FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology Patents: Top Filers 2026
- 78.1% concentration. The top 5 of 38 ranked assignees hold 146 of 187 records in scope — a small group has occupied most of the claim space around afterburn control and catalyst circulation.
- Filing has flattened. From a 2018 peak of 10 filings, activity fell toward single digits by the 2022 midpoint of 3, with recent-year momentum reading 0 across every one of the leading assignees tracked.
- One family carries the field's core citations. The two most-cited records, both titled around FCC feed contacting with catalyst recycle reactor, draw 163 and 121 citations — far ahead of anything published since.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks 187 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine FCC regenerator, riser or catalyst-circulation claims with technical-detail language around afterburn, catalyst attrition, feed nozzle atomization, cyclone efficiency or heat balance, classified under C10G11, B01J8 and B01J38. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not all FCC patents, but the subset where the specification actually engages with regenerator and riser operating problems rather than downstream product chemistry.
Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025-2026 filing counts in this dataset are undercounts and will rise as later filings publish. Read the trend's most recent year as a floor, not a ceiling.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 187 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
A peak in 2018, then a flat-to-declining line
Filings ran from 2 in 2017 up to a peak of 10 in 2018, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 3. The most recent year in the dataset (2026) shows 0, but that reflects publication lag rather than a stopped field — filings made in the last 18 months have not all surfaced yet.
Refining and catalysis dominate; separation and thermal are secondary
C10G (hydrocarbon oils and refining) appears on 89.8% of the 187 records and B01J (catalysis and chemical/physical processes) on 49.2%, confirming this is fundamentally a refining-process dataset with catalysis as its main supporting class. B01D (separation, 25.7%) is a meaningful secondary cluster tied to cyclone and catalyst-recovery claims, while F28D (heat exchange, 4.8%), B04C (cyclone separators, 2.1%) and smaller classes appear only at the margins — each a candidate for closer inspection rather than a settled area.
Shares are the percentage of the 187 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fcc regenerator and riser technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents anchoring this field
US6776607B2 — Process for minimizing afterburn in a FCC regenerator
The invention relates to a process and apparatus for controlling afterburning in the regenerator of a FCC unit. The process and apparatus inject steam into the dilute phase within a regenerator to promote combustion of carbon monoxide before it enters the regenerator cyclones, plenum, or flue gas transfer lines.Filed by ExxonMobil Research & Engineering, this record sits squarely in the dataset's densest technical cluster: afterburn control via dilute-phase gas injection ahead of the cyclone train.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5451313A | FCC feed contacting with catalyst recycle reactor | 163 |
| 2 | US5597537A | FCC feed contacting with catalyst recycle reactor | 121 |
| 3 | US5681450A | Reduced chaos cyclone separation | 101 |
| 4 | US20140014555A1 | Fluid cracking process and apparatus for maximizing light olefins or middle distillates and light olefins | 82 |
| 5 | US6660683B1 | NOx reduction compositions for use in FCC processes | 74 |
| 6 | US5716514A | FCC NOx reduction by turbulent/laminar thermal conversion | 73 |
| 7 | US5830346A | FCC regenerator in partial CO burn with downstream air addition | 69 |
| 8 | US4812430A | NOx control during multistage combustion | 65 |
| 9 | US5268089A | FCC of nitrogen containing hydrocarbons and catalyst regeneration | 61 |
| 10 | US4895636A | FCC process with catalyst separation | 56 |
Citation counts inside this corpus reward age: the two highest-cited records date from the 1990s and remain reference points precisely because later filings had to work around them.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the concentration, citation and trend figures above.
Freedom-to-operate work starts with a small group
With 146 of 187 records in scope held by the top 5 assignees, a freedom-to-operate review for regenerator or riser hardware can prioritise a short list before widening the search. The tail below the top 10 (93.0% of 187) thins out fast to single-filing entrants.
Old art still defines the design space
The two records that draw 163 and 121 citations date to the mid-1990s and both centre on catalyst-recycle reactor contacting. Newer filings sit downstream of these foundational claims rather than replacing them — a sign that core mechanical geometry for feed contacting was settled early and later work optimises around it.
Activity has cooled since 2018
Every assignee with recent-year momentum data shows 0 filings in the latest year, including a -100% year-on-year reading for Marathon Petroleum. Combined with the 2018 peak of 10 and the 2022 midpoint of 3, the pattern reads as a maturing claim space rather than an active filing race — though publication lag means the true 2025-2026 count is not yet visible.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fcc regenerator and riser technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where it opens up
The 38 ranked assignees form a steep curve: a handful of refining and licensing majors hold most of the record count, with a long tail of single-digit filers behind them.
One filer sits well ahead of the field
The leading assignee's 48 records are roughly four times the fifth-place count of 12, a gap wide enough that its portfolio effectively sets the baseline for afterburn and feed-contacting claims that others must design around.
A workable mid-tier exists below the leader
Between fifth place (12 records) and tenth place (4 records), the field still supports several assignees with enough filing history to be worth direct monitoring, rather than only a single dominant player and noise.
Co-filing is limited and concentrated
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of them links a single major assignee to a research institute across three shared records. Most filers in this space patent independently rather than through joint development structures.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Company | 0 | — |
| Mobil Oil Corporation | 0 | — |
| W.R. Grace & Co. | 0 | — |
| Technip Process Technology Inc. | 0 | — |
| Lummus Technology Inc. | 0 | — |
| MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP | 0 | -100% |
| Engelhard Corporation | 0 | — |
| Reliance Industries Limited | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The landscape points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top 5
Given 78.1% concentration among 5 of 38 ranked assignees, a targeted FTO review of their claim scopes is more efficient than a broad field search before committing engineering resources to regenerator or riser hardware.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaMap the smaller IPC clusters for open claim space
Classes like F28D, B04C and B03C sit at single-digit percentages of the 187 records, which may mean genuine white space or simply thin coverage in this exact search string — worth verifying with a broader class-level search.
Search adjacent IPC classes in EurekaTrack whether momentum resumes post-lag
Every leading assignee reads 0 filings in the latest year, but publication lag means 2025-2026 activity is still arriving. Re-running this trend in a year will show whether the field is truly cooling or just delayed in the record.
Set a filing alert in EurekaCommon questions on FCC regenerator and riser patents
Filing activity in this space is concentrated: the top 5 of 38 ranked assignees together hold 146 of 187 records in scope, or 78.1%. The single leading assignee alone holds 48 records, well ahead of the fifth-ranked filer at 12. This means a small group of refining technology licensors and majors controls most of the documented claim space, and any competitive or freedom-to-operate analysis should start there before widening to the full ranked list.
Afterburn refers to uncontrolled combustion of carbon monoxide occurring after the main catalyst regeneration reaction, typically in the dilute phase above the catalyst bed or in the cyclones and flue gas lines. It is a specific engineering problem covered directly in the dataset's search terms, and representative filings such as US6776607B2 address it through steam injection into the dilute phase to promote controlled CO combustion before gas reaches the cyclone train. Because this is a well-established failure mode, expect dense prior art around gas-injection and combustion-control approaches specifically.
The trend points to a slowdown rather than continued growth: filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 10 in 2018, then eased to 3 by the 2022 midpoint, and every leading assignee tracked shows 0 filings in the most recent year. That said, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years in this dataset understate true filing activity and should not be read as a hard stop. A re-check in twelve months would give a clearer picture of whether the slowdown is real or a lag artefact.
The most-cited records in this dataset, drawing 163 and 121 citations respectively, both concern FCC feed contacting with a catalyst recycle reactor and have shaped the mechanical geometry that later filings build on. High citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings, so these numbers reflect long-standing influence rather than current enforceability, but the underlying contacting and recycle-reactor concepts remain reference points that new filings are typically drafted to distinguish from rather than repeat.
The smaller IPC clusters in this dataset — F28D heat-exchange apparatus at 4.8% of 187 records, B04C cyclone separators at 2.1%, and B03C magnetic or electrostatic separation at 1.1% — carry far fewer filings than the core C10G and B01J classes. This can indicate genuine under-claimed sub-areas such as regenerator heat-balance instrumentation or fines separation by non-mechanical means, though it may also simply reflect the narrowness of this specific search string. Either way, these branches warrant a dedicated search before assuming they are open.
Research FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole fcc regenerator and riser technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.