Book a demo

Extravasation Detection Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Extravasation Detection Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/extravasation-and-infiltration-detection-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Medical Equipment
Extravasation and Infiltration Detection Patents
  • A 2003-era filing still anchors the field. The two most-cited records in scope date to the early 2000s (644 and 364 citations), meaning the foundational bioimpedance approach to tissue monitoring was claimed well before most current entrants filed.
  • Filing has not kept pace with device interest. Volume peaked at 9 in 2017; the most recent complete year (2024) sits at 3, though the 2021→2024 span still shows +50% growth once the trend is read on a like-for-like basis.
  • IPC coverage is narrow and two classes carry nearly all of it. A61M and A61B together account for the large majority of the 78 records in scope, while informatics, flow-measurement, temperature-measurement and AI-based classes each register in the low single digits.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
78
Published Records
+50%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
29
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Extravasation and infiltration detection covers devices and methods that identify when fluid delivered through an intravascular catheter has begun to leak into surrounding tissue rather than the intended vein. The dataset in scope spans 78 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search combining extravasation- and infiltration-specific terms with the sensing modalities used to detect them: bioimpedance sensing, optical sensing, skin temperature monitoring, detection latency, false-alarm handling and sensor-patch form factors.

The technology sits at the intersection of two IPC classes almost entirely: A61M, which covers devices for introducing body fluids, and A61B, which covers diagnosis and surgery instrumentation. Adjacent classes touching informatics, flow measurement, temperature sensing and machine-learning-based signal processing appear only occasionally, which is one of the clearest signals in this dataset about where the field's claim space has and has not been built out.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1INOTECH MEDICAL SYST14
  2. 2AGENCY FOR SCI TECH & RES11
  3. 3SINGAPORE HEALTH SERVICES PTE LTD11
  4. 4CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC11
  5. 5GEORGIA TECH RES CORP11
  6. 6EMORY UNIVERSITY10
  7. 7MEDRAD INC8
  8. 8BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC6
  9. 9NEORAD AS5
  10. 10AUGUSTINE BIOMEDICAL AND DESIGN LLC5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 78 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing activity, 2015–2026

Filings peaked in 2017 at 9 for the year, then settled lower. Reading only the years that are complete enough to compare, 2021 to 2024 shows growth of +50% (2 to 3). Note that 2025 and 2026 figures are necessarily undercounted: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year totals will continue to rise as more records publish.

Filing activity, 2015–2026035810920172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition (share of 78 records)

A61M (devices for body fluids) appears in 76.9% of records and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) in 69.2%, confirming that most inventive activity is framed as either a delivery-device modification or a diagnostic add-on rather than a standalone informatics or sensor product. G16H (healthcare informatics), G01F (flow/level/volume measurement), G01K (temperature measurement) and G06N (AI-based computing) each sit at 5.1% or below, the record total being 78 in each case. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100%.

IPC subclass composition (share of 78 records)A61M · Devices for body fluids6076.9%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery5469.2%G16H · Healthcare informatics45.1%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring11.3%G01K · Temperature measurement11.3%G06N · Computing based on AI models11.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 78 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about extravasation and infiltration detection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping this field

Representative Filing
US11957873B22024-04-16

IV extravasation detection device (US11957873B2)

AUGUSTINE BIOMEDICAL AND DESIGN, LLC

A fluid extravasation detection device detects the subcutaneous extravasation of fluid from a vein containing an intravenous (IV) catheter. The device includes one or more first temperature sensors for positioning on skin near an entry point of the IV catheter into the vein, and one or more second temperature sensors for positioning on skin near a tip of the subcutaneously located IV catheter. The first and second temperature sensors are operably connected to an electronic thermometer that compares the temperature difference between a first temperature and a second temperature.Filed by Augustine Biomedical and Design, granted 2024-04-16. Representative of the temperature-differential approach that sits alongside bioimpedance as the field's two dominant detection strategies.

US11957873B2 — patent drawing 1US11957873B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030216630A1Conductivity reconstruction based on inverse finite element measurements in a tissue monitoring system644
2US6980852B2Film barrier dressing for intravascular tissue monitoring system364
3US7169107B2Conductivity reconstruction based on inverse finite element measurements in a tissue monitoring system329
4US7184820B2Tissue monitoring system for intravascular infusion275
5US20030216663A1Tissue monitoring system for intravascular infusion214
6US4647281AInfiltration detection apparatus172
7US6375624B1Extravasation detector using microwave radiometry163
8US5954668AExtravasation detector using microwave radiometry144
9WO2003063680A2Tissue monitoring system for intravascular infusion89
10US20030216662A1Film barrier dressing for intravascular tissue monitoring system83

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings almost by construction — read them as a measure of influence on later filers, not as a signal of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for R&D and IP strategy

Three findings from this dataset that should shape where a new filing gets aimed.

Citation concentration
644 citations
top-cited record

Foundational bioimpedance claims are decades old

The most-cited record in scope, on conductivity reconstruction for tissue monitoring, and its closest relatives collectively account for the bulk of citation weight in the field. New bioimpedance-based filings need freedom-to-operate review against this cluster before assuming the approach is open.

Citation data favours older filings; treat as influence, not current relevance.
Filing trend
+50%
2021 to 2024

Growth is real but off a small base

Filing volume in this niche never reached double digits after its 2017 peak of 9. The 2021-to-2024 growth of 2 to 3 filings is directionally positive but the absolute numbers mean the field has not attracted a wave of new entrants at scale.

2025-2026 figures will rise as publication catches up to filing.
Technology concentration
76.9% / 69.2%
A61M / A61B share

Two classes hold nearly all the claim density

Almost every record in scope is framed under body-fluid devices or diagnosis-and-surgery instrumentation. Informatics-layer claims (G16H) and AI-based signal processing (G06N) each sit near or below 5%, which is a narrow footprint for a detection problem that is fundamentally a signal-classification task.

Shares are of the 78-record total and overlap because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to extravasation and infiltration detection, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where organisations co-file
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd (SingHealth)11
Georgia Tech Research CorporationChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc.11
Georgia Tech Research CorporationEmory University10
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc.Emory University10
Medrad, Inc.UBER ARTHUR E III2
Medrad, Inc.KALAFUT JOHN F2
Medrad, Inc.KALAFUT JOHN2
Medrad, Inc.GRIFFITHS DAVID M2

The dataset records 9 co-assignee pairs, with the strongest links sitting between research institutes and the hospital systems that host their clinical validation work — a pattern consistent with device development that needs bedside testing before a filing is complete.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

The assignee ranking covers 29 companies and research organisations, counted in patent families. Filing here is led by a single organisation with 14 families, with a second tier clustering around 11 and a longer tail down to single-digit counts by tenth place — a pattern of one clear leader plus a broad group of institutional and corporate filers rather than a duopoly.

Leader
14 families
top assignee

One organisation sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 14 patent families in this dataset, noticeably ahead of the rest of the ranked group. That gap is worth checking against the specific claims held, not just the count, before deciding where a new filing can sit safely.

Counted across the 29 ranked assignees in this dataset.
Second tier
11 families
fifth place

A cluster of research-hospital pairs

Fifth place sits at 11 families, and the strongest co-assignee links in the dataset run between research institutes and the hospital systems they partner with for clinical testing. This suggests device validation, not just invention, is where a lot of the claim scope gets locked in.

Co-assignee pairs: 9 recorded in this dataset.
Long tail
5 families
tenth place

Tenth place already down to single digits

By the tenth-ranked assignee, family counts have dropped to 5, and the ranking continues to a long tail of organisations with only a handful of filings each. That distribution points to a field still open to a well-targeted new entrant rather than one locked up by a small group.

29 companies ranked in total in this evidence set.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
IPC composition shows these branches sitting at 5.1% of records or below — thin enough that a well-drafted claim may find genuine open space.
Healthcare informatics integration (G16H)AI-based signal classification for alarm thresholdsFlow/volume-rate correlation with leak onsetStandalone temperature-measurement hardware claimsFalse-alarm suppression logic as a distinct claim
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
INOTECH MEDICAL SYST0
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)0
Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd (SingHealth)0
Georgia Tech Research Corporation0
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc.0
Emory University0
Medrad, Inc.0
Augustine Biomedical and Design, LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or drafting a new filing.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the bioimpedance cluster

The most-cited records in this field concentrate around conductivity-reconstruction and tissue-monitoring claims filed in the early 2000s. Any new bioimpedance-based sensor should be checked against that cluster specifically, not just against recent filings.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Track the leading assignee's recent activity

With 14 families, the top assignee sets the pace in this field. Monitoring their filing cadence and claim language gives an early signal of where the occupied space is expanding.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Draft against the under-claimed branches

Informatics, AI-based classification and standalone temperature or flow-measurement claims all sit under 6% of records. A first-to-file claim in one of these adjacent areas has a materially better chance of standing alone.

Draft and compare claims in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Extravasation and Infiltration Detection in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole extravasation and infiltration detection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.