Book a demo

Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/epoxy-resin-polymer-synthesis-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Polymers & Composites · Patent Landscape
Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis Patents: Who Is Still Filing
  • Filing has cooled since a 2019 peak of 673. annual output has drifted down toward single digits by 2026, well below the 2017 base of 614.
  • Condensation chemistry dominates the claim map. C08G alone accounts for 16,569 records, more than C08L, C08K and C09D combined.
  • Even the household names have gone quiet. several long-standing filers show 0 filings in the latest year, and the rest report double-digit YoY declines.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
69K
Published Records
14%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-40%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (498 records) with 2024 (300) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 69,046 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the epoxy resin synthesis patent record shows

Epoxy resin polymer synthesis has been claimed under C08G59, C08L63 and related subclasses for decades, and the corpus behind this page — 69,046 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 — reflects a field that built out its core chemistry early. The search spans curing-agent formulation, prepolymer synthesis and bio-based epoxy routes, filtered to records that name epoxy resin, epoxy or epoxy formulation in the title and cross-reference curing agents, prepolymers or bio-based routes in the title or claims.

Filing volume rose from 614 in 2017 to a peak of 673 in 2019, then eased back through the low-to-mid 500s by 2022 before falling sharply toward the most recent, still-partial year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years understate true filing activity — but the multi-year decline from the 2019 peak is a real trend, not a reporting artefact.

Annual filings, 2017–2026 (2026 partial)
  1. 1RESONAC CORP2,810
  2. 2SUMITOMO BAKELITE CO LTD2,451
  3. 3TORAY INDUSTRIES INC1,526
  4. 4SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD1,336
  5. 5THE DOW CHEM CO1,332
  6. 6DIC CORP1,267
  7. 7DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC1,158
  8. 8NITTO DENKO CORP992
  9. 9AJINOMOTO CO INC989
  10. 10MITSUBISHI GAS CHEM CO INC945
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the 69,046 records split across IPC subclasses that touch epoxy chemistry.

A field past its filing peak

From 614 filings in 2017 to a peak of 673 in 2019, then a decline through 547 at the 2022 midpoint and down to single digits in the most recent, partial year — consistent with a mature chemistry rather than an emerging one.

A field past its filing peak0200400600800614201720186732019202020212022202320242025102026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Condensation chemistry leads, downstream uses trail

C08G (condensation polymers) leads at 16,569 records, ahead of C08L (polymer compositions, 11,479) and C08K (additives, 4,664). Coatings (C09D), processing (C08J) and adhesives (C09J) each sit in the 2,700–3,900 range, while electronics-adjacent filing under H01L and H05K trails at 2,114 and 1,786 — evidence that epoxy synthesis claims still outnumber application-specific claims in electronics packaging.

Condensation chemistry leads, downstream uses trailC08G · Condensation polymers16,56924.0%C08L · Polymer compositions11,47916.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers4,6646.8%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks3,8285.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions3,6975.4%C09J · Adhesives2,7804.0%H01L · Semiconductor devices2,1143.1%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies1,7862.6%Other11,35716.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 69,046 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy resin polymer synthesis and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in epoxy resin synthesis

Representative record
US4534882A1985-08-13

US4534882A — Method of making an epoxy prepolymer curing agent

HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY A DE CORP

A method of making an epoxy prepolymer curing agent is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of reacting a mixture of piperidine and an epoxy resin so as to form an epoxy prepolymer adduct. The adduct is mixed with 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole thereby forming the curing agent composition.Filed by Hughes Aircraft Company, granted 1985-08-13 — illustrates how early aerospace-driven curing-agent chemistry still anchors claim scope decades later.

View full record
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4069055APhotocurable epoxy compositions containing group Va onium salts1,296
2US4985340AEnergy curable compositions: two component curing agents598
3US3708296APhotopolymerization of epoxy monomers593
4US4058401APhotocurable compositions containing group via aromatic onium salts563
5US6268055B1Photochromic epoxy resin coating composition and articles having such a coating417
6US20030080341A1Light emitting diode, optical semiconductor element and epoxy resin composition suitable for optical semicond…395
7US5278257APhenol-terminated polyurethane or polyurea(urethane) with epoxy resin369
8US3496250ABlends of epoxy resins and acrylonitrile butadiene-styrene graft copolymers328
9US4751249AReinforcement insert for a structural member and method of making and using the same315
10US4778851ARubber-modified epoxy compounds311

Citation counts accumulate over time inside this searched corpus, so older photocurable-chemistry patents dominate the top of the list; treat this as a measure of historical influence, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Four read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the citation table, aimed at where a new filing would land and how crowded that ground already is.

Filing momentum
673 → 10
peak 2019 vs. latest partial year

Volume has fallen for six straight years

The 2019 peak of 673 filings gave way to 547 by the 2022 midpoint and single digits in the most recent year. Some of that drop is publication lag, but the multi-year direction predates the lag window and points to a genuinely slowing filing rate.

Trend data, 2017–2026
Claim concentration
16,569 records
C08G condensation polymers

Core synthesis chemistry is the densest ground

C08G alone carries more records than the next two subclasses combined, meaning new prepolymer and condensation-route claims face the thickest prior art. Downstream application classes — coatings, adhesives, electronics — are comparatively open by volume.

IPC composition, 8 subclasses
Citation influence
1,296 citations
top-cited record, US4069055A

Photocurable chemistry still anchors the field

The most-cited records are photocurable and onium-salt curing systems from the 1970s–90s. Their citation counts reflect decades of accumulation inside a searched corpus, not current relevance — newer bio-based or low-VOC routes have not had time to accrue comparable citation volume.

Top 5 cited records
Collaboration density
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 27 shared filings

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest — a materials major and its subsidiary — accounts for 27 shared filings. Most assignees file independently, so joint-development signals are the exception rather than the rule here.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy resin polymer synthesis, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where joint filing actually happens
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Dow Global Technologies LLCRohm and Haas Company (USA)27
Resonac Holdings Corporation (formerly Showa Denko)Hitachi, Ltd.16
Dow Global Technologies LLCMULLINS MICHAEL J12
Dow Global Technologies LLCLUTZ ANDREAS12
Dow Global Technologies LLCUniversity of Minnesota10
Dow Global Technologies LLCZHANG YI10
Dow Global Technologies LLCHEFNER ROBERT E10
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc.Henkel AG & Co. KGaA10

The strongest co-assignee pairs sit inside single corporate families (parent-subsidiary) or link a filer to a named inventor, rather than across competing firms — a sign that formal cross-company R&D partnerships are not a visible feature of this field's patent record.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is still active, and who has stopped

Recent-year momentum diverges sharply from historical filing weight. Several of the field's largest historical filers show flat or declining output in the latest year, while smaller filers account for what little recent activity remains.

Momentum leader (relative)
2 filings, -60% YoY
latest year

Sika Technology AG

The only assignee in the momentum data still filing more than one patent in the latest year, though even this figure is down 60% year over year — a slowdown rather than a retreat.

Recent-year momentum tracking
Gone quiet
0 filings, latest year
three of six tracked assignees

Dow Chemical Company · Dow Global Technologies LLC · Toray Industries, Inc.

These historically significant filers show zero filings in the most recent year, with Toray Industries, Inc. down 100% year over year — consistent with the field-wide filing decline rather than an isolated retreat by any one firm.

Recent-year momentum tracking
Single-digit filers
1 filing, latest year
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. · Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.

Legacy chemical majors, minimal recent output

Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. each recorded one filing in the latest year, down 92% and 50% YoY respectively — both still present in the field but at a fraction of historical pace.

Recent-year momentum tracking
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where volume by receiving office and IPC subclass suggests thinner coverage relative to the core chemistry:
low-VOC bio-based epoxy prepolymersimidazole-free latent curing agentsepoxy-adhesive claims outside C09J coreprinted-circuit epoxy encapsulation (H05K)photochromic epoxy coating systems
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Sika Technology AG2-60%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.1-92%
Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.1-50%
Dow Chemical Company0
Dow Global Technologies LLC0
Toray Industries, Inc.0-100%
Resonac Holdings Corporation (formerly Showa Denko)0-100%
3M Innovative Properties Company (USA)0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this from here

The trend and IPC data point to a field with dense core chemistry and thinner downstream claims. The next step is usually to test a specific claim idea against that density rather than read more aggregate charts.

Stress-test a claim against the C08G prior art

Run a candidate prepolymer or curing-agent claim against the condensation-polymer subclass specifically, since that is where 16,569 records concentrate and where novelty is hardest to establish.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Check activity before assuming a competitor has exited

Several major historical filers show zero filings in the latest year; confirm whether that reflects publication lag, a strategic pause, or a genuine exit before adjusting freedom-to-operate assumptions.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Look at receiving-office split for filing strategy

With US, EPO and PCT carrying the bulk of records and Canada, UK and Australia trailing, weigh whether a downstream-application claim needs the same jurisdictional spread as a core-chemistry claim.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about epoxy resin synthesis patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Epoxy Resin Polymer Synthesis in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole epoxy resin polymer synthesis corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.