Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Fischer-Tropsch synthesis converts syngas into liquid hydrocarbons, and the patent activity around it splits into three recognisable layers: catalyst formulation (cobalt and iron systems), reactor engineering (slurry bubble columns and gas handling), and downstream product finishing (wax handling, lubricating base oils). This dataset spans 779 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search that combines Fischer-Tropsch-specific terminology with IPC classes covering hydrocarbon refining, catalysis and organic compound chemistry.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in the trend line is understated and should not be read as a real drop-off on its own. The dataset is more useful for what it shows across the fuller history: a small group of oil majors and national energy companies holding the dense filing positions, and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants around them.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 779 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.
Filings rose to 16 in 2018 from 14 in 2017, then activity did not sustain: the 2022 midpoint reads zero, and the trend does not show a later rebound through the most recent complete filing years. Read the final year or two as incomplete rather than as a real collapse, given the usual 18-month publication lag.
C10G (hydrocarbon oils and refining) appears in 91.1% of the 779 records and B01J (catalytic processes) in 70.9%, confirming that most filings sit at the intersection of refining process and catalyst chemistry. C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) reaches 32.5%, while smaller classes such as C10K (fuel gas purification, 3.7%) and B01D (separation processes, 4.1%) mark narrower, less-crowded corners of the same technology space. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% of the record total and should not be summed.
Shares are the percentage of the 779 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fischer-tropsch synthesis and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe invention concerns a process for optimal operation of a slurry bubble column containing a suspension of solid particles in a liquid, where a gas phase containing the reactant(s) is injected as bubbles near the lower end of the reactor and at least part of the liquid fraction (and optionally solid fraction) is recirculated between the two extremities of the reactor, with the liquid flow rate held at or above the sedimentation rate of the solids.Filed by Institut Francais du Petrole; granted 2000-05-09.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5324335A | Process for the production of hydrocarbons | 216 |
| 2 | US20050133407A1 | Finished lubricating comprising lubricating base oil with high monocycloparaffins and low multicycloparaffins | 178 |
| 3 | US6211255B1 | Fischer-tropsch synthesis | 163 |
| 4 | US5763716A | Process for the production of hydrocarbons | 131 |
| 5 | US6117814A | Titania catalysts their preparation and use in fischer-tropsch synthesis | 117 |
| 6 | US4279830A | Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures utilizing dual reactors | 105 |
| 7 | US5939350A | Processes and catalysts for conducting fischer-tropsch synthesis in a slurry bubble column reactor | 104 |
| 8 | US20100160463A1 | Fischer-tropsch synthesis using microchannel technology and novel catalyst and microchannel reacotr | 99 |
| 9 | US7084180B2 | Fischer-tropsch synthesis using microchannel technology and novel catalyst and microchannel reactor | 94 |
| 10 | US6537945B2 | Highly active fischer-tropsch catalyst having increased thermal stability | 90 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings and are a signal of influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the data that matter for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.
The leading assignee holds 121 records against 99 at fifth place and 51 at tenth, among the 100 companies the ranking covers. That gap between the top position and the rest of the ranked group suggests one organisation built a deliberate, sustained filing programme rather than accumulating positions incidentally.
Filings climbed from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2018, then the midpoint year of 2022 shows zero. That pattern points to a technology area where core positions were staked out and then defended rather than expanded, at least through the years with complete publication data.
The most-cited record in this set, US5324335A, addresses hydrocarbon production process rather than a specific catalyst composition, and a slurry bubble column operating patent (US6060524A) is the representative filing. That balance suggests reactor and process engineering claims carry as much downstream influence as catalyst chemistry claims.
The United States (184), Europe (127) and Australia (103) account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, with WIPO PCT filings (82) indicating a meaningful share of applicants pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection from the outset.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fischer-tropsch synthesis, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked assignee list is dominated by oil majors, national energy companies and specialist catalyst engineering firms, with a long tail of single-filing entrants behind them.
The top-ranked assignee's filing count sits well above the rest of the ranked group, consistent with a long-running internal Fischer-Tropsch programme spanning catalyst, reactor and downstream claims rather than a single product line.
The strongest co-assignee pairings in this dataset repeat across the same small set of organisations at counts around 91 shared records each, pointing to structured joint-development or joint-venture filing rather than incidental co-ownership.
Every one of the leading assignees tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, including a -100% year-on-year change for one of them. Given the publication lag, this understates true recent activity but still marks a clear slowdown from the 2018 peak.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Cosmo Oil Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation | 0 | — |
| IFP Energies Nouvelles | 0 | -100% |
| Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation | 0 | — |
| Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| INPEX Corporation | 0 | — |
| Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking or white-space filing.
US6060524A and the other high-citation records concentrate on slurry bubble column operation; a design working in that space should map its process against those claims specifically rather than the catalyst literature.
Explore claims in EurekaA 121-record leader with this filing depth is worth a dedicated portfolio pull, not just a ranking glance, before committing to a reactor or catalyst design direction.
Run a portfolio benchmarkFuel gas purification and separation processes carry a fraction of the record count that core refining classes do, which is where a narrower first claim is more likely to clear prior art.
Search white space in EurekaIn this dataset of 779 records, one assignee leads with 121 records, well ahead of the fifth-place company at 99 and the tenth-place company at 51, across a ranking of 100 companies. The leading positions are held by a mix of national energy companies and oil majors with long-running research programmes in gas-to-liquids conversion. Because the ranking counts patent families rather than raw filings, it is a fairer comparison across companies that file in different numbers of jurisdictions.
Filing activity peaked at 16 records in 2018 within this dataset and had not returned to that level by the 2022 midpoint, which shows zero. Recent-year momentum data for the leading assignees also shows zero filings in the latest tracked year across the board. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the very latest year is always undercounted, but the multi-year flattening pattern here looks like a genuine slowdown rather than a reporting artefact.
Hydrocarbon oils and refining processes (IPC class C10G) appear in 91.1% of the 779 records, and catalytic process claims (B01J) appear in 70.9%, showing that most patents sit at the overlap of process engineering and catalyst chemistry. Acyclic and carbocyclic compound claims (C07C) reach 32.5% of records, covering the hydrocarbon products themselves. Narrower classes like fuel gas purification and separation processes each account for under 5% of records, marking them as comparatively open ground.
US6060524A, assigned to Institut Francais du Petrole, claims a method for operating a slurry bubble column reactor where gas is injected near the bottom and liquid (and optionally solid) fractions are recirculated between the reactor's two ends at a controlled flow rate. Any new slurry-phase Fischer-Tropsch reactor design that recirculates liquid at or above the solids' sedimentation rate in this configuration should be checked against this claim specifically. It does not cover fixed-bed or fluidised-bed reactor designs, nor does it reach catalyst composition, so alternative reactor geometries or different recirculation control schemes are a starting point for designing around it.
The IPC composition data shows fuel gas purification (C10K, 3.7% of records), separation processes (B01D, 4.1%) and fuels/firelighters (C10L, 4.2%) are all filed at a fraction of the density seen in core refining and catalysis classes. These narrower branches, particularly around syngas ratio control and wax handling and separation trains, carry far fewer competing claims and are worth a dedicated prior-art search before committing to a filing strategy there. Co-assignee pairing data also suggests joint-development filings are concentrated among a small group, leaving room for independent filers in adjacent process steps.
Go past this page: query the whole fischer-tropsch synthesis corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.