https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fiber-optic-sensor-signal-conditioning-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Sensors, MEMS & Instrumentation
Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patents: Who Leads and Where the Gaps Are

A data-backed view of fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patents: filing trends since 2015, IPC composition across 8 subclasses, leading assignees among 981 records, and the most-cited prior art.

981
Published Records
12%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+23%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (26 records) → 2024 (32); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 981 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Fiber optic sensor signal conditioning sits at the boundary between optical sensing hardware and the electronics that turn a weak optical or photodetector output into a usable measurement. The scope here spans 981 records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, indexed under IPC classes covering general measuring and recording, temperature, length, vibration, pressure, electrical measurement and optical elements. Signal conditioning in this dataset means the amplification, filtering and compensation circuitry that sits downstream of the fiber optic sensing element itself — analog front ends, readout circuits and the demodulation logic that makes a fiber Bragg grating, interferometric or intensity-based sensor usable in a control loop.

Because a single record can be tagged with several IPC subclasses at once, the technology composition below sums to more than the record total — that overlap is itself informative, showing how tightly conditioning circuitry is coupled to the physical quantity being measured, whether that is temperature, strain, pressure or vibration.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1LITTON SYST INC32
  2. 2HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC27
  3. 3CHINA JILIANG UNIV21
  4. 4STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA20
  5. 5TIANJIN UNIV17
  6. 6KK TOSHIBA16
  7. 7THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV14
  8. 8SUBARU CORP13
  9. 9HARBIN ENG UNIV12
  10. 10BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS INC10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 981 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which measurement domains the signal-conditioning claims attach to.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Annual filings peaked at 43 in 2020, dipped, and then rose again — 26 records in 2021 climbing to 32 in 2024, a 23% increase over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 show lower counts, but publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so those two years are still filling in rather than signalling a real slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017–20260132538503320172018201943202020212022202320242025112026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

G01D (measuring and recording, general) is the largest single subclass at 25.1% of the 981 records, followed by G01N (material analysis, 16.6%), G01K (temperature, 16.5%) and G01B (length and dimension, 16.2%). G01H (vibration/sound, 14.2%), G01L (force/pressure, 13.6%), G01R (electrical/magnetic measurement, 13.4%) and G02B (optical elements, 9.3%) round out the picture — evidence that signal conditioning circuitry in this space is claimed alongside nearly every physical quantity a fiber optic sensor can measure, not concentrated in one modality.

Technology composition by IPC subclassG01D · Measuring (general) & recording24625.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing16316.6%G01K · Temperature measurement16216.5%G01B · Measuring length & dimensions15916.2%G01H · Measuring vibrations & sound13914.2%G01L · Force & pressure measurement13313.6%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement13113.4%G02B · Optical elements & systems919.3%Other68770.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 981 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Most-cited records in the corpus

Representative Filing
CN214959461U2021-11-30

CN214959461U — Weak-signal amplification circuit for a fiber optic sensor

浙江万里学院

A utility model covering a two-stage amplification circuit for weak signals from a fiber optic sensor: an APD-based photoelectric conversion stage feeds a first amplification stage, which connects through a capacitor to a second amplification stage. The design converts the sensor's weak current output into a voltage signal, filters it through the coupling capacitor, and applies a second proportional amplification stage to make the signal usable by downstream circuitry.Filed by Zhejiang Wanli University, 2021-11-30. Original abstract translated from Chinese for this summary.

CN214959461U — patent drawing 1CN214959461U — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6016702AHigh sensitivity fiber optic pressure sensor for use in harsh environments350
2US6072567AVertical seismic profiling system having vertical seismic profiling optical signal processing equipment and f…168
3US6522797B1Seismic optical acoustic recursive sensor system163
4US7246521B2Diagnostic system for monitoring structural health conditions155
5US5275053AFiber optic pressure sensor systems127
6US5385053AFiber optic pressure sensor systems122
7US5204922AOptical signal channel selector101
8US20040067003A1Fiber-optic sensing system for distributed detection and localization of alarm conditions90
9US4409476AFiber optic temperature-measuring apparatus85
10US5844667AFiber optic pressure sensor with passive temperature compensation82

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records that have had more time to accumulate citations — read these as markers of influence on the field's foundational approaches, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data indicates

Four figures that matter more than the raw record count when deciding where to file, partner or design around existing claims.

Concentration
11.9%
of all 981 records held by the top 5 assignees

Leadership is real but not dominant

The leading assignee holds 32 records and the fifth-placed holds 17 — a top 5 that together account for 11.9% of the 981 records in scope. That leaves the large majority of filings spread across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants, including universities and utility-adjacent research institutes.

Top 5 combined: 117 of 981 records
Filing office
385
records filed at the China receiving office

China is the primary filing venue

China's receiving office accounts for 385 of the tracked records, well ahead of the United States (141), EPO (95), South Korea (76), Japan (75) and WIPO/PCT (59). Any freedom-to-operate check for this technology should start with Chinese utility models and invention filings before looking elsewhere.

US 141 · EPO 95 · South Korea 76 · Japan 75 · PCT 59
Growth
+23%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Activity is rebuilding, not shrinking

After a 2020 peak of 43 records, annual filings dipped before climbing from 26 in 2021 to 32 in 2024 — a 23% increase over that span. 2025–2026 figures look lower only because publication lag has not caught up; they should not be read as a slowdown.

2021: 26 → 2024: 32 records
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is thin and utility-driven

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest being repeated filings between a state grid corporation and its provincial power-research affiliates, and between a university and its own trustees' board. This pattern reflects internal institutional filing structure more than cross-company R&D partnership.

Strongest pair: 3 shared records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The figures above describe the field as filed. Turning them into a filing or design-around decision means going deeper on specific claim language and specific assignees.

Map claims against your own circuit topology

Compare the amplification, filtering and demodulation stages in your design against the claim scope of the most-cited records and the leading assignees' recent filings, not just the abstracts.

Open Eureka to run a claim comparison →

Track the leading assignees' recent activity

A handful of assignees hold outsized shares of the ranked field; watching their newest filings is a better early-warning signal than watching the field average.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →

Stress-test white space before committing R&D

Under-claimed IPC combinations look attractive until a broader parent claim turns up in adjacent classes; verify white space against the full claim tree, not just subclass counts.

Explore white space with Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fiber Optic Sensor Signal Conditioning Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fiber optic sensor signal conditioning patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.