Enhanced Oil Recovery Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Filings peaked in 2019 at 99 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 35 — a mature field being consolidated rather than expanded.
- Earth & rock drilling (E21B) and EOR materials (C09K) dominate the IPC mix, while digital-monitoring and solar-thermal subclasses stay in the double digits, marking them as peripheral rather than core.
- The strongest co-filing pair sits inside one corporate family, at 20 shared filings, well ahead of the next closest pairing — a sign of tightly held internal collaboration rather than open industry partnership.
Filing growth compares 2021 (32 records) with 2024 (32) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,156 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
A field with occupied core claims and a shrinking filing rate
Enhanced oil recovery patenting covers three broad technical routes — thermal methods such as steam and cyclic injection, chemical methods including polymer and surfactant flooding, and gas-based methods such as CO2 flooding. Across 1,156 patent families filed since 2015, the claim space concentrates heavily in well-construction mechanics (E21B) and recovery-fluid formulations (C09K), with thermal-equipment and polymer-chemistry subclasses forming a secondary tier.
Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2019, and has trended down since — the 2022 midpoint of 35 filings sits well below peak, and the most recent year is necessarily undercounted because publication lags filing by around 18 months. Read the decline as a market that has already staked its core positions, not as one that has lost commercial relevance.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,156-family dataset: filings by year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.
A peak-and-decline curve, not a plateau
Filings ran from 76 in 2017 to a peak of 99 in 2019, then fell toward a 2022 midpoint of 35. The final year in the chart is partial by construction — treat any apparent cliff at the right edge as a reporting artefact, not a market signal.
Two subclasses carry most of the claim weight
E21B (well drilling and construction) appears in 975 records and C09K (recovery-fluid materials) in 696 — between them they cover the bulk of the corpus. Polymer chemistry (C08F), thermal equipment (F22B, F01K) and monitoring/digital subclasses (G06F) each stay under 110, marking them as supporting rather than primary claim territory.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,156 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced oil recovery enhanced oil recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this corpus
US20090288826A1 — Enzyme enhanced oil recovery (EEOR) for cyclic steam injection
The present disclosure relates to the release or recovery of subterranean hydrocarbon deposits and, more specifically, to a system for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), by utilizing stabilized enzymatic fluid and cyclic injection of steam or heated fluid into subterranean formations.Filed by GRAY, JOHN L. — an example of a chemical-thermal hybrid claim combining enzymatic fluid treatment with cyclic steam injection, rather than either mechanism alone.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4694907A | Thermally-enhanced oil recovery method and apparatus | 464 |
| 2 | US5082055A | Gas fired radiant tube heater | 364 |
| 3 | US5020596A | Enhanced oil recovery system with a radiant tube heater | 300 |
| 4 | US5103909A | Profile control in enhanced oil recovery | 225 |
| 5 | US4199025A | Method and apparatus for tertiary recovery of oil | 223 |
| 6 | US4762543A | Carbon dioxide recovery | 213 |
| 7 | WO2001081723A1 | Enhanced oil recovery by in SITU gasification | 202 |
| 8 | US6805194B2 | Gas and oil production | 161 |
| 9 | US20100282467A1 | Sulfonated internal olefin surfactant for enhanced oil recovery | 149 |
| 10 | WO2007068682A1 | Enhanced oil recovery process and a process for the sequestration of carbon dioxide | 142 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — read this table as a map of influential prior art, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern tells a competitive-intelligence read
Three signals worth acting on before you plan a filing or a design-around in this space.
The core is already staked
A peak-then-decline curve, with the 2022 midpoint less than half the 2019 peak, indicates the dominant assignees filed their foundational claims early in the window and have since slowed rather than accelerated. New entrants face dense prior art on the mechanics that matter most.
Mechanics and materials, not digital
Well-construction claims (E21B) and recovery-fluid formulations (C09K) dwarf the digital-monitoring subclass (G06F, 27 records). Software-defined EOR optimisation is patented far less densely than the physical methods it monitors.
Collaboration stays inside the corporate family
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest is two entities within a single corporate group. Cross-company joint filing is rare here, which limits how much freedom-to-operate insight comes from studying alliances.
Recent-year momentum has gone quiet across the board
Several of the historically most active filers show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with year-on-year drops as steep as -100%. Combined with publication lag, this likely overstates the slowdown — but it still confirms no single assignee is currently accelerating.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced oil recovery enhanced oil recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where the chips are still open
Filing activity concentrates among a handful of major oil-services and chemical groups, with a long tail of single-filing entrants behind them.
A recognisable core group, then a long tail
The assignee ranking is led by major integrated oil, oilfield-services and specialty-chemical groups, several of which appear together as co-assignees within their own corporate structures. Behind them sits a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants typical of a mature extraction technology.
Joint filings cluster inside single corporate groups
The strongest co-assignee relationship links two entities under one shell/oil major's corporate umbrella; the next strongest pairs a national oil company with its own services arm, and a university with an industrial chemicals partner. Cross-competitor joint filing is essentially absent.
No current filer is visibly accelerating
Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active assignees, including large integrated majors, at zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this is partly an artefact of timing, but it means recent competitive signal should be read cautiously rather than taken at face value.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | 0 | -100% |
| Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V. | 0 | — |
| Shell Oil Company | 0 | — |
| BASF SE | 0 | — |
| GlassPoint Solar, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Ecolab USA Inc. | 0 | — |
| Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | 0 | — |
Where to take this
Use the landscape as a starting point for a narrower, decision-ready search.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on a specific mechanism
The dense citation cluster around thermal-equipment patents suggests any new steam or cyclic-injection filing should be checked against the highest-cited records in this corpus before drafting claims.
Explore in EurekaMap the under-claimed branches to your own R&D pipeline
Digital reservoir optimisation and solar-thermal steam generation both show thin filing density relative to the core mechanics — worth a deeper look if your work touches either.
Explore in EurekaCommon questions about EOR patenting
The patent literature splits into three broad routes: thermal methods such as steam and cyclic injection, chemical methods such as polymer and surfactant flooding, and gas-based methods such as CO2 flooding. In this corpus, well-construction mechanics (IPC class E21B) and recovery-fluid material formulations (C09K) account for the largest share of filings, meaning most patented value sits in how fluids and equipment are engineered rather than in monitoring software. Thermal equipment and polymer chemistry form a smaller but still significant secondary layer.
Filings peaked at 99 in 2019 and fell toward a 2022 midpoint of 35, a pattern consistent with a field where the dominant players staked their core claims early and then slowed rather than continuing to expand. It does not necessarily mean interest in EOR is fading commercially — patent activity and commercial deployment do not move in lockstep. Any apparent drop in the very latest year should also be discounted, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
The ranking is led by a recognisable set of major integrated oil companies, oilfield-services firms and specialty-chemical groups, several of which co-file with their own affiliated entities rather than with outside partners. Behind this core sits a long tail of assignees with only one or a few filings each, which is typical of a mature extraction technology rather than an emerging one. Recent-year filing counts for several of these historically active assignees have dropped to zero, though publication lag makes the most recent year an unreliable basis for judging current strategy.
The clearest under-claimed territory sits adjacent to the dense core: digital reservoir-optimisation methods, solar-thermal steam generation for injection processes, enzymatic or biocatalytic flooding agents, and hybrid chemical-thermal cyclic injection schemes all show comparatively thin filing density against the core E21B and C09K claim territory. That thinness reflects lower filing density, not lower technical merit or lower commercial relevance — it means less prior art stands in the way of a well-drafted first claim in these areas.
US20090288826A1 combines stabilized enzymatic fluid treatment with cyclic steam or heated-fluid injection into subterranean formations, which means new filings claiming enzyme-assisted thermal recovery need to design specifically around that combination rather than around either enzymatic treatment or cyclic steam injection alone. Because it merges a chemical mechanism with a thermal one, it sits at the intersection of two of the corpus's core technology classes. Anyone drafting claims in enzymatic or biocatalytic EOR should review this filing's claim scope before finalising language on the injection-cycle mechanism.
Research Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole enhanced oil recovery enhanced oil recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.