https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/epoxy-molding-compound-for-semiconductor-packages-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electronic Packaging Materials
Epoxy Molding Compound Patents for Semiconductor Packages
  • 31.8% concentration at the top. The top 5 assignees hold 132 of 415 records in scope, while a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants fills out the rest of the ranked field.
  • Filing more than doubled from 2021 to 2024. Records rose from 18 in 2021 to 40 in 2024, a +122% increase, before the count for 2025 onward understates true activity due to publication lag.
  • Composition claims sit well outside the semiconductor-device core. H01L covers 70.4% of the 415 records, but C08L polymer-composition and C08K filler-additive classes each cover a smaller, less crowded slice worth checking before drafting.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
415
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+122%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (18 records) with 2024 (40) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 415 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent activity at the intersection of epoxy molding compound formulation and the packaging-process controls that determine whether a compound performs in production: filler loading, warpage control, resin bleed, moisture sensitivity level, spiral flow and mold cleaning. The scope spans 415 published records from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, treating each family as the unit of analysis so that continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates do not inflate any single assignee's footprint.

Coverage runs across semiconductor device packaging (H01L, H10W), the polymer chemistry that makes up the compound itself (C08L, C08G), the additive systems that tune its properties (C08K), and the process and equipment side (B29C, H05K). Reading these together shows where a filing sits relative to the compound's formulation versus its application in a package.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD42
  2. 2STATS CHIPPAC LTD30
  3. 3SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS CO LTD24
  4. 4TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD19
  5. 5STATS CHIPPAC MANAGEMENT PTE LTD17
  6. 6WOLFSPEED INC15
  7. 7MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS INC14
  8. 8MACDERMID ACUMEN INC11
  9. 9SUMITOMO BAKELITE SINGAPORE PTE11
  10. 10NIPPON CARBIDE KOGYO KK11
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 415-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the records fall into.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Annual filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 43 in 2023, with the 2021-to-2024 span alone showing a +122% increase (18 to 40 records). The 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, so a dip in the most recent one or two years should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017-202601325385042017201820192020202120224320232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 70.4% of the 415 records and H10W in 47.5%, confirming that most filings are anchored to package-level device claims. Polymer chemistry (C08L, 22.4%) and additive systems (C08K, 16.1%) are the next largest groupings, each well below the semiconductor-device share, followed by condensation polymers (C08G), circuit assembly (H05K), H10P and plastics-shaping (B29C). Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total and should not be added together.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH01L · Semiconductor devices29270.4%H10W19747.5%C08L · Polymer compositions9322.4%C08K · Use of additives in polymers6716.1%C08G · Condensation polymers5914.2%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies5914.2%H10P358.4%B29C · Shaping of plastics286.7%Other17742.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 415 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy molding compound for semiconductor packages and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this space

Representative Filing
US20080045632A12008-02-21

Method for preventing blocking and deterioration in flowability of epoxy molding compound powder

CHEIL INDUSTRIES, INC.

A method for preparing an epoxy molding compound powder includes preparing epoxy molding compound chips, feeding dry ice into a dry ice consecutive feeder to form dry ice chips, grinding the epoxy molding compound chips and dry ice chips together in a grinder to form a powder mixture, and separating the powder mixture to form epoxy molding compound powder.Filed by Cheil Industries; published 2008-02-21 as US20080045632A1.

US20080045632A1 — patent drawing 1US20080045632A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records, 2015-2026
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US11158606B2Molded direct bonded and interconnected stack178
2US6238949B1Method and apparatus for forming a plastic chip on chip package module158
3US20060097366A1Semiconductor package including leadframe roughened with chemical etchant to prevent separation between leadf…130
4US5681883AEnhanced boron nitride composition and polymer based high thermal conductivity molding compound107
5US20070054122A1Enhanced boron nitride composition and compositions made therewith83
6US20110210436A1Integrated circuit packaging system with encapsulation and method of manufacture thereof70
7US4931852AHigh thermal conductivity/low alpha emission molding compound containing high purity semiconductor filler and…69
8US7205180B1Process of fabricating semiconductor packages using leadframes roughened with chemical etchant68
9US7595226B2Method of packaging an integrated circuit die65
10US20080197376A1Method for Producing an Optical, Radiation-Emitting Component and Optical, Radiation-Emitting Component54

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older records; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the IPC composition are read together.

Concentration
31.8%
of 415 records held by the top 5 assignees

The top of the field is concentrated, the rest is not

The leading assignee holds 42 records outright, and the top 5 combined account for 132 of 415 records (31.8%). The top 10 extend that to 194 records (46.7%), meaning over half of the field is spread across a long tail of smaller filers.

Ranking covers 100 companies, the full set the data endpoint returns.
Momentum
+122%
growth from 2021 (18) to 2024 (40)

Filing accelerated sharply through 2024

Annual filings roughly doubled between 2021 and 2024, tracking the peak year of 43 in 2023. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent tail-off in 2025 and 2026 reflects incomplete data rather than a real pullback.

Peak year to date: 2023.
Technology mix
70.4%
of 415 records classified under H01L

Most claims are anchored to the package, not the chemistry

H01L and H10W dominate the classification mix, while polymer composition (C08L) and additive systems (C08K) sit at 22.4% and 16.1% respectively. That gap suggests formulation-level claims are comparatively less crowded than package-level ones.

Shares sum above 100% since records carry multiple IPC classes.
Collaboration
3
co-assignee pairs identified

Joint filing is rare and narrow where it exists

Only three co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a materials supplier with a chemical company across 6 shared records. The other two pairs are single-record links between an electronics manufacturer and a university research arm, and between two related entities of the same corporate group.

Collaboration is the exception, not the norm, in this field.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy molding compound for semiconductor packages, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing patterns
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Momentive Performance Materials Inc.KCC Corporation6
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Konkuk University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation1
Sumitomo Bakelite Singapore Pte. Ltd.Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.1

Co-assignee activity is limited to three identified pairs, the largest between a performance-materials supplier and a chemical company across 6 records.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the gaps sit

The ranked field runs 100 companies deep, but activity concentrates at the top while momentum shifts year to year even among leaders.

Leader
42
records

A single assignee leads by a wide margin

The top-ranked assignee holds 42 records, well ahead of fifth place at 17 and tenth place at 11. That gap between first and fifth signals a defensible core position rather than a crowded tie at the top.

Fifth place: 17 records. Tenth place: 11 records.
Momentum shift
-75% YoY
one major filer's latest-year change

Recent-year activity is uneven among the largest filers

Some previously active assignees show zero filings in the latest year, including two large device makers each down -100% year over year, while a materials-and-chemical pairing continues filing at a modest but steady pace in the same period.

Latest-year filings vary sharply across the ranked leaders.
Receiving offices
248
US filings, the largest single office

Filing activity is concentrated in the US, with EPO and PCT next

Of the offices tracked, the United States accounts for 248 filings, followed by Europe (EPO) at 33 and WIPO/PCT at 25. China, Singapore and Japan each show smaller but non-trivial counts, indicating the compound's supply chain and packaging houses filing regionally.

China: 21. Singapore: 18. Japan: 8.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before drafting
Formulation and process branches that sit below the H01L/H10W density but are not empty.
Low-warpage filler gradient profilesHalogen-free flame retardant epoxy systemsSpiral-flow optimization for fine-pitch packagesMoisture sensitivity level reduction additivesMold-cleaning compound formulations
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Momentive Performance Materials Inc.4
KCC Corporation3
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1-75%
STATS ChipPAC Pte. Ltd.0
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.0-100%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.0-100%
Rohm and Haas Company0
Wolfspeed, Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or identifying open claim space.

Check formulation-level white space before drafting

C08L and C08K classes carry a smaller share of the 415 records than H01L, suggesting additive and polymer-composition claims are comparatively less crowded than package-level ones. A targeted search within those subclasses can confirm what is actually open.

Explore with Eureka →

Track the momentum leaders, not just the ranking

Cumulative rank and recent-year activity diverge here: some top-ranked assignees show zero filings in the latest year while others keep filing steadily. Monitoring year-over-year change surfaces who is still investing.

Run a momentum query →

Map citations against filing date before relying on them

The most-cited records in this dataset skew toward older filings, which is expected in any citation count. Cross-check citation rank against filing year before treating a record as currently blocking.

Review citation context →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Epoxy Molding Compound for Semiconductor Packages in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole epoxy molding compound for semiconductor packages corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.