Book a demo

FinFET SoC Integration Patent Snapshot 2026

FinFET SoC Integration Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
FinFET SoC Integration Patent Snapshot in 2026

This is a highly concentrated, decline-stage niche: IBM holds a dominant position among only two ranked filers, and recorded filings peaked in 2017 with no activity observed after 2019. New entrants face a field where the foundational positions have been staked but annual origination has effectively ceased.

12
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

IBM dominates a two-player field in sharp concentration

IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) leads the applicant ranking by a wide margin, accounting for the overwhelming majority of the top-ranked filers’ combined output. GlobalFoundries Singapore is the only other ranked applicant in the corpus.

The top five filers collectively account for 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, and the ranking itself collapses to just two named entities — a level of concentration that leaves virtually no structural room for mid-tier challengers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1International Business Machines Corporation15
2GlobalFoundries Singapore Pte. Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

IBM’s positional dominance, built primarily around stacked FinFET non-volatile memory structures and anti-fuse devices, implies that any entrant pursuing similar device architectures will encounter a dense prior-art thicket controlled by a single incumbent.

Filing counts for the most recent periods reflect publication lag and should be interpreted cautiously; apparent zeros in 2020 onward do not necessarily confirm a complete absence of new activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2017 and has eased; semiconductor device classes dominate the mix

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that burst briefly in 2017 and has since contracted, with its technical scope anchored firmly in core semiconductor device classifications.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked at five records in 2017, stepped down through 2018 and 2019, and show no recorded activity from 2020 onward. The absence of recent filings is consistent with both genuine decline and publication lag; the latter applies particularly to 2024–2026 and those years should be treated as under-counted.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2017.52017320184201902020020210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (Semiconductor devices) is the visible IPC branch, followed by H10D (Semiconductor devices, general) and H10B (Memory device manufacture). G11C (Static and digital memories) and H10P appear at lower counts, while H10W is the sparsest branch — a signal of relative under-coverage in that classification.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 16; H10D · Semiconductor devices (general) 9.H01L · Semiconductor dev…16H10D · Semiconductor dev…9H10B · Memory device man…5G11C · Static & digital …4H10P4H10W2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US10741552B2Published 2020-08-11

Method and device for embedding flash memory and l…

Globalfoundries Singapore PTE. LTD.

Methods for preventing step-height difference of flash and logic gates in FinFET devices and related devices are provided. Embodiments include forming fins in flash and logic regions; recessing an oxide exposing an upper portion of the fins; forming an oxide liner over the upper portion in the flash region; forming a polysilicon gate over and perpendicular… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method and device for embedding flash memory and l… — patent drawingMethod and device for embedding flash memory and l… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Stacked FinFET EEPROM9
2Vertically stacked FinFET fuse9
3Multiple breakdown point low resistance anti-fuse …7
4Stacked finfet eeprom5
5Vertically stacked FinFET fuse4
6Metal finfet Anti-fuse2
7Metal FinFET anti-fuse2
8Stacked finfet eeprom1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · IBM

International Business Machines Corporation

IBM leads with 15 patent records, concentrated in H01L 27 (integrated semiconductor circuits), H01L 29 (semiconductor device elements), and H01L 23 (semiconductor device details). The most-cited works cluster around stacked FinFET EEPROM and vertically stacked FinFET fuse and anti-fuse architectures. Applicant momentum data is not available in the evidence, so trajectory cannot be quantified beyond the filing-trend observation that activity ceased after 2019.

15 patent records
Challenger · GlobalFoundries Singapore

GlobalFoundries Singapore Pte. Ltd.

GlobalFoundries Singapore holds 1 patent record, spread evenly across H01L 21 (semiconductor fabrication processes), H01L 27, and H01L 29. Its single record provides minimal IP leverage but signals awareness of the stacked FinFET SoC integration space from a foundry perspective. Momentum data is not available in the evidence.

1 patent record
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
International Business Machines CorporationGlobalFoundries Singapore Pte. Ltd.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.