Book a demo

Expandable Tubular Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Expandable Tubular Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/expandable-and-solid-expandable-tubulars-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Casing & Cementing
Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubular Patents
  • Concentrated at the top. the five leading assignees hold 59.7% of all 1,840 records in scope, and the top ten hold 73.5% — this is a field with a small set of gatekeepers, not a fragmented one.
  • Filings have cooled from their 2019 peak. the peak year was 2019 at 58 records, and the 2021→2024 span shows an 11% decline (14 to 11, -21%), with 2025 onward still filling in due to publication lag.
  • Claim density runs well beyond drilling. 83.6% of records sit in E21B, but meaningful overlap into F16L pipe fittings and A61F implant/prosthesis classing shows expansion-cone and sealing mechanics reused far outside the wellbore.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,840
Published Records
60%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-21%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (14 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,840 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

Expandable and solid expandable tubular technology spans casing patches, liner hangers, expansion cones and elastomer seals used to restore or increase wellbore diameter without a full workover. The 1,840 records in scope run from 2015 through the current data cut-off, capturing both the drilling-specific mechanics and the adjacent sealing and expansion hardware that shares claim language with medical stent and graft technology. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit here because they neutralise aggressive continuation filing by a small number of large operators.

The receiving-office spread — led by the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Canada, with WIPO and EPO filings close behind — points to a technology prosecuted primarily where deepwater and unconventional wells are drilled or serviced, rather than filed defensively across a broad global footprint.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC343
  2. 2SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV246
  3. 3ENVENTURE GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LLC228
  4. 4WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC182
  5. 5WELLTEC OILFIELD SOLUTIONS AG99
  6. 6WELLTEC AS78
  7. 7SHELL OIL CO59
  8. 8BAKER HUGHES CO58
  9. 9SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INC30
  10. 10WL GORE & ASSOC INC30
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,840 records: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses those records are classified under.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked in 2019 at 58 records and have since eased; the 2021-to-2024 comparison (14 to 11 records, -21%) is the most recent window not distorted by publication lag, since records from 2025 onward are still being published.

Filing trend, 2017-2026015304560442017201858201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

E21B (earth and rock drilling) covers 83.6% of records, confirming this is primarily a wellbore technology, but secondary classing into F16L pipe fittings (10.3%) and A61F implants and prostheses (9.7%) shows the expansion-cone and radial-seal mechanics are drawn from, and cited by, tubular graft and stent art.

IPC subclass compositionE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)1,53983.6%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings19010.3%A61F · Implants & prostheses1799.7%A61M · Devices for body fluids633.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery462.5%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting422.3%B21D · Sheet-metal working422.3%A47B · Tables & furniture281.5%Other1799.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,840 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about expandable and solid expandable tubulars and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative recent filing
US20260117616A12026-04-30

Expandable casing patch system and method for installing such casing patch

UNIARMOUR LLC

A casing patch assembly deployable within existing casing uses a pipe with wide and narrow diameter portions, an expansion cone, and a plug that seals against the wide portion while an anchor engages the casing wall. Fluid passed through a channel in the plug urges the expansion cone along the narrow portion, expanding it in place.Filed by UNIARMOUR LLC, published 2026-04-30 as US20260117616A1.

US20260117616A1 — patent drawing 1US20260117616A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing in Eureka
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5667523ADual supported intraluminal graft896
2US6217585B1Mechanical stent and graft delivery system845
3US6325826B1Extendible stent apparatus619
4US5628786ARadially expandable vascular graft with resistance to longitudinal compression and method of making same550
5US6190357B1Expandable cannula for performing cardiopulmonary bypass and method for using same515
6US6706062B2Extendible stent apparatus389
7US20020042650A1Extendible stent apparatus363
8US20030074049A1Covered stents and systems for deploying covered stents357
9US20040055758A1Annular isolators for expandable tubulars in wellbores313
10US5390742AInternally sealable perforable nipple for downhole well applications283

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside a searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on downstream design, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the assignee, class and trend data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
59.7% / 73.5%
share held by top 5 / top 10 of 1,840 records

A small gatekeeper set, not a fragmented field

With the five leading assignees holding 59.7% of all 1,840 records and the top ten holding 73.5%, a new entrant is filing into territory already claimed densely by a handful of operators and service companies. Freedom-to-operate work here should start with those leaders' portfolios, not a broad landscape scan.

Based on the 100-company assignee ranking returned by the dataset.
Momentum
-21% (2021→2024)
filing change over the most recent complete window

Activity has eased from its 2019 peak

Filings peaked at 58 records in 2019 and the 2021-to-2024 window shows an 11-to-14 decline, a 21% drop. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are not yet a reliable read on whether that decline continues.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Cross-domain reuse
9.7% in A61F
share of records also classed as implants/prostheses

Expansion and sealing mechanics cross into medical device art

The most-cited records in this dataset are stent and vascular graft patents, not drilling patents — a reminder that expansion-cone and radial-seal claim language predates the oilfield application and that prior art searches should not stop at E21B.

179 of 1,840 records also carry an A61F classification.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to expandable and solid expandable tubulars, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where filings cluster jointly
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Enventure Global Technology, LLCSHUSTER MARK25
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.KRIESELS PETRUS CORNELIS18
Enventure Global Technology, LLCGRAY MALCOLM18
Enventure Global Technology, LLCCOSTA SCOTT18
Enventure Global Technology, LLCGRINBERG GRIGORIY16
Enventure Global Technology, LLCBRISCO DAVID PAUL16
Enventure Global Technology, LLCWATSON BROCK WAYNE14
Welltec A/SWelltec Oilfield Solutions AG12

Ten co-assignee pairs recur in this dataset, with the strongest pairing appearing 25 times — evidence of named-inventor and corporate-assignee filing pairs rather than broad industry consortia.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

The assignee ranking covers 100 companies counted in records; it is the full ranking the dataset returns, not a curated top-50 or top-100 list.

Leader
343 records
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds 343 records, more than triple the fifth-ranked assignee's 99 — a gap wide enough that any competitive claim mapping should treat this filer's portfolio as the baseline to design around.

Fifth place sits at 99 records, tenth at 30.
Momentum
0 in latest year
recent-year filings across several leading assignees

Leaders have gone quiet in the most recent tracked year

Several of the largest historical filers show zero filings in the latest year, with year-on-year drops of -100% reported for some. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects incomplete data rather than an actual filing halt, but it is worth re-checking against fresh publications before drawing conclusions.

Recent-year momentum is reported at the assignee level in the dataset.
Long tail
90 of 100 ranked
assignees outside the top ten

A long tail beneath the concentrated top ten

Below the top ten, which together hold 73.5% of all 1,840 records, the remaining ranked assignees each hold comparatively small counts — service companies, single-well operators and toolmakers filing narrowly around specific hardware variants.

Based on the 100-company ranking returned by the dataset.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is lower relative to the core E21B claim space, based on secondary IPC classing in this dataset.
Elastomer seal durability under repeated expansion cyclesCasing patch anchor geometry for multi-stage repairsLiner hanger expansion pressure monitoringExpansion cone wear-resistant coatingsMonobore completion transition joints
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.0-100%
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.0
Enventure Global Technology, LLC0-100%
Weatherford Lamb, Inc.0
Welltec A/S0-100%
Shell Oil Company0
Welltec Oilfield Solutions AG0
Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated top tier, a cooling filing trend still subject to publication lag, and cross-domain claim overlap with medical device art. Each of these opens a different next step.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top ten

Since 73.5% of all 1,840 records sit with ten assignees, a targeted FTO review of those portfolios covers most of the field's active claim space before a broader search is needed.

Run an FTO scan in Eureka

Track the 2025-2026 filing gap as it fills in

Recent-year zeros across several leading assignees are very likely a publication-lag artefact rather than a real slowdown; re-pull the trend in a few quarters before concluding filings have stopped.

Set a filing alert in Eureka

Search stent and graft prior art before drafting seal claims

The most-cited records in this space are vascular graft and stent patents, not drilling patents, so novelty searches for expansion-cone or elastomer-seal claims should extend into A61F and A61M art.

Search cross-domain prior art in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Expandable and Solid Expandable Tubulars in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole expandable and solid expandable tubulars corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.