Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 596 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Extended reach and horizontal well drilling filings sit at the intersection of mechanical hole-cleaning hardware and the fluids that carry cuttings out of long, low-angle boreholes. The search set combines extended reach drilling and horizontal well drilling terms with the operational problems that make those wells hard to complete: cuttings beds, wellbore stability, casing running friction, axial drag and pipe rotation speed. That pairing captures both the drilling-string engineering side and the drilling-fluid chemistry side of the same set of problems.
596 published records span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with receiving-office activity concentrated in the United States, followed by Canada, WIPO PCT filings, Europe, Australia and the United Kingdom. The IPC composition confirms the field's centre of gravity: E21B earth and rock drilling classifications appear on the large majority of records, with materials science (C09K), geophysics (G01V) and digital control or data processing classes appearing on a meaningful but much smaller share.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 596-record dataset: activity by year, and the IPC subclasses that carry the claims. Because a single record can carry more than one classification, the class shares below sum to more than 100% of records.
Filings rose from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2020, and after a dip climbed again to 13 in 2024 — a 30% increase over the 2021-2024 span. 2025 and 2026 figures are not yet comparable: publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent two years understate actual filing activity rather than showing a real decline.
E21B (earth and rock drilling) covers 81.5% of the 596 records, confirming this is primarily a mechanical and operational drilling field. C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications, largely drilling fluids) sits at 21.1%, with G01V geophysics, G06F data processing and G05B control systems each appearing on single-digit shares — signals of instrumentation and digital-monitoring activity layered onto a mechanically dominated base.
Shares are the percentage of the 596 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about extended reach and horizontal wells and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing discloses a lab apparatus for measuring drilling-string lubricity in horizontal wells where cuttings have settled into a bed along the low side of the wellbore. A simulated wellbore section holds a drill rod fitted with thrust and torque sensors, driven by a rotating mechanism, with a cuttings-feed port and slurry circulation system that reproduces cuttings-bed conditions during testing.Filed by Southwest Petroleum University, published 2020-07-09.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5181571A | Well casing flotation device and method | 438 |
| 2 | US5482116A | Wellbore guided hydraulic fracturing | 230 |
| 3 | US7172038B2 | Well system | 228 |
| 4 | US4384625A | Reduction of the frictional coefficient in a borehole by the use of vibration | 223 |
| 5 | US5117915A | Well casing flotation device and method | 186 |
| 6 | US6923273B2 | Well system | 176 |
| 7 | US4986361A | Well casing flotation device and method | 149 |
| 8 | US20030075361A1 | Well system | 134 |
| 9 | US20080000693A1 | Steerable rotary directional drilling tool for drilling boreholes | 133 |
| 10 | US20060124360A1 | Methods and apparatus for drilling, completing and configuring U-tube boreholes | 131 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records that have had more time to accumulate citing references — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a marker of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading concentration, classification spread and citation depth together gives a clearer picture than any single chart.
The top 5 assignees combined hold 296 of the 596 records in scope — 49.7% of the field. The leader alone accounts for 122 records, well ahead of fifth place at 26, which points to a small group of oilfield service majors setting the claim boundaries that everyone else drills around.
Moving from 5 to 10 ranked assignees adds only 14.4 percentage points, taking combined share to 64.1% of all 596 records. That gap between the top 5 and top 10 curves is shallow, which signals that beyond the leading names, filing activity thins out quickly into single- and double-digit contributors.
E21B drilling-mechanics classifications appear on 81.5% of records against 21.1% for C09K materials claims. That gap suggests fluid and additive chemistry for cuttings transport is comparatively less contested than the mechanical hardware and drill-string engineering side of the same problem set.
The most-cited record in the dataset, on well casing flotation, carries 438 citations — far ahead of the rest of the most-cited group. High citation counts here mark foundational mechanical concepts that later filings built on, not necessarily technology still being actively claimed today.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to extended reach and horizontal wells, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked assignee list runs to 100 companies drawn from the 596 records in scope. It is a full ranking, not a curated top tier, and recent-year momentum inside it tells a different story from the cumulative totals.
The leading assignee's 122 records sit far ahead of fifth place at 26, a gap that marks a genuine leader rather than a crowded top tier. That single-assignee weight is a large share of the 49.7% held by the top 5 combined.
A number of the assignees with the largest cumulative totals, including the field's leader, show zero records in the latest year of the dataset. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings still working through the pipeline as an actual pullback, but it is worth checking each name's own trend before assuming continued investment.
The dataset surfaces only 10 co-assignee pairs, with the strongest pairs built around named individual inventors filing alongside a corporate assignee rather than joint ventures between companies. That pattern suggests most IP in this field is filed by a single corporate owner rather than through formal collaboration.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | 0 | — |
| WESTERN WELL TOOL | 0 | — |
| Landmark Graphics Corporation | 0 | — |
| M-I LLC | 0 | — |
| Tercel IP | 0 | — |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co. (Saudi Aramco) | 0 | — |
| Sinvent AS | 0 | — |
| Meciria Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion — each one narrows the field differently.
With 49.7% of records held by five assignees, any new filing in core hole-cleaning or drag-force mechanics should be checked against those portfolios first, not the long tail.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaC09K materials filings sit at less than a third of the E21B mechanical share. That gap may reflect real white space in cuttings-transport fluid chemistry, or simply different classification habits worth verifying claim by claim.
Run a claims comparison in EurekaSeveral cumulative leaders show no publications in the latest year. Confirming whether that is a pipeline lag or a genuine pause changes how a competitive-watch list should be prioritised.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaOne assignee leads the ranked list with 122 records, well ahead of the rest of the field, and the top 5 assignees together hold 296 of the 596 records in scope, or 49.7%. That level of concentration means a small number of oilfield service companies set the boundaries that most other filers have to work around. Beyond the top 10, which holds 64.1% of records, filing activity thins into a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants.
E21B, the earth and rock drilling classification, appears on 81.5% of the 596 records in scope, making mechanical drilling hardware and operational technique the dominant subject matter. C09K materials-science classifications, largely drilling fluids and additives, appear on 21.1% of records — a substantial but much smaller share. Geophysics, digital data processing and control-systems classes each appear on single-digit shares, indicating instrumentation and monitoring technology is a secondary but present theme.
Filings rose from 10 in 2021 to 13 in 2024, a 30% increase over that span, following an earlier peak of 13 in 2020. The apparent drop-off in 2025 and 2026 should not be read as a slowdown: patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any dataset are still filling in. The reliable read on trend direction stops at 2024.
US20200217780A1, filed by Southwest Petroleum University, discloses a laboratory testing apparatus for measuring drill-string lubricity in horizontal wells while accounting for a cuttings bed — specifically a simulated wellbore fitted with sensors, a rotating drive mechanism and a slurry circulation system. It covers a specific experimental testing rig and method, not drilling operations themselves, so it constrains other lab-scale lubricity test-rig designs more than it constrains field drilling technique or fluid formulation claims. Anyone building a similar cuttings-bed simulation apparatus should review its claims closely, but it does not broadly block operational extended reach drilling methods.
The gap between the 81.5% share held by E21B mechanical classifications and the 21.1% held by C09K materials classifications suggests drilling-fluid and cuttings-transport chemistry is comparatively less claimed than mechanical hardware. Digital and control-related classes such as G06F, G05B and G06Q each sit under 4% of records, pointing to real-time sensing, automated control loops and predictive stability modelling as areas with thinner coverage relative to their operational importance. Any of these branches warrants a targeted freedom-to-operate search before committing to a claim strategy, since thin coverage in a classification does not guarantee the specific claim scope is open.
Go past this page: query the whole extended reach and horizontal wells corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.