Book a demo

EUV Photoresist Patent Landscape 2026

EUV Photoresist Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

EUV Photoresist Patent Landscape in 2026

The EUV photoresist patent space is dominated by equipment and process specialists, with Lam Research Corporation and Tokyo Electron Limited together holding a commanding share of the top-ranked applicants. The field has reached a maturity plateau—annual volume peaked in 2021 and has since stabilized—while several new entrants signal continued competitive pressure at the process integration layer.

629
Patent families in scope
57%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
0%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Equipment makers lead a highly concentrated applicant field

Lam Research Corporation ranks first among all applicants, followed by Tokyo Electron Limited in second and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company in third, with Applied Materials and IBM rounding out the top five.

The top five filers account for 57% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, indicating a strongly concentrated field with a meaningful gap before the mid-tier cluster that includes Samsung SDI, Samsung Electronics, and ASM IP Holdings.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Lam Research Corporation185
2Tokyo Electron Limited137
3Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited67
4Applied Materials Inc61
5International Business Machines Corporation55
6Samsung SDI Co Ltd40
7Samsung Electronics Co Ltd31
8ASM IP Holding BV28
9Tokyo Electron US Holdings Inc25
10Brewer Science Inc17
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Intel Corporation15
12Merck Patent GmbH10
13LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PR…9
14GlobalFoundries US Inc9
15DuPont Electronic Materials International LLC9
16Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation8
17SanDisk Technologies LLC7
18Gelest Inc7
19Qualcomm Inc7
20TSMC Nanjing Co Ltd7
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of etch, deposition, and process-equipment vendors in the top positions suggests that competitive advantage in EUV photoresist has migrated toward process integration and hardware-enabled patterning rather than purely chemical formulation—a structural shift that has lasting implications for IP freedom to operate.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and understate actual activity; apparent softness in 20242025 data should not be read as a real decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity plateaued after a 2021 peak; semiconductor device integration dominates the IPC mix

Two signals define the technology structure: a filing curve that climbed from 2017 through 2021 and has since stabilized, and a technology composition overwhelmingly anchored in semiconductor device processing with a secondary cluster in photolithography.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings grew from 48 in 2017 to a peak of 101 in 2021, then settled into the 75–82 range through 2023–2024. The 2025–2026 counts are incomplete due to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a real downturn.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 101 in 2021.482017522018602019752020101202177202282202376202457202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (semiconductor devices) and G03F (photolithography and photomechanics) are the two dominant IPC branches, reflecting process-integration focus. Lower-volume branches—C11D (cleaning), H01J (electron and discharge tubes), C07F (organo-metallic compounds), and C23C (coating and surface deposition)—form a sparse second tier that marks the outer boundaries of current activity.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 851; G03F · Photolithography & photomechanics 497.H01L · Semiconductor dev…851G03F · Photolithography …497C11D · Detergents & clea…59H01J · Electron & discha…56C07F · Organo-metallic &…42C23C · Coating & surface…34H10B · Memory device man…24H10N · Other electric so…14↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US10957552B2Published 2021-03-23

Extreme ultraviolet lithography patterning with di…

International Business Machines Corporation

Semiconductor structures fabricated via extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithographic patterning techniques implementing directional deposition on a EUV resist mask improves selectivity and critical dimension control during the patterning of features in multiple layers of the semiconductor substrate. A semiconductor structure includes a substrate structure having… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Extreme ultraviolet lithography patterning with di… — patent drawingExtreme ultraviolet lithography patterning with di… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Methods for making EUV patternable hard masks545
2Method of topologically restricted plasma-enhanced…503
3Semiconductor processing apparatus457
4Method of topologically restricted plasma-enhanced…424
5Combined anneal and selective deposition process407
6Semiconductor processing apparatus389
7Methods for making EUV patternable hard masks357
8Structure including a photoresist underlayer and m…340

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structural data means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a maturing filing curve, high top-tier concentration, active intra-group co-filing, and US-dominant jurisdiction coverage frames where the defensible whitespace and entry risks lie.

Maturity

Field has plateaued near its 2021 peak

Annual filings have plateaued near their peak level, placing the field in a mature stage. The multi-year growth from 2017 to 2021 has given way to a stable, high-volume plateau rather than further expansion. For new entrants, this means core patterning process claims are densely occupied and incremental differentiation requires targeting adjacent branches or next-generation material chemistries.

Lifecycle: Mature
Concentration

Top five hold over half the leading-filer share

The top five filers account for 57% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, a level of concentration that creates meaningful freedom-to-operate risk for any new applicant working near H01L and G03F subject matter. The tier-two group—Samsung SDI, Samsung Electronics, ASM IP, and Tokyo Electron US Holdings—holds substantially smaller positions, suggesting limited near-term challenge to the top-tier incumbents.

Concentration: High
Collaboration

Co-filing is largely intra-corporate with selective strategic alliances

The most active co-filing pair is Tokyo Electron Limited and its US holding subsidiary Tokyo Electron US Holdings, with 25 joint records—reflecting internal portfolio management rather than external alliance. The second-most active pairing is Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company with TSMC Nanjing, again intra-group. The most strategically notable external collaboration is Lam Research Corporation with IBM (3 joint records), pointing to process-chemistry co-development at the leading edge. ASM IP Holdings and IMEC (Interuniversitair Micro-Electronics Centrum) co-filed 4 records, linking a major equipment vendor to Europe’s premier semiconductor research consortium.

Collaboration: Mostly intra-group
Geography

US filing dominates; PCT and EPO provide secondary coverage

The United States is by far the primary filing jurisdiction, followed by WIPO PCT routes and the European Patent Office. Israel and Singapore appear as secondary destinations, consistent with the advanced-node fab and R&D presence in those jurisdictions. South Korea, China, Taiwan, and Japan together represent a comparatively thin filing footprint given the concentration of EUV-capable fabs in those regions, suggesting potential gaps in geographic coverage that competitors could exploit.

Geography: US-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Tokyo Electron LimitedTokyo Electron US Holdings Inc25
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company LimitedTSMC Nanjing Co Ltd7
Tokyo Electron LimitedTokyo Electron America Inc4
Samsung Electronics Co LtdSemes Co Ltd4
ASM IP Holding BVInteruniversitair Micro-Electronics Centrum (IMEC VZW)4
Lam Research CorporationInternational Business Machines Corporation3
International Business Machines CorporationIBM China Co Ltd2
International Business Machines CorporationIBM United Kingdom Ltd2
International Business Machines CorporationZeon Corporation1
BASF SEBASF (China) Co Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration pairs and jurisdiction counts are derived from patent-record level data.Explore insights →
Leaders

Lam Research and Tokyo Electron lead on volume; Applied Materials and Samsung SDI are accelerating

The two top-ranked applicants share a similar IPC focus on semiconductor device processing and photolithography but show diverging momentum; meanwhile, several applicants categorized as new entrants in the recent filing window are reshaping the mid-tier.

Leader · Lam Research Corporation

Lam Research Corporation

Lam Research leads with 185 patent records, focused on H01L semiconductor device processing, G03F photolithography, and H01J electron and discharge tube applications—reflecting its etch and deposition equipment portfolio applied to EUV patterning. However, its recent-period filings show a downward trend of –51% versus the prior window, indicating a possible portfolio consolidation or strategic prioritization shift rather than continued volume accumulation.

patent records: 185
Challenger · Tokyo Electron Limited

Tokyo Electron Limited

Tokyo Electron Limited holds 137 patent records with a technology emphasis on H01L, G03F, and—to a lesser extent—H01J, closely mirroring the leader’s profile. Unlike Lam Research, Tokyo Electron’s recent filings show a modest upward trend of +8%, suggesting steady continued investment. Its 25-record co-filing relationship with its US holding subsidiary underscores an integrated transatlantic portfolio strategy.

patent records: 137
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings, momentum trends, and technology emphasis for all top-100 filers in this space.
Applied Materials IncSamsung SDI Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Lam Research Corporation39▼ -51%
Tokyo Electron Limited39▲ +8%
International Business Machines Corporation4▼ -84%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited20▬ 0%
Applied Materials Inc33▲ new entrant
Samsung SDI Co Ltd14▲ new entrant
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd21▲ new entrant
ASM IP Holding BV15▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant patent record counts and momentum trends are drawn from the top-100 applicant ranking and recent-vs-prior filing comparison.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the core EUV patterning cluster

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H01L and G03F core carry low patent-record counts relative to their technical relevance to EUV photoresist performance, marking them as areas of relative sparsity worth monitoring.

C07F · Organo-metallic compounds

With 42 patent records and a 2% share of the IPC mix, organo-metallic and non-carbon compound chemistry is sparsely covered relative to its known technical importance in metal-oxide EUV resist formulations. Samsung SDI’s portfolio shows 17 records in C07F, making it the most active filer in this branch; the remaining field is largely open. Entrants with organometallic synthesis capabilities—particularly tin-based or hafnium-based resist chemistries—could establish differentiated positions here with relatively limited incumbent resistance.

Search this in Eureka →

C23C · Coating and surface deposition

C23C (coating and surface deposition) holds 34 patent records and a 2% share—sparse for a branch directly relevant to underlayer and hardmask deposition in EUV patterning stacks. ASM IP Holdings shows activity here with 8 records in C23C 16, and Tokyo Electron US Holdings has 1 record; otherwise the branch is thinly populated. For organizations with ALD or CVD competencies, C23C represents a plausible adjacent entry path that complements existing H01L and G03F positions without directly confronting the dense incumbent clusters.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete adjacent-branch analysis including C11D cleaning compositions, H01J tube-based process equipment, and H10B memory device integration.
C11D · Detergents & cleaning compositionsH01J · Electron & discharge tubes+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are calculated from patent-record level IPC classifications across the full corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How top applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesG03F 7 · Photolithography & photomechanicsH01J 37 · Electron & discharge tubesC11D 11 · Detergents & cleaning compositionsG03F 1 · Photolithography & photomechanics
Lam Research CorporationStrong · 185Strong · 99Moderate · 38AbsentEmerging · 9
Tokyo Electron LimitedStrong · 129Moderate · 60Emerging · 5AbsentEmerging · 4
BASF SEStrong · 51Strong · 37AbsentStrong · 36Absent
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company LimitedStrong · 63Strong · 43AbsentEmerging · 7Emerging · 1
International Business Machines CorporationStrong · 63Strong · 36Emerging · 3AbsentEmerging · 12
Applied Materials IncStrong · 60Strong · 33Emerging · 5AbsentEmerging · 5
Samsung SDI Co LtdStrong · 40Strong · 37AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own EUV photoresist landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.