Etch Damage & Low k Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026
Etch Damage and Low k Integration Patents
Filing has cooled sharply. from a peak of 22 filings in 2021 to just 1 in 2024, a -95% drop over that three-year span. Filings rose to a peak of 22 in 2021, then fell to 1 by 2024 — a -95% decline over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as evidence of continued decline, since publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months.
- 1VERSUM MATERIALS US LLC91
- 2AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC11
- 3GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC9
- 4INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO ELECTRONICS CENT (IMEC VZW)8
- 5TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD7
See the full etch damage and low k integration analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Frequently asked questions
What causes plasma-induced damage in porous low k dielectrics?
Plasma exposure during etch and ash steps strips carbon from the organosilicate matrix of porous low k films, a process known as carbon depletion. The loss of carbon leaves the film more hydrophilic and structurally porous, which raises its dielectric constant (k value) and increases leakage current between interconnects. This is why the patent literature in this space pairs damage-mode claims with repair-process claims, since restoring the film’s hydrophobicity is treated as inseparable from characterizing the damage itself.
Who are the leading patent holders in etch damage and low k repair?
The assignee ranking in this dataset is heavily concentrated, with the top-ranked company holding 91 records against a fifth-place count of 7 and a tenth-place count of 4 across 36 ranked companies. That leader’s portfolio centers on ultraviolet and thermal treatments for sealing porous low k surfaces. Beyond the leader, activity drops off quickly into a long tail of companies with only a handful of filings each, rather than a cluster of comparably sized competitors.
Why has patent filing in this area declined since 2021?
Filings peaked at 22 in 2021 and fell to 1 by 2024, a decline of about 95% over that span, based on filings that have already been published and are old enough not to be affected by publication lag. This pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core repair mechanisms — UV curing, silylation, sidewall treatment — were claimed early and thoroughly, leaving less room for new foundational filings. It does not necessarily mean the underlying manufacturing techniques have stopped being used industrially.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Etch Damage and Low k Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.