Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (35 records) with 2024 (18) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,328 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks patent families where epoxy resin or epoxy formulation claims are tied explicitly to moisture barrier, gas barrier, permeation resistance or barrier coating language, filtered to laminate, coating and polymer-processing IPC codes. It spans filings from 2015 through the current data cut-off, covering 1,328 published families across six major receiving offices.
The dataset skews toward laminate and packaging applications rather than pure resin chemistry, which shows up clearly in the IPC composition below. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year is always undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a peak.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 1,328-family dataset: filing volume by year, and where those filings sit across the IPC subclasses that define the barrier-epoxy claim space.
Filings ran from 39 in 2017 to a peak of 50 in 2019, sat at 23 by the 2022 midpoint, and have not recovered since — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Treat the final year or two as undercounted given publication lag.
B32B (layered products) accounts for 862 records, well ahead of C09D coatings (544), C08G condensation polymers (400) and C08J polymer processing (386). Packaging-specific B65D and adhesive-specific C09J trail, suggesting most barrier claims are filed as laminate or coating structures rather than as standalone container or adhesive inventions.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,328 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy resin barrier properties and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, this application claims an amine-based epoxy curing agent designed to impart high gas barrier performance and long pot life to the resulting epoxy composition, positioned for use as a coating agent and as an adhesive for laminates against polymers, paper and metal substrates.Abstract text is reproduced from the publication; claim scope should be verified against the granted claims before relying on it.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6268055B1 | Photochromic epoxy resin coating composition and articles having such a coating | 417 |
| 2 | WO2003101862A1 | Cartridge for moisture-curable sealant | 298 |
| 3 | US6184311B1 | Powder coating composition of semi-crystalline polyester and curing agent | 202 |
| 4 | US5962093A | Thermally stable polyetheramines | 190 |
| 5 | US4423185A | Thermoplastic resinous composition | 172 |
| 6 | US4410595A | Laminate of thermoplastic resinous composition | 137 |
| 7 | US20070154704A1 | Fluoropolymer coated films useful for photovoltaic modules | 134 |
| 8 | JP2002256208A | Composition for coating having gas barrier property and coating | 112 |
| 9 | WO1991014745A1 | Coating compositions | 109 |
| 10 | JP2001310425A | Gas barrier film | 92 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of longer exposure time; read this as a map of influence within the searched corpus, not a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once filing volume, IPC composition and receiving-office spread are read together.
Filings peaked at 50 in 2019 and had fallen to 23 by the 2022 midpoint, with no recovery since. This is a maturing claim space, not an emerging one — new entrants are filing into already-dense prior art rather than opening new ground.
Nearly two-thirds of records sit in B32B, the layered-products subclass, well ahead of coatings (C09D) or resin chemistry codes (C08G, C08J, C08L). Barrier performance in this corpus is predominantly claimed at the structure level, not the monomer or additive level.
Japan Patent Office filings (306) exceed US filings (272), with EPO close behind at 242. For a technology area often assumed to be US- or Europe-led, the receiving-office data points to Japan as the primary first-filing jurisdiction.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy resin barrier properties, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum among the most prominent assignees shows near-universal pullback, while co-filing pairs reveal a small number of durable technical partnerships.
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Kuraray, DuPont, Toppan Holdings and PPG Industries Ohio all show zero filings in the latest year in this dataset, with Dai Nippon Printing recording a -100% year-on-year drop. This is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a single company's retreat.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest — Mitsubishi Gas Chemical with Henkel — has just 15 joint filings. Kansai Paint appears in two of the top three pairs, alongside Toyo Seikan and JFE Steel, pointing to a coatings-to-substrate collaboration pattern rather than broad industry-wide co-development.
C08K (use of additives in polymers) is the smallest of the eight major IPC subclasses at 153 records, well behind the laminate and coating codes. Additive-driven barrier improvement — rather than structural or coating-level solutions — is comparatively under-claimed in this corpus.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Kuraray Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) | 0 | — |
| Toppan Holdings Inc. | 0 | — |
| PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Nitto Denko Corporation | 0 | — |
| Henkel AG & Co. KGaA | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a maturing, laminate-dominated field with a small set of quiet incumbents. Two directions are worth pursuing next.
C08K additive claims and C09J adhesive-barrier overlap are both thin relative to the laminate and coating codes. A focused search on these subclasses alone would clarify whether the gap is genuine white space or simply unindexed under different terms.
Explore this in Eureka →Several top assignees show zero filings in the latest year. Given publication lag, some of that may already be reversing; a rolling watch on these names would catch a resurgence before it shows up in aggregate trend charts.
Set up monitoring in Eureka →The assignee ranking in this dataset is dominated by a mix of Japanese chemical and coatings firms alongside a few Western materials companies, with Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Kuraray, DuPont, Toppan Holdings, PPG Industries and Dai Nippon Printing all appearing among the more active names. None of these shows filing activity in the most recent year in this corpus, which is more a function of publication lag and a broader plateau in filings than a sign any one company has exited the field. Verifying current activity requires checking each assignee's filings directly rather than relying on the latest-year snapshot alone.
Filing volume peaked in 2019 at 50 records and had declined to 23 by 2022, with no recovery visible through the most recent full years in this dataset. That pattern reads as a maturing claim space rather than a growing one — activity continues, but at a lower and fairly flat rate compared to the late 2010s. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final year or two in any such trend will always understate true activity, so a firm conclusion about the very latest period should wait for another filing cycle.
In this dataset the two terms are searched together because barrier-epoxy filings frequently claim both properties in a single composition, but they are not identical: gas barrier claims typically address oxygen or other gas permeation through a film or coating, while moisture barrier claims address water vapor transmission specifically. The representative filing in this landscape, an amine-based epoxy curing agent, is explicitly framed around gas barrier performance while also serving as a general-purpose adhesive and coating agent. Anyone drafting around either property should check the specific permeation metric claimed — gas transmission rate and water vapor transmission rate are measured and claimed differently even within the same resin family.
The IPC composition points strongly toward layered products and laminates (B32B, 862 records) and coatings (C09D, 544 records), with packaging-specific claims (B65D, 209 records) and adhesives (C09J, 191 records) forming smaller but distinct clusters. This suggests the core commercial applications are laminate structures and protective coatings — used across packaging, electronics encapsulation and metal protection — rather than standalone resin chemistry sold in isolation. A company evaluating freedom to operate should check both the laminate-structure claims and the underlying coating or adhesive claims, since a single barrier solution is often protected at more than one structural level.
Relative to the laminate and coating subclasses, additive-level claims (C08K, 153 records) are the thinnest major category in this dataset, suggesting that barrier improvement achieved through additive formulation rather than structural or coating design is comparatively under-claimed. The small number of co-assignee pairs — only 10 in total, with the strongest pair sharing just 15 joint filings — also indicates that cross-industry collaboration on barrier epoxy technology is limited rather than the norm. Both patterns point to the same conclusion: most of the crowded claim space sits at the structure and coating level, leaving formulation-level and collaborative filings comparatively open.
Go past this page: query the whole epoxy resin barrier properties corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.