Book a demo

EV Fast Charging for Commercial Trucks Patent Landscape

EV Fast Charging for Commercial Trucks Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
EV Fast Charging for Commercial Trucks Patent Landscape in 2026

The patent corpus for EV fast charging in commercial trucks is extremely nascent, with only 3 patent families on record and all activity concentrated in the United States. Siemens AG and Rivian are the only named institutional filers to date, and the field shows no signs of deep prior-art density, signaling an early-stage arena with wide-open technical territory.

3
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Siemens AG leads a near-empty field

Siemens AG holds the top rank with 2 patent families, followed by Rivian Holdings LLC with 1. These two organizations account for the entirety of the current corpus.

The top five filers’ share of the ranked applicants visible in this query stands at 100%, which in this case reflects a corpus so small that only two applicants appear in the ranking — there is effectively no second tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Siemens AG2
2Rivian Holdings LLC1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Siemens AG’s lead position, built on B60L electric-vehicle propulsion and H02M power-conversion filings, suggests early framing of the hardware and power-electronics layer. Rivian’s single family signals that vehicle OEMs are beginning to stake positions, but neither player has yet established a defensive portfolio depth.

Activity recorded after mid-2024 is subject to normal patent-publication lag and may be under-counted; the current totals should be treated as a floor rather than a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity started only in 2022 and the technology mix is tightly clustered

The annual trend and IPC composition together reveal a field that is embryonic both in volume and in technical scope, with all filings concentrated in a narrow set of electrification classes.

Annual filing trend

No families were recorded before 2022. A single family appeared in 2022, followed by two in 2023. Years from 2024 onward show zero at present, but this reflects publication lag rather than a cessation of activity; any filings from late 2023 onward are likely still pending publication.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2023.02017020180201902020020211202222023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) is visible in with 3 records, flanked by H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H02M (power conversion) each with 2 records. The absence of thermal management, connector-standards, or communication-protocol classes highlights how narrowly defined the current prior art is.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 3; H02J · Power supply & grid systems 2.B60L · Electric vehicle …3H02J · Power supply & gr…2H02M · Power conversion …2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240157841A1Published 2024-05-16

Bi-directional power converter

Siemens Aktiengesellschaft

A bi-directional power converter, a control unit, a charging device and a method for transferring power between an EV and a power grid are provided. The bi-directional power converter includes an isolated DC-DC converter having a first stage converting a DC voltage into a high frequency AC voltage, a second stage, having four power conversion switches and… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Bi-directional power converter — patent drawingBi-directional power converter — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Bi-directional power converter2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D investment decisions

Three data points limit statistical confidence, but the structural signals are clear: this is an uninhabited patent space where first-mover filing can define the prior-art landscape.

Maturity

Embryonic stage — field effectively begins in 2022

The lifecycle evidence shows no stage classification is yet possible given the tiny corpus, but all observable filing occurred between 2022 and 2023. The technology has not yet accumulated the density of prior art typical of a growth-phase field. Teams entering now would be writing foundational claims rather than navigating a crowded landscape.

Early-stage
Concentration

Two filers hold all known IP; the field is structurally open

Siemens AG and Rivian Holdings LLC together account for 100% of the ranked families. This extreme concentration is a function of low total volume rather than deep entrenchment by incumbents. No single player has built a blocking portfolio, meaning late entrants face minimal freedom-to-operate risk from existing grants at this stage.

High concentration, low depth
Collaboration

No co-applicant activity detected

Evidence pending — the collaboration data shows no co-filed or jointly assigned families in the current corpus. The absence of university, national-lab, or OEM-supplier co-filings may reflect the field’s novelty rather than a structural preference for solo filing. Watching for consortium or joint-development agreements would be a leading indicator of the next filing wave.

No co-filings yet
Geography

All activity anchored in the United States

All 3 patent records are filed at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. No European, Chinese, or other jurisdictional coverage is visible in the current corpus. For teams with global commercial ambitions, PCT or direct national filings in the EU and China represent an open geographic flank that no current filer has addressed.

US-only
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence for this corpus.Explore insights →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Siemens AG

Siemens AG

Siemens AG holds 2 patent families and entered the corpus as a new entrant, with its most recent filing period showing 1 family recorded. Its technical emphasis spans B60L 53 and B60L 55 (EV propulsion charging infrastructure) and H02M 3 (DC power conversion), pointing to a hardware and power-electronics framing consistent with Siemens’ broader grid and charging infrastructure business.

families: 2
Challenger · Rivian Holdings LLC

Rivian Holdings LLC

Rivian Holdings LLC holds 1 patent family and also entered as a new entrant. Its technical focus covers B60L 53 (charging interface) alongside H02J 1 and H02J 3 (power supply and grid systems), suggesting an OEM-side interest in vehicle-grid integration rather than pure charging hardware — a complementary angle to Siemens’ converter-centric approach.

families: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Siemens AGRivian Holdings LLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own EV charging IP landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.