Book a demo

FinFET TCAD Simulation Patent Snapshot 2026

FinFET TCAD Simulation Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
FinFET TCAD Simulation Patent Snapshot in 2026

The FinFET TCAD simulation patent space is tightly concentrated, with Bell Semiconductor LLC and STMicroelectronics together accounting for the majority of the top filers’ output, anchored primarily in semiconductor device IPC classes. Annual filing volume has eased back from its 2019 peak, signalling a field in decline where foundational positions are already well defended.

27
Patent families in scope
60%
Top visible applicants share
-25%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Bell Semiconductor and STMicroelectronics dominate a highly concentrated field

Bell Semiconductor LLC leads the applicant ranking with 15 patent records, followed immediately by STMicroelectronics Inc with 14 patent records — the two together nearly equal the combined output of all remaining ranked filers.

The top five filers account for 60% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, a high concentration figure for such a specialised simulation niche; the tier gap between rank two and rank three (IBM and TSMC, each with 4 patent records) is steep, indicating two clearly visible players and a fragmented trailing group.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Bell Semiconductor LLC15
2STMicroelectronics Inc14
3IBM (International Business Machines Corporation)4
4Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4
5South China University of Technology3
6GlobalFoundries US Inc2
7Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL)2
8STMicroelectronics (US)2
9Intermolecular Inc2
10HINDUSTHAN COLLEGE OF ENG & TECH1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11STMicroelectronics (Crolles 2) SAS1
12Vishvakeerthi C1
13Karpagam College of Engineering1
14Ahmed Shibly S1
15Nantong University1
16Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi1
17Advanced Micro Devices Inc1
18Xidian University1
19Dr S Ashok Kumar1
20Anbarasu K1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of Bell Semiconductor and STMicroelectronics implies that any new entrant must either carve out technically distinct simulation approaches or target sub-domains — such as AI-assisted modelling or biosensor-oriented TCAD — that the leaders have not prioritised.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and will rise as pending applications are published; current late-period totals should be treated as floor estimates rather than final counts.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume peaked in 2019–2021 and has since eased; H01L dominates the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that established its core IP foundations between 2019 and 2021 and is now consolidating, with semiconductor device classes absorbing the overwhelming share of activity.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings climbed from 2 in 2017 to a plateau of 4 per year from 2019 through 2021, then eased to 3 in 2022–2024 and 2 in 2025; 2026 shows 0, reflecting publication lag rather than a true halt. The trajectory confirms a past-peak field — the multi-year window is down 25% — and new foundational filings are unlikely to reshape the competitive order.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2019.22017220184201942020420213202232023320242202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (Semiconductor devices) accounts for the large majority of patent records, confirming that FinFET TCAD work is filed primarily under device-physics classifications. G06F (Electric digital data processing) is the next most present branch, reflecting simulation software aspects, while G01N (Material analysis and testing), H10D, G06N, and G11C each hold minimal shares, marking them as sparse adjacent branches.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 47; G06F · Electric digital data processing 7.H01L · Semiconductor dev…47G06F · Electric digital …7H10D · Semiconductor dev…6G01N · Material analysis…3H10P2G06N · Computing based o…1G11C · Static & digital …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2023279372A1Published 2023-01-12

一种基于自热效应的FinFET器件建模仿真优化方法和系统

South China University Of Technology

本发明公开了一种基于自热效应的FinFET器件建模仿真优化方法和系统,该方法包括:基于通用数据,运用仿真软件建立FinFET器件模型并进行电仿真,获取电特性参数;通过对FinFET器件模型进行热仿真,获得热参数;根据所述热参数修改仿真的环境温度,在FinFET器件受自热影响的环境下修正FinFET器件模型的电特性参数;最后建立基于自热效应的FinFET器件模型。本发明提供的一种基于自热效应的FinFET器件建模仿真优化方法和系统,与不考虑自热效应的传统建模相比较,能够降低器件仿真的误差、提高建模的精准性、提高可靠性分析的准确性。 (excerpt from the patent abstract)

一种基于自热效应的FinFET器件建模仿真优化方法和系统 — patent drawing一种基于自热效应的FinFET器件建模仿真优化方法和系统 — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Accumulation type finfet, circuits and fabrication…150
2Defect-free strain relaxed buffer layer100
3Accumulation type FinFET, circuits and fabrication…80
4Method to induce strain in finfet channels from an…58
5Method to induce strain in 3-d microfabricated str…36
6Method to fabricate finfet sensors, in particular,…29
7Accumulation type finfet, circuits and fabrication…25
8Counter-doped low-power finfet22

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Bell Semiconductor LLC

Bell Semiconductor LLC

Bell Semiconductor LLC holds 15 patent records, the highest in the ranking. Its technology focus sits across H01L 27 and H01L 29 (both with 4 records each), covering integrated and discrete semiconductor device simulation. Momentum data classifies the entity as a new entrant on a recent-filing basis, suggesting its position was built through a concentrated burst rather than a long filing history — worth monitoring to see whether activity continues or plateaus.

patent records: 15
Challenger · STMicroelectronics Inc

STMicroelectronics Inc

STMicroelectronics Inc holds 14 patent records and shows the broadest technology footprint among all filers, with H01L 29 (27 sub-record hits), H01L 27 (12), and H01L 21 (6) all represented. It is also the hub of the collaboration network, co-filing with GlobalFoundries, IBM, and its own Crolles 2 entity. Momentum data also classifies it as a new entrant in the recent window, indicating recent filing activity despite its established position.

patent records: 14
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
IBM (4 patent records)TSMC (4 patent records)+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.