Book a demo

Epoxy Resin Additives Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Epoxy Resin Additives Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/epoxy-resin-additives-and-fillers-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Polymers & Composites · Patent Landscape
Epoxy Resin Additive and Filler Patents: Who Holds the Claim Space
  • Filing has cooled since a 2017 peak. 485 families filed in 2017 against 59 so far in the most recent (partial) year, with 2022's 353 marking the last stable midpoint before the decline set in.
  • Japan dominates the filing map. 4,758 records route through the Japanese office, nearly double the United States (2,623) and well ahead of China (2,128) and Europe (2,128), pointing to where enforcement and prior art risk concentrate.
  • Collaboration is rare and narrow. Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across 14,813 families, and the strongest link — 42 shared filings — sits between two Japanese conglomerates, not across borders or sectors.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
14.8K
Published Records
24%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-16%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (341 records) with 2024 (285) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 14,813 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families whose title or abstract references epoxy resin, epoxy, or epoxy formulation, combined with claim or description language around toughening agents, flame retardant fillers, nanofillers, or curing accelerators, and classified under C08K3, C08K5, or C08L63. It captures the additive and filler layer of epoxy chemistry rather than the base resin synthesis itself — the compounds and particulates that determine impact resistance, flame behaviour, thermal conductivity and cure kinetics in finished formulations.

The coverage window runs from 2015 through the third quarter of 2026, with 14,813 published families in total. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity — the 2026 figure in particular should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
  1. 1SUMITOMO BAKELITE CO LTD1,379
  2. 2RESONAC CORP821
  3. 3NITTO DENKO CORP513
  4. 4SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD482
  5. 5TORAY INDUSTRIES INC372
  6. 6PANASONIC ELECTRIC WORKS CO LTD341
  7. 7MITSUBISHI GAS CHEM CO INC336
  8. 8DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC312
  9. 93M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO289
  10. 10GUANGDONG SHENGYI SCI TECH253
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the underlying families actually sit in.

A decade past its peak

Filings ran at 485 in 2017, held near a midpoint of 353 by 2022, and have fallen to 59 in the most recent partial year. Read alongside the 18-month publication lag, the honest interpretation is a market that has plateaued and is now trending down rather than one still accelerating.

A decade past its peak0125250375500485201720182019202020212022202320242025592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in polymer composition classes, with electronics as a secondary pull

C08L (polymer compositions) and C08G (condensation polymers) cover the bulk of the corpus, with C08K (additive use) close behind — consistent with a dataset built around formulation and filler chemistry. The presence of H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuits) at meaningful volume signals that a large share of this filing activity is driven by electronics encapsulation and underfill applications rather than structural composites alone.

Concentrated in polymer composition classes, with electronics as a secondary pullC08L · Polymer compositions13,66592.3%C08G · Condensation polymers10,08168.1%C08K · Use of additives in polymers7,91353.4%H01L · Semiconductor devices4,38629.6%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions2,52317.0%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies1,64611.1%B32B · Layered products & laminates1,62511.0%C09J · Adhesives1,4089.5%Other6,34942.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 14,813 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy resin additives and fillers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a representative filing

Representative filing
US20090118442A12009-05-07

Curing accelerator for deep-ultraviolet-transmitting epoxy resin, deep-ultraviolet-transmitting epoxy resin composition, and deep-ultraviolet-transmitting epoxy resin cured product

NIPPON CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

The filing discloses a curing accelerator built from a tetraalkylphosphonium dialkyl phosphate, intended to produce deep-UV-transmitting epoxy resin cured products with high heat resistance. It targets a narrow but technically demanding niche: optical and UV-exposed applications where conventional curing chemistry compromises light transmission or thermal stability.Filed by Nippon Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd., published 2009-05-07.

US20090118442A1 — patent drawing 1US20090118442A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5278257APhenol-terminated polyurethane or polyurea(urethane) with epoxy resin369
2WO2007025007A1Epoxy compositions having improved impact resistance275
3EP1632533A1Process for producing modified epoxy resin261
4US20050070634A1Process for applying a streamable epoxy adhesive255
5US6573309B1Heat-curable, thermally expandable moulded part247
6US7037958B1Epoxy coating221
7US20070027233A1Process for producing modified epoxy resin219
8US5405688AEpoxy resin/aminopolysiloxane/aromatic oligomer composite217
9WO2006061249A1Aqueous binder for mineral fibers213
10US6572971B2Structural modified epoxy adhesive compositions212

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings — treat them as a map of foundational art, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, geography and citation data are read together.

Filing momentum
485 → 59
2017 vs. latest partial year

A field past its filing peak

Volume peaked in 2017 and has declined through the 2022 midpoint of 353 down to 59 in the most recent partial year. Even allowing for the 18-month publication lag, the trajectory points to a maturing space where core additive chemistries are largely staked out.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Geographic concentration
4,758 filings
Japan receiving office

Japan is the office of record

Japan accounts for nearly twice the volume of the next-largest office (United States, 2,623), with China and Europe close behind. Freedom-to-operate work that skips a Japanese search is working from an incomplete picture.

Receiving office distribution
Collaboration pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships found

Filing is largely solitary

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 14,813 families, and the strongest — 42 shared filings between two Japanese firms — is still a domestic, single-sector pairing. Cross-licensing or joint-development filings are the exception, not the norm.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Application pull
4,386 records
H01L semiconductor overlap

Electronics is a real secondary driver

Semiconductor devices (H01L) and printed circuits (H05K) together account for a substantial share of the corpus alongside core polymer classes, indicating that encapsulation and underfill use cases shape a meaningful portion of additive innovation, not just structural composites.

IPC technology composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy resin additives and fillers, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has stalled

Assignee-level filing has gone quiet across the board in the most recent year, even among historically active filers — a pattern worth checking against each firm's broader portfolio before reading too much into any single year.

Momentum check
-88% YoY
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shin-Etsu Chemical)

Even the most active recent filer is slowing

Shin-Etsu Chemical shows just 1 filing in the latest year against an 88% year-on-year decline — the only assignee in the momentum set with any recent activity at all. Every other tracked assignee, including Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. (Sumitomo Bakelite) and Resonac Holdings Corporation (Resonac), shows zero filings in the latest year.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Publication lag caveat
0 filings
across five of six tracked assignees

Read the latest year with caution

A near-universal drop to zero in the most recent year is consistent with the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication rather than an actual halt in R&D. The safer read is that these firms' most recent work simply has not published yet.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration density
42 shared filings
Resonac Holdings Corporation + Hitachi, Ltd.

The strongest tie is domestic and narrow

The single strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links two Japanese firms — Resonac and Hitachi — at 42 shared filings, with the next two pairs (Sumitomo Bakelite with NEC, and Sumitomo Bakelite with Sumitomo Dielec) both below 25. Cross-border joint filing is essentially absent from the top tier.

Co-assignee pair strength
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core toughening-agent and flame-retardant-filler claims
Deep-UV-stable curing acceleratorsPhosphonium-based latent catalystsNanofiller dispersion for thermal interface epoxiesHalogen-free flame-retardant synergist blendsLow-outgassing underfill fillers
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.1-88%
Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.0
Resonac Holdings Corporation0
Nitto Denko Corporation0
Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.0
Toray Industries, Inc.0
Dow Global Technologies LLC0
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trends above raise questions that a landscape summary can point to but not fully answer.

Check freedom-to-operate against the Japanese-office cluster

With Japan accounting for the largest single share of receiving-office volume, any new formulation work in toughening agents or curing accelerators should be checked against that cluster first, not treated as a secondary market.

Run a claim-level FTO check in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches for real white space

Thin filing density in areas like phosphonium-based latent catalysts or low-outgassing underfill fillers may reflect genuine white space or simply narrower commercial demand — the difference matters before committing R&D spend.

Explore white space mapping in Eureka

Watch for the publication-lag rebound

The near-universal drop to zero in the latest year across major assignees is likely a lag artifact rather than a real slowdown. Revisiting this trend in 12–18 months will show whether filing has actually stalled or simply not yet published.

Track assignee filing activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about epoxy resin additive patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Epoxy Resin Additives and Fillers in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole epoxy resin additives and fillers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.