Book a demo

EUV Lithography Patent Landscape 2026

EUV Lithography Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

EUV Lithography Patent Landscape in 2026

EUV lithography is a mature, highly concentrated field where a handful of equipment makers, chipmakers, and materials suppliers collectively dominate filings. Annual volume peaked in 2021 and has since eased, though the multi-year corpus reflects a decade of sustained investment across optics, photoresist chemistry, and process control.

10,643
Patent families in scope
48%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-1%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··8 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

ASML and TSMC anchor a deeply concentrated top tier

The leading position belongs to ASML Netherlands BV, whose patent records place it narrowly ahead of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd in the applicant ranking. The two together account for a dominant share of activity among the top filers, reflecting the field’s dependence on a single primary tool supplier and a single leading-edge foundry.

The top five filers — ASML Netherlands BV, TSMC, Nikon, Shin-Etsu Chemical, and Carl Zeiss SMT — collectively hold 48% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, signalling a two-tier structure: a narrow group of deep specialists followed by a longer tail of materials, process, and design-tool companies each holding meaningfully smaller shares.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1ASML Netherlands BV4,045
2Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4,001
3Nikon Corporation2,442
4Shin-Etsu Chemical Co Ltd2,370
5Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH2,178
6Fujifilm Corporation1,299
7Intel Corporation995
8Applied Materials Inc947
9Samsung Electronics Co Ltd921
10Tokyo Electron Ltd881
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11AGC Inc824
12Canon Inc766
13International Business Machines Corporation709
14ASML Holding NV564
15Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co Ltd528
16Lam Research Corporation442
17KLA Corporation410
18Nissan Chemical Corporation362
19Sumitomo Chemical Co Ltd351
20imec vzw261
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect distinct roles: ASML owns the scanner platform, TSMC drives process integration, Nikon and Carl Zeiss SMT cover optics and illumination, and Shin-Etsu Chemical anchors the photoresist materials supply chain. This interdependence makes head-on displacement of any single leader difficult without engaging the full ecosystem.

Filing counts for 2024 and especially 2025–2026 are subject to publication lag and will increase as pending applications publish; apparent recent dips should not be read as evidence of declining activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A field that peaked in 2021 and is now diversifying into adjacent chemistry and optics

The annual filing trend reveals a field that grew steadily from 2017 to its 2021 peak and has since moderated, while the technology composition shows that photolithography process patents remain dominant but materials and optical-element classes are growing in relative importance.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 2017 through a 2021 peak and have moderated since; 2024–2026 counts are materially under-reported due to publication lag and should not be read as a true decline. The multi-year trajectory still reflects a very active decade of EUV investment.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,470 in 2021.91020171,04020181,12720191,33020201,47020211,44520221,34320231,11920248332025262026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G03F (photolithography and photomechanics) is by far the dominant class, followed by H01L (semiconductor devices). Smaller but notable shares in G02B (optical elements), G21K (particle and radiation handling), C08F (addition polymers), and H05G (X-ray technique) indicate that optics, resist chemistry, and EUV source engineering each support substantial sub-fields.

Technology compositionG03F · Photolithography & photomechanics leads with 17,538; H01L · Semiconductor devices 8,429.G03F · Photolithography …17,538H01L · Semiconductor dev…8,429G02B · Optical elements …1,808G21K · Particle & radiat…1,160C08F · Addition polymers…1,094G03B · Photographic appa…774H05G · X-ray technique661C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…620↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20200142315A1Published 2020-05-07

Immersion post-exposure bake lithography process a…

Sandisk TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

A method of performing extreme ultraviolet lithography process includes applying a protic solvent over an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) photoresist layer located over a substrate after exposure to EUV radiation, heating the protic solvent on the EUV photoresist layer to a post-exposure bake temperature photoresist, and removing the protic solvent from above the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Immersion post-exposure bake lithography process a… — patent drawingImmersion post-exposure bake lithography process a… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Exposure apparatus and exposure method capable of …1,149
2Method and system for drying a substrate989
3Optical element for an illumination system912
4Semiconductor memory and method for manufacturing …851
5Template for room temperature, low pressure micro-…735
6Stationary and dynamic radial transverse electric …730
7Optical element for a lighting system717
8Stationary and dynamic radial transverse electric …637

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity stage, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic filing bias — together define where new entrants face the highest barriers and where targeted investment may still find room.

Maturity

Field is at a plateau: high barriers, incremental differentiation

The lifecycle stage is Maturity: annual filings plateaued near their 2021 peak and have eased since. New entrants face extensive prior art in core scanner, mask, and resist sub-fields. The practical implication is that differentiated positions must be carved out at the subsystem or materials level rather than through broad platform patents.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Top five hold nearly half of the hundred largest filers’ combined total

The top five filers account for 48% of the combined patent records held by the hundred largest filers, with ASML Netherlands BV alone the single largest holder. The second tier — Fujifilm, Intel, Applied Materials, Samsung Electronics, Tokyo Electron — each hold meaningfully smaller shares, suggesting that adjacent sub-fields (metrology, cleaning, deposition) remain more competitively open than the core lithography platform.

High concentration
Collaboration

ASML–Carl Zeiss and IBM–GlobalFoundries are the most active co-filing pairs

The most active co-applicant pair is ASML Netherlands BV and ASML Holding NV with 57 joint filings, followed closely by ASML Netherlands BV and Carl Zeiss SMT with 56, confirming that the core scanner–optics integration is protected jointly. IBM and GlobalFoundries have 29 joint filings, reflecting their historical process-development alliance. TSMC co-files with National Taiwan University (15 filings) and National Tsing Hua University (13 filings), signalling academic partnerships in advanced resist and process research.

Ecosystem co-filing
Geography

US filings dominate; EPO and PCT provide secondary international coverage

The United States is the lead filing office by a wide margin, reflecting both the headquarters of major IP holders and the importance of the US market for semiconductor tooling. Europe via EPO and WIPO PCT provide the next largest coverage layers. Singapore appears as a notable Asia-Pacific filing destination, likely tied to TSMC and ASML regional operations. South Korea, Japan, and China show comparatively sparse direct filings, which may represent either strategic filing gaps or reliance on national routes not fully captured here.

US-centric, EPO secondary
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
ASML Netherlands BVASML Holding NV57
ASML Netherlands BVCarl Zeiss SMT GmbH56
International Business Machines CorporationGlobalFoundries Inc29
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co LtdNational Taiwan University15
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co LtdNational Tsing Hua University13
ASML Netherlands BVKoninklijke Philips NV13
International Business Machines CorporationJSR Corporation9
International Business Machines CorporationIBM UNITED KINGDOM LTD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPAR…9
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co LtdTSMC Nanjing Co Ltd7
International Business Machines CorporationIBM China Co Ltd7

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts reflect co-applicant patent records; jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

ASML and TSMC lead by volume; materials specialists are accelerating

The top two filers are close in absolute scale but differ sharply in trajectory and technical focus. Among the broader top ten, materials suppliers Shin-Etsu Chemical and Carl Zeiss SMT show the strongest recent momentum.

Leader · ASML Netherlands BV

ASML Netherlands BV

ASML Netherlands BV is the largest single filer and concentrates its portfolio heavily in G03F photolithography process and mask technology, with secondary coverage in H01L semiconductor device manufacture. Despite its dominant position, recent momentum is down 14% versus the prior three-year period, consistent with a maturing core platform and a shift toward incremental process refinements rather than new architectural filings.

patent records: 4,045
Challenger · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd

TSMC ranks second and its portfolio spans G03F process patents, H01L device integration, and G03F mask technology — reflecting a foundry-level perspective covering full process flows rather than tool design. Recent momentum is up 10% versus the prior three-year period, making it the only top-two filer still growing, and its academic co-filing with National Taiwan University and National Tsing Hua University suggests continued investment in next-generation resist and patterning research.

patent records: 4,001
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers including momentum scores, technology focus maps, and collaboration networks.
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co LtdCarl Zeiss SMT GmbH+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd1,002▲ +10%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co Ltd428▲ +52%
ASML Netherlands BV289▼ -14%
Nikon Corporation6▼ -90%
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH238▲ +40%
Fujifilm Corporation146▼ -10%
Applied Materials Inc136▼ -50%
International Business Machines Corporation35▼ -80%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player patent record counts are drawn from the applicant ranking within the corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in optics, radiation handling, and resist chemistry

Relative to the dominant G03F core, several adjacent IPC branches carry lower filing density despite clear technical relevance to EUV system performance. These observations of relative sparsity may indicate where targeted entry could encounter less prior-art crowding.

G21K · Particle and radiation handling

This branch covers EUV source optics, beam shaping, and radiation management — functions central to scanner performance but with a share roughly one-fifteenth that of the dominant G03F class. Carl Zeiss SMT holds meaningful coverage here (249 records in G21K subclasses), but the broader field is sparse. For teams working on collector mirror lifetime, debris mitigation, or plasma source efficiency, this branch represents a less crowded entry path with direct commercial relevance to next-generation high-NA EUV tools.

Search this in Eureka →

C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)

Photoresist polymer chemistry sits at the intersection of C08F and G03F, but C08F alone — covering the underlying monomer and polymer synthesis — is comparatively sparse at roughly 3% of the overall composition. Shin-Etsu Chemical and Fujifilm are active here, but the sub-field for metal-oxide and non-chemically-amplified resist chemistries tailored to high-NA EUV appears to have room for additional entrants, particularly from specialty chemical firms with polymer synthesis capabilities seeking to supply the next generation of EUV process nodes.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, applicant gaps, and entry-path analysis across all adjacent IPC branches in the EUV lithography corpus.
H05G · X-ray techniqueG03B · Photographic apparatus+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are computed at the patent-record level relative to the overall IPC class distribution in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across photolithography, optics, and device integration

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG03F 7 · Photolithography & photomechanicsH01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesG03F 1 · Photolithography & photomechanicsG02B 5 · Optical elements & systemsG21K 1 · Particle & radiation handling
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co LtdStrong · 1,777Strong · 1,158Strong · 1,007Emerging · 39Emerging · 39
ASML Netherlands BVStrong · 1,363Moderate · 349Moderate · 638Emerging · 133Emerging · 135
Nikon CorporationStrong · 1,209Strong · 751AbsentEmerging · 82Emerging · 84
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbHStrong · 1,108AbsentEmerging · 209Moderate · 315Moderate · 249
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co LtdStrong · 1,174AbsentModerate · 446AbsentEmerging · 21
Canon IncStrong · 525Strong · 488AbsentEmerging · 52Emerging · 58
Fujifilm CorporationStrong · 750Moderate · 256AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own EUV lithography landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.