Book a demo

FinFET Interconnect Patent Landscape 2026

FinFET Interconnect Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
FinFET Interconnect Patent Landscape in 2026

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) commands this field by a wide margin, holding a dominant position among the top filers in the hundred largest filers. Annual filing volume peaked in 2017 and has eased steadily since, signaling a maturing technology where the core IP positions are largely established.

1,218
Patent families in scope
75%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-42%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

TSMC leads a heavily concentrated field with a wide tier gap

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) ranks first with 1,120 patent records, placing it in a category of its own relative to all other applicants. GlobalFoundries US and IBM follow at 286 and 275 patent records respectively, forming a distinct second tier.

The top five filers account for 75% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, indicating unusually high concentration. The gap between TSMC and the second-ranked applicant is roughly fourfold, making TSMC’s positional advantage structurally difficult to close in the near term.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC)1,120
2GlobalFoundries US Inc.286
3IBM Corporation275
4Intel Corporation123
5GlobalFoundries Inc.79
6Qualcomm Incorporated45
7Elpis Tech Inc.34
8Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.34
9STMicroelectronics Inc.34
10Parabellum Strategic Opportunities Fund LLC33
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)29
12Synopsys, Inc.29
13Adeia Semiconductor Solutions LLC24
14Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation20
15Alsephina Innovations Inc.20
16Apple Inc.19
17Micron Technology, Inc.19
18imec (Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre)18
19Texas Instruments Incorporated17
20United Microelectronics Corporation13
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Leaders’ deep portfolios in H01L semiconductor device classes reflect sustained, systematic investment across device design, fabrication, and integration — suggesting that new entrants face a high barrier to establishing broad freedom to operate in core FinFET interconnect architectures.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are substantially under-counted due to typical patent publication lags of 18–24 months; apparent recent low values should not be interpreted as a real acceleration of decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume has contracted from its 2017 peak; H01L dominates the technology mix

Two views together characterize the field: an annual trend that shows a sustained contraction from the 2017 peak, and a technology-branch breakdown that reveals heavy concentration in semiconductor device classes alongside a set of smaller adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked in 2017 at 252 and have declined each subsequent year through 2023, consistent with a post-peak lifecycle. Values for 2024, 2025, and 2026 reflect publication lag and should be treated as incomplete rather than as evidence of further acceleration in the decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 252 in 2017.2522017226201818820191502020125202110920229520236320248202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (Semiconductor devices) accounts for the dominant share of patent records, with H10D (Semiconductor devices, general) and H10B (Memory device manufacture) forming a secondary layer. Branches such as H10N, G11C, and G06F each hold a small fraction, indicating that application areas beyond core device and memory integration remain comparatively sparse.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 2,442; H10D · Semiconductor devices (general) 653.H01L · Semiconductor dev…2,442H10D · Semiconductor dev…653H10B · Memory device man…322H10P113H10W87H10N · Other electric so…52G11C · Static & digital …51G06F · Electric digital …46↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240332398A1Published 2024-10-03

High density metal-insulator-metal capacitor

International Business Machines Corporation

A semiconductor structure with a nanosheet device region with GAA nanosheet FETs on a bottom dielectric isolation layer. The GAA nanosheet FETs connect by a frontside contact to the frontside back-end-of-line (BEOL) interconnect wiring and by a backside contact to the backside BEOL interconnect wiring. The semiconductor structure includes a finFET device… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

High density metal-insulator-metal capacitor — patent drawingHigh density metal-insulator-metal capacitor — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Fin structure of FinFET1,322
2FinFET device having a channel defined in a diamon…540
3Fabrication of a vertical fin field effect transis…429
4FIN field effect transistor330
5Fin-like field effect transistor (finfet) device a…324
6Method and structure for a 1T-RAM bit cell and macro283
7Narrow fin FinFET275
8FinFET SRAM cell using low mobility plane for cell…274

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a past-peak filing trend, extreme concentration, structured collaboration, and U. S.-centric jurisdiction coverage shapes both the risk profile and the opportunity set for new and existing participants.

Decline

Field is in decline from a 2017 peak

The lifecycle stage is Decline: annual filings have eased back from the 2017 peak of 252 records and have continued to fall through 2023. This indicates that the core FinFET interconnect design space is substantially mapped, and incremental patent-building in established sub-areas offers diminishing differentiation. R&D investment is better directed at adjacent branches or next-generation architectures where IP density is lower.

Post-peak
Concentration

TSMC holds a structurally dominant position

The top five filers represent 75% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, with TSMC alone accounting for 1,120 patent records — roughly four times the second-ranked filer. This degree of concentration means that design-around and licensing considerations are unavoidable for most new entrants. Challengers such as GlobalFoundries US (286 records) and IBM (275 records) occupy a distinct second tier that is itself well above the remainder of the field.

High concentration
Collaboration

IBM–GlobalFoundries axis is the dominant co-filing partnership

The most active co-filing pair is IBM and GlobalFoundries, with 50 joint records — far exceeding any other pair. IBM and STMicroelectronics, and GlobalFoundries and STMicroelectronics, each account for 16 joint records, reflecting a triangle of foundry and IDM collaboration. These relationships suggest that key process-integration knowledge has been developed cooperatively and may be reflected in jointly held IP that complicates freedom-to-operate analysis for outsiders.

Structured alliances
Geography

U.S. is the overwhelmingly dominant jurisdiction

The United States accounts for 2,078 patent records, far exceeding all other jurisdictions. Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT) follow at 81 and 78 records respectively, with China at 59 and Taiwan at 52. The strong U.S. skew reflects both the home-country filing strategies of U.S.-headquartered leaders and the commercial primacy of the U.S. semiconductor market. Non-U.S. coverage is relatively thin, which may present both risk (gaps in protection) and opportunity (lower competitive density in certain markets).

U.S.-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
IBM CorporationGlobalFoundries Inc.50
IBM CorporationSTMicroelectronics Inc.16
GlobalFoundries Inc.STMicroelectronics Inc.16
GlobalFoundries Inc.GlobalFoundries US Inc.9
STMicroelectronics Inc.STMicroelectronics (Crolles 2) SAS6
IBM CorporationIBM United Kingdom Ltd.3
IBM CorporationIBM China Co., Ltd.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts are based on co-applicant pairs in the patent records.Explore insights →
Leaders

TSMC leads by a wide margin; IBM and GlobalFoundries anchor the second tier

The top players are all focused on H01L semiconductor device sub-classes, reflecting the core device and process-integration nature of FinFET interconnect IP. Trajectory diverges: established leaders are filing at reduced rates, while several smaller players are emerging as new entrants.

Leader · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC)

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC)

TSMC holds 1,120 patent records, anchoring all three leading H01L sub-classes (H01L 29, H01L 21, and H01L 27) with the highest counts in each. Its recent filing trend shows a decline of 43% versus the prior period, consistent with the field-wide post-peak pattern rather than a strategic retreat — the base portfolio remains by far the largest in the field.

patent records: 1,120
Challenger · GlobalFoundries US Inc.

GlobalFoundries US Inc.

GlobalFoundries US ranks second with 286 patent records, concentrated in H01L 29, H01L 21, and H01L 27 — the same core classes as TSMC. Recent filing momentum shows it as a new entrant in the most recent period, suggesting that its current activity is building from a relatively low recent base. Its parent entity GlobalFoundries Inc. contributes an additional 79 patent records, and the two entities have 9 joint records between them.

patent records: 286
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers including Intel, Qualcomm, Samsung, STMicroelectronics, and more.
Intel Corp · 123 patent recordsQualcomm Inc · 45 patent records+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC)173▼ -43%
IBM Corporation13▼ -70%
Intel Corporation13▼ -41%
STMicroelectronics Inc.2▲ new entrant
Qualcomm Incorporated9▲ new entrant
GlobalFoundries US Inc.4▲ new entrant
Apple Inc.17▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player patent record counts are drawn from the top-100 applicant ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the core FinFET interconnect domain

Several IPC branches appear at lower density relative to the dominant H01L core. These are observations of relative sparsity; whether they represent actionable opportunities depends on technical fit and a realistic entry path.

H10B · Memory device manufacture

H10B holds 322 patent records — sizable in absolute terms but representing only 8% of the total IPC-level count, which is modest given the strategic importance of FinFET-based memory integration (e.g., SRAM bit cells). The most-cited patents in the corpus already include FinFET SRAM cell work, indicating recognized technical value. Teams with process expertise in both FinFET fabrication and memory cell integration could find this branch underrepresented relative to commercial relevance, and the IBM–GlobalFoundries–STMicroelectronics collaboration triangle has produced joint work in this area that could inform freedom-to-operate scoping.

Search this in Eureka →

H10N · Other electric solid-state devices

H10N accounts for 52 patent records — roughly 1% of the IPC-level count — placing it among the sparser branches in the corpus. This class covers non-standard solid-state devices, including emerging materials and unconventional device structures that may interface with FinFET interconnect layers. The low density suggests that researchers exploring novel device–interconnect integration schemes (e.g., phase-change, ferroelectric, or spintronic elements co-integrated with FinFET back-end) would encounter limited prior IP, though a thorough freedom-to-operate search across the dominant H01L classes would still be necessary given the breadth of TSMC’s and IBM’s core portfolios.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all five identified adjacent branches with density scores and entry-path analysis.
H10P · emerging device structuresG11C · Static and digital memories+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; a family filing in multiple classes is counted once per class.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across H01L sub-classes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01L 29 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 27 · Semiconductor devicesH10D 62 · Semiconductor devices (general)H10D 84 · Semiconductor devices (general)
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC)Strong · 1,066Strong · 879Strong · 600Moderate · 228Emerging · 211
IBM CorporationStrong · 404Strong · 325Strong · 204Emerging · 78Moderate · 83
GlobalFoundries Inc.Strong · 305Strong · 233Moderate · 124Emerging · 48Emerging · 43
Intel CorporationStrong · 122Strong · 95Strong · 68Moderate · 35Moderate · 30
STMicroelectronics Inc.Strong · 53Strong · 45Strong · 27Moderate · 15Emerging · 8
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)Strong · 45Strong · 42Moderate · 12AbsentAbsent
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 34Strong · 19Strong · 28AbsentModerate · 7
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own FinFET interconnect landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.