Book a demo

Epoxy Coating & Film Patent Landscape 2026

Epoxy Coating & Film Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Epoxy Coating & Film Patent Landscape in 2026

The epoxy coating and film patent field spans 2,390 families and is in a growth stage, with annual filing volume trending upward over the multi-year window. Activity is moderately concentrated among established coatings multinationals — led by AkzoNobel, Dow Chemical, and Kansai Paint — with China and Japan dominating jurisdictional filings.

2,390
Patent families in scope
21%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+9%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

AkzoNobel leads a moderately concentrated field with active Japanese and Western challengers

AkzoNobel Coatings International holds the top position in applicant rankings, followed closely by Dow Chemical and Kansai Paint. The top five filers together account for 21% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a moderately concentrated competitive structure rather than outright dominance by a single player.

The gap between the leader and the second-ranked applicant is narrow — AkzoNobel at 178 patent records versus Dow Chemical at 162 and Kansai Paint at 155 — indicating a competitive tier of roughly five to six players with comparable filing intensity rather than a single dominant actor pulling clearly ahead.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1AkzoNobel Coatings International B.V.178
2The Dow Chemical Company162
3Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.155
4Somar Corporation145
5KCC Corporation112
6Nippon Paint Co., Ltd.105
7DIC Corporation104
8Dai Nippon Toryo Co., Ltd.92
9Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.91
10Dow Global Technologies LLC86
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.74
12PPG Industries Ohio Inc.73
13Sika Technology AG73
14Nitto Denko Corporation65
15EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO62
16Morton International Inc.61
17BASF Coatings GmbH55
18Sumitomo Durez Co., Ltd.53
19Blue Cube IP LLC53
203M Company49
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leading positions are held by large, globally active coatings and specialty chemicals firms. Their sustained filing activity implies mature internal R&D pipelines and portfolio-maintenance strategies, which means new entrants and mid-tier challengers must differentiate through application specificity or materials innovation rather than volume alone.

Filings from approximately 2024 onward are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; trend readings for those years should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sustained multi-year growth with a dominant coatings chemistry core and several adjacent technology branches

Annual filing activity has grown approximately 9% over the recent window, consistent with the field’s growth-stage lifecycle designation. The technology composition is heavily skewed toward coatings formulation and condensation polymer chemistry, with a long tail of adjacent branches reflecting diverse end-use applications.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings fluctuated between roughly 227 and 296 patent records per year from 2017 through 2025, with 2024 representing the highest recorded annual volume in the dataset. The 2026 figure is heavily incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as a decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 296 in 2024.247201724020182352019289202022720212682022257202329620242842025472026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The C09D coatings and paints class overwhelmingly dominates the technology mix, followed by C08G condensation polymers and C08L polymer compositions. Downstream application branches — including B05D coating processes, B32B layered products, C09J adhesives, H05K printed circuits, and H01L semiconductor devices — appear at substantially lower counts, pointing to the field’s breadth across industrial end-uses while chemistry remains the primary innovation focus.

Technology compositionC09D · Coatings, paints & inks leads with 6,854; C08G · Condensation polymers 2,521.C09D · Coatings, paints …6,854C08G · Condensation poly…2,521C08L · Polymer compositi…1,137B05D · Coating processes1,075C08K · Use of additives …490B32B · Layered products …297C09J · Adhesives221C08J · Polymer processin…217↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US4639476APublished 1987-01-27

Epoxy resin powder coating composition

Nitto Electric Industrial CO., LTD.

An epoxy resin powder coating composition is described, comprising an epoxy resin and at least a hardener and a filler compounded thereto, wherein the filler is a mixture of from 30 to 180 parts by weight of a needle-like glass powder having an average length of at least 40 mu m and an aspect ratio of at least 4:1 and at least 30 parts by weight of a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Photocurable epoxy compositions containing group V…1,293
2Photochromic epoxy resin coating composition and a…417
3Activatable material for sealing, baffling or rein…263
4Powder coating composition of semi-crystalline pol…202
5Stable aqueous epoxy dispersions175
6Smooth, flexible powder coatings157
7Epoxy polysiloxane coating and flooring compositions151
8Fire protective intumescent mastic composition and…127

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of growth-stage dynamics, moderate concentration, active cross-industry collaboration, and strong Asian jurisdictional filings shapes where differentiation opportunities are most accessible.

Growth

Growth stage: annual volume rising, multi-year window up 9%

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filing volume still rising and the recent-window growth rate at 9%. The 2024 peak year has not yet shown signs of easing. This stage implies that foundational patent positions are still being established, making early filing in emerging sub-segments strategically valuable before the field matures.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration: top five hold 21% of the top-100 filers’ total

The top five filers — AkzoNobel, Dow Chemical, Kansai Paint, Somar, and KCC — collectively hold 21% of the top-100 filers’ combined patent records. The close spacing of counts across the top three suggests no single player has built an insurmountable lead. Mid-tier challengers with focused application strategies retain viable pathways to meaningful portfolio positions.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Vertical supply-chain partnerships dominate co-filing activity

The most active co-filing pair is DIC Corporation and Kurimoto Ltd. with 25 joint records, followed by Dai Nippon Toryo and Kurimoto Ltd. at 17. Nippon Paint and Honda Motor Company filed 9 records jointly, illustrating paint-supplier and automotive OEM partnerships. Dow Chemical and Essex Specialty Products account for 7 joint records. These patterns reflect coatings suppliers collaborating with downstream industrial users — steel pipe manufacturers, automakers, and infrastructure firms — rather than horizontal competitor alliances.

Supply-chain co-filing
Geography

China and Japan lead filings; US and EPO are significant but secondary

China is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by Japan, the United States, and the EPO. South Korea, Canada, WIPO, and the United Kingdom form a secondary tier. The strong Asian presence reflects both the manufacturing intensity of the region and the home-market filing strategies of Japanese and Korean coatings majors. An R&D team seeking broad protection should prioritize China, Japan, the US, and EPO as the core four jurisdictions.

Asia-first geography
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
DIC CorporationKurimoto, Ltd.25
Dai Nippon Toryo Co., Ltd.Kurimoto, Ltd.17
Nippon Paint Co., Ltd.Honda Motor Co., Ltd.9
Dow Chemical CompanyEssex Specialty Products LLC7
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.JFE Steel Corporation6
Nippon Paint Co., Ltd.Nippon Steel Corporation6
DIC CorporationMeishin Corporation6
Dai Nippon Toryo Co., Ltd.AGC Inc.6
DIC CorporationDai Nippon Toryo Co., Ltd.5
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.Hitachi Zosen Corporation4

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts are based on co-applicant records; jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

AkzoNobel and Dow Chemical lead on volume; Kansai Paint and Somar are strong challengers

The top players share a common focus on epoxy-resin coatings chemistry (C09D 163) and condensation polymer platforms (C08G 59), but differ in their secondary emphasis — Dow tilts toward polymer chemistry, while Kansai and Nippon Paint extend into coating-process claims.

Leader · AkzoNobel Coatings International

AkzoNobel Coatings International

AkzoNobel Coatings International holds the top position with 178 patent records, concentrated in epoxy-resin coatings formulation (C09D 163), protective coatings (C09D 5), and polymer compositions (C08L 63). The applicant momentum data shows a ‘new entrant’ signal in the recent period, suggesting recent filing activity has resumed or accelerated from a low prior-period base rather than reflecting a long-established continuous filing run.

patent records: 178
Challenger · Dow Chemical

Dow Chemical Company

Dow Chemical ranks second with 162 patent records and, together with the affiliated Dow Global Technologies entity at 86 patent records, represents the largest combined Dow-family footprint in the dataset. Technology focus spans epoxy coatings (C09D 163), condensation polymers (C08G 59), and protective coatings (C09D 5). KCC Corporation, ranked fifth at 112 patent records, shows a downward momentum trend of -42% in recent filings relative to its prior period, opening space for challengers in its segments.

patent records: 162
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology focus maps for all 100 applicants.
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.Somar Corporation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Somar Corporation5▲ new entrant
AkzoNobel Coatings International B.V.2▲ new entrant
KCC Corporation14▼ -42%
Dai Nippon Toryo Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player patent record counts are drawn from the top-100 applicant ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in polymer compositions, coating processes, and layered products

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant coatings core show relatively lower filing share, representing areas where the existing patent density may leave room for differentiated claims — particularly where application-specific performance requirements are rising.

B32B · Layered products & laminates

Layered products and laminates account for a comparatively low share of the overall filing mix. As epoxy films are increasingly specified in multi-layer architectures for electronics, automotive, and construction applications, this branch is technically adjacent to the core chemistry base and has a plausible entry path through formulation-to-structure claims. Teams with expertise in film adhesion and interlayer compatibility could build differentiated positions here.

Search this in Eureka →

C09J · Adhesives

Epoxy-based adhesives sit at the interface of the coatings and bonding domains and show a relatively sparse filing count within this landscape. The technical overlap with structural bonding, underfill materials for electronics, and pipeline joint sealing gives this branch practical industrial relevance. Entry paths exist through formulation patents targeting cure kinetics, flexibility, or substrate-specific adhesion in sectors such as H05K printed circuits or F16L pipe fittings, both of which appear in the technology tail.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, applicant coverage, and entry-path analysis across all adjacent IPC branches.
C08K · Use of additives in polymersB05D · Coating processes+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative filing share within the dataset and are not validated commercial opportunity assessments.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC09D 163 · Coatings, paints & inksC09D 5 · Coatings, paints & inksC09D 7 · Coatings, paints & inksC08G 59 · Condensation polymersC09D 167 · Coatings, paints & inks
Dow Chemical CompanyStrong · 158Strong · 99AbsentStrong · 155Absent
Somar CorporationStrong · 120Strong · 130AbsentStrong · 72Absent
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.Strong · 115Strong · 105AbsentModerate · 44Emerging · 19
AkzoNobel Coatings International B.V.Strong · 102Strong · 99Moderate · 28AbsentAbsent
KCC CorporationStrong · 93Strong · 89Moderate · 40AbsentAbsent
Morton International Inc.Strong · 77Strong · 61AbsentStrong · 61Absent
Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.Strong · 77Strong · 77Moderate · 37AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own epoxy coating patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.