Book a demo

FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology Patents: Top Filers 2026

FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology Patents: Top Filers 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fcc-regenerator-and-riser-technology-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oil Refining & Lubricants
FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology Patents
  • 78.1% concentration. The top 5 of 38 ranked assignees hold 146 of 187 records in scope — a small group has occupied most of the claim space around afterburn control and catalyst circulation.
  • Filing has flattened. From a 2018 peak of 10 filings, activity fell toward single digits by the 2022 midpoint of 3, with recent-year momentum reading 0 across every one of the leading assignees tracked.
  • One family carries the field's core citations. The two most-cited records, both titled around FCC feed contacting with catalyst recycle reactor, draw 163 and 121 citations — far ahead of anything published since.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
187
Published Records
78%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 187 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine FCC regenerator, riser or catalyst-circulation claims with technical-detail language around afterburn, catalyst attrition, feed nozzle atomization, cyclone efficiency or heat balance, classified under C10G11, B01J8 and B01J38. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not all FCC patents, but the subset where the specification actually engages with regenerator and riser operating problems rather than downstream product chemistry.

Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025-2026 filing counts in this dataset are undercounts and will rise as later filings publish. Read the trend's most recent year as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO48
  2. 2MOBIL OIL CORP39
  3. 3WR GRACE & CO CONN28
  4. 4T EN PROCESS TECHNOLOGY INC19
  5. 5LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC12
  6. 6MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP8
  7. 7RELIANCE IND LTD7
  8. 8ENGELHARD CORP5
  9. 9UOP LLC4
  10. 10BASF CORPORATON4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 187 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A peak in 2018, then a flat-to-declining line

Filings ran from 2 in 2017 up to a peak of 10 in 2018, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 3. The most recent year in the dataset (2026) shows 0, but that reflects publication lag rather than a stopped field — filings made in the last 18 months have not all surfaced yet.

A peak in 2018, then a flat-to-declining line03581022017102018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Refining and catalysis dominate; separation and thermal are secondary

C10G (hydrocarbon oils and refining) appears on 89.8% of the 187 records and B01J (catalysis and chemical/physical processes) on 49.2%, confirming this is fundamentally a refining-process dataset with catalysis as its main supporting class. B01D (separation, 25.7%) is a meaningful secondary cluster tied to cyclone and catalyst-recovery claims, while F28D (heat exchange, 4.8%), B04C (cyclone separators, 2.1%) and smaller classes appear only at the margins — each a candidate for closer inspection rather than a settled area.

Refining and catalysis dominate; separation and thermal are secondaryC10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining16889.8%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …9249.2%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…4825.7%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus94.8%B04C · Cyclone separators42.1%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds31.6%B03C · Magnetic/electrostatic separat…21.1%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion21.1%Other137.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 187 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fcc regenerator and riser technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents anchoring this field

Representative Filing
US6776607B22004-08-17

US6776607B2 — Process for minimizing afterburn in a FCC regenerator

EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO.

The invention relates to a process and apparatus for controlling afterburning in the regenerator of a FCC unit. The process and apparatus inject steam into the dilute phase within a regenerator to promote combustion of carbon monoxide before it enters the regenerator cyclones, plenum, or flue gas transfer lines.Filed by ExxonMobil Research & Engineering, this record sits squarely in the dataset's densest technical cluster: afterburn control via dilute-phase gas injection ahead of the cyclone train.

US6776607B2 — patent drawing 1US6776607B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5451313AFCC feed contacting with catalyst recycle reactor163
2US5597537AFCC feed contacting with catalyst recycle reactor121
3US5681450AReduced chaos cyclone separation101
4US20140014555A1Fluid cracking process and apparatus for maximizing light olefins or middle distillates and light olefins82
5US6660683B1NOx reduction compositions for use in FCC processes74
6US5716514AFCC NOx reduction by turbulent/laminar thermal conversion73
7US5830346AFCC regenerator in partial CO burn with downstream air addition69
8US4812430ANOx control during multistage combustion65
9US5268089AFCC of nitrogen containing hydrocarbons and catalyst regeneration61
10US4895636AFCC process with catalyst separation56

Citation counts inside this corpus reward age: the two highest-cited records date from the 1990s and remain reference points precisely because later filings had to work around them.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the concentration, citation and trend figures above.

Concentration
78.1% of 187
held by top 5 of 38 ranked assignees

Freedom-to-operate work starts with a small group

With 146 of 187 records in scope held by the top 5 assignees, a freedom-to-operate review for regenerator or riser hardware can prioritise a short list before widening the search. The tail below the top 10 (93.0% of 187) thins out fast to single-filing entrants.

Ranking covers all 38 assignees the dataset returns
Citation influence
163 citations
on the single most-cited record

Old art still defines the design space

The two records that draw 163 and 121 citations date to the mid-1990s and both centre on catalyst-recycle reactor contacting. Newer filings sit downstream of these foundational claims rather than replacing them — a sign that core mechanical geometry for feed contacting was settled early and later work optimises around it.

Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus
Filing momentum
0 in latest year
across every leading assignee tracked

Activity has cooled since 2018

Every assignee with recent-year momentum data shows 0 filings in the latest year, including a -100% year-on-year reading for Marathon Petroleum. Combined with the 2018 peak of 10 and the 2022 midpoint of 3, the pattern reads as a maturing claim space rather than an active filing race — though publication lag means the true 2025-2026 count is not yet visible.

Publication lag of roughly 18 months applies to the most recent years
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fcc regenerator and riser technology, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it opens up

The 38 ranked assignees form a steep curve: a handful of refining and licensing majors hold most of the record count, with a long tail of single-digit filers behind them.

Leader
48 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The leading assignee's 48 records are roughly four times the fifth-place count of 12, a gap wide enough that its portfolio effectively sets the baseline for afterburn and feed-contacting claims that others must design around.

Compare against fifth place at 12 and tenth place at 4
Mid-tier
12 to 4 records
spans fifth through tenth place

A workable mid-tier exists below the leader

Between fifth place (12 records) and tenth place (4 records), the field still supports several assignees with enough filing history to be worth direct monitoring, rather than only a single dominant player and noise.

Top 10 combined hold 93.0% of 187 records
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified across the dataset

Co-filing is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of them links a single major assignee to a research institute across three shared records. Most filers in this space patent independently rather than through joint development structures.

Strongest pair recorded at 3 shared filings
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer search
Smaller IPC clusters suggest specific branches with thinner coverage than the core refining and catalysis classes.
Cyclone dipleg attrition controlFeed nozzle atomization geometryRegenerator heat-balance instrumentationMagnetic/electrostatic catalyst fines separationRiser-to-regenerator thermal coupling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Company0
Mobil Oil Corporation0
W.R. Grace & Co.0
Technip Process Technology Inc.0
Lummus Technology Inc.0
MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP0-100%
Engelhard Corporation0
Reliance Industries Limited0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The landscape points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top 5

Given 78.1% concentration among 5 of 38 ranked assignees, a targeted FTO review of their claim scopes is more efficient than a broad field search before committing engineering resources to regenerator or riser hardware.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Map the smaller IPC clusters for open claim space

Classes like F28D, B04C and B03C sit at single-digit percentages of the 187 records, which may mean genuine white space or simply thin coverage in this exact search string — worth verifying with a broader class-level search.

Search adjacent IPC classes in Eureka

Track whether momentum resumes post-lag

Every leading assignee reads 0 filings in the latest year, but publication lag means 2025-2026 activity is still arriving. Re-running this trend in a year will show whether the field is truly cooling or just delayed in the record.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on FCC regenerator and riser patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research FCC Regenerator and Riser Technology in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fcc regenerator and riser technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.