Book a demo

Enhanced Weathering Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Enhanced Weathering Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/enhanced-weathering-and-mineral-carbonation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Environmental & Water Treatment
Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation Patents: Who Holds the Claims
  • 35 filings in the 2022 peak year against just 83 total families since 2017 — this is a young, thinly filed field, not a mature one.
  • University assignees dominate the strongest co-filing pairs Columbia University's team ties appear repeatedly with individual named inventors, a pattern more typical of research programmes than corporate portfolios.
  • B01D separation processes cover 75 of 83 records while cement-integration claims under C04B sit at just 6, marking the clearest gap between air/water capture and built-environment application.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
83
Published Records
76%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-33%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the patent record shows about enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation

Enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation cover methods that accelerate the natural reaction between CO2 and alkaline minerals to lock carbon into stable solid or dissolved form. The patent record for this search spans 2017 to 2026 and totals 83 families, concentrated heavily in separation-process claims (IPC B01D) rather than in cement or construction integration. Filing activity rose steadily to a peak in 2022 before flattening, a pattern consistent with a field still defining its dominant technical routes rather than one converging on a settled design.

Filing offices skew toward the United States, Europe and the PCT route, with meaningful activity in Australia, India and Canada — a spread that suggests applicants are hedging jurisdiction rather than committing to one home market. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent slowdown after 2022 is likely overstated; the true 2024-2026 filing level will not be visible in this dataset for some time yet.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA26
  2. 2YALE UNIVERSITY14
  3. 3THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIV IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK9
  4. 4NEUMANN SYSTEMS GROUP INC8
  5. 5CARBONRUN CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL LTD6
  6. 6THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA5
  7. 7THE UNIV OF BRITISH COLUMBIA5
  8. 8DIPPLE GREG3
  9. 9CARBONBUILT3
  10. 10MCQUEEN NOAH3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The numbers below come directly from the underlying corpus of 83 published families matching the search criteria, broken out by filing year and by IPC subclass.

A flat trajectory after a 2022 peak

Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 35 in 2022, then eased off. Read the final one to two years as incomplete rather than declining, since publication lag hides recent filings.

A flat trajectory after a 2022 peak01020304012017201820192020202135202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation processes dominate the classification mix

B01D (separation processes) appears in 75 of 83 records, far ahead of C02F water treatment (30) and C01B inorganic compounds (17). Cement-specific carbonation under C04B and hydraulic engineering under E02B each register only 6, marking the thinnest-claimed adjacent branches.

Separation processes dominate the classification mixB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…7590.4%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment3036.1%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1720.5%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…1416.9%C01F · Alkaline-earth, Al & rare-eart…1214.5%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories67.2%C25C · Electrolytic metal production67.2%E02B · Hydraulic & waterway engineeri…67.2%Other3036.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 83 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records and a recent representative filing

Representative Recent Filing
US20260084104A12026-03-26

US20260084104A1 — Systems and methods for carbon sequestration using enhanced weathering (Yale University, filed 2026-03-26)

YALE UNIVERSITY

The disclosure covers enhanced weathering systems and apparatuses for at least partially sequestering CO2 from an influent aqueous solution containing aqueous and/or gaseous CO2, and separately from a gaseous CO2 source, including methods of optimizing the design and operation of such a system.Abstract condensed from the original filing for length.

US20260084104A1 — patent drawing 1US20260084104A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2020263910A1Systems and methods for enhanced weathering and calcining for c02 removal from air19
2WO2022187336A1Systems and methods for enhanced weathering and calcining for co 2 removal from air17
3CN106904647A一种CO<sub>2</sub>矿化与海水资源利用耦合的方法13
4US8864876B2Indirect and direct method of sequestering contaminates12
5US20220040639A1Alkaline cation enrichment and water electrolysis to provide co2 mineralization and global-scale carbon manag…11
6US20220347650A1Systems and methods for enhanced weathering and calcining for co2 removal from air10
7WO2023115224A1Methods of carbon dioxide removal in freshwater7
8US11413578B2Alkaline cation enrichment and water electrolysis to provide CO<sub>2 </sub>mineralization and global-scale c…7
9US20230019754A1Alkaline cation enrichment and water electrolysis to provide co2 mineralization and global-scale carbon manag…6
10WO2010037040A1Indirect and direct method of sequestering contaminates4

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat this as a measure of influence on the field's early framing, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analyst Insights

What the filing pattern signals for R&D and IP strategy

Three structural features of this dataset matter more than the raw counts: where claim density sits, who is filing together, and how recent activity is distributed across assignees.

Claim Density
75 of 83 records in B01D
IPC subclass share

Separation-process claims are the crowded ground

Nearly every record in this corpus touches B01D separation processes, meaning gas-liquid contacting, absorption and filtration configurations for CO2 capture ahead of mineralization are the most densely claimed part of the field. New filings here compete directly with an established base rather than opening fresh territory.

Search before drafting apparatus claims in this subclass.
Co-Filing Pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pairs tied at 4

Academic teams, not corporate portfolios, anchor the strongest ties

The strongest co-assignee relationships pair a university with named individual inventors rather than with corporate co-owners, a structure typical of externally funded research programmes that later spin out licensing rather than in-house commercial filing.

Expect licensing negotiations rather than cross-portfolio blocking.
Recent Momentum
0% YoY for most top assignees
latest-year filings

Activity among named leaders has gone quiet

Several of the most active historical assignees show zero or negative year-over-year filings in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true activity, but it also means no single assignee is currently pulling ahead on visible filing volume.

Re-check momentum once lagged filings publish.
Geographic Spread
US 22, EPO 13, WIPO 11
top receiving offices

Filing is hedged across jurisdictions, not concentrated in one

The United States leads but does not dominate; EPO, PCT, Australia, India and Canada all carry meaningful shares. That spread points to applicants pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection early, consistent with a technology still targeting an undefined primary commercial market.

Budget for multi-region prosecution from the outset.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where the field is still open

No single assignee holds a commanding share of the 83 families in this dataset. The mix runs from research universities to a small number of dedicated carbon-removal companies, with named individual inventors appearing repeatedly alongside institutional owners.

University Programs
3 universities among top filers
with repeated co-assignee ties

Research institutions lead on filing volume

Columbia University, the University of California system and Yale University each appear among the more active filers, frequently alongside named academic inventors rather than corporate co-owners.

Licensing, not acquisition, is the likely route to access these claims.
Dedicated Carbon-Removal Firms
CarbonRun among named assignees
latest-year filings: 0

Specialist companies are present but not yet scaling filings

CarbonRun Carbon Dioxide Removal Ltd and similar dedicated-purpose entities appear in the dataset but show no filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with either an early-stage portfolio or a lag in what has published so far.

Monitor for a filing resurgence as lagged applications publish.
Individual Inventors
Named inventors in top co-filing pairs
e.g. Wilcox, McQueen, Dipple

Named academic inventors co-anchor institutional filings

Individual researchers appear as co-assignees on several of the strongest-tied filings alongside their university, a structure that can complicate freedom-to-operate checks since rights may sit with the inventor as well as the institution.

Check both institutional and individual inventor rights during clearance.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches show low IPC density relative to the field's core, suggesting room for a defensible first claim.
Carbonation-cured concrete integrationFeedstock grinding energy reductionAlkalinity measurement & reporting verificationElectrolytic mineralization pathways (C25B/C25C)Hydraulic/waterway alkalinity dosing (E02B)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Regents of the University of California10%
Yale University0-100%
The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York0
Neumann Systems Group, Inc.0
CARBONRUN CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL LTD0
WILCOX JENNIFER0
NARASIMHAMURTHY PRAKASHKUMAR0
MCQUEEN NOAH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The filing data points to a field with an occupied core and several thin adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate clearance or identifying open claim space.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on B01D claims

With 75 of 83 records touching separation processes, any new apparatus or absorption-configuration claim needs a targeted clearance search against this subclass before drafting.

Explore B01D prior art in Eureka

Watch for the lagged 2024-2026 filing wave

Publication lag means the apparent post-2022 slowdown is incomplete. Re-run trend analysis in 12-18 months to see whether momentum among quiet assignees resumes.

Set a filing alert in Eureka

Investigate the cement-integration gap

C04B carbonation-in-concrete claims sit at only 6 records against a much larger capture-side literature, suggesting the downstream application side is comparatively open.

Map C04B white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.