https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/epoxy-resin-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Polymers & Composites · Patent Landscape
Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability Patents
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 41 families filed that year versus 7 in the most recent (partial) year — the field is past its filing high, not before it.
  • Condensation chemistry dominates the claim space. C08G records outnumber every other IPC subclass, with C08L polymer compositions a close second — durability claims cluster on formulation, not on test methodology.
  • The named leaders have gone quiet. Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero new filings in the latest year, including one at -100% YoY — active filing has shifted to entities outside the historical leaderboard.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,412
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-51%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (41 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,412 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families where epoxy resin or epoxy formulation claims intersect with durability-specific language — thermal aging, hydrolytic stability, UV durability, long-term reliability — inside IPC classes covering polymer compositions, condensation resins and material testing. That intersection matters: a generic epoxy composition patent is not counted here unless its claims or description tie the chemistry to a durability or aging behaviour.

1,412 patent families sit in the dataset, spanning filings from 2015 through the 2026 cutoff. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — read the recent decline with that lag in mind, not as a final verdict.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1GENERAL ELECTRIC CO84
  2. 2TOSHIBA KEMIKARU KK76
  3. 3DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC71
  4. 4EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO49
  5. 5SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV44
  6. 6VALSPAR CORP26
  7. 7FRX POLYMERS INC25
  8. 8HUNTSMAN ADVANCED MATERIALS LICENSING SWITZERLAND GMBH24
  9. 9THE DOW CHEM CO23
  10. 10ADITYA BIRLA CHEM (THAILAND) LTD22
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,412 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A 2018 peak, then a slow decline

Filings rose to 41 in 2018, sat near 30 at the 2022 midpoint, and have fallen since — a pattern consistent with a technology area that filled its core claim space early and has been filing incrementally around the edges since.

A 2018 peak, then a slow decline01325385018201741201820192020412021202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Condensation and polymer-composition chemistry lead

C08G (condensation polymers) and C08L (polymer compositions) carry the bulk of records, with C08K (additives), C09D (coatings) and H01L (semiconductor devices) forming a second tier — durability claims are written primarily against resin chemistry and formulation additives, with coatings and electronics packaging as the largest application-side draws.

Condensation and polymer-composition chemistry leadC08G · Condensation polymers1,06175.1%C08L · Polymer compositions89863.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers49835.3%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks32723.2%H01L · Semiconductor devices22015.6%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)17012.0%C09J · Adhesives16511.7%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions916.4%Other87762.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,412 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about epoxy resin reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records

Representative record
US20030214073A12003-11-20

Hardener for an epoxy resin compound, method for curing an epoxy resin compound, epoxy resin compound, and utilizations thereof

HOHN, KLAUS

A hardener for an epoxy resin includes an accelerator having a tetraalkylphosphonium salt. The tetraalkylphosphonium salt has the following formula: P(R', R'', R''', R'''')4+, X-, where R', R'', R''', R'''' are individually-selected alkyls ranging from C2 to C20, X- is an anion such as Hal-, ClO4-, RCO2(Ac-), MX'6-; where M is P, As, Sb; and X- is Hal-. The hardener, an application thereof in the fabrication of an epoxy resin, the epoxy resin itself, and a method for curing an epoxy resin compound, create a material system that is suitable for the field of optoelectronics.Filed by an individual inventor rather than a corporate assignee — a reminder that influential claim positions in this space are not confined to the major filers.

View full record
Highest-citation patents in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4069055APhotocurable epoxy compositions containing group Va onium salts1,296
2US4058401APhotocurable compositions containing group via aromatic onium salts563
3EP0012463A1Thermosetting resinous binder compositions, their preparation, and use as coating materials297
4US4212781AModified epoxy resins, processes for making and using same and substrates coated therewith291
5US4138255APhoto-curing method for epoxy resin using group VIa onium salt286
6US6121398AHigh modulus polymers and composites from plant oils254
7US4247439AWater-borne coating composition made from epoxy resin, polymeric acid and tertiary amine249
8US3975346ABoron-containing, quaternary ammonium salt-containing resin compositions246
9US5296525AAqueous coating compositions194
10US5863970AEpoxy resin composition with cycloaliphatic epoxy-functional siloxane160

Citation counts inside any searched corpus skew toward older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — treat this table as a map of foundational influence, not of current competitive priority.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field stands

Four read-throughs of the filing, citation and co-filing data — useful for deciding where a freedom-to-operate search needs to go deeper.

Filing momentum
41 → 7
peak year to latest year

The core wave has passed

2018's peak of 41 families has not been matched since; by the 2022 midpoint annual filing had already dropped to 30, and the decline has continued. Publication lag means the last year or two will fill in somewhat, but the trend direction is not in doubt.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim concentration
1,061 of 1,412
records touching C08G

Condensation chemistry is the crowded lane

Three out of every four families in this dataset touch C08G condensation-polymer claims, and nearly two-thirds touch C08L compositions. New formulation claims in either subclass are filing into dense prior art.

IPC composition
Filer activity
0 in latest year
across every tracked leading assignee

The historical leaderboard has stopped filing

Every assignee with tracked recent-year momentum — including one at -100% YoY — shows zero filings in the latest year. That does not mean the technology is abandoned; it means current activity is coming from filers outside the historical top ranks, and a leaderboard built on cumulative counts will miss them.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the dataset

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across 1,412 families, and the strongest pair is a corporate-subsidiary relationship rather than an external partnership. Joint development filing is not how this field typically moves.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to epoxy resin reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing patterns
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
TOSHIBA KEMIKARU KKToshiba Chemical Corporation42
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyRAJENDRAN GOVINDASAMY PARAMASIVAM7
Dow Global Technologies LLCWILMOT NATHAN4
Dow Global Technologies LLCDUGGAL RAJAT4
Dow Global Technologies LLCSHAH HARSHAD M2
Dow Global Technologies LLCSHAH HARSHAD2
Dow Global Technologies LLCSCHROCK ALAN K2
Dow Global Technologies LLCSCHROCK ALAN2

The strongest co-assignee link ties a company to its own subsidiary under two name renderings, not to an outside partner — cross-company joint filing is the exception here, not the rule.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who filed, and where the gate stands now

The named assignees below built the foundational claim positions in this space. Their recent-year momentum has gone flat, which changes what a new entrant needs to check before filing.

Legacy chemicals majors
0 in latest year
recent filings, multiple leading assignees

Quiet at the top

Assignees including General Electric Company, Dow Global Technologies LLC, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V. built large historical positions but show no filings in the latest tracked year. Their granted claims remain live prior art regardless of current filing pace.

Recent-year momentum data
Japanese electronics/materials filers
42
strongest co-assignee pair count

Toshiba's dual-entity filing pattern

TOSHIBA KEMIKARU KK and Toshiba Chemical Corporation form the strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset at 42 shared filings, reflecting a single filer recorded under two name variants — worth deduplicating before drawing rank conclusions from raw assignee counts.

Co-assignee pairs
Receiving-office spread
US 372 · EPO 275 · JP 254
top three receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in three jurisdictions

The United States, European and Japanese offices together receive the large majority of filings, with WIPO PCT, China and Canada trailing well behind. A freedom-to-operate check limited to these three offices will catch most of the enforceable claim density.

Receiving offices
🔍
Where the claim space is thinner
Sub-areas inside this dataset with comparatively light claim density — worth a closer look before assuming the space is closed.
hydrolytic stability test protocolsUV-durability additive synergy claimsadhesive-specific aging (C09J overlap)thermal-aging coating formulations (C09D overlap)polymer-processing durability (C08J overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
General Electric Company0
TOSHIBA KEMIKARU KK0
Dow Global Technologies LLC0-100%
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company0
Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V.0
Toshiba Chemical Corporation0
Huntsman Advanced Materials Licensing (Switzerland) GmbH0
The Dow Chemical Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The landscape data points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the dense subclasses

C08G and C08L carry the bulk of granted claims. Any new formulation work should be checked against both before drafting, not just the durability-specific literature.

Search C08G/C08L prior art →

Investigate who is filing now, outside the legacy leaderboard

Every historically leading assignee shows zero recent filings. Identifying the current active filers requires looking past cumulative rank.

Map recent filers →

Scope the under-claimed adjacent branches

Adhesive, coating and polymer-processing overlaps show lighter claim density than the core resin chemistry. These are candidate areas for a first-mover filing.

Explore white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about epoxy resin reliability patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Epoxy Resin Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole epoxy resin reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.