Book a demo

EOR Well Completion Patents: Who Leads, Trends & Gaps 2026

EOR Well Completion Patents: Who Leads, Trends & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/enhanced-oil-recovery-well-completion-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oil, Gas & Subsurface
Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion Patents

A data-backed look at enhanced oil recovery well completion patents: filing trends since 2015, the assignees holding claim density, and where completion sub-areas remain under-claimed.

173
Published Records
43%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (1 records) → 2024 (2); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 173 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape covers 173 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine enhanced oil recovery terminology (EOR, tertiary recovery) with well completion mechanics — sand control, smart completion, zonal isolation — under drilling and hydrocarbon-treatment classifications E21B43 and E21B33. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is the intersection of how a well is finished and how oil is coaxed out of a depleted reservoir, not EOR chemistry or completion hardware in isolation.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend line will read lower than actual filing activity once those applications clear the pipeline. Read the most recent year as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST29
  2. 2CONOCOPHILLIPS CO13
  3. 3CHEVRON USA INC13
  4. 4LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP11
  5. 5EOR TECH APS8
  6. 6RESOURCE INNOVATIONS8
  7. 7SERVICES PETROLIERS SCHLUMBERGER SA7
  8. 8WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC7
  9. 9POPE GARY A6
  10. 10UNION OIL CO OF CALIFORNIA6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 173 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings ran from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2022, then trail off toward 0 in the partial, most recent year. A midpoint sitting at the peak is a signature of a technology that filled its claim space some years ago rather than one still accelerating.

A flat-to-declining filing curve023563201720182019202020216202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

E21B carries the volume, C09K carries the chemistry

E21B (earth and rock drilling) appears in 164 of 173 families, essentially the whole set, confirming this is a completion-mechanics-first landscape. C09K's presence in 60 families shows that a majority of that mechanics work is paired with a materials or surfactant claim, while smaller counts in C08B, C08L, C08G point to polymer and polysaccharide additive chemistry as a persistent secondary theme, and G06F/G06N counts of 7 and 4 mark a small but real digital-completion and AI-assisted subset.

E21B carries the volume, C09K carries the chemistryE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)16494.8%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…6034.7%G06F · Electric digital data processi…74.0%C08B · Polysaccharides & derivatives63.5%C08L · Polymer compositions63.5%B01F · Mixing & stirring42.3%C08G · Condensation polymers42.3%G06N · Computing based on AI models42.3%Other2615.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 173 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced oil recovery well completion and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US9296942B22016-03-29

US9296942B2 — Anionic polyalkoxy surfactants on a Guerbet-alcohol basis for EOR

BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

Compositions and synthesis methods for anionic surfactants made by alkoxylating a Guerbet alcohol (12–36 carbons) with butylene oxide, optionally propylene and/or ethylene oxide, followed by a terminal anionic group. The Guerbet alcohol itself is produced by base-catalysed dimerisation of shorter-chain alcohols. The resulting large-hydrophobe ether surfactants are claimed for oil solubilisation and mobilisation in EOR and for environmental cleanup.Filed by the Board of Regents, University of Texas System — issued 2016-03-29.

US9296942B2 — patent drawing 1US9296942B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090029879A1Process for enhanced oil recovery using a microbial consortium79
2US20110048721A1Di-functional surfactants for enhanced oil recovery69
3US5110487AEnhanced oil recovery method using surfactant compositions for improved oil mobility66
4US4678039AMethod and apparatus for secondary and tertiary recovery of hydrocarbons60
5US5244042ALanthanide-crosslinked polymers for subterranean injection50
6US20100181069A1Apparatus and method for downhole steam generation and enhanced oil recovery45
7US5291949AMethod for inhibiting caustic flood breakthrough34
8US20140096967A1Salt-tolerant anionic surfactant compositions for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications30
9US20160063150A1Enhanced oil recovery using digital core sample27
10US8188012B2Process of using hard brine at high alkalinity for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications27

Citation counts inside a searched corpus skew toward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three read-throughs from the composition and trend data that matter more than the headline family count.

Filing momentum
6 in 2022, trending to 0
peak year vs. most recent partial year

The space filled early, then went quiet

A midpoint year matching the peak year is a flat-or-declining signature, not a growth curve. Combined with the ~18-month publication lag, the honest read is that new filing has slowed from its 2022 high rather than continuing to build.

Trend basis: 2017–2026 annual counts
Jurisdiction spread
US 61, Canada 34, PCT 28
leading receiving offices

US and Canada dominate the filing venue mix

The United States and Canada together account for the largest share of receiving offices, consistent with EOR's concentration in North American unconventional and heavy-oil plays. The PCT count of 28 signals a meaningful share of filers still pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than domestic-only coverage.

Basis: receiving office counts across 173 families
Chemistry overlap
60 of 173 families tag C09K
materials-class overlap with E21B

Completion claims routinely bundle a materials claim

More than a third of families pair core drilling/completion classification with a materials-for-miscellaneous-applications tag, meaning a freedom-to-operate check on completion mechanics alone is incomplete without a parallel surfactant or polymer chemistry search.

Basis: IPC subclass co-occurrence
Collaboration pattern
Strongest co-filing pair: 6 shared families
University of Texas System + individual inventor / BASF

University-anchored, industry-licensed development

The strongest co-assignee pairs both centre on the University of Texas System, paired once with an individual inventor and once with BASF at comparable strength. That pattern is more typical of academic licensing pipelines than of closed corporate R&D, and it marks a route into this space via partnership rather than solo filing.

Basis: 10 recorded co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced oil recovery well completion, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Derived observations on the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a specific set of next questions for anyone deciding whether to file, license, or design around.

Run a freedom-to-operate check across both classes

Because more than a third of families pair E21B completion claims with C09K materials claims, a search limited to drilling mechanics alone will miss the surfactant and polymer chemistry that often rides alongside it.

Explore the full claim set in Eureka

Watch the university-licensing route

The strongest co-assignee relationships in this dataset run through a university research office rather than a single corporate lab, suggesting partnership or licensing may be a faster path in than solo filing against an occupied space.

Trace assignee relationships in Eureka

Revisit the under-claimed digital-completion branch

G06F and G06N counts are small but present, and they sit at the edge of a chemistry- and mechanics-heavy field — a narrower, technically specific claim there faces less prior art than a conventional completion claim.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Enhanced Oil Recovery Well Completion in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole enhanced oil recovery well completion corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.