Book a demo

Farm Digital Twin & Crop Model Patent Landscape 2026

Farm Digital Twin & Crop Model Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Farm Digital Twin / Crop Model Patent Landscape in 2026

The farm digital twin and crop model patent field is in a confirmed growth stage, with filings expanding roughly 800% over the review window and Indian academic institutions dominating all top filing positions. Activity is heavily concentrated in India, and the competitive structure is defined by universities rather than agri-tech corporates or equipment manufacturers.

477
Patent families in scope
21%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+800%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Indian universities lead a field with limited corporate participation

Lovely Professional University holds the top position with 13 patent families, followed closely by CVR College of Engineering with 12 and Chandigarh University with 11. Every applicant in the top twenty is an Indian academic or research institution, or an individual inventor — no global agri-tech corporation or precision-agriculture OEM appears in the ranked list.

The top five filers account for 21% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderately diffuse field at the top tier with no single dominant assignee commanding a commanding lead. The gap between the leader (13 patent families) and the twentieth-ranked applicant (3 patent families) is narrow, reinforcing the fragmented structure.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Lovely Professional University13
2CVR College of Engineering12
3Chandigarh University11
4SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI9
5SR University9
6Manipal University Jaipur8
7Vaibhav Laxman Dhasal (Director)6
8KKR & KSR INST OF TECH & SCI6
9Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering4
10Anurag University4
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11JIS College of Engineering4
12REVA University4
13Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation3
14Dr. Sandip Debnath3
15Sona College of Technology3
16N. Gopinath3
17Saveetha Engineering College3
18Narula Institute of Technology3
19Dr. Rajesh Bhaskar Survase3
20Dattatray G. Takale3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

This university-led structure implies that the foundational IP layer for farm digital twins is being built primarily as applied research output rather than as commercial product IP. For a corporate entrant, the competitive barrier from existing patent positions is relatively low, but the technology base is being established quickly and the window for staking core claims is narrowing.

Filings from the most recent 18–24 months are likely under-represented due to standard patent publication lag; the true volume for 2025 and 2026 will be higher than current counts suggest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Rapid volume growth paired with a software-and-AI-heavy technology mix

Two structural patterns define this field: an accelerating annual filing trajectory driven almost entirely by Indian academic institutions, and a technology composition dominated by business data processing and AI rather than field-level agricultural hardware.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible through 2020 (single digits annually), then stepped up sharply from 2021 onward — 10 families in 2021, 35 in 2023, 111 in 2024, and 196 in 2025. The 2026 figure of 100 families covers only part of the year and will rise significantly as publications catch up. The overall growth rate across the review window is approximately 800%, consistent with the Growth lifecycle stage.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 196 in 2025.12017020184201942020102021162022352023111202419620251002026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The dominant IPC branch is G06Q (business and administrative data processing), reflecting system-level farm management architectures. G06N (AI computing models) ranks second, followed by A01B (soil working in agriculture) and A01G (horticulture and forestry). Digital communications (H04L) and materials analysis (G01N) round out the mid-tier. The skew toward software and AI classes over core agricultural mechanization classes suggests the field is primarily developing decision-support and simulation layers rather than embedded hardware control.

Technology compositionG06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing leads with 426; G06N · Computing based on AI models 265.G06Q · Business, commerc…426G06N · Computing based o…265A01B · Soil working in a…224A01G · Horticulture & fo…209H04L · Digital informati…110G01N · Material analysis…102A01C · Planting & sowing66G06V · Image/video recog…64↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20220172467A1Published 2022-06-02

Mini drone and agbot based distributed system and …

VERMA, Shiv

In this invention a Web Server based distributed cellular system to provide 21st century total digital precision agriculture to small and uneducated poor farmers is proposed. A service model is used to avoid farmers owning any equipment and a system’s provided service agent becomes on ground mentor of the farmer. The invention uses plurality of low cost… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Mini drone and agbot based distributed system and … — patent drawingMini drone and agbot based distributed system and … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Precision agriculture system and related methods38
2Smart farming13
3Crop- prediction: intelligent prediction of crop w…10
4Mini drone and agbot based distributed system and …9
5Smart decision support system architecture for IoT…9
6一种基于多源数据的作物估产方法4
7Smart farming4
8Soil fertility evaluation and management3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The combination of a growth-stage lifecycle, university-dominated filing base, and near-total geographic concentration in India creates a distinctive risk-opportunity profile for corporate and institutional R&D planners.

Growth

Early Growth — core IP layer still being formed

The lifecycle assessment places this field firmly in Growth, with annual filing volume still rising and the multi-year window showing approximately 800% expansion. The field moved from near-zero activity before 2019 to triple-digit annual filings by 2024, meaning core architectural patents are still being filed. An entrant today would be competing in an active formative period rather than entering a mature, crowded space.

Growth stage
Concentration

Fragmented top tier with no dominant corporate assignee

The top five filers hold 21% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and the lead applicant holds only 13 patent families. All top-ranked filers are Indian academic institutions or individual inventors. This means the field lacks the type of large-portfolio corporate blockades common in mature agri-tech segments, but also that licensed or transferable technology clusters are currently thin.

Fragmented
Collaboration

No recorded co-applicant activity in the evidence base

Collaboration data returns no co-filing relationships in the current evidence set. This is consistent with the individual-university filing model observed in the applicant ranking, where each institution files independently. The absence of cross-institution or industry-academia co-filing suggests that collaborative R&D consortia — common in hardware-intensive agri-tech — have not yet formed around digital twin and crop-model IP in this corpus.

Evidence pending
Geography

India-centric with minimal international coverage

India accounts for the overwhelming majority of patent records in this corpus, with the United States at 4 records, WIPO PCT at 2, China at 1, and the United Kingdom at 1. This concentration means most of the existing IP offers limited direct competitive threat outside India, but also that international filing coverage for farm digital twin technologies remains nearly open. Organizations seeking broad geographic protection for innovations in this space face minimal blocking positions in the US, Europe, or China.

India-dominant
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Top filers emphasize AI-enabled farm management systems over hardware

The leading applicants share a common technology emphasis centered on AI computing models and agricultural data processing, with most entering the ranking as new entrants in the most recent filing period — indicating the competitive field assembled rapidly.

Leader · Lovely Professional University

Lovely Professional University

The top-ranked filer with 13 patent families, Lovely Professional University entered the ranking as a new entrant in the recent period, with 7 recent-period families. Its technology focus spans soil working in agriculture (A01B), business data processing (G06Q), and AI computing models (G06N) — a broad platform covering both agronomic inputs and the analytical layer above them.

families: 13
Challenger · CVR College of Engineering

CVR College of Engineering

CVR College of Engineering ranks second with 12 patent families and is also a new entrant in momentum terms, with 3 recent-period families. Its strongest IPC concentration is in business and administrative data processing (G06Q) with 11 records, complemented by soil working (A01B) and AI models (G06N). The near-parity with the leader and new-entrant momentum signal that it is actively building its position rather than coasting on prior filings.

families: 12
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of all applicants with family counts, momentum scores, and technology focus profiles.
Chandigarh UniversitySaveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Lovely Professional University7▲ new entrant
CVR College of Engineering3▲ new entrant
Chandigarh University2▲ new entrant
SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI7▲ new entrant
Manipal University Jaipur3▲ new entrant
KKR & KSR INST OF TECH & SCI2▲ new entrant
REVA University1▲ new entrant
KRISHAN KUMAR4▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant AI and agronomy core

Several IPC branches appear in the technology composition at relatively low share levels despite having direct technical relevance to farm digital twin architectures — these are observations of relative sparsity, not validated commercial opportunities.

G06V · Image and Video Recognition for Crop Monitoring

G06V accounts for 64 patent records — a 4% share among the branches observed — despite image and video recognition being a foundational input layer for crop condition assessment, disease detection, and yield estimation in digital twin pipelines. The branch is technically adjacent to the dominant AI (G06N) and horticulture (A01G) classes already active in the field. A realistic entry path exists for teams combining drone or satellite imagery with crop-model inference, particularly given the separate presence of B64C (aeroplanes and helicopters, 29 records) and B64U (unmanned aerial vehicles, 7 records) in the composition.

Search this in Eureka →

G01W · Meteorology and Weather Integration

G01W (meteorology) appears with only 11 patent records, making it one of the sparsest branches in a corpus where weather-driven crop modeling is a core use case. Microclimate and forecast data integration is a standard component of commercial crop simulation platforms, yet the IP footprint here is minimal. For teams building physics-based or hybrid crop models that ingest real-time and forecast weather data, this branch represents a sparse area with plausible technical value and a direct connection to the dominant G06Q and G06N classes already well-represented in the field.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See the complete adjacency analysis across all IPC branches, with filing density, trend direction, and suggested entry angles.
A01C · Planting and sowing automationG01S · Positioning and remote sensing for field mapping+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative share within the technology composition; low share does not by itself confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading institutions differ by technology route emphasis

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processingA01B 79 · Soil working in agricultureG06N 20 · Computing based on AI modelsA01G 25 · Horticulture & forestryG06Q 10 · Business, commerce & admin data processing
Chandigarh UniversityStrong · 9Strong · 5Strong · 7Strong · 8Moderate · 2
CVR College of EngineeringStrong · 11Strong · 6Moderate · 4AbsentModerate · 4
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical SciencesStrong · 9Strong · 6AbsentStrong · 5Moderate · 4
Lovely Professional UniversityStrong · 9Strong · 9Strong · 5AbsentAbsent
Manipal University JaipurStrong · 6Strong · 7Strong · 4AbsentModerate · 3
SR UniversityStrong · 9Moderate · 3Strong · 5AbsentAbsent
Anurag UniversityStrong · 4Strong · 3AbsentModerate · 2Moderate · 2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.