https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/epoxy-resin-barrier-properties-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Polymers & Composites · Patent Landscape
Epoxy Resin Barrier Property Patents: Filing Trends and Leading Assignees
  • Filing has cooled since 2019. the 50-filing peak year, down to single digits by the most recent (partial) year — claim activity is settling rather than accelerating.
  • Laminates dominate the claim space. B32B appears in 862 of 1,328 records, nearly double the next-largest subclass, C09D coatings at 544.
  • Japan outfiles the US on this term. 306 receiving-office filings versus 272 in the US, signalling where barrier-epoxy priority filings actually originate.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,328
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-49%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (35 records) with 2024 (18) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,328 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families where epoxy resin or epoxy formulation claims are tied explicitly to moisture barrier, gas barrier, permeation resistance or barrier coating language, filtered to laminate, coating and polymer-processing IPC codes. It spans filings from 2015 through the current data cut-off, covering 1,328 published families across six major receiving offices.

The dataset skews toward laminate and packaging applications rather than pure resin chemistry, which shows up clearly in the IPC composition below. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year is always undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a peak.

Filing activity and technology composition
  1. 1MITSUBISHI GAS CHEM CO INC248
  2. 2KURARAY CO LTD51
  3. 3PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC41
  4. 4EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO34
  5. 5TOPPAN HOLDINGS INC34
  6. 6DAI NIPPON PRINTING CO LTD29
  7. 7NITTO DENKO CORP26
  8. 8SUMITOMO CHEM CO LTD25
  9. 9KANSAI PAINT CO LTD24
  10. 10HOLLISTER INCORPORAED21
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,328-family dataset: filing volume by year, and where those filings sit across the IPC subclasses that define the barrier-epoxy claim space.

A peak in 2019, then a plateau

Filings ran from 39 in 2017 to a peak of 50 in 2019, sat at 23 by the 2022 midpoint, and have not recovered since — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Treat the final year or two as undercounted given publication lag.

A peak in 2019, then a plateau013253850392017201850201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Laminates lead, chemistry follows

B32B (layered products) accounts for 862 records, well ahead of C09D coatings (544), C08G condensation polymers (400) and C08J polymer processing (386). Packaging-specific B65D and adhesive-specific C09J trail, suggesting most barrier claims are filed as laminate or coating structures rather than as standalone container or adhesive inventions.

Laminates lead, chemistry followsB32B · Layered products & laminates86264.9%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks54441.0%C08G · Condensation polymers40030.1%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions38629.1%C08L · Polymer compositions37628.3%B65D · Containers & packaging20915.7%C09J · Adhesives19114.4%C08K · Use of additives in polymers15311.5%Other93570.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,328 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy resin barrier properties and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a representative claim

Representative filing
US20100160494A12010-06-24

US20100160494A1 — Amine epoxy resin curing agent for gas barrier epoxy resin compositions

MITSUBISHI GAS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.

Filed by Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, this application claims an amine-based epoxy curing agent designed to impart high gas barrier performance and long pot life to the resulting epoxy composition, positioned for use as a coating agent and as an adhesive for laminates against polymers, paper and metal substrates.Abstract text is reproduced from the publication; claim scope should be verified against the granted claims before relying on it.

US20100160494A1 — patent drawing 1US20100160494A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6268055B1Photochromic epoxy resin coating composition and articles having such a coating417
2WO2003101862A1Cartridge for moisture-curable sealant298
3US6184311B1Powder coating composition of semi-crystalline polyester and curing agent202
4US5962093AThermally stable polyetheramines190
5US4423185AThermoplastic resinous composition172
6US4410595ALaminate of thermoplastic resinous composition137
7US20070154704A1Fluoropolymer coated films useful for photovoltaic modules134
8JP2002256208AComposition for coating having gas barrier property and coating112
9WO1991014745A1Coating compositions109
10JP2001310425AGas barrier film92

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of longer exposure time; read this as a map of influence within the searched corpus, not a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, IPC composition and receiving-office spread are read together.

Filing momentum
50 → flat
peak year 2019, declining since

Growth has stalled, not accelerated

Filings peaked at 50 in 2019 and had fallen to 23 by the 2022 midpoint, with no recovery since. This is a maturing claim space, not an emerging one — new entrants are filing into already-dense prior art rather than opening new ground.

Based on filing-year trend, 2017–2026
Structural concentration
862 of 1,328
records tagged B32B

Barrier claims are laminate claims first

Nearly two-thirds of records sit in B32B, the layered-products subclass, well ahead of coatings (C09D) or resin chemistry codes (C08G, C08J, C08L). Barrier performance in this corpus is predominantly claimed at the structure level, not the monomer or additive level.

IPC subclass distribution, this dataset
Geographic origin
306 vs 272
Japan vs US receiving-office filings

Japan edges out the US as filing origin

Japan Patent Office filings (306) exceed US filings (272), with EPO close behind at 242. For a technology area often assumed to be US- or Europe-led, the receiving-office data points to Japan as the primary first-filing jurisdiction.

Receiving office counts, this dataset
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy resin barrier properties, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the field is open

Recent-year momentum among the most prominent assignees shows near-universal pullback, while co-filing pairs reveal a small number of durable technical partnerships.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across multiple top assignees

Established filers have gone quiet

Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Kuraray, DuPont, Toppan Holdings and PPG Industries Ohio all show zero filings in the latest year in this dataset, with Dai Nippon Printing recording a -100% year-on-year drop. This is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a single company's retreat.

Recent-year momentum, top assignees
Collaboration
15 co-filings
strongest assignee pair

A handful of durable co-filing pairs

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest — Mitsubishi Gas Chemical with Henkel — has just 15 joint filings. Kansai Paint appears in two of the top three pairs, alongside Toyo Seikan and JFE Steel, pointing to a coatings-to-substrate collaboration pattern rather than broad industry-wide co-development.

Co-assignee pair analysis
White space
153 records
smallest IPC subclass, C08K additives

Additive-level claims are the thinnest layer

C08K (use of additives in polymers) is the smallest of the eight major IPC subclasses at 153 records, well behind the laminate and coating codes. Additive-driven barrier improvement — rather than structural or coating-level solutions — is comparatively under-claimed in this corpus.

IPC subclass distribution
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where filing density is low relative to the rest of the corpus, based on IPC composition and record counts above.
additive-level gas-barrier tuning (C08K routes)adhesive-integrated barrier layers (C09J overlap)amine curing agent barrier chemistrypackaging-specific barrier laminates (B65D)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc.0
Kuraray Co., Ltd.0
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont)0
Toppan Holdings Inc.0
PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.0
Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.0-100%
Nitto Denko Corporation0
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a maturing, laminate-dominated field with a small set of quiet incumbents. Two directions are worth pursuing next.

Map the additive and adhesive sub-branches in detail

C08K additive claims and C09J adhesive-barrier overlap are both thin relative to the laminate and coating codes. A focused search on these subclasses alone would clarify whether the gap is genuine white space or simply unindexed under different terms.

Explore this in Eureka →

Track the quiet incumbents for renewed activity

Several top assignees show zero filings in the latest year. Given publication lag, some of that may already be reversing; a rolling watch on these names would catch a resurgence before it shows up in aggregate trend charts.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Epoxy Resin Barrier Properties in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole epoxy resin barrier properties corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.