Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (18 records) with 2024 (40) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 415 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent activity at the intersection of epoxy molding compound formulation and the packaging-process controls that determine whether a compound performs in production: filler loading, warpage control, resin bleed, moisture sensitivity level, spiral flow and mold cleaning. The scope spans 415 published records from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, treating each family as the unit of analysis so that continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates do not inflate any single assignee's footprint.
Coverage runs across semiconductor device packaging (H01L, H10W), the polymer chemistry that makes up the compound itself (C08L, C08G), the additive systems that tune its properties (C08K), and the process and equipment side (B29C, H05K). Reading these together shows where a filing sits relative to the compound's formulation versus its application in a package.
Two views of the same 415-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the records fall into.
Annual filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 43 in 2023, with the 2021-to-2024 span alone showing a +122% increase (18 to 40 records). The 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, so a dip in the most recent one or two years should not be read as a slowdown.
H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 70.4% of the 415 records and H10W in 47.5%, confirming that most filings are anchored to package-level device claims. Polymer chemistry (C08L, 22.4%) and additive systems (C08K, 16.1%) are the next largest groupings, each well below the semiconductor-device share, followed by condensation polymers (C08G), circuit assembly (H05K), H10P and plastics-shaping (B29C). Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total and should not be added together.
Shares are the percentage of the 415 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy molding compound for semiconductor packages and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method for preparing an epoxy molding compound powder includes preparing epoxy molding compound chips, feeding dry ice into a dry ice consecutive feeder to form dry ice chips, grinding the epoxy molding compound chips and dry ice chips together in a grinder to form a powder mixture, and separating the powder mixture to form epoxy molding compound powder.Filed by Cheil Industries; published 2008-02-21 as US20080045632A1.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US11158606B2 | Molded direct bonded and interconnected stack | 178 |
| 2 | US6238949B1 | Method and apparatus for forming a plastic chip on chip package module | 158 |
| 3 | US20060097366A1 | Semiconductor package including leadframe roughened with chemical etchant to prevent separation between leadf… | 130 |
| 4 | US5681883A | Enhanced boron nitride composition and polymer based high thermal conductivity molding compound | 107 |
| 5 | US20070054122A1 | Enhanced boron nitride composition and compositions made therewith | 83 |
| 6 | US20110210436A1 | Integrated circuit packaging system with encapsulation and method of manufacture thereof | 70 |
| 7 | US4931852A | High thermal conductivity/low alpha emission molding compound containing high purity semiconductor filler and… | 69 |
| 8 | US7205180B1 | Process of fabricating semiconductor packages using leadframes roughened with chemical etchant | 68 |
| 9 | US7595226B2 | Method of packaging an integrated circuit die | 65 |
| 10 | US20080197376A1 | Method for Producing an Optical, Radiation-Emitting Component and Optical, Radiation-Emitting Component | 54 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older records; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the IPC composition are read together.
The leading assignee holds 42 records outright, and the top 5 combined account for 132 of 415 records (31.8%). The top 10 extend that to 194 records (46.7%), meaning over half of the field is spread across a long tail of smaller filers.
Annual filings roughly doubled between 2021 and 2024, tracking the peak year of 43 in 2023. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent tail-off in 2025 and 2026 reflects incomplete data rather than a real pullback.
H01L and H10W dominate the classification mix, while polymer composition (C08L) and additive systems (C08K) sit at 22.4% and 16.1% respectively. That gap suggests formulation-level claims are comparatively less crowded than package-level ones.
Only three co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a materials supplier with a chemical company across 6 shared records. The other two pairs are single-record links between an electronics manufacturer and a university research arm, and between two related entities of the same corporate group.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy molding compound for semiconductor packages, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Momentive Performance Materials Inc. | KCC Corporation | 6 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Konkuk University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | 1 |
| Sumitomo Bakelite Singapore Pte. Ltd. | Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. | 1 |
Co-assignee activity is limited to three identified pairs, the largest between a performance-materials supplier and a chemical company across 6 records.
The ranked field runs 100 companies deep, but activity concentrates at the top while momentum shifts year to year even among leaders.
The top-ranked assignee holds 42 records, well ahead of fifth place at 17 and tenth place at 11. That gap between first and fifth signals a defensible core position rather than a crowded tie at the top.
Some previously active assignees show zero filings in the latest year, including two large device makers each down -100% year over year, while a materials-and-chemical pairing continues filing at a modest but steady pace in the same period.
Of the offices tracked, the United States accounts for 248 filings, followed by Europe (EPO) at 33 and WIPO/PCT at 25. China, Singapore and Japan each show smaller but non-trivial counts, indicating the compound's supply chain and packaging houses filing regionally.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Momentive Performance Materials Inc. | 4 | — |
| KCC Corporation | 3 | — |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 1 | -75% |
| STATS ChipPAC Pte. Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Rohm and Haas Company | 0 | — |
| Wolfspeed, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or identifying open claim space.
C08L and C08K classes carry a smaller share of the 415 records than H01L, suggesting additive and polymer-composition claims are comparatively less crowded than package-level ones. A targeted search within those subclasses can confirm what is actually open.
Explore with Eureka →Cumulative rank and recent-year activity diverge here: some top-ranked assignees show zero filings in the latest year while others keep filing steadily. Monitoring year-over-year change surfaces who is still investing.
Run a momentum query →The most-cited records in this dataset skew toward older filings, which is expected in any citation count. Cross-check citation rank against filing year before treating a record as currently blocking.
Review citation context →The ranked field covers 100 companies, with one assignee holding 42 records outright and a clear step down to fifth place at 17 records and tenth place at 11. The top 5 assignees combined account for 132 of the 415 records in scope, or 31.8%, and the top 10 extend that to 194 records, or 46.7%. Beyond the top 10, filing activity spreads across a long tail of companies with far fewer records each, so a full competitive picture requires looking past the leaders alone.
Filing activity grew sharply through the middle of the tracked period, rising from 18 records in 2021 to 40 in 2024, a +122% increase, with a peak of 43 records in 2023. Counts for 2025 and 2026 appear lower, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between when a patent is filed and when it publishes, not an actual decline. Any conclusion about a slowdown should wait until those later years have had time to fully publish.
Most records classify under H01L (semiconductor devices, 70.4% of the 415 records) and H10W (47.5%), reflecting that most claims describe the compound as used within a package. Smaller but meaningful shares fall under C08L polymer compositions (22.4%), C08K additive systems (16.1%), C08G condensation polymers (14.2%), H05K circuit assemblies (14.2%), H10P (8.4%) and B29C plastics shaping (6.7%). Because records often carry multiple IPC classes, these percentages add up to more than 100% of the record total and should be read individually rather than summed.
The formulation side of the field, particularly filler-additive systems under C08K and polymer-composition claims under C08L, carries a noticeably smaller share of the 415 records than the package-level H01L classification. Specific process controls named in the search scope, such as spiral flow optimization, moisture sensitivity level reduction and mold-cleaning formulations, also show less density than device-level claims. These are reasonable starting points for a freedom-to-operate check, though a targeted search of the current dataset is still needed to confirm what is genuinely open at the time of filing.
US20080045632A1, filed by Cheil Industries, claims a specific method for preparing epoxy molding compound powder that uses dry ice chips ground together with epoxy molding compound chips to prevent blocking and preserve flowability of the resulting powder. It does not claim epoxy molding compound formulations generally, so it does not block work on the compound's chemistry or on other packaging applications. Anyone using a dry-ice or similar co-grinding step specifically to control powder flowability and blocking should review this filing's claim scope and consider alternative grinding or anti-blocking methods that fall outside its specific process steps.
Go past this page: query the whole epoxy molding compound for semiconductor packages corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.