https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fischer-tropsch-synthesis-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical Process Routes
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis patents: who holds the ground and where filing has cooled
  • Filing has flattened since 2018. the peak year in this dataset (16 records), with the 2022 midpoint at zero and no rebound through the most recent complete years.
  • One assignee sits well clear of the field. 121 records against a fifth-place count of 99 and a tenth-place count of 51, among 100 ranked companies.
  • Reactor engineering, not just catalyst chemistry, is where citations concentrate. the most-cited record in this set covers slurry bubble column operation rather than a catalyst formulation.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
779
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
100
Active Filers Ranked
2018
Peak Filing Year
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis converts syngas into liquid hydrocarbons, and the patent activity around it splits into three recognisable layers: catalyst formulation (cobalt and iron systems), reactor engineering (slurry bubble columns and gas handling), and downstream product finishing (wax handling, lubricating base oils). This dataset spans 779 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search that combines Fischer-Tropsch-specific terminology with IPC classes covering hydrocarbon refining, catalysis and organic compound chemistry.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in the trend line is understated and should not be read as a real drop-off on its own. The dataset is more useful for what it shows across the fuller history: a small group of oil majors and national energy companies holding the dense filing positions, and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants around them.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1COSMO OIL CO LTD121
  2. 2JX NIPPON OIL & ENERGY CORP115
  3. 3IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES101
  4. 4JAPAN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION CO LTD99
  5. 5JAPAN OIL GAS & METALS NAT CORP99
  6. 6INPEX CORP99
  7. 7NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN ENGINEERING CO LTD97
  8. 8BP EXPLORATION OPERATING CO LTD53
  9. 9EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO52
  10. 10JOHNSON MATTHEY DAVY TECHNOLOGIES LTD51
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 779 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

A peak in 2018, then a flat line

Filings rose to 16 in 2018 from 14 in 2017, then activity did not sustain: the 2022 midpoint reads zero, and the trend does not show a later rebound through the most recent complete filing years. Read the final year or two as incomplete rather than as a real collapse, given the usual 18-month publication lag.

A peak in 2018, then a flat line05101520142017162018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Hydrocarbon refining and catalysis dominate the class mix

C10G (hydrocarbon oils and refining) appears in 91.1% of the 779 records and B01J (catalytic processes) in 70.9%, confirming that most filings sit at the intersection of refining process and catalyst chemistry. C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) reaches 32.5%, while smaller classes such as C10K (fuel gas purification, 3.7%) and B01D (separation processes, 4.1%) mark narrower, less-crowded corners of the same technology space. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% of the record total and should not be summed.

Hydrocarbon refining and catalysis dominate the class mixC10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining71091.1%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …55270.9%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds25332.5%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…739.4%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…557.1%C10L · Fuels & firelighters334.2%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…324.1%C10K · Purifying fuel gases293.7%Other14618.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 779 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fischer-tropsch synthesis and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records other filings build on

Representative Filing
US6060524A2000-05-09

US6060524A — Process and apparatus for operation of a slurry bubble column with application to the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

INSTITUT FRANCAIS DU PETROLE,

The invention concerns a process for optimal operation of a slurry bubble column containing a suspension of solid particles in a liquid, where a gas phase containing the reactant(s) is injected as bubbles near the lower end of the reactor and at least part of the liquid fraction (and optionally solid fraction) is recirculated between the two extremities of the reactor, with the liquid flow rate held at or above the sedimentation rate of the solids.Filed by Institut Francais du Petrole; granted 2000-05-09.

US6060524A — patent drawing 1US6060524A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5324335AProcess for the production of hydrocarbons216
2US20050133407A1Finished lubricating comprising lubricating base oil with high monocycloparaffins and low multicycloparaffins178
3US6211255B1Fischer-tropsch synthesis163
4US5763716AProcess for the production of hydrocarbons131
5US6117814ATitania catalysts their preparation and use in fischer-tropsch synthesis117
6US4279830AConversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures utilizing dual reactors105
7US5939350AProcesses and catalysts for conducting fischer-tropsch synthesis in a slurry bubble column reactor104
8US20100160463A1Fischer-tropsch synthesis using microchannel technology and novel catalyst and microchannel reacotr99
9US7084180B2Fischer-tropsch synthesis using microchannel technology and novel catalyst and microchannel reactor94
10US6537945B2Highly active fischer-tropsch catalyst having increased thermal stability90

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings and are a signal of influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the evidence supports

Three read-outs from the data that matter for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Concentration
121 vs 51
leader vs tenth place

One filer, then a steep drop

The leading assignee holds 121 records against 99 at fifth place and 51 at tenth, among the 100 companies the ranking covers. That gap between the top position and the rest of the ranked group suggests one organisation built a deliberate, sustained filing programme rather than accumulating positions incidentally.

Based on the assignee ranking, 100 companies
Trend
16 in 2018
peak filing year

Activity has not returned to 2018 levels

Filings climbed from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2018, then the midpoint year of 2022 shows zero. That pattern points to a technology area where core positions were staked out and then defended rather than expanded, at least through the years with complete publication data.

Filing trend, 2015-2026, most recent year partial
Citations
216 citations
top-cited record

Reactor operation outranks catalyst formulation on citations

The most-cited record in this set, US5324335A, addresses hydrocarbon production process rather than a specific catalyst composition, and a slurry bubble column operating patent (US6060524A) is the representative filing. That balance suggests reactor and process engineering claims carry as much downstream influence as catalyst chemistry claims.

Most-cited records table
Jurisdictions
184 US filings
leading receiving office

Filing activity is concentrated in a handful of offices

The United States (184), Europe (127) and Australia (103) account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, with WIPO PCT filings (82) indicating a meaningful share of applicants pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection from the outset.

Receiving office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fischer-tropsch synthesis, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked assignee list is dominated by oil majors, national energy companies and specialist catalyst engineering firms, with a long tail of single-filing entrants behind them.

Leader profile
121 records
leading assignee

A national energy group with sustained filing depth

The top-ranked assignee's filing count sits well above the rest of the ranked group, consistent with a long-running internal Fischer-Tropsch programme spanning catalyst, reactor and downstream claims rather than a single product line.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Co-filing pattern
91 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

Joint filings cluster around a small group

The strongest co-assignee pairings in this dataset repeat across the same small set of organisations at counts around 91 shared records each, pointing to structured joint-development or joint-venture filing rather than incidental co-ownership.

Co-assignee pairs, 10 identified
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Momentum has stalled across the leading filers

Every one of the leading assignees tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, including a -100% year-on-year change for one of them. Given the publication lag, this understates true recent activity but still marks a clear slowdown from the 2018 peak.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These narrower IPC corners carry far fewer records than the core refining and catalysis classes, which is where freedom-to-operate room is more likely to exist.
Syngas ratio control loopsWax handling and separation trainsFuel gas purification (C10K)Cobalt-iron mixed catalyst systemsSlurry recirculation hydrodynamics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Cosmo Oil Co., Ltd.0
JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation0
IFP Energies Nouvelles0-100%
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.0
Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation0
Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd.0
INPEX Corporation0
Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking or white-space filing.

Check claim scope on the leading reactor patents

US6060524A and the other high-citation records concentrate on slurry bubble column operation; a design working in that space should map its process against those claims specifically rather than the catalyst literature.

Explore claims in Eureka

Benchmark against the leading filer's full portfolio

A 121-record leader with this filing depth is worth a dedicated portfolio pull, not just a ranking glance, before committing to a reactor or catalyst design direction.

Run a portfolio benchmark

Test the under-claimed IPC corners

Fuel gas purification and separation processes carry a fraction of the record count that core refining classes do, which is where a narrower first claim is more likely to clear prior art.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about Fischer-Tropsch patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fischer-tropsch synthesis corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.