Book a demo

Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering Patent Landscape 2026

Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering Patent Landscape 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/enhanced-oil-recovery-interface-engineering-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oil, Gas & Subsurface
Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering Patent Landscape 2026
  • Filing has cooled sharply since its 2019 peak of 69, with the 2022 midpoint down to 12 — a decline that predates the usual 18-month publication lag.
  • C09K materials claims outnumber E21B process claims nearly 1.6 to 1, showing the field is contested mainly at the chemistry, not the wellbore mechanics.
  • Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 509 families, and the strongest link — Texas system with BASF at 18 — is still a small fraction of total filings.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
509
Published Records
65%
Top-5 Share of Top-100 Filers
-40%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families combining enhanced oil recovery or tertiary recovery language with interface-specific mechanisms — interfacial tension reduction, wettability alteration, surfactant-oil interface effects and emulsification — restricted to the core IPC classes for EOR surfactant and polymer compositions and well treatment. It is a narrower cut than general EOR patenting: it isolates the chemistry and mechanism claims that determine whether a formulation actually moves oil at the pore scale, rather than the drilling or injection hardware around it.

509 families published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off give a filing curve that peaked in 2019 and has since fallen back toward its starting level, a pattern worth reading against where the receiving offices and citation weight sit.

Filing trend and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Trican Well Service IP, LLC48
  2. 2Board of Regents, The University of Texas System43
  3. 3BASF SE38
  4. 4Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)28
  5. 5SPCM SA27
  6. 6Stepan Company24
  7. 7Ecolab USA Inc.21
  8. 8ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company20
  9. 9King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals17
  10. 10Trican Solutions IPCO, LLC15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 509 families: when they were filed, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A peak in 2019, then a steady decline

Filings rose from 17 in 2017 to a peak of 69 in 2019, then fell through the midpoint of 12 in 2022 toward negligible counts by the most recent year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but the multi-year slide predates that lag and reflects a genuine slowdown in new filing activity, not a reporting gap.

A peak in 2019, then a steady decline020406080172017201869201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C09K materials dominate over E21B process claims

C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications) appears in 470 of 509 records and E21B (well drilling and treatment) in 296, meaning most families claim the chemistry — surfactant, polymer or emulsifier formulations — rather than the mechanical well process. Supporting subclasses (C07C, C08F, C11D, B01F, C08J, C08L) point to a formulation-heavy field built on polymer and surfactant chemistry rather than downhole tooling.

C09K materials dominate over E21B process claimsC09K · Materials for misc. applications47042.7%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)29626.9%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds423.8%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)413.7%C11D · Detergents & cleaning compositio…353.2%B01F · Mixing & stirring272.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions181.6%C08L · Polymer compositions171.5%Other15414.0%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced oil recovery interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US20220157406A12022-05-19

Methods and apparatus for enhanced oil recovery (US20220157406A1, University of Wyoming)

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING

Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to methods and apparatus for enhanced oil recovery. In an embodiment, a method of enhanced oil recovery from a reservoir is provided. The method includes determining a three-dimensional molecular association between simulated oil and a simulated surface using molecular dynamics, and selecting a reservoir additive from a plurality of additives. The method further includes introducing the reservoir additive to the reservoir, and recovering oil from the reservoir using the reservoir additive.Filed by a university rather than an operator or majors — a reminder that some of the more mechanistically detailed filings in this space originate outside the incumbent assignee cluster.

US20220157406A1 — patent drawing 1US20220157406A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4432881AWater-dispersible hydrophobic thickening agent334
2US4814096AEnhanced oil recovery process using a hydrophobic associative composition containing a hydrophilic/hydrophobi…189
3US20100282467A1Sulfonated internal olefin surfactant for enhanced oil recovery149
4US8211837B2Method of manufacture and use of large hydrophobe ether sulfate surfactants in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) ap…139
5WO2011003606A1Method of enhanced oil recovery from geological reservoirs110
6US4447342AMethod of clay stabilization in enhanced oil recovery108
7US4528106AGlucoside surfactants103
8US20100300682A1Computer-implemented systems and methods for screening and predicting the performance of enhanced oil recover…97
9US20110281779A1Novel Anionic Polyalkoxy Group Comprising Surfactants on Basis of Guerbet-Alcohols, Method of Manufacture and…81
10US20110071057A1Method of manufacture and use of large hydrophobe ether sulfate surfactants in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) ap…77

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this as a map of foundational influence, not of which claims are currently most valuable.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Read together, the trend, the IPC split and the citation table describe a field where the foundational chemistry is already staked out and new activity is thinning.

Filing Trend
69 → ~0
peak (2019) to latest year

Growth has already turned

The rise-and-fall shape from 17 in 2017 to 69 in 2019 and back down to 12 by 2022 is not a data artefact of the publication lag — it is a multi-year decline. New entrants are filing into a space where the volume of fresh art has been shrinking for several years.

Source: filing trend, 2017–2026
Claim Weight
470 vs 296
C09K vs E21B records

Chemistry, not hardware, is the crowded layer

Materials claims (C09K) outnumber well-process claims (E21B) by a wide margin, with acyclic compounds, polymers and detergent chemistry (C07C, C08F, C11D) filling out the supporting classes. A formulation filed today competes against a deep, IPC-diverse chemistry base more than against downhole method art.

Source: IPC composition table
Citation Concentration
334 citations
top-cited record, US4432881A

Foundational art is decades old

The most-cited record in the set is a hydrophobic thickening agent patent, followed by hydrophobic associative polymer and sulfonated surfactant filings. These older records anchor the citation graph; current filers are building around, not past, this foundational layer.

Source: most-cited records table
Jurisdiction Spread
213 US filings
of 509 total, by receiving office

Filing is US-centred with a real international tail

The United States leads with 213 filings, but Canada (62), Europe (60), the WIPO PCT route (56), India (37) and Australia (23) show this is not a US-only claim space. A freedom-to-operate check confined to the US misses a meaningful share of the family.

Source: receiving office breakdown
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced oil recovery interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-assignee activity is thin
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Board of Regents, The University of Texas SystemBASF SE18
Board of Regents, The University of Texas SystemHarcros Chemicals Inc.10
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)Aramco Services Company6
SPCM SAPOWELTEC6
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals4
Ecolab USA Inc.CHAMPIONX USA INC4
Trican Well Service IP, LLCTrican Solutions IPCO, LLC3
Board of Regents, The University of Texas SystemWEERASOORIYA UPALI P3

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 509 families; the strongest, Texas system with BASF, reaches 18 shared filings — a signal that most work here is filed solo rather than through formal co-development.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it is thin

Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees is flat: every name in the momentum list shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the corpus-wide decline rather than any one company stepping back.

Academic-Industry Link
18 shared families
Texas system + BASF

The strongest collaboration is still small

得克萨斯大学体系董事会 (University of Texas System) pairs with 巴斯福股份公司 (BASF) on 18 families and separately with 哈克罗斯化学股份有限公司 (Harcros Chemicals) on 10 — the two largest co-assignee links in the dataset, though both are a small slice of 509 total families.

Source: co-assignee pairs
National Oil Company Pairing
6 shared families
Saudi Aramco + Aramco Services

Corporate-affiliate filing is common but modest in scale

沙特阿拉伯石油公司 (Saudi Aramco) and 沙特阿美服务公司 (Aramco Services Company) co-file 6 families together, and Saudi Aramco's momentum shows a -100% year-on-year drop to zero in the latest year, mirroring the sector-wide slowdown.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Momentum
0 in latest year
across all tracked assignees

No assignee is currently accelerating

Every named assignee in the momentum list — from 轨迹石油IP有限责任公司 (Trican Well Service IP) to 斯特潘公司 (Stepan Company) — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the publication lag, this understates true current activity, but it confirms none of the historically active filers is visibly ramping up.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively thin direct claim coverage relative to the core surfactant and polymer classes above
Nanoparticle-stabilised Pickering emulsions for EORLow-salinity wettability-alteration synergistsMolecular-dynamics-guided additive selectionThermally stable associative polymer-surfactant blendsBio-based emulsifier interface modifiers
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Trican Well Service IP, LLC0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
BASF SE0
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)0-100%
SPCM SA0
Stepan Company0
Ecolab USA Inc.0
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this landscape

The trend and claim map above are a starting point for freedom-to-operate and white-space work, not a substitute for a claim-by-claim review of the families that matter to a specific formulation.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the foundational patents

Start with the most-cited records — the hydrophobic thickening agent and associative polymer filings anchor the citation graph — and work outward to see which of their claims still constrain a new surfactant or polymer system.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Map the under-claimed sub-areas against your own formulation route

Nanoparticle-stabilised emulsions and molecular-dynamics-guided additive selection show thinner direct claim coverage than the core surfactant classes — worth a dedicated search before committing R&D spend.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Track whether the 2019 peak repeats as filings catch up

Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent decline since 2022 needs revisiting once the most recent filing years fully populate.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Enhanced Oil Recovery Interface Engineering in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole enhanced oil recovery interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.