https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/flame-retardant-chemistry-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Fine Chemicals
Flame Retardant Chemistry Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Filings peaked in 2017 at 344 and have declined since, with 2026 (partial) at 41 — this is a maturing, consolidating field rather than a growth story.
  • C08K additive chemistry dominates at 6,618 records, nearly 1,700 ahead of C08L polymer compositions, showing where claim density is heaviest.
  • China receives 2,178 filings versus 1,241 in the US, making Chinese-language prior art essential to any freedom-to-operate search in this space.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
7,140
Published Records
15%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+3%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (272 records) with 2024 (279) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 7,140 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A dense, consolidating field built on additive chemistry

Flame retardant chemistry patenting concentrates on additive formulations rather than base polymer invention: the IPC composition shows C08K (additives in polymers) far ahead of C08L (polymer compositions) and C09K (miscellaneous materials). This pattern holds across the corpus's 7,140 patent families, filed mostly in China, the United States and before the EPO. Filing volume peaked in 2017 and has fallen through the following years, a shape consistent with a technology area where core mechanisms — phosphorus-based synergists, intumescent char formers, halogen-free substitutions — are largely staked out and remaining activity is incremental.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent filing years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. Read the decline from 2017 as directionally real but treat the final one or two years as provisional.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1BASF SE343
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO194
  3. 3ALBEMARLE CORP188
  4. 4LANXESS CORPORATION184
  5. 5EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO161
  6. 6KINGFA SCI & TECH CO LTD160
  7. 7CLARIANT INT LTD154
  8. 8DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC145
  9. 9DSM IP ASSETS BV144
  10. 10SHPP GLOBAL TECH BV128
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flame Retardant Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the field's technical boundaries.

A field past its filing peak

Filings ran from 344 in 2017 to a midpoint of 268 in 2022, and sit at 41 in the still-incomplete 2026 count. That trajectory — a clear peak followed by a multi-year decline — points to a technology area consolidating around established chemistries rather than one still being actively opened up.

A field past its filing peak0100200300400344201720182019202020212022202320242025412026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Additive chemistry leads by a wide margin

C08K (additives in polymers) accounts for 6,618 records, ahead of C08L (polymer compositions, 4,927) and C09K (miscellaneous materials, 1,451). Smaller but present clusters in C07F (organo-metallic compounds), H01B (cable and conductor insulation) and B29C (plastics shaping) mark where flame retardant chemistry intersects adjacent processing and end-use claims.

Additive chemistry leads by a wide marginC08K · Use of additives in polymers6,61892.7%C08L · Polymer compositions4,92769.0%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…1,45120.3%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions88912.5%C08G · Condensation polymers5888.2%C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon c…5347.5%H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators5337.5%B29C · Shaping of plastics3805.3%Other2,31432.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 7,140 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flame Retardant Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Flame Retardant Chemistry with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flame retardant chemistry and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents everyone else cites

Representative filing
WO2017096519A12017-06-15

Triazine-based intumescent flame retardant and intumescent flame-retardant polypropylene (WO2017096519A1)

NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY

Filed by Northeast Forestry University, this record combines a triazine-based char-foaming agent, ammonium polyphosphate and a halogen-free synergist into a single intumescent system for polypropylene film. The stated aim is to fix the poor polymer compatibility and environmental drawbacks of inorganic flame retardants while improving flame-retardant efficiency without sacrificing mechanical properties or increasing smoke output.Abstract translated and condensed from the original filing for readability.

WO2017096519A1 — patent drawing 1WO2017096519A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1EP0363608A1Polymer mixture comprising an aromatic polycarbonate, a styrene-containing copolymer and/or graft polymer and…743
2DE19734437A1Synergistische Flammschutzmittel-Kombination für Polymere406
3US5204394APolymer mixture having aromatic polycarbonate, styrene I containing copolymer and/or graft polymer and a flam…404
4US20040002559A1Flame retardant coatings210
5EP1582549A1Flame retardant resin blends based on polymers derived from 2-hydrocarbyl-3,3-Bis(4-Hydroxyaryl)Phthalimidine…203
6WO1999000450A1Flame retardant compositions202
7US20090292048A1Flame retardant laser direct structuring materials200
8WO2012045414A1Flame retardant-stabilizer combination for thermoplastic polymers175
9WO1998008898A1Flame retardant composition169
10JP1984202240AFlame-retardant thermoplastic resin composition159

Citation counts inside a searched corpus skew toward older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations — read this as a map of foundational influence, not of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flame Retardant Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field stands

Three signals from the dataset matter more than the raw record count: the shape of the filing curve, the concentration of IPC activity, and the geographic split of receiving offices.

Filing trajectory
344 → 41
2017 peak vs. 2026 (partial)

Past peak, not pre-peak

Volume ran from a 2017 high of 344 down through a 2022 midpoint of 268 to 41 in the still-open 2026 window. Even allowing for publication lag understating recent years, the multi-year decline from peak is a genuine signal that core chemistries are largely claimed.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology concentration
6,618 records
C08K additive filings

Additive chemistry is the crowded lane

C08K outnumbers the next subclass, C08L, by nearly 1,700 records. Anyone filing a new additive or synergist claim is filing into the densest part of the map; adjacent processing classes like B29C and H01B carry far lower volume.

IPC composition, all years
Geographic split
2,178 vs. 1,241
China vs. US receiving office

China leads filing volume

China's receiving office count nearly doubles the US total, with Europe close behind the US at 1,209. A freedom-to-operate review that skips Chinese-language filings is working from an incomplete picture of this field.

Receiving offices, all years
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flame retardant chemistry, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flame Retardant Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignee activity is thinning at the top

Momentum data shows the leading assignees pulling back rather than scaling up — several show year-over-year declines of 25% or more, and some report zero filings in the latest year.

Momentum
-77% YoY
Kingfa Sci. & Tech.

Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.

Kingfa and its regional units (Shanghai Kingfa, Sichuan Kingfa) form the strongest co-assignee cluster in the dataset at 36 shared filings, but the parent's own latest-year count has dropped sharply, down 77% year over year to 3 filings.

Co-assignee pair strength: 36
Momentum
-25% YoY
Lanxess

Lanxess

Lanxess shows continued but shrinking activity, at 3 filings in the latest year against a 25% year-over-year decline — one of the few named assignees still filing at all in the most recent period.

Latest-year filings: 3
Momentum
-100% YoY
BASF

BASF

BASF's co-assignee pairing with an individual inventor (Xalter Rainer) ranks among the dataset's strongest at 12 shared filings, yet BASF's own latest-year filing count has fallen to zero, a full year-over-year drop.

Co-assignee pair strength: 12
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show lower density relative to the C08K/C08L core and are worth a targeted prior-art check before committing claim language.
Halogen-free synergist blends for thin-film insulationSmoke-suppression additives for cable jacketing (H01B overlap)Migration-resistant intumescent coatingsOrgano-phosphorus flame retardants outside C07F core claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.3-77%
Lanxess3-25%
BASF0-100%
General Electric Company0
Albemarle Corporation0-100%
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (USA)0
DSM IP Assets B.V.0
Dow Global Technologies LLC0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flame Retardant Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with occupied core claims and a shrinking pool of active top filers. The next steps depend on whether you are clearing a product or scouting a filing gap.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on C08K claims

Given that additive chemistry carries the highest record density, any new formulation should be checked against the C08K corpus first, with particular attention to Chinese-language filings given the receiving-office split.

Explore the C08K landscape in Eureka

Track the co-assignee clusters

The strongest co-assignee pairs point to active R&D partnerships; watching their latest filings is a faster read on where incremental innovation is still happening than the aggregate trend line.

Map assignee relationships in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Smoke-suppression additives for cable jacketing and migration-resistant coatings show lower density than the core additive classes — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is open.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flame Retardant Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about flame retardant chemistry patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flame Retardant Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Flame Retardant Chemistry in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole flame retardant chemistry corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.