Enhanced Weathering Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- 35 filings in the 2022 peak year against just 83 total families since 2017 — this is a young, thinly filed field, not a mature one.
- University assignees dominate the strongest co-filing pairs Columbia University's team ties appear repeatedly with individual named inventors, a pattern more typical of research programmes than corporate portfolios.
- B01D separation processes cover 75 of 83 records while cement-integration claims under C04B sit at just 6, marking the clearest gap between air/water capture and built-environment application.
What the patent record shows about enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation
Enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation cover methods that accelerate the natural reaction between CO2 and alkaline minerals to lock carbon into stable solid or dissolved form. The patent record for this search spans 2017 to 2026 and totals 83 families, concentrated heavily in separation-process claims (IPC B01D) rather than in cement or construction integration. Filing activity rose steadily to a peak in 2022 before flattening, a pattern consistent with a field still defining its dominant technical routes rather than one converging on a settled design.
Filing offices skew toward the United States, Europe and the PCT route, with meaningful activity in Australia, India and Canada — a spread that suggests applicants are hedging jurisdiction rather than committing to one home market. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent slowdown after 2022 is likely overstated; the true 2024-2026 filing level will not be visible in this dataset for some time yet.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
The numbers below come directly from the underlying corpus of 83 published families matching the search criteria, broken out by filing year and by IPC subclass.
A flat trajectory after a 2022 peak
Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 35 in 2022, then eased off. Read the final one to two years as incomplete rather than declining, since publication lag hides recent filings.
Separation processes dominate the classification mix
B01D (separation processes) appears in 75 of 83 records, far ahead of C02F water treatment (30) and C01B inorganic compounds (17). Cement-specific carbonation under C04B and hydraulic engineering under E02B each register only 6, marking the thinnest-claimed adjacent branches.
Shares are the percentage of the 83 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records and a recent representative filing
US20260084104A1 — Systems and methods for carbon sequestration using enhanced weathering (Yale University, filed 2026-03-26)
The disclosure covers enhanced weathering systems and apparatuses for at least partially sequestering CO2 from an influent aqueous solution containing aqueous and/or gaseous CO2, and separately from a gaseous CO2 source, including methods of optimizing the design and operation of such a system.Abstract condensed from the original filing for length.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2020263910A1 | Systems and methods for enhanced weathering and calcining for c02 removal from air | 19 |
| 2 | WO2022187336A1 | Systems and methods for enhanced weathering and calcining for co 2 removal from air | 17 |
| 3 | CN106904647A | 一种CO<sub>2</sub>矿化与海水资源利用耦合的方法 | 13 |
| 4 | US8864876B2 | Indirect and direct method of sequestering contaminates | 12 |
| 5 | US20220040639A1 | Alkaline cation enrichment and water electrolysis to provide co2 mineralization and global-scale carbon manag… | 11 |
| 6 | US20220347650A1 | Systems and methods for enhanced weathering and calcining for co2 removal from air | 10 |
| 7 | WO2023115224A1 | Methods of carbon dioxide removal in freshwater | 7 |
| 8 | US11413578B2 | Alkaline cation enrichment and water electrolysis to provide CO<sub>2 </sub>mineralization and global-scale c… | 7 |
| 9 | US20230019754A1 | Alkaline cation enrichment and water electrolysis to provide co2 mineralization and global-scale carbon manag… | 6 |
| 10 | WO2010037040A1 | Indirect and direct method of sequestering contaminates | 4 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat this as a measure of influence on the field's early framing, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals for R&D and IP strategy
Three structural features of this dataset matter more than the raw counts: where claim density sits, who is filing together, and how recent activity is distributed across assignees.
Separation-process claims are the crowded ground
Nearly every record in this corpus touches B01D separation processes, meaning gas-liquid contacting, absorption and filtration configurations for CO2 capture ahead of mineralization are the most densely claimed part of the field. New filings here compete directly with an established base rather than opening fresh territory.
Academic teams, not corporate portfolios, anchor the strongest ties
The strongest co-assignee relationships pair a university with named individual inventors rather than with corporate co-owners, a structure typical of externally funded research programmes that later spin out licensing rather than in-house commercial filing.
Activity among named leaders has gone quiet
Several of the most active historical assignees show zero or negative year-over-year filings in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true activity, but it also means no single assignee is currently pulling ahead on visible filing volume.
Filing is hedged across jurisdictions, not concentrated in one
The United States leads but does not dominate; EPO, PCT, Australia, India and Canada all carry meaningful shares. That spread points to applicants pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection early, consistent with a technology still targeting an undefined primary commercial market.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and where the field is still open
No single assignee holds a commanding share of the 83 families in this dataset. The mix runs from research universities to a small number of dedicated carbon-removal companies, with named individual inventors appearing repeatedly alongside institutional owners.
Research institutions lead on filing volume
Columbia University, the University of California system and Yale University each appear among the more active filers, frequently alongside named academic inventors rather than corporate co-owners.
Specialist companies are present but not yet scaling filings
CarbonRun Carbon Dioxide Removal Ltd and similar dedicated-purpose entities appear in the dataset but show no filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with either an early-stage portfolio or a lag in what has published so far.
Named academic inventors co-anchor institutional filings
Individual researchers appear as co-assignees on several of the strongest-tied filings alongside their university, a structure that can complicate freedom-to-operate checks since rights may sit with the inventor as well as the institution.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Regents of the University of California | 1 | 0% |
| Yale University | 0 | -100% |
| The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York | 0 | — |
| Neumann Systems Group, Inc. | 0 | — |
| CARBONRUN CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL LTD | 0 | — |
| WILCOX JENNIFER | 0 | — |
| NARASIMHAMURTHY PRAKASHKUMAR | 0 | — |
| MCQUEEN NOAH | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing data points to a field with an occupied core and several thin adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate clearance or identifying open claim space.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on B01D claims
With 75 of 83 records touching separation processes, any new apparatus or absorption-configuration claim needs a targeted clearance search against this subclass before drafting.
Explore B01D prior art in EurekaWatch for the lagged 2024-2026 filing wave
Publication lag means the apparent post-2022 slowdown is incomplete. Re-run trend analysis in 12-18 months to see whether momentum among quiet assignees resumes.
Set a filing alert in EurekaInvestigate the cement-integration gap
C04B carbonation-in-concrete claims sit at only 6 records against a much larger capture-side literature, suggesting the downstream application side is comparatively open.
Map C04B white space in EurekaCommon questions about enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation patents
Enhanced weathering patents typically claim methods of exposing alkaline minerals to atmospheric or dissolved CO2 over land or in coastal/ocean settings to accelerate natural rock weathering. Mineral carbonation patents more often claim engineered industrial processes that react CO2 directly with mineral feedstock, such as mine tailings or slag, under controlled conditions. In this dataset both terms appear together because the underlying chemistry overlaps, but the claim scope differs: weathering claims tend to cover deployment methods and site design, while carbonation claims tend to cover reactor conditions, feedstock preparation and reaction kinetics.
The dataset shows research universities, including Columbia University, the University of California system and Yale University, among the more active filers, often alongside named academic co-inventors. Dedicated carbon-removal companies such as CarbonRun also appear but with lower recent visible filing counts. No single assignee holds a dominant share of the 83 total families, so the field currently reads as fragmented rather than led by one clear incumbent.
The base chemistry of CO2 reacting with alkaline minerals is long established and not itself patentable, but specific engineered methods, apparatus configurations, feedstock preparation techniques and monitoring/verification processes built around that chemistry are being actively claimed, as shown by the 83 families in this corpus. Claims tend to focus on reaction kinetics, grinding energy reduction, and measurement or reporting verification methods rather than on the underlying reaction itself. A novelty search against the B01D-heavy prior art base is the practical starting point before drafting.
Based on this corpus, B01D (separation processes) is the dominant classification by a wide margin, followed by C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds). C01F, C04B, C25B, C25C and E02B all appear at lower but non-trivial volumes and are worth including in a full clearance search, particularly for claims touching cement integration, electrolytic pathways or hydraulic engineering applications.
The clearest gap in this dataset sits between the heavily claimed capture and separation side (B01D) and the thinly claimed application side, particularly carbonation-cured concrete integration under C04B, which registers only 6 of 83 records. Feedstock grinding energy reduction and alkalinity measurement/reporting verification methods also appear underrepresented relative to the core separation-process claims, making them reasonable areas to investigate for a defensible first-mover filing.
Research Enhanced Weathering and Mineral Carbonation in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole enhanced weathering and mineral carbonation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.