Book a demo

Fiber Laser Photonic Integration Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Fiber Laser Photonic Integration Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fiber-laser-photonic-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Fiber Laser Photonic Integration Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Small, concentrated field. just 20 patent families sit inside the monolithic and all-fiber integration search, with filings led by United States and China receiving offices.
  • Filing activity has cooled. the trend peaked at 6 families in 2023 after a flat 2022, with no clear upward momentum among tracked assignees in the latest year.
  • Claims cluster in H01S. 19 of 20 records sit in H01S (lasers & stimulated emission) against 7 in G02B, showing the core contest is inside the laser cavity, not the coupling optics.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
20
Published Records
80%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the fiber laser photonic integration patent set covers

Fiber laser photonic integration covers architectures that fuse gain fiber, pump coupling and cavity components into a single spliced or monolithic optical path, removing free-space alignment steps from the laser build. The search string ties monolithic fiber laser, all-fiber integration and spliced component integration language to IPC classes for fiber-laser gain media (H01S3/067, H01S3/16) and fiber-optic coupling elements (G02B6/255), so the resulting 20 families are concentrated on structural integration claims rather than broader laser-system patents.

The dataset spans records published from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the most recent one to two years of activity will read lower than actual filing volume once later applications publish.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1BLUE 425 LLC5
  2. 2TIANJIN UNIV5
  3. 3UNIVERSITE LAVAL4
  4. 4SHANGHAI INST OF OPTICS & FINE MECHANICS CHINESE ACAD OF SCI1
  5. 5WELLS FARGO BANK NA1
  6. 6NUBURU SUBSIDIARY INC1
  7. 7INDIAN INST OF TECH HYDERABAD1
  8. 8CHANGCHUN UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
  9. 9JDS UNIPHASE CORP1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 20-family dataset: how filings moved year over year, and where those filings sit across the IPC classes that define fiber laser integration.

A peak in 2023, then no clear direction

Filings opened at 5 in 2017, dipped to 0 at the 2022 midpoint, then rose to a peak of 6 in 2023 before the partial, still-publishing 2026 count. That shape reads as a small field with sporadic filing bursts rather than sustained investment growth, and the 2022 trough is a genuine gap in the record rather than a data artefact.

A peak in 2023, then no clear direction023565201720182019202020212022620232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01S dominates; G02B is the supporting class

19 of the 20 records classify under H01S (lasers and stimulated-emission devices), confirming that most claims describe the laser cavity, gain fiber or pump scheme itself. Only 7 records also carry a G02B optical-elements classification, meaning fewer than half the families claim the fiber-optic coupling or splicing hardware separately from the laser architecture.

H01S dominates; G02B is the supporting classH01S · Lasers & stimulated emission1995.0%G02B · Optical elements & systems735.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 20 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fiber laser photonic integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited and most representative filings

Representative Filing
US20240146014A12024-05-02

US20240146014A1 — Hundred-kilowatts-level monolithic fiber laser based on auxiliary lasers and hybrid cladding pumping scheme

TIANJIN UNIVERSITY

Filed by Tianjin University, this application couples multi-wavelength auxiliary lasers alongside a signal laser into the core of a single gain fiber under hybrid cladding pumping. Gain competition along the fiber suppresses signal amplification at the front segment and concentrates it at the rear segment, a staged-gain approach aimed at scaling monolithic fiber laser output toward the hundred-kilowatt class without adding free-space stages.Published 2024-05-02.

US20240146014A1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in the fiber laser integration set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5566196AMultiple core fiber laser and optical amplifier460
2US20170343729A1Monolithic visible wavelength fiber laser19
3CN102496842A高重频锁模光纤激光器12
4CN113131317A基于单模双偏芯结构的可调谐锁模光纤激光器及控制方法8
5WO2017189962A1Monolithic visible wavelength fiber laser8
6CN110635346A一种环型腔1.7um掺铥全光纤激光器7
7CN115986541A一种2.8μm和3.5μm双波长中红外光纤激光器3
8US20210181417A1Mid-infrared optical fibers with enhanced oh-diffusion resistance2
9US20240146014A1Hundred-kilowatts-level monolithic fiber laser based on auxiliary lasers and hybrid cladding pumping scheme1
10US20240275120A12.8 micrometer and 3.5 micrometer dual-wavelength mid-infraredfiber laser1

Citation counts reflect a searched corpus skewed toward older filings; treat them as a signal of past influence, not current filing activity.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the family counts, IPC split and receiving-office mix are read together.

Filing concentration
20 families
total tracked

A narrow, specialist field

With only 20 patent families across the entire 2015–2026 window, fiber laser photonic integration is a niche relative to the broader fiber-laser art. That narrowness cuts both ways: freedom-to-operate searches are tractable, but any single well-drafted family can dominate a sub-claim.

Based on assignee ranking coverage.
Geographic split
US 11 / CN 5
receiving offices

US-first filing pattern with a China contingent

United States receiving-office filings outnumber China roughly two to one, with smaller counts at the EPO, India and via WIPO/PCT. That skew suggests the commercially defended claim territory is still primarily US-anchored, with China as the clear secondary jurisdiction to monitor.

Receiving office counts from the full 20-record set.
Cavity vs. coupling claims
19 vs. 7
H01S vs. G02B records

Cavity and gain-fiber claims outweigh coupling claims

The gap between H01S and G02B classification counts indicates that most applicants are claiming what happens inside the laser cavity — gain fiber design, pumping scheme, mode-locking — rather than the splice or coupling hardware that physically integrates the fiber path.

IPC subclass counts, single search string.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fiber laser photonic integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum has stalled

The assignee list is a long tail: universities, a handful of laser specialists and no single entity with an obvious recent-year filing lead. Momentum tracking shows the tracked assignees at zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the flat overall 2022–2026 trend.

Academic filers
0 latest-year filings
across tracked assignees

Universities hold a visible share, but activity has paused

Institutions including Tianjin University, Université Laval, Changchun University of Science and Technology, and the Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics appear in the assignee set. None show filings in the latest tracked year, matching the dataset's flat post-2022 trend rather than any single organisation withdrawing.

Recent-year momentum data.
Specialist laser firms
-100% YoY
one tracked assignee

Commercial specialists show the same pause as academia

Named commercial assignees such as nLIGHT and Lumentum Operations sit in the same zero-filing latest-year bucket as the university filers, with one assignee (the India-based Institute of Technology Hyderabad) recording a -100% year-over-year change. There is no assignee currently showing positive filing momentum in this dataset.

Assignee-level momentum tracking.
Citation leadership
460 citations
top-cited record

One legacy patent anchors the citation table

US5566196A, a multiple-core fiber laser and optical amplifier patent, carries far more citations than any other record in the set. That gap reflects its age and foundational subject matter rather than current relevance — newer entrants should read it for freedom-to-operate history, not as a gauge of active competitive pressure.

Most-cited records table.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where the 20-family set shows thin coverage relative to the core cavity and gain-fiber claims.
Fiber-integrated pump/signal combinersSpliced mode-locking componentsHybrid cladding-pumping architecturesFiber-integrated wavelength-division elementsAll-fiber polarization control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
nLIGHT, Inc.0
Tianjin University0
Université Laval0
Changchun University of Science and Technology0
Institute of Technology Hyderabad0-100%
Lumentum Operations LLC0
Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences0
SDL, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a narrow field with concentrated cavity claims and a stalled filing trend — three directions worth following up.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on cladding-pumping claims

With H01S claims outnumbering G02B claims nearly three to one, a new entrant's biggest exposure is likely inside gain-fiber and pumping-scheme claims rather than coupling hardware. Map any planned design against the H01S-classified families first.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Watch China filings for a possible second wave

China's 5 receiving-office filings against the US's 11 suggest the jurisdiction is still building out coverage. A flat 2022–2026 global trend combined with publication lag means a China-driven uptick could surface once 2025–2026 filings finish publishing.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Draft around the under-claimed coupling branches

Fiber-integrated combiners, splice-based mode-locking and all-fiber polarization control remain thin in this dataset relative to core cavity claims, making them a plausible place to file a defensible first claim.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about fiber laser photonic integration patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Laser Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fiber Laser Photonic Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fiber laser photonic integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.