Book a demo

FinFET Fab Process Control (APC) Patent Snapshot

FinFET Fab Process Control (APC) Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
FinFET Fab Process Control (APC) Patent Snapshot in 2026

This is a highly concentrated niche: the top five filers account for 83% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. holding the leading position. Annual volume peaked in 2019 and has since eased sharply, signaling a mature, post-peak field rather than an actively expanding frontier.

21
Patent families in scope
83%
Top visible applicants share
-93%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

TSMC leads a tightly consolidated field

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. sits at the top of the applicant ranking, followed by Applied Materials Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. The visible assignee structure is concentrated: a small group of integrated device manufacturers and equipment suppliers accounts for the large majority of documented activity among the ranked applicants visible in this query.

The top five filers together hold 83% of the patent records filed by the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating a steep tier gap between the leading cluster and the remaining participants. Firms ranked sixth and below each hold two patent records, underscoring how decisively the upper tier is visible in this narrow topic.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.13
2Applied Materials, Inc.10
3International Business Machines Corporation8
4STMicroelectronics Inc.6
5SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International) Beijing2
6GlobalFoundries US Inc.2
7Intel Corporation2
8SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International) Shanghai2
9Tokyo Electron Limited2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect deep vertical integration between device architecture and process control: TSMC and IBM concentrate on H01L 21 and H01L 29 classes covering fabrication and device structures, while Applied Materials extends into H10D general semiconductor device classes consistent with its equipment-supplier role.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and will be revised upward as pending applications publish; the apparent absence of activity after 2023 should not be read as a definitive cessation.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2019 peak followed by sustained quiet, with semiconductor device classes dominating

The filing trend reveals a narrow activity window centered on 2019, while the technology composition is overwhelmingly concentrated in core semiconductor device IPC classes, with only thin representation in adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings climbed to a clear peak in 2019 and have since eased back substantially. The years 2021–2023 show no recorded activity, and 2024 carries a single record; the most recent 18–24 months remain subject to publication lag, so the post-2023 trough may not fully reflect actual filing behavior yet.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 11 in 2019.320172201811201942020020210202202023120240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L Semiconductor devices is visible in the technology mix, reflecting the field’s focus on fabrication-process and device-structure patents. H10D Semiconductor devices (general) forms a secondary cluster, while H10P and B82Y Nanotechnology applications together represent the thinner, adjacent branches that may offer differentiation headroom.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 39; H10D · Semiconductor devices (general) 14.H01L · Semiconductor dev…39H10D · Semiconductor dev…14H10P5B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US6642090B1Published 2003-11-04

Fin FET devices from bulk semiconductor and method…

Globalfoundries U.S. INC.

The present invention thus provides a device structure and method for forming fin Field Effect Transistors (FETs) that overcomes many of the disadvantages of the prior art. Specifically, the device structure and method provides the ability to form finFET devices from bulk semiconductor wafers while providing improved wafer to wafer device uniformity… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Fin FET devices from bulk semiconductor and method… — patent drawingFin FET devices from bulk semiconductor and method… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Fin FET devices from bulk semiconductor and method…573
2Method of making a finfet device126
3Silicon germanium-on-insulator finfet53
4Methods, apparatus and system for gate cut process…30
5Using a metal-containing layer as an etching stop …15
6Silicon germanium-on-insulator FinFET15
7High-electron-mobility transistors with heterojunc…13
8Epitaxial growth of doped film for source and drai…8

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · TSMC

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.

TSMC holds the leading position with 13 patent records, concentrated across H01L 21 (fabrication processes) and H01L 29 (device structures), with additional coverage in H01L 27 (integrated circuits). This breadth across fabrication and integration classes is consistent with a fully vertically integrated foundry defending its process node IP. No recent momentum data is available for TSMC in the applicant momentum evidence.

patent records: 13
Challenger · IBM

International Business Machines Corporation

IBM holds 8 patent records and is flagged as a new entrant in recent momentum data, indicating a renewed or re-initiated filing program after a quiet period. IBM’s technical focus spans H01L 21, H01L 29, and H01L 27 in near-equal proportions, reflecting a broad process and device architecture scope. IBM is also the anchor of the dataset’s largest co-filing relationship, partnering with STMicroelectronics Inc. on 6 records.

patent records: 8
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Applied Materials Inc.STMicroelectronics Inc.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.