less than half the 2019 peak, indicates the dominant assignees filed their foundational claims early in the window and have since slowed rather than accelerated. New entrants face dense prior art on the mechanics that matter most.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Technology mix
975 vs. 696
E21B records vs. C09K records

Mechanics and materials, not digital

Well-construction claims (E21B) and recovery-fluid formulations (C09K) dwarf the digital-monitoring subclass (G06F, 27 records). Software-defined EOR optimisation is patented far less densely than the physical methods it monitors.

IPC subclass distribution
Collaboration pattern
20 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Collaboration stays inside the corporate family

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest is two entities within a single corporate group. Cross-company joint filing is rare here, which limits how much freedom-to-operate insight comes from studying alliances.

Co-assignee pairs
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several historically active assignees

Recent-year momentum has gone quiet across the board

Several of the historically most active filers show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with year-on-year drops as steep as -100%. Combined with publication lag, this likely overstates the slowdown — but it still confirms no single assignee is currently accelerating.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced oil recovery enhanced oil recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the chips are still open

Filing activity concentrates among a handful of major oil-services and chemical groups, with a long tail of single-filing entrants behind them.

Concentration
1,156 families
across the full ranking

A recognisable core group, then a long tail

The assignee ranking is led by major integrated oil, oilfield-services and specialty-chemical groups, several of which appear together as co-assignees within their own corporate structures. Behind them sits a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants typical of a mature extraction technology.

Assignee ranking
Internal collaboration
20 filings
top co-assignee pair

Joint filings cluster inside single corporate groups

The strongest co-assignee relationship links two entities under one shell/oil major's corporate umbrella; the next strongest pairs a national oil company with its own services arm, and a university with an industrial chemicals partner. Cross-competitor joint filing is essentially absent.

Co-assignee pairs
Momentum
-100% YoY
for multiple former leaders

No current filer is visibly accelerating

Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active assignees, including large integrated majors, at zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this is partly an artefact of timing, but it means recent competitive signal should be read cautiously rather than taken at face value.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These sit adjacent to the dense core claim territory but show comparatively thin filing density.
Digital EOR reservoir optimisation (G06F-adjacent)Solar-thermal steam generation for EOR (F24S-adjacent)Enzymatic or biocatalytic flooding agentsHybrid chemical-thermal cyclic injectionLow-carbon CO2-flooding process controls
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.0-100%
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)0-100%
Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V.0
Shell Oil Company0
BASF SE0
GlassPoint Solar, Inc.0
Ecolab USA Inc.0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

Use the landscape as a starting point for a narrower, decision-ready search.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on a specific mechanism

The dense citation cluster around thermal-equipment patents suggests any new steam or cyclic-injection filing should be checked against the highest-cited records in this corpus before drafting claims.

Explore in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches to your own R&D pipeline

Digital reservoir optimisation and solar-thermal steam generation both show thin filing density relative to the core mechanics — worth a deeper look if your work touches either.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about EOR patenting

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole enhanced oil recovery enhanced oil recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.