Book a demo

Enzyme Fermentation Oxygen Transfer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Enzyme Fermentation Oxygen Transfer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/enzyme-production-fermentation-oxygen-transfer-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Updated 2026
Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer Patents
  • Filing is concentrated at the top. the five most active assignees hold 32.5% of all 366 records in scope, and the top ten hold 47.0%.
  • C12N and C12P dominate the claim space. 64.5% and 62.8% of records respectively cover host organisms and fermentation processes, while bioreactor hardware under C12M sits at just 27.3%.
  • Filings eased after a 2021 peak. activity fell from 12 filings in 2021 to 8 in 2024, a -33% change over the last fully-counted period.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
366
Published Records
33%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-33%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 366 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape covers patent families and applications filed under IPC classes C12N, C12P and C12M that combine enzyme production or microbial fermentation language with oxygen-transfer terms — dissolved oxygen, agitation speed, gas flow, bubble size and transfer coefficient. The scope runs from 2015 through the current data cut-off, capturing both the organism-engineering side of enzyme manufacture and the process-engineering side that governs how oxygen reaches the culture.

366 records fall within this scope. Publication of a patent application typically lags its filing date by roughly 18 months, so filing activity in the most recent one to two years is understated in any trend shown here and will continue to fill in as more records publish.

Records in scope by filing year and IPC composition
  1. 1DSM IP ASSETS BV47
  2. 2VERSALIS SPA26
  3. 3DANISCO US INC19
  4. 4GENECOR INC15
  5. 5NOVOZYMES AS12
  6. 6ARKION LIFE SCIENCES LLC12
  7. 7DCV DOING BUSINESS BIO TECHN RESOURSES11
  8. 8REACTIVE SURFACES LTD10
  9. 9XYLECO INC10
  10. 10SAIPEM SPA10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Publication counts below are drawn from the 366 records in scope for this search across 2015-01-01 to 2026-07-31. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent filing years are undercounted and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity peaked in 2021, then eased into an incomplete tail

Filings rose to a peak of 12 in 2021, the highest year in the series. From 2021 to 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete — filings fell from 12 to 8, a -33% change. Years after 2024 are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so they should not be read as continued decline.

Filing activity peaked in 2021, then eased into an incomplete tail03691272017201820192020122021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Two IPC subclasses carry most of the filing weight

C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) appears on 64.5% of the 366 records in scope and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) on 62.8%, confirming that organism and process claims are the primary battleground. C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus), at 27.3%, is filed at less than half that density, and classes touching agrochemical, medicinal and therapeutic applications each sit under 8% — evidence of adjacent uses that are claimed far more thinly than the fermentation core.

Two IPC subclasses carry most of the filing weightC12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…23664.5%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…23062.8%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus10027.3%C12Q · Measuring & testing involving …277.4%C07H · Sugars & nucleic acids267.1%A61K · Medicinal preparations246.6%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…236.3%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals226.0%Other31987.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 366 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enzyme production fermentation oxygen transfer and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative Filing
US20090181433A12009-07-16

Methods for producing end-products from carbon substrates

GENENCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.

The present invention provides means for the production of desired end-products of in vitro and/or in vivo bioconversion of biomass-based feed stock substrates, including but not limited to such materials as starch and cellulose. In particularly preferred embodiments, the methods of the present invention do not require gelatinization and/or liquefaction of the substrate.Filed by Genencor International, Inc., 2009-07-16 (US20090181433A1)

US20090181433A1 — patent drawing 1US20090181433A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040109853A1Biological active coating components, coatings, and coated surfaces437
2US20100233146A1Coatings and Surface Treatments Having Active Enzymes and Peptides317
3US20100120104A1Biological and chemical process utilizing chemoautotrophic microorganisms for the chemosythetic fixation of c…255
4WO1991018974A1HEMICELLULASE ACTIVE AT EXTREMES OF pH AND TEMPERATURE AND THE MEANS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF255
5US20120097194A1Polymeric Coatings Incorporating Bioactive Enzymes for Catalytic Function250
6WO2009149419A2Variant alpha-amylases from bacillus subtilis and methods of use, thereof231
7WO2009155115A2Coatings and surface treatments having active enzymes and peptides177
8US6372457B1Process and materials for production of glucosamine86
9US20100248334A1Biological active coating components, coatings, and coated surfaces80
10US5476775AHemicellulase active at PH and temperature extremes78

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern signals

Reading the composition and citation data together points to where claim space is occupied and where it is still open.

Concentration
32.5%
of 366 records held by top 5 assignees

A small group of filers set the terms

With the five most active assignees holding 32.5% of the 366 records in scope and the top ten holding 47.0%, most of the fermentation and organism-engineering claim space is defined by a handful of long-standing filers rather than a broad field of new entrants.

Top 10 combined: 172 of 366 records
Claim balance
64.5% vs 27.3%
C12N share vs C12M share

Organisms and process outrank hardware

C12N and C12P claims together cover the large majority of records, while C12M bioreactor and apparatus claims trail well behind at 27.3%. Oxygen-transfer performance is largely being protected through the organism or the process recipe, not the vessel.

Record can carry multiple IPC classes; shares exceed 100%
Momentum
12 → 8
filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity has eased since its 2021 peak

Filings peaked at 12 in 2021 and stood at 8 by 2024, a -33% change over that span. 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete given typical publication lag and should not be read as a further decline.

2024 is the most recent complete year
Influence
437 citations
top-cited record in this set

Coating and surface-treatment claims lead citation counts

The most-cited records in this corpus concern enzyme coatings and surface treatments rather than fermentation vessels themselves, suggesting those mechanisms have drawn the widest subsequent examiner attention.

Citation counts favour older filings in a searched corpus
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enzyme production fermentation oxygen transfer, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee ranking below covers 100 companies as returned by the data endpoint — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full ranked list the search produced, measured in records.

Leader
47
records, leading assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds 47 records, more than three times the fifth-place count of 12 — a gap wide enough that its portfolio should be the first stop in any competitive or freedom-to-operate review of this space.

Fifth place: 12 records; tenth place: 10 records
Mid-field
12 → 10
records, 5th to 10th place

A tight cluster behind the leader

Positions five through ten sit close together, from 12 down to 10 records, indicating a group of similarly-sized challengers rather than a sharp drop-off after the top few names.

Top 10 combined: 172 of 366 records (47.0%)
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Joint filing is limited but concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, and the strongest pairings recur around the same handful of organisations, suggesting collaboration here happens through a small number of established relationships rather than broad industry consortia.

Strongest pairs recur at 4 shared records each
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches sit well below the C12N/C12P core in filing density but touch the same underlying enzyme systems.
Enzyme-linked biocide formulations (A01N overlap)Sugar/nucleic-acid substrate chemistry (C07H overlap)Therapeutic-use enzyme claims (A61P overlap)India-first filing strategiesBioreactor gas-transfer hardware claims (C12M)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
DSM IP Assets B.V.0
Versalis S.p.A.0
Danisco US Inc.0
Genencor International, Inc.0
Novozymes A/S0
Arkion Life Sciences LLC0
Xyleco, Inc.0
DCV, Inc. (doing business as Bio-Technical Resources)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a handful of next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or spotting where to file next.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leading assignee

With one filer holding 47 records against a fifth-place count of 12, any new fermentation or oxygen-transfer process should be checked against that portfolio first.

Run a freedom-to-operate search

Explore the under-claimed adjacent branches

A01N, A61P and C07H overlaps sit well below the C12N/C12P core in filing density, and each connects to the same enzyme systems already in production.

Map the white space in Eureka

Track the post-2021 filing shift

Filings eased from 12 in 2021 to 8 in 2024; watching how 2025-2026 fills in as publications catch up will clarify whether that is a real slowdown or a lag artefact.

Monitor filing trends
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked

Questions practitioners ask about this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole enzyme production fermentation oxygen transfer corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.