Book a demo

EV Fast Charging for Marine Propulsion Patent Landscape

EV Fast Charging for Marine Propulsion Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
EV Fast Charging for Marine Propulsion Patent Landscape in 2026

The patent space for EV fast charging applied to marine propulsion is early-stage and highly concentrated, with the top five filers controlling nearly three-quarters of activity among the hundred largest filers. Annual filings have grown sharply over the multi-year window, and nearly every ranked applicant entered the field recently, signaling a field still in formation.

33
Patent families in scope
72%
Top visible applicants share
+400%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

NIO Tech Anhui leads a nascent, highly concentrated field

NIO Tech Anhui Co Ltd holds the top position with 7 patent families, followed by Fluid Power AI Inc with 5 and Power Hero Corp with 4. The ranking is short — only eleven distinct applicants appear among the top-ranked filers — confirming that this is a field in early formation rather than a mature competitive arena.

The top five filers account for 72% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, a concentration level that is characteristic of an emerging technology where a handful of early movers have defined the initial filing landscape before broader industry participation.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1NIO Tech Anhui Co Ltd7
2Fluid Power AI Inc5
3Power Hero Corp4
4Volvo Car Corporation3
5Plug P2P Inc2
6MERCEDES-BENZ RES & DEV NORTH AMERICA2
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
7ArvinMeritor Technology LLC2
8NIO USA Inc1
9Thompson Claiborn B1
10GM Global Technology Operations LLC1
11Abd Elmogaweed Hassan Khaled Salah1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

NIO Tech Anhui’s lead, reinforced by the separate presence of NIO USA Inc, suggests that the NIO group has pursued the most systematic filing strategy to date. Challengers such as Fluid Power AI and Power Hero Corp are new entrants with momentum, meaning the current hierarchy is not yet entrenched.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and likely undercount actual activity; the 20252026 figures in particular should be read as a floor, not a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sharp multi-year growth with electric-vehicle propulsion dominating the technology mix

Annual filing volume and the IPC branch breakdown together reveal both the pace of the field’s expansion and the degree to which it remains anchored in automotive EV charging frameworks rather than marine-specific engineering.

Annual filing trend

Filings were minimal from 2017 through 2020 (peaking at 5 families in 2017 then dipping), recovered strongly from 2022 onward, and reached 7 families in both 2023 and 2024. The 2025 figure of 3 and the 2026 figure of 0 reflect publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown. The multi-year growth rate stands at 400%, confirming that the field is in an active growth phase.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 7 in 2023.52017120182201922020020216202272023720243202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) is the visible branch, appearing in all 33 patent families in scope, which confirms that most filings are adapting automotive EV charging architectures to marine contexts. H02J (power supply and grid systems) is the second most active branch, followed by H01M (batteries and fuel cells) and H02M (power conversion). Marine-specific branches such as vessel power management are absent, indicating that the field has not yet developed a dedicated IPC identity.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 33; H02J · Power supply & grid systems 16.B60L · Electric vehicle …33H02J · Power supply & gr…16H01M · Batteries, cells …6H02M · Power conversion …5B60K · Vehicle propulsio…4B60R · Vehicles, parts &…3G06Q · Business, commerc…3H02P · Control of motors…3↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250121725A1Published 2025-04-17

Decentralized network for predictive selection of …

Plug P2P, INC.

A device includes program instructions executable by one or more processors that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to perform operations. The operations include acquiring data indicative of a geometry of a charging feature of a vehicle for charging a battery of the vehicle and a rated power input for the battery of the vehicle. The operations… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Decentralized network for predictive selection of … — patent drawingDecentralized network for predictive selection of … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Power systems and methods for electric vehicles24
2Authentication using electromagnet signal detection17
3Vehicle-based charging system for electric vehicles10
4Charging systems and methods for electric vehicles9
5Systems and methods for regulating charging of ele…8
6Systems and methods for regulating charging of ele…5
7Distributed on-demand elevated power in low power …4
8Systems and methods for monitoring and managing ba…2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape the risk and opportunity profile for an engineer or strategist evaluating entry into this space.

Growth

Growth stage: annual filings still rising on a multi-year basis

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth, driven by a 400% increase in recent filing volume. Annual output has been rising and the 2023–2024 period marks the highest sustained activity on record. Because early architectural patents are still being filed, there is meaningful room to establish claim positions before the field matures and prior art becomes denser.

Growth stage
Concentration

Top-heavy but not yet locked: new entrants are actively filing

The top five filers hold 72% of activity among the ranked applicants visible in this query, yet every challenger in the momentum data is classified as a new entrant. This combination — high headline concentration but an unstable roster — means the hierarchy is still contestable. A well-scoped filing program entered now can compete with existing leaders before the field crosses into a more defensive phase.

Contestable
Collaboration

No co-filing partnerships detected in the current evidence

The collaboration data returns no co-applicant relationships in this corpus, meaning all identified filings are sole-applicant submissions. The absence of visible joint filings may reflect the field’s immaturity — consortia and standards bodies have not yet organized formal collaborative R&D in this niche. It also leaves open the question of whether academic or industrial partnerships are being conducted under a single entity’s name.

Evidence pending
Geography

United States is visible in; international coverage is thin

The United States is the lead filing office with 20 patent records, followed by WIPO PCT with 7, Europe (EPO) with 2, and India with 2. Australia and Canada each show 1 record. The narrow geographic spread suggests that most applicants are not yet pursuing broad international protection, which may indicate either early-stage commercial focus or limited resources — and leaves non-US markets relatively open for new filers.

US-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · NIO Tech Anhui Co Ltd

NIO Tech Anhui Co Ltd

NIO Tech Anhui holds 7 patent families, the largest individual position in this space. Its technology focus spans power conversion (H02M3), battery management (B60L58), and grid-side charging systems (H02J7), suggesting a systems-level approach that covers the charger, the battery interface, and the power supply architecture. The NIO group’s combined presence — through the separate NIO USA Inc entity — reinforces its lead. Momentum data does not flag NIO Tech Anhui specifically as a new entrant, implying it has held an active position across multiple filing periods.

7 patent families
Challenger · Fluid Power AI Inc

Fluid Power AI Inc

Fluid Power AI Inc holds 5 patent families and is classified as a new entrant with recent momentum, having filed 3 families in the recent window. Its technology emphasis is concentrated in EV propulsion (B60L58), battery cell management (H01M50), and electrical measurement (G01R31) — a combination that points toward intelligent battery monitoring as a differentiating angle. Power Hero Corp, the third-ranked filer with 4 patent families and also a new entrant, focuses tightly on charging interface standards (B60L53) and grid-side power supply (H02J7), suggesting a complementary rather than competing positioning.

5 patent families
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Volvo Car CorporationPlug P2P Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own EV marine charging landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.