Extravasation Detection Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- A 2003-era filing still anchors the field. The two most-cited records in scope date to the early 2000s (644 and 364 citations), meaning the foundational bioimpedance approach to tissue monitoring was claimed well before most current entrants filed.
- Filing has not kept pace with device interest. Volume peaked at 9 in 2017; the most recent complete year (2024) sits at 3, though the 2021→2024 span still shows +50% growth once the trend is read on a like-for-like basis.
- IPC coverage is narrow and two classes carry nearly all of it. A61M and A61B together account for the large majority of the 78 records in scope, while informatics, flow-measurement, temperature-measurement and AI-based classes each register in the low single digits.
Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
What this landscape covers
Extravasation and infiltration detection covers devices and methods that identify when fluid delivered through an intravascular catheter has begun to leak into surrounding tissue rather than the intended vein. The dataset in scope spans 78 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search combining extravasation- and infiltration-specific terms with the sensing modalities used to detect them: bioimpedance sensing, optical sensing, skin temperature monitoring, detection latency, false-alarm handling and sensor-patch form factors.
The technology sits at the intersection of two IPC classes almost entirely: A61M, which covers devices for introducing body fluids, and A61B, which covers diagnosis and surgery instrumentation. Adjacent classes touching informatics, flow measurement, temperature sensing and machine-learning-based signal processing appear only occasionally, which is one of the clearest signals in this dataset about where the field's claim space has and has not been built out.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 78 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing activity, 2015–2026
Filings peaked in 2017 at 9 for the year, then settled lower. Reading only the years that are complete enough to compare, 2021 to 2024 shows growth of +50% (2 to 3). Note that 2025 and 2026 figures are necessarily undercounted: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year totals will continue to rise as more records publish.
IPC subclass composition (share of 78 records)
A61M (devices for body fluids) appears in 76.9% of records and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) in 69.2%, confirming that most inventive activity is framed as either a delivery-device modification or a diagnostic add-on rather than a standalone informatics or sensor product. G16H (healthcare informatics), G01F (flow/level/volume measurement), G01K (temperature measurement) and G06N (AI-based computing) each sit at 5.1% or below, the record total being 78 in each case. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 78 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Extravasation and Infiltration Detection with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about extravasation and infiltration detection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records shaping this field
IV extravasation detection device (US11957873B2)
A fluid extravasation detection device detects the subcutaneous extravasation of fluid from a vein containing an intravenous (IV) catheter. The device includes one or more first temperature sensors for positioning on skin near an entry point of the IV catheter into the vein, and one or more second temperature sensors for positioning on skin near a tip of the subcutaneously located IV catheter. The first and second temperature sensors are operably connected to an electronic thermometer that compares the temperature difference between a first temperature and a second temperature.Filed by Augustine Biomedical and Design, granted 2024-04-16. Representative of the temperature-differential approach that sits alongside bioimpedance as the field's two dominant detection strategies.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030216630A1 | Conductivity reconstruction based on inverse finite element measurements in a tissue monitoring system | 644 |
| 2 | US6980852B2 | Film barrier dressing for intravascular tissue monitoring system | 364 |
| 3 | US7169107B2 | Conductivity reconstruction based on inverse finite element measurements in a tissue monitoring system | 329 |
| 4 | US7184820B2 | Tissue monitoring system for intravascular infusion | 275 |
| 5 | US20030216663A1 | Tissue monitoring system for intravascular infusion | 214 |
| 6 | US4647281A | Infiltration detection apparatus | 172 |
| 7 | US6375624B1 | Extravasation detector using microwave radiometry | 163 |
| 8 | US5954668A | Extravasation detector using microwave radiometry | 144 |
| 9 | WO2003063680A2 | Tissue monitoring system for intravascular infusion | 89 |
| 10 | US20030216662A1 | Film barrier dressing for intravascular tissue monitoring system | 83 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings almost by construction — read them as a measure of influence on later filers, not as a signal of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for R&D and IP strategy
Three findings from this dataset that should shape where a new filing gets aimed.
Foundational bioimpedance claims are decades old
The most-cited record in scope, on conductivity reconstruction for tissue monitoring, and its closest relatives collectively account for the bulk of citation weight in the field. New bioimpedance-based filings need freedom-to-operate review against this cluster before assuming the approach is open.
Growth is real but off a small base
Filing volume in this niche never reached double digits after its 2017 peak of 9. The 2021-to-2024 growth of 2 to 3 filings is directionally positive but the absolute numbers mean the field has not attracted a wave of new entrants at scale.
Two classes hold nearly all the claim density
Almost every record in scope is framed under body-fluid devices or diagnosis-and-surgery instrumentation. Informatics-layer claims (G16H) and AI-based signal processing (G06N) each sit near or below 5%, which is a narrow footprint for a detection problem that is fundamentally a signal-classification task.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to extravasation and infiltration detection, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) | Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd (SingHealth) | 11 |
| Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc. | 11 |
| Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Emory University | 10 |
| Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc. | Emory University | 10 |
| Medrad, Inc. | UBER ARTHUR E III | 2 |
| Medrad, Inc. | KALAFUT JOHN F | 2 |
| Medrad, Inc. | KALAFUT JOHN | 2 |
| Medrad, Inc. | GRIFFITHS DAVID M | 2 |
The dataset records 9 co-assignee pairs, with the strongest links sitting between research institutes and the hospital systems that host their clinical validation work — a pattern consistent with device development that needs bedside testing before a filing is complete.
Who holds the claim space
The assignee ranking covers 29 companies and research organisations, counted in patent families. Filing here is led by a single organisation with 14 families, with a second tier clustering around 11 and a longer tail down to single-digit counts by tenth place — a pattern of one clear leader plus a broad group of institutional and corporate filers rather than a duopoly.
One organisation sets the pace
The leading assignee holds 14 patent families in this dataset, noticeably ahead of the rest of the ranked group. That gap is worth checking against the specific claims held, not just the count, before deciding where a new filing can sit safely.
A cluster of research-hospital pairs
Fifth place sits at 11 families, and the strongest co-assignee links in the dataset run between research institutes and the hospital systems they partner with for clinical testing. This suggests device validation, not just invention, is where a lot of the claim scope gets locked in.
Tenth place already down to single digits
By the tenth-ranked assignee, family counts have dropped to 5, and the ranking continues to a long tail of organisations with only a handful of filings each. That distribution points to a field still open to a well-targeted new entrant rather than one locked up by a small group.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| INOTECH MEDICAL SYST | 0 | — |
| Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) | 0 | — |
| Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd (SingHealth) | 0 | — |
| Georgia Tech Research Corporation | 0 | — |
| Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc. | 0 | — |
| Emory University | 0 | — |
| Medrad, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Augustine Biomedical and Design, LLC | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or drafting a new filing.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on the bioimpedance cluster
The most-cited records in this field concentrate around conductivity-reconstruction and tissue-monitoring claims filed in the early 2000s. Any new bioimpedance-based sensor should be checked against that cluster specifically, not just against recent filings.
Explore prior art in EurekaTrack the leading assignee's recent activity
With 14 families, the top assignee sets the pace in this field. Monitoring their filing cadence and claim language gives an early signal of where the occupied space is expanding.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaDraft against the under-claimed branches
Informatics, AI-based classification and standalone temperature or flow-measurement claims all sit under 6% of records. A first-to-file claim in one of these adjacent areas has a materially better chance of standing alone.
Draft and compare claims in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
The dataset in scope contains 78 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine extravasation- or infiltration-specific claim language with a sensing modality such as bioimpedance, optical sensing, skin temperature or sensor patches. The two most-cited records, both from the early 2000s, cover conductivity-reconstruction methods for tissue monitoring during intravascular infusion. More recent filings, including a 2024 grant from Augustine Biomedical, shift toward temperature-differential sensing built directly into the IV line. Most records are classified under either A61M (body fluid devices) or A61B (diagnosis and surgery), which together account for the large majority of the field.
The assignee ranking in this dataset covers 29 organisations, counted in patent families, with the leader holding 14 families and a clear step down to a second tier around 11. The field mixes device manufacturers with academic and hospital-system co-filers; several of the strongest co-assignee links sit between a research institute and the hospital it partners with for clinical validation. It is not a two-player market: the ranking runs a long tail down to single-digit family counts, which suggests room for a well-targeted new entrant rather than a locked-up space.
Two approaches dominate the patent record: bioimpedance sensing, which measures conductivity changes in tissue to infer fluid leakage, and temperature-differential sensing, which compares skin temperature near the catheter entry point against a second point near the catheter tip. Optical sensing and flow/volume-rate correlation appear in the search terms but show up in only a small fraction of the IPC-classified records. Healthcare informatics and AI-based signal classification for alarm logic are present but thin, each covering close to or under 5% of the 78 records in scope, which marks them as comparatively open ground.
Filing peaked in 2017 at 9 records for the year and has not returned to that level since. Looking only at years complete enough to compare fairly, the count moved from 2 in 2021 to 3 in 2024, a +50% change, though both figures are small in absolute terms. Filings from 2025 onward will look artificially low for a while yet because patent publication typically lags the original filing date by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years of any trend chart should be read as a floor, not a final count.
US11957873B2, granted to Augustine Biomedical and Design in April 2024, claims a device using paired temperature sensors positioned near the IV entry point and near the catheter tip, connected to an electronic thermometer that compares the two readings to flag a temperature differential consistent with extravasation. It blocks straightforward implementations of dual-point skin temperature comparison for this specific diagnostic purpose. It does not, on its face, block bioimpedance-based detection, optical sensing, or single-sensor temperature approaches that use a different comparison logic, which is why alternative sensing modalities remain a viable design-around path.
Research Extravasation and Infiltration Detection in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole extravasation and infiltration detection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.