Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (272 records) with 2024 (279) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 7,140 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Flame retardant chemistry patenting concentrates on additive formulations rather than base polymer invention: the IPC composition shows C08K (additives in polymers) far ahead of C08L (polymer compositions) and C09K (miscellaneous materials). This pattern holds across the corpus's 7,140 patent families, filed mostly in China, the United States and before the EPO. Filing volume peaked in 2017 and has fallen through the following years, a shape consistent with a technology area where core mechanisms — phosphorus-based synergists, intumescent char formers, halogen-free substitutions — are largely staked out and remaining activity is incremental.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent filing years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. Read the decline from 2017 as directionally real but treat the final one or two years as provisional.
Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the field's technical boundaries.
Filings ran from 344 in 2017 to a midpoint of 268 in 2022, and sit at 41 in the still-incomplete 2026 count. That trajectory — a clear peak followed by a multi-year decline — points to a technology area consolidating around established chemistries rather than one still being actively opened up.
C08K (additives in polymers) accounts for 6,618 records, ahead of C08L (polymer compositions, 4,927) and C09K (miscellaneous materials, 1,451). Smaller but present clusters in C07F (organo-metallic compounds), H01B (cable and conductor insulation) and B29C (plastics shaping) mark where flame retardant chemistry intersects adjacent processing and end-use claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 7,140 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flame retardant chemistry and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by Northeast Forestry University, this record combines a triazine-based char-foaming agent, ammonium polyphosphate and a halogen-free synergist into a single intumescent system for polypropylene film. The stated aim is to fix the poor polymer compatibility and environmental drawbacks of inorganic flame retardants while improving flame-retardant efficiency without sacrificing mechanical properties or increasing smoke output.Abstract translated and condensed from the original filing for readability.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EP0363608A1 | Polymer mixture comprising an aromatic polycarbonate, a styrene-containing copolymer and/or graft polymer and… | 743 |
| 2 | DE19734437A1 | Synergistische Flammschutzmittel-Kombination für Polymere | 406 |
| 3 | US5204394A | Polymer mixture having aromatic polycarbonate, styrene I containing copolymer and/or graft polymer and a flam… | 404 |
| 4 | US20040002559A1 | Flame retardant coatings | 210 |
| 5 | EP1582549A1 | Flame retardant resin blends based on polymers derived from 2-hydrocarbyl-3,3-Bis(4-Hydroxyaryl)Phthalimidine… | 203 |
| 6 | WO1999000450A1 | Flame retardant compositions | 202 |
| 7 | US20090292048A1 | Flame retardant laser direct structuring materials | 200 |
| 8 | WO2012045414A1 | Flame retardant-stabilizer combination for thermoplastic polymers | 175 |
| 9 | WO1998008898A1 | Flame retardant composition | 169 |
| 10 | JP1984202240A | Flame-retardant thermoplastic resin composition | 159 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus skew toward older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations — read this as a map of foundational influence, not of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals from the dataset matter more than the raw record count: the shape of the filing curve, the concentration of IPC activity, and the geographic split of receiving offices.
Volume ran from a 2017 high of 344 down through a 2022 midpoint of 268 to 41 in the still-open 2026 window. Even allowing for publication lag understating recent years, the multi-year decline from peak is a genuine signal that core chemistries are largely claimed.
C08K outnumbers the next subclass, C08L, by nearly 1,700 records. Anyone filing a new additive or synergist claim is filing into the densest part of the map; adjacent processing classes like B29C and H01B carry far lower volume.
China's receiving office count nearly doubles the US total, with Europe close behind the US at 1,209. A freedom-to-operate review that skips Chinese-language filings is working from an incomplete picture of this field.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flame retardant chemistry, with the prior art for and against each one.
Momentum data shows the leading assignees pulling back rather than scaling up — several show year-over-year declines of 25% or more, and some report zero filings in the latest year.
Kingfa and its regional units (Shanghai Kingfa, Sichuan Kingfa) form the strongest co-assignee cluster in the dataset at 36 shared filings, but the parent's own latest-year count has dropped sharply, down 77% year over year to 3 filings.
Lanxess shows continued but shrinking activity, at 3 filings in the latest year against a 25% year-over-year decline — one of the few named assignees still filing at all in the most recent period.
BASF's co-assignee pairing with an individual inventor (Xalter Rainer) ranks among the dataset's strongest at 12 shared filings, yet BASF's own latest-year filing count has fallen to zero, a full year-over-year drop.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. | 3 | -77% |
| Lanxess | 3 | -25% |
| BASF | 0 | -100% |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Albemarle Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (USA) | 0 | — |
| DSM IP Assets B.V. | 0 | — |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to a field with occupied core claims and a shrinking pool of active top filers. The next steps depend on whether you are clearing a product or scouting a filing gap.
Given that additive chemistry carries the highest record density, any new formulation should be checked against the C08K corpus first, with particular attention to Chinese-language filings given the receiving-office split.
Explore the C08K landscape in EurekaThe strongest co-assignee pairs point to active R&D partnerships; watching their latest filings is a faster read on where incremental innovation is still happening than the aggregate trend line.
Map assignee relationships in EurekaSmoke-suppression additives for cable jacketing and migration-resistant coatings show lower density than the core additive classes — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is open.
Search white space in EurekaThe dataset shows filings running from 344 in 2017 down to 268 at the 2022 midpoint and to 41 in the still-incomplete 2026 count. A decline of this shape usually means the core mechanisms in a field — here, phosphorus-based synergists, intumescent char-forming systems and halogen-free substitutions — have already been claimed by early movers, leaving later entrants to file narrower, incremental improvements. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the very last one or two years will always undercount, but the multi-year downward trend predates that window and is likely a genuine slowdown.
C08K, covering additives used in polymers, is by far the largest class in this corpus at 6,618 records, ahead of C08L polymer compositions at 4,927 and C09K miscellaneous materials at 1,451. Smaller but relevant activity sits in C07F organo-metallic compounds, H01B cable and conductor insulation, and B29C plastics shaping, marking where flame retardant claims intersect processing and end-use applications. Anyone drafting new claims should expect the heaviest prior art in C08K and consider whether a formulation claim might instead sit more defensibly in a less crowded adjacent class.
The dataset's co-assignee data points to Kingfa Sci. & Tech. and its regional subsidiaries as the strongest filing cluster, with 36 shared filings between the parent and its Shanghai unit. BASF and Lanxess also appear among the more active historical filers, though momentum data shows a broad pullback: BASF's latest-year filings dropped 100% year over year, and Kingfa's own count fell 77%. No single assignee shows sustained growth in the most recent filing year, which is consistent with a maturing rather than expanding field.
Density is lowest, relative to the dominant C08K and C08L clusters, in areas like smoke-suppression additives for cable jacketing, migration-resistant intumescent coatings, and organo-phosphorus retardants filed outside the core C07F class. These are not empty spaces — they show real filings — but they carry meaningfully less claim density than the core additive chemistries. A targeted prior-art search in these sub-areas, rather than in the crowded C08K core, is more likely to surface genuinely open claim language.
China's receiving office recorded 2,178 filings in this corpus, nearly double the United States' 1,241 and ahead of the EPO's 1,209. This reflects both the scale of China's domestic polymer and plastics manufacturing base and the volume of filings from institutions such as Northeast Forestry University alongside industrial assignees like Kingfa. Any competitive or freedom-to-operate analysis in this field that excludes Chinese-language filings is working from a materially incomplete dataset, since China represents the single largest share of documented activity.
Go past this page: query the whole flame retardant chemistry corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.