Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since a 2019 peak of 673. annual output has drifted down toward single digits by 2026, well below the 2017 base of 614.
- Condensation chemistry dominates the claim map. C08G alone accounts for 16,569 records, more than C08L, C08K and C09D combined.
- Even the household names have gone quiet. several long-standing filers show 0 filings in the latest year, and the rest report double-digit YoY declines.
Filing growth compares 2021 (498 records) with 2024 (300) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 69,046 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the epoxy resin synthesis patent record shows
Epoxy resin polymer synthesis has been claimed under C08G59, C08L63 and related subclasses for decades, and the corpus behind this page — 69,046 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 — reflects a field that built out its core chemistry early. The search spans curing-agent formulation, prepolymer synthesis and bio-based epoxy routes, filtered to records that name epoxy resin, epoxy or epoxy formulation in the title and cross-reference curing agents, prepolymers or bio-based routes in the title or claims.
Filing volume rose from 614 in 2017 to a peak of 673 in 2019, then eased back through the low-to-mid 500s by 2022 before falling sharply toward the most recent, still-partial year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years understate true filing activity — but the multi-year decline from the 2019 peak is a real trend, not a reporting artefact.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the 69,046 records split across IPC subclasses that touch epoxy chemistry.
A field past its filing peak
From 614 filings in 2017 to a peak of 673 in 2019, then a decline through 547 at the 2022 midpoint and down to single digits in the most recent, partial year — consistent with a mature chemistry rather than an emerging one.
Condensation chemistry leads, downstream uses trail
C08G (condensation polymers) leads at 16,569 records, ahead of C08L (polymer compositions, 11,479) and C08K (additives, 4,664). Coatings (C09D), processing (C08J) and adhesives (C09J) each sit in the 2,700–3,900 range, while electronics-adjacent filing under H01L and H05K trails at 2,114 and 1,786 — evidence that epoxy synthesis claims still outnumber application-specific claims in electronics packaging.
Shares are the percentage of the 69,046 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy resin polymer synthesis and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in epoxy resin synthesis
US4534882A — Method of making an epoxy prepolymer curing agent
A method of making an epoxy prepolymer curing agent is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of reacting a mixture of piperidine and an epoxy resin so as to form an epoxy prepolymer adduct. The adduct is mixed with 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole thereby forming the curing agent composition.Filed by Hughes Aircraft Company, granted 1985-08-13 — illustrates how early aerospace-driven curing-agent chemistry still anchors claim scope decades later.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4069055A | Photocurable epoxy compositions containing group Va onium salts | 1,296 |
| 2 | US4985340A | Energy curable compositions: two component curing agents | 598 |
| 3 | US3708296A | Photopolymerization of epoxy monomers | 593 |
| 4 | US4058401A | Photocurable compositions containing group via aromatic onium salts | 563 |
| 5 | US6268055B1 | Photochromic epoxy resin coating composition and articles having such a coating | 417 |
| 6 | US20030080341A1 | Light emitting diode, optical semiconductor element and epoxy resin composition suitable for optical semicond… | 395 |
| 7 | US5278257A | Phenol-terminated polyurethane or polyurea(urethane) with epoxy resin | 369 |
| 8 | US3496250A | Blends of epoxy resins and acrylonitrile butadiene-styrene graft copolymers | 328 |
| 9 | US4751249A | Reinforcement insert for a structural member and method of making and using the same | 315 |
| 10 | US4778851A | Rubber-modified epoxy compounds | 311 |
Citation counts accumulate over time inside this searched corpus, so older photocurable-chemistry patents dominate the top of the list; treat this as a measure of historical influence, not of current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Four read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the citation table, aimed at where a new filing would land and how crowded that ground already is.
Volume has fallen for six straight years
The 2019 peak of 673 filings gave way to 547 by the 2022 midpoint and single digits in the most recent year. Some of that drop is publication lag, but the multi-year direction predates the lag window and points to a genuinely slowing filing rate.
Core synthesis chemistry is the densest ground
C08G alone carries more records than the next two subclasses combined, meaning new prepolymer and condensation-route claims face the thickest prior art. Downstream application classes — coatings, adhesives, electronics — are comparatively open by volume.
Photocurable chemistry still anchors the field
The most-cited records are photocurable and onium-salt curing systems from the 1970s–90s. Their citation counts reflect decades of accumulation inside a searched corpus, not current relevance — newer bio-based or low-VOC routes have not had time to accrue comparable citation volume.
Co-filing is rare and concentrated
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest — a materials major and its subsidiary — accounts for 27 shared filings. Most assignees file independently, so joint-development signals are the exception rather than the rule here.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy resin polymer synthesis, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | Rohm and Haas Company (USA) | 27 |
| Resonac Holdings Corporation (formerly Showa Denko) | Hitachi, Ltd. | 16 |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | MULLINS MICHAEL J | 12 |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | LUTZ ANDREAS | 12 |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | University of Minnesota | 10 |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | ZHANG YI | 10 |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | HEFNER ROBERT E | 10 |
| Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | Henkel AG & Co. KGaA | 10 |
The strongest co-assignee pairs sit inside single corporate families (parent-subsidiary) or link a filer to a named inventor, rather than across competing firms — a sign that formal cross-company R&D partnerships are not a visible feature of this field's patent record.
Who is still active, and who has stopped
Recent-year momentum diverges sharply from historical filing weight. Several of the field's largest historical filers show flat or declining output in the latest year, while smaller filers account for what little recent activity remains.
Sika Technology AG
The only assignee in the momentum data still filing more than one patent in the latest year, though even this figure is down 60% year over year — a slowdown rather than a retreat.
Dow Chemical Company · Dow Global Technologies LLC · Toray Industries, Inc.
These historically significant filers show zero filings in the most recent year, with Toray Industries, Inc. down 100% year over year — consistent with the field-wide filing decline rather than an isolated retreat by any one firm.
Legacy chemical majors, minimal recent output
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. each recorded one filing in the latest year, down 92% and 50% YoY respectively — both still present in the field but at a fraction of historical pace.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Sika Technology AG | 2 | -60% |
| Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | 1 | -92% |
| Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. | 1 | -50% |
| Dow Chemical Company | 0 | — |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| Toray Industries, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Resonac Holdings Corporation (formerly Showa Denko) | 0 | -100% |
| 3M Innovative Properties Company (USA) | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this from here
The trend and IPC data point to a field with dense core chemistry and thinner downstream claims. The next step is usually to test a specific claim idea against that density rather than read more aggregate charts.
Stress-test a claim against the C08G prior art
Run a candidate prepolymer or curing-agent claim against the condensation-polymer subclass specifically, since that is where 16,569 records concentrate and where novelty is hardest to establish.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaCheck activity before assuming a competitor has exited
Several major historical filers show zero filings in the latest year; confirm whether that reflects publication lag, a strategic pause, or a genuine exit before adjusting freedom-to-operate assumptions.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaLook at receiving-office split for filing strategy
With US, EPO and PCT carrying the bulk of records and Canada, UK and Australia trailing, weigh whether a downstream-application claim needs the same jurisdictional spread as a core-chemistry claim.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaCommon questions about epoxy resin synthesis patents
The data shows filings peaking at 673 in 2019, easing to 547 by 2022, and dropping sharply toward the most recent year. Part of that recent drop is a reporting artefact, because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years are always understated at the time of measurement. But the multi-year decline from 2019 through 2022 predates that lag window, which points to a genuinely mature filing base rather than a data gap alone — core synthesis routes for epoxy resin, curing agents and prepolymers were largely staked out in earlier decades, and new filings increasingly target narrower formulation or application claims instead of foundational chemistry.
Recent-year momentum data shows most of the historically dominant filers, including Dow Chemical Company (Dow) and its affiliate Dow Global Technologies LLC, recording zero filings in the latest tracked year. The assignees with any recent activity — Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. and Sika Technology AG — report only one or two filings each, all down sharply year over year. This does not necessarily mean these companies have exited the field; it may reflect publication lag or a strategic pause, but it does mean fresh filing activity is thin across the board right now.
The IPC composition data shows condensation-polymer chemistry (C08G) and general polymer compositions (C08L) carrying the bulk of the corpus, while application-adjacent classes like printed-circuit encapsulation (H05K) and semiconductor packaging (H01L) trail well behind. That gap suggests downstream application claims — bio-based low-VOC prepolymers, latent curing agents that avoid imidazole chemistry, and epoxy adhesive formulations outside the core C09J classification — are comparatively less claimed than the underlying synthesis chemistry itself. Any new filing should still be checked against the dense C08G prior art before assuming an application-side claim is genuinely open.
US4534882A, assigned to Hughes Aircraft Company and granted in 1985, claims a method of making an epoxy prepolymer curing agent by reacting piperidine with an epoxy resin to form a prepolymer adduct, then mixing that adduct with 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole to form the finished curing agent. It is a specific process claim tied to that exact chemical combination, not a broad claim over epoxy curing agents generally. A new filing using different amine chemistry, a different imidazole derivative, or a materially different reaction sequence would not necessarily be blocked by this patent, though it remains a useful reference point for how narrowly curing-agent process claims were drafted even in early aerospace-driven epoxy work.
The most-cited records in this corpus are dominated by photocurable epoxy chemistry from the 1970s through 1990s, led by US4069055A on group Va onium salt photocurable compositions with 1,296 citations, followed by patents on energy-curable two-component systems and onium-salt photopolymerization. High citation counts in a searched corpus accumulate over decades and favour older records almost by default, so this list is best read as a map of historically influential chemistry rather than a signal of what is most relevant to file around today. Newer bio-based or low-VOC epoxy routes have not had the time in circulation to accumulate comparable citation counts, regardless of their current commercial relevance.
Research Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole epoxy resin polymer synthesis corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.