Book a demo

Expanded Perlite & Vermiculite Patents: Top Companies, Trends 2026

Expanded Perlite & Vermiculite Patents: Top Companies, Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/expanded-perlite-and-vermiculite-products-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Functional Materials
Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Has Stalled
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. the field peaked at 32 filings in 2019 and sat at 24 by 2022 — a plateau, not an expansion.
  • Ceramics and refractories dominate the claim space. C04B alone covers 57.7% of the 1,372 records in scope, dwarfing every other IPC subclass.
  • No single assignee controls the field. the leader holds 56 records and the top 5 combined account for just 16.4% of all 1,372 records — a long tail follows.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,372
Published Records
16%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-56%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape draws on 1,372 published patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that reference expanded perlite, exfoliated vermiculite, or lightweight mineral aggregate in claims tied to bulk density, expansion ratio, cryogenic insulation, filter-aid grade, dust handling, or fireproofing board applications. The scope spans lightweight construction aggregates, filtration media, polymer additive systems and horticultural substrates built on these two minerals.

Filing activity is concentrated in China, the United States and the United Kingdom, with a smaller but active pool of European and PCT filings. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in any trend here understates real activity.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO56
  2. 2Jiang Wenlan44
  3. 3WINDSOR TECH LTD42
  4. 4ADVANCED MINERALS CORP42
  5. 5PROMAT RES & TECH CENT41
  6. 6GEORGIA PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC34
  7. 7SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE SA34
  8. 8JOHNS MANVILLE CORP22
  9. 9Gansu Huachen Ecological Governance Co., Ltd.22
  10. 10RECKITT & COLMAN PRODUCTS LIMITED21
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,372 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which technical classes carry the claim density.

A decade of flat-to-declining filing

Filings rose from 30 in 2017 to a peak of 32 in 2019, then eased back to 24 by the 2022 midpoint before continuing to soften. This is a mature, cyclical field rather than one in active expansion — new entrants are filing into established claim territory rather than opening new ground.

A decade of flat-to-declining filing010203040302017201832201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Ceramics and refractories carry the weight

C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) appears on 57.7% of the 1,372 records, far ahead of separation processes (B01D, 7.9%), polymer additives (C08K, 7.6%) and catalysis-related processes (B01J, 7.1%). Building structures (E04B, 5.4%) and horticulture (A01G, 4.7%) trail further back, marking them as smaller but less contested pockets of the same dataset.

Ceramics and refractories carry the weightC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories79257.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1097.9%C08K · Use of additives in polymers1047.6%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …987.1%C08L · Polymer compositions755.5%E04B · Building structures & elements745.4%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…664.8%A01G · Horticulture & forestry644.7%Other1,12381.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,372 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about expanded perlite and vermiculite products and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping this field

Representative Filing
US9011708B22015-04-21

US9011708B2 — Thermal insulator using closed cell expanded perlite

KYUNGDONG ONE CORPORATION

Filed by Kyungdong One Corporation, this patent claims a thermal insulator built from 10–84 wt% expanded perlite with a closed-cell surface, combined with 15–85 wt% liquid binder and 0.25–5 wt% reinforcing fiber. The claimed formulation reduces compression ratio during molding to lower density while improving constructability.Published 2015-04-21

US9011708B2 — patent drawing 1US9011708B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record →
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4159302AFire door core251
2US4454267ALightweight joint compound181
3US8038790B1High performance non-combustible gypsum-cement compositions with enhanced water durability and thermal stabil…170
4US4051056AAbrasive scouring compositions148
5US5395438AMineral wool-free acoustical tile composition146
6US4343127AFire door141
7US4462835ALightweight building material and method of producing the same140
8US4288959ARoofing or siding article135
9US5256222ALightweight building material board131
10US5465547ALightweight cementitious roofing117

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing decisions

Four patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend line and the class breakdown are read together.

Concentration
16.4%
of 1,372 records held by top 5 assignees

No dominant gatekeeper

The leading assignee holds 56 records out of 1,372, and the top 5 combined reach only 16.4% of the field. Compare that to the tenth-ranked assignee at 21 records — the drop from leader to rank ten is steep, then the tail flattens into many single- and few-filing entrants.

Ranking covers 100 assignees, not a top-50 or top-100 selection by design.
Technology mix
57.7%
of records classed under C04B

Ceramics claims crowd the space

More than half of all records touch C04B — ceramics, cement and refractories. That density makes new fireproofing-board or lightweight-cement claims harder to clear without running into prior art; the smaller classes (E04B, A01G) carry comparatively less prior claim traffic.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Momentum
32 → 24
peak (2019) vs. 2022 midpoint filings

A plateaued field

Filing volume peaked in 2019 and has not returned to that level since. None of the assignees with recent-year momentum data show growth into the most recent year, suggesting incumbents are maintaining rather than expanding portfolios.

2026 figures are partial due to publication lag.
Geography
316
China-origin filings, the largest receiving office

China leads by filing count

China's 316 filings lead the United States (237) and United Kingdom (159), with Europe, Canada and WIPO/PCT filings trailing. A filer prioritising defensive coverage in this field would weight China and the US first based on filing volume alone.

Receiving office counts are independent of assignee nationality.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to expanded perlite and vermiculite products, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders hold a modest share of the field individually, but a small number of co-filing relationships reveal where sustained collaborative programs exist.

Leader
56 records
top-ranked assignee

A modest lead, not a monopoly

The top assignee's 56 records represent a real but non-dominant position; with the top 5 combined reaching only 16.4% of all 1,372 records, no single organisation can be said to control the claim space.

Based on the full 100-assignee ranking.
Co-filing
10 pairs
documented co-assignee relationships

A few durable filing partnerships

The strongest co-assignee pair appears together 6 times, with two other pairs recurring 4–5 times. These recurring pairings likely reflect named-inventor or joint R&D arrangements rather than one-off collaborations.

Ten co-assignee pairs identified across the dataset.
Momentum
0
latest-year filings across tracked leaders

Incumbents have gone quiet recently

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, some of this is an artefact of timing rather than an actual stop in R&D — but the pattern is consistent across leaders, not isolated to one firm.

Momentum reflects publication date, not filing date.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These sub-areas sit below the dominant C04B ceramics cluster and carry comparatively thin claim density.
cryogenic insulation grade perlitefilter-aid grade dust suppressionhorticultural substrate expansion controlvermiculite fireproofing board laminatespolymer-additive expansion ratio tuning
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
United States Gypsum Co.0
Advanced Minerals Corp0
Jiang Wenlan0
Promat Research & Technology Center0
Windsor Tech Ltd0
Georgia Pacific Gypsum LLC0
Johns Manville Corp0
Reckitt & Colman Products Limited0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature field with concentrated technology claims but no dominant single filer — the next step is testing a specific formulation or claim against that backdrop.

Check freedom-to-operate against the C04B cluster

With 57.7% of records touching ceramics and refractories, any new cementitious or fireproofing formulation should be checked against this cluster first, not treated as a peripheral search.

Run a claim check in Eureka →

Map the under-claimed branches to a filing strategy

The smaller classes — building structures, horticulture, catalysis-adjacent processes — carry less prior art density and may offer cleaner claim territory for new formulations.

Explore white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Expanded Perlite and Vermiculite Products in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole expanded perlite and vermiculite products corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.