Environmental Monitoring Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
- No single company dominates. the ranked leader holds 150 records and the top 5 combined account for just 9.0% of all 5,088 records in scope — a long tail of filers, not a two-horse race.
- Filing kept climbing through the last complete year. activity rose from 216 records in 2021 to 282 in 2024, a 31% increase, before 2025-26 figures understate true volume due to publication lag.
- Software and connectivity classes outweigh sensing hardware. G06F data processing (16.5%) and G06Q business/admin processing (16.4%) each edge out G01N material analysis (14.5%) among the 5,088 records in scope.
Filing growth compares 2021 (216 records) with 2024 (282) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 5,088 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the environmental monitoring patent record shows
Environmental monitoring patents span sensing hardware, wireless transmission, and the data-processing layers that turn raw readings into alerts, compliance reports, or automated responses. The search set behind this page combines pollutant monitoring, environmental sensing, and emission/detection terms with treatment and condition-monitoring language, capturing 5,088 records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off. The mix leans heavily toward the software and connectivity side of the stack rather than pure sensor chemistry, which shapes where freedom-to-operate risk actually sits.
Filing offices skew toward the United States, with India, the WIPO PCT route, and the EPO each contributing meaningfully — a pattern consistent with a field where both hardware manufacturers and software/platform players are filing internationally rather than staying domestic.
Filing trends and technology composition
The data below tracks publication volume by year and the IPC subclasses that recur across the 5,088 records in scope. Because a single record often carries several IPC codes, class shares sum to more than 100% — read them as claim-density signals, not as a partition of the field.
Filing trend: steady growth through the last complete year
Publications rose from 331 in 2017 to a peak of 430 in 2025, with the reliable comparison being 216 records in 2021 climbing to 282 in 2024 — a 31% increase. 2025 and 2026 figures will revise upward as publication catches up with filing, given the roughly 18-month lag between the two.
Technology composition: software and connectivity lead sensing hardware
G06F (electric digital data processing) and G06Q (business/admin data processing) each cover roughly one in six of the 5,088 records, narrowly ahead of G01N (material analysis and testing) at 14.5%. Wireless networking (H04W), alarm/signalling (G08B), and digital transmission (H04L) each clear 9%, while AI-specific computing (G06N) sits at 6.5% — still a meaningful presence given how recently that class has existed as a distinct filing category.
Shares are the percentage of the 5,088 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Environmental Monitoring Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about environmental monitoring patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited records
US20160071183A1 — Environmental monitoring device with event-driven service
A sensor mechanism in an environmental monitoring device provides sensor data representing an environmental condition in an external environment. A control mechanism determines, based on that sensor data, an alert associated with the environmental condition, and an interface circuit provides a service offer to an electronic device of an entity such as a user, tenant, property owner, or property manager.Filed by Leeo, Inc., published 2016-03-10 — illustrates the event-driven alert-to-service-offer pattern common across consumer and property-facing monitoring devices in this dataset.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6611793B1 | Systems and methods to identify and disable re-use single use devices based on detecting environmental changes | 2,178 |
| 2 | US6237604B1 | Systems and methods for preventing automatic identification of re-used single use devices | 1,598 |
| 3 | US20060154642A1 | Medication & health, environmental, and security monitoring, alert, intervention, information and network sys… | 1,517 |
| 4 | US6387092B1 | Systems and methods to identify and disable re-used single use devices based on time elapsed from first thera… | 1,438 |
| 5 | US20070061393A1 | Management of health care data | 1,132 |
| 6 | US20080146892A1 | Physiological and environmental monitoring systems and methods | 1,109 |
| 7 | US20040117330A1 | System and method for controlling usage of a commodity | 1,065 |
| 8 | US20200284883A1 | Component for a lidar sensor system, lidar sensor system, lidar sensor device, method for a lidar sensor syst… | 1,018 |
| 9 | US20100327766A1 | Wireless emergency lighting system | 996 |
| 10 | US20110133655A1 | Autonomous grid shifting lighting device | 934 |
Citation counts favor older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the concentration and growth figures mean for strategy
Three figures matter more than the raw ranking: how concentrated the top of the field actually is, how fast filing has grown in the years that are safe to compare, and which technology classes carry the claim density.
The field is fragmented, not captured
The leader holds 150 records and the fifth-ranked assignee holds 69 — a steep drop-off, but the combined top 5 still account for only 9.0% of all records in scope. That leaves most of the field open to new entrants who file precisely.
Momentum built steadily through the last complete year
Records climbed from 216 in 2021 to 282 in 2024. That is the safest window to cite: 2025-26 volumes will rise as publication catches up with filings made in those years.
Data processing outweighs sensing chemistry
G06F and G06Q together edge out G01N material analysis, meaning the busiest claim territory is how readings get processed and monetized, not how they get captured. G06N (AI-based computing) at 6.5% is a newer but non-trivial pocket.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to environmental monitoring patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Parker Sense LLC | JENSEN THOMAS P | 8 |
| Wireless Environment, LLC | RECKER MICHAEL V | 4 |
| Wireless Environment, LLC | LEVINE DAVID B | 4 |
| Parker Sense LLC | LAWLER CASIMIR E JR | 4 |
| Parker Sense LLC | HATCHETT JAMES | 4 |
| Temptime Corporation | Zebra Technologies Corp. | 3 |
| Parker Sense LLC | SPENCER JAMES J | 2 |
| Parker Sense LLC | LAWLER JR CASIMIR E | 2 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, and the strongest pairs are inventor-employer combinations rather than cross-company joint filings — a sign that most activity here is filed independently rather than through formal collaboration.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The ranked leaders list covers 100 companies drawn from the 5,088 records in scope. Momentum in the most recent year is muted across several named filers, which is expected given publication lag rather than a sign those companies have stopped filing.
A wide lead, but not a monopoly
The top-ranked assignee's 150 records outpace the fifth-place holder's 69, yet the combined top 5 still represent only 9.0% of all records in scope — this is a fragmented field with room for a well-targeted new filer.
A long, active mid-tier
The gap between 5th place (69) and 10th place (51) is shallow compared with the gap from the leader down to 5th, suggesting a broad group of moderately active filers rather than a sharp cliff.
Filing is mostly independent
With only 10 co-assignee pairs across the dataset, most organizations here are filing solo rather than through joint ventures or named research partnerships.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Temptime Corporation | 1 | — |
| Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Leeo, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Industrial Scientific Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Google LLC | 0 | — |
| CareFusion 303, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Wireless Environment, LLC | 0 | — |
| Federal Express Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a fragmented field with clear technology-class concentration in data processing rather than sensing hardware. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive tracking.
Map claims against the busiest IPC classes
G06F and G06Q claim density suggests any new filing touching data processing or alert workflows should be checked against that crowded territory before drafting.
Explore IPC-level claim charts in EurekaTrack the mid-tier filers, not just the leader
The shallow gap between 5th and 10th place suggests a group worth monitoring for acquisition or licensing signals rather than assuming the top filer sets the pace alone.
Set up assignee alerts in EurekaValidate whitespace before committing claims
Under-claimed branches like sensor fusion or edge processing look open on this dataset, but a full freedom-to-operate check should confirm before drafting.
Run a whitespace search in EurekaCommon questions about environmental monitoring patents
The ranked leader in this dataset holds 150 records, well ahead of the fifth-ranked assignee at 69. However, the top 5 combined account for only 9.0% of all 5,088 records in scope, so no single company controls the field. This makes competitive tracking a matter of watching a broad mid-tier rather than one or two dominant players.
Filing grew from 216 records in 2021 to 282 in 2024, a 31% increase over that three-year window, which is the most reliable comparison available. Numbers for 2025 and 2026 appear lower, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than an actual slowdown. Treat the most recent one to two years in any trend chart as still filling in.
Data processing classes lead: G06F (electric digital data processing) covers 16.5% of the 5,088 records and G06Q (business and administrative data processing) covers 16.4%, both ahead of G01N material analysis and testing at 14.5%. Wireless networking, alarm and signalling systems, and digital transmission each exceed 9%. This means claim density concentrates on how sensor data gets processed and acted on, not just how it is captured.
Based on the technology composition in this dataset, branches like AI-driven anomaly detection for pollutant time-series, cross-sensor fusion for multi-pollutant events, and edge-processing for low-power remote nodes show thinner claim density relative to the core sensing-and-alerting pattern. These are not guaranteed clear, but they warrant a closer freedom-to-operate look before assuming the space is occupied.
It is fragmented rather than concentrated: the top 5 assignees hold 9.0% of the 5,088 records in scope and the top 10 hold 14.5%. The drop from the leader (150 records) to fifth place (69) is steep, but the gap from fifth to tenth (69 to 51) is much shallower, indicating a broad, moderately active group beneath the leader rather than a sharp two-tier structure.
Research Environmental Monitoring Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole environmental monitoring patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.