Enzyme Fermentation Oxygen Transfer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing is concentrated at the top. the five most active assignees hold 32.5% of all 366 records in scope, and the top ten hold 47.0%.
- C12N and C12P dominate the claim space. 64.5% and 62.8% of records respectively cover host organisms and fermentation processes, while bioreactor hardware under C12M sits at just 27.3%.
- Filings eased after a 2021 peak. activity fell from 12 filings in 2021 to 8 in 2024, a -33% change over the last fully-counted period.
Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 366 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this patent landscape covers
This landscape covers patent families and applications filed under IPC classes C12N, C12P and C12M that combine enzyme production or microbial fermentation language with oxygen-transfer terms — dissolved oxygen, agitation speed, gas flow, bubble size and transfer coefficient. The scope runs from 2015 through the current data cut-off, capturing both the organism-engineering side of enzyme manufacture and the process-engineering side that governs how oxygen reaches the culture.
366 records fall within this scope. Publication of a patent application typically lags its filing date by roughly 18 months, so filing activity in the most recent one to two years is understated in any trend shown here and will continue to fill in as more records publish.
Filing trends and technology composition
Publication counts below are drawn from the 366 records in scope for this search across 2015-01-01 to 2026-07-31. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent filing years are undercounted and should not be read as a slowdown.
Filing activity peaked in 2021, then eased into an incomplete tail
Filings rose to a peak of 12 in 2021, the highest year in the series. From 2021 to 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete — filings fell from 12 to 8, a -33% change. Years after 2024 are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so they should not be read as continued decline.
Two IPC subclasses carry most of the filing weight
C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) appears on 64.5% of the 366 records in scope and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) on 62.8%, confirming that organism and process claims are the primary battleground. C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus), at 27.3%, is filed at less than half that density, and classes touching agrochemical, medicinal and therapeutic applications each sit under 8% — evidence of adjacent uses that are claimed far more thinly than the fermentation core.
Shares are the percentage of the 366 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about enzyme production fermentation oxygen transfer and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited records
Methods for producing end-products from carbon substrates
The present invention provides means for the production of desired end-products of in vitro and/or in vivo bioconversion of biomass-based feed stock substrates, including but not limited to such materials as starch and cellulose. In particularly preferred embodiments, the methods of the present invention do not require gelatinization and/or liquefaction of the substrate.Filed by Genencor International, Inc., 2009-07-16 (US20090181433A1)


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040109853A1 | Biological active coating components, coatings, and coated surfaces | 437 |
| 2 | US20100233146A1 | Coatings and Surface Treatments Having Active Enzymes and Peptides | 317 |
| 3 | US20100120104A1 | Biological and chemical process utilizing chemoautotrophic microorganisms for the chemosythetic fixation of c… | 255 |
| 4 | WO1991018974A1 | HEMICELLULASE ACTIVE AT EXTREMES OF pH AND TEMPERATURE AND THE MEANS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF | 255 |
| 5 | US20120097194A1 | Polymeric Coatings Incorporating Bioactive Enzymes for Catalytic Function | 250 |
| 6 | WO2009149419A2 | Variant alpha-amylases from bacillus subtilis and methods of use, thereof | 231 |
| 7 | WO2009155115A2 | Coatings and surface treatments having active enzymes and peptides | 177 |
| 8 | US6372457B1 | Process and materials for production of glucosamine | 86 |
| 9 | US20100248334A1 | Biological active coating components, coatings, and coated surfaces | 80 |
| 10 | US5476775A | Hemicellulase active at PH and temperature extremes | 78 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Reading the composition and citation data together points to where claim space is occupied and where it is still open.
A small group of filers set the terms
With the five most active assignees holding 32.5% of the 366 records in scope and the top ten holding 47.0%, most of the fermentation and organism-engineering claim space is defined by a handful of long-standing filers rather than a broad field of new entrants.
Organisms and process outrank hardware
C12N and C12P claims together cover the large majority of records, while C12M bioreactor and apparatus claims trail well behind at 27.3%. Oxygen-transfer performance is largely being protected through the organism or the process recipe, not the vessel.
Activity has eased since its 2021 peak
Filings peaked at 12 in 2021 and stood at 8 by 2024, a -33% change over that span. 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete given typical publication lag and should not be read as a further decline.
Coating and surface-treatment claims lead citation counts
The most-cited records in this corpus concern enzyme coatings and surface treatments rather than fermentation vessels themselves, suggesting those mechanisms have drawn the widest subsequent examiner attention.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to enzyme production fermentation oxygen transfer, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The assignee ranking below covers 100 companies as returned by the data endpoint — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full ranked list the search produced, measured in records.
One filer sits well ahead of the field
The leading assignee holds 47 records, more than three times the fifth-place count of 12 — a gap wide enough that its portfolio should be the first stop in any competitive or freedom-to-operate review of this space.
A tight cluster behind the leader
Positions five through ten sit close together, from 12 down to 10 records, indicating a group of similarly-sized challengers rather than a sharp drop-off after the top few names.
Joint filing is limited but concentrated
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, and the strongest pairings recur around the same handful of organisations, suggesting collaboration here happens through a small number of established relationships rather than broad industry consortia.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| DSM IP Assets B.V. | 0 | — |
| Versalis S.p.A. | 0 | — |
| Danisco US Inc. | 0 | — |
| Genencor International, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Novozymes A/S | 0 | — |
| Arkion Life Sciences LLC | 0 | — |
| Xyleco, Inc. | 0 | — |
| DCV, Inc. (doing business as Bio-Technical Resources) | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a handful of next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or spotting where to file next.
Check freedom-to-operate against the leading assignee
With one filer holding 47 records against a fifth-place count of 12, any new fermentation or oxygen-transfer process should be checked against that portfolio first.
Run a freedom-to-operate searchExplore the under-claimed adjacent branches
A01N, A61P and C07H overlaps sit well below the C12N/C12P core in filing density, and each connects to the same enzyme systems already in production.
Map the white space in EurekaTrack the post-2021 filing shift
Filings eased from 12 in 2021 to 8 in 2024; watching how 2025-2026 fills in as publications catch up will clarify whether that is a real slowdown or a lag artefact.
Monitor filing trendsQuestions practitioners ask about this field
Filing in this field is concentrated at the top: the five most active assignees together account for 32.5% of the 366 records in scope, and the ten most active account for 47.0%. That leaves a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants outside the ranked leaders. Anyone entering this space should expect to run freedom-to-operate checks primarily against a small number of established filers, since they hold a disproportionate share of the filed art relative to their number.
Filings peaked in 2021 at 12 for the year and fell to 8 by 2024, a -33% change over that three-year span — the most recent period that can be treated as complete. Data for 2025 and 2026 is still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those later years understate true filing activity and should not be read as a continued decline. A fair reading is that filing has eased off its 2021 peak but has not necessarily stopped.
C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) are the two dominant classes, appearing on 64.5% and 62.8% of the 366 records in scope respectively — meaning most filings claim either the host organism or the production process itself. C12M, covering bioreactors and enzyme apparatus, appears on 27.3% of records, showing that hardware and vessel-level claims are a secondary but still substantial layer. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should not be read as mutually exclusive categories.
US20090181433A1, filed by Genencor International in 2009, covers methods for producing end-products from carbon substrates such as starch and cellulose through bioconversion, with preferred embodiments that avoid requiring conventional gelatinization or liquefaction of the substrate. It is most relevant to anyone designing a bioconversion process around biomass feedstocks that skips those pretreatment steps. It sits inside the dense C12P cluster that covers 62.8% of records in this field, so it should be treated as one of several records to clear on a freedom-to-operate review, not the sole barrier.
The thinnest classes in this dataset are A01N (biocide and agrochemical applications, 6.0% of records), A61P (therapeutic activity, 6.3%) and C07H (sugar and nucleic-acid chemistry, 7.1%) — all far below the C12N/C12P fermentation core. These adjacent-use branches are technically connected to the same enzyme systems but are claimed far less densely, which suggests room for claims that tie a specific fermentation-derived enzyme to one of these end-uses rather than claiming the organism or process alone. Geographic filing is also uneven: India carries only 18 of the 366 records against 79 in the United States, pointing to a thinner prior-art base in some jurisdictions.
Research Enzyme Production Fermentation Oxygen Transfer in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole enzyme production fermentation oxygen transfer corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.