Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed view of fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patents: filing trends since 2015, IPC composition across 8 subclasses, leading assignees among 981 records, and the most-cited prior art.
Filing growth = 2021 (26 records) → 2024 (32); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 981 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
Fiber optic sensor signal conditioning sits at the boundary between optical sensing hardware and the electronics that turn a weak optical or photodetector output into a usable measurement. The scope here spans 981 records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, indexed under IPC classes covering general measuring and recording, temperature, length, vibration, pressure, electrical measurement and optical elements. Signal conditioning in this dataset means the amplification, filtering and compensation circuitry that sits downstream of the fiber optic sensing element itself — analog front ends, readout circuits and the demodulation logic that makes a fiber Bragg grating, interferometric or intensity-based sensor usable in a control loop.
Because a single record can be tagged with several IPC subclasses at once, the technology composition below sums to more than the record total — that overlap is itself informative, showing how tightly conditioning circuitry is coupled to the physical quantity being measured, whether that is temperature, strain, pressure or vibration.
Two views of the same 981 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which measurement domains the signal-conditioning claims attach to.
Annual filings peaked at 43 in 2020, dipped, and then rose again — 26 records in 2021 climbing to 32 in 2024, a 23% increase over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 show lower counts, but publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so those two years are still filling in rather than signalling a real slowdown.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
G01D (measuring and recording, general) is the largest single subclass at 25.1% of the 981 records, followed by G01N (material analysis, 16.6%), G01K (temperature, 16.5%) and G01B (length and dimension, 16.2%). G01H (vibration/sound, 14.2%), G01L (force/pressure, 13.6%), G01R (electrical/magnetic measurement, 13.4%) and G02B (optical elements, 9.3%) round out the picture — evidence that signal conditioning circuitry in this space is claimed alongside nearly every physical quantity a fiber optic sensor can measure, not concentrated in one modality.
Shares are the percentage of the 981 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA utility model covering a two-stage amplification circuit for weak signals from a fiber optic sensor: an APD-based photoelectric conversion stage feeds a first amplification stage, which connects through a capacitor to a second amplification stage. The design converts the sensor's weak current output into a voltage signal, filters it through the coupling capacitor, and applies a second proportional amplification stage to make the signal usable by downstream circuitry.Filed by Zhejiang Wanli University, 2021-11-30. Original abstract translated from Chinese for this summary.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6016702A | High sensitivity fiber optic pressure sensor for use in harsh environments | 350 |
| 2 | US6072567A | Vertical seismic profiling system having vertical seismic profiling optical signal processing equipment and f… | 168 |
| 3 | US6522797B1 | Seismic optical acoustic recursive sensor system | 163 |
| 4 | US7246521B2 | Diagnostic system for monitoring structural health conditions | 155 |
| 5 | US5275053A | Fiber optic pressure sensor systems | 127 |
| 6 | US5385053A | Fiber optic pressure sensor systems | 122 |
| 7 | US5204922A | Optical signal channel selector | 101 |
| 8 | US20040067003A1 | Fiber-optic sensing system for distributed detection and localization of alarm conditions | 90 |
| 9 | US4409476A | Fiber optic temperature-measuring apparatus | 85 |
| 10 | US5844667A | Fiber optic pressure sensor with passive temperature compensation | 82 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records that have had more time to accumulate citations — read these as markers of influence on the field's foundational approaches, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four figures that matter more than the raw record count when deciding where to file, partner or design around existing claims.
The leading assignee holds 32 records and the fifth-placed holds 17 — a top 5 that together account for 11.9% of the 981 records in scope. That leaves the large majority of filings spread across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants, including universities and utility-adjacent research institutes.
China's receiving office accounts for 385 of the tracked records, well ahead of the United States (141), EPO (95), South Korea (76), Japan (75) and WIPO/PCT (59). Any freedom-to-operate check for this technology should start with Chinese utility models and invention filings before looking elsewhere.
After a 2020 peak of 43 records, annual filings dipped before climbing from 26 in 2021 to 32 in 2024 — a 23% increase over that span. 2025–2026 figures look lower only because publication lag has not caught up; they should not be read as a slowdown.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest being repeated filings between a state grid corporation and its provincial power-research affiliates, and between a university and its own trustees' board. This pattern reflects internal institutional filing structure more than cross-company R&D partnership.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The figures above describe the field as filed. Turning them into a filing or design-around decision means going deeper on specific claim language and specific assignees.
Compare the amplification, filtering and demodulation stages in your design against the claim scope of the most-cited records and the leading assignees' recent filings, not just the abstracts.
Open Eureka to run a claim comparison →A handful of assignees hold outsized shares of the ranked field; watching their newest filings is a better early-warning signal than watching the field average.
Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →Under-claimed IPC combinations look attractive until a broader parent claim turns up in adjacent classes; verify white space against the full claim tree, not just subclass counts.
Explore white space with Eureka →The ranked leader in this dataset holds 32 of the 981 records in scope, with the fifth-placed assignee at 17 and the tenth at 10. That is a top 5 combining for 11.9% of all records — meaningful but not dominant, since the remainder is spread across a long tail of universities, utility research institutes and smaller filers. No single company controls the field outright, which matters for freedom-to-operate assessments: clearance work needs to check the long tail, not just the largest holders.
Filings grew from 26 records in 2021 to 32 in 2024, a 23% increase, after an earlier peak of 43 in 2020. The apparent drop in 2025 and 2026 numbers is a publication-lag artifact — patent applications typically publish roughly 18 months after filing, so the most recent one to two years in any trend chart are always undercounted. Treat 2024 as the last year with a reasonably complete count, and expect the 2025–2026 figures to revise upward as more records publish.
General measuring and recording (IPC class G01D) is the largest single category at 25.1% of the 981 records, ahead of material analysis (G01N, 16.6%), temperature measurement (G01K, 16.5%) and length/dimension measurement (G01B, 16.2%). Vibration (G01H), pressure (G01L), electrical measurement (G01R) and optical elements (G02B) each account for a further 9–14% of records. Because records often carry multiple IPC tags, this shows signal-conditioning circuitry is claimed across nearly every physical quantity fiber optic sensors measure rather than concentrated in one niche.
China is by far the largest receiving office in this dataset at 385 tracked records, more than double the United States at 141. Europe (EPO), South Korea and Japan each sit in the 75–95 range, and WIPO/PCT filings total 59. A filing strategy focused only on the US and Europe would miss the majority of the documented activity — clearance and freedom-to-operate work should prioritise Chinese-language prior art first.
CN214959461U, filed by Zhejiang Wanli University, claims a two-stage amplification circuit: an avalanche-photodiode-based photoelectric conversion stage feeding a first amplifier, coupled through a capacitor to a second amplifier that proportionally re-amplifies the voltage signal for downstream processing. It is a utility model, which in China carries a narrower and faster-granted scope than an invention patent, so its practical blocking effect is limited to designs matching that specific two-stage, capacitor-coupled topology. A workable alternative circuit — a different coupling method or a single-stage design with digital gain correction — would likely sit outside its literal claim scope.
Go past this page: query the whole fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.