Book a demo

Flameless & Low NOx Combustion Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Flameless & Low NOx Combustion Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/flameless-and-low-nox-combustion-in-furnaces-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Furnaces
Flameless and Low NOx Combustion Furnace Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Headed
  • 31.3% sits with five filers. the top five assignees combine for 238 of the 760 records in scope, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them.
  • Burner and combustion-apparatus classes dominate claim space. F23D and F23C each cover roughly half of all records, while control-specific class F23N sits at just 8.4% — a narrower, more open band.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2023 peak. activity ran 2021's 20 filings down to 14 by 2024, a 30% pullback over that span, even before accounting for publication lag in the newest years.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
760
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-30%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (20 records) with 2024 (14) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 760 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 760 published patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine flameless combustion, low NOx burner design or furnace combustion control with a secondary technique such as exhaust gas recirculation, oxygen enrichment, peak flame temperature management or reaction zone dilution. The search string deliberately pairs a combustion-control concept with an emissions or thermal-management mechanism, so the corpus is narrower than “combustion” at large and closer to the specific engineering problem of cutting NOx without losing flame stability.

Coverage spans six receiving offices, led by the United States and the European Patent Office, with meaningful WIPO, Japanese, Canadian and Indian filing activity. Because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months, the final one to two years of the trend understate real activity and should be read as provisional rather than declining.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1PRAXAIR TECH INC64
  2. 2ZEECO INC62
  3. 3AIR PROD & CHEM INC54
  4. 4CLEARSIGN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION31
  5. 5EDWARDS LTD27
  6. 6EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC20
  7. 7HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC17
  8. 8BABCOCK HITACHI KK15
  9. 9FIVES NORTH AMERICAN COMBUSTION INC15
  10. 10LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 760 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the field splits across IPC subclasses when a record can carry more than one classification.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2023, then eased to 14 by 2024 — a 30% decline over the 2021-2024 window using the last fully comparable years. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates.

Filing trend, 2017-202606131925142017201820192020202120222520232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

Burners (F23D, 54.9% of records) and combustion apparatus (F23C, 48.9%) anchor the field; air and draught supply (F23L, 22.0%) is the next largest. Furnace casings and linings, combustion control, incinerators and gas-turbine plants each sit in single-digit-to-low-double-digit territory, marking narrower but still active bands of claim activity.

IPC subclass compositionF23D · Burners41754.9%F23C · Combustion apparatus37248.9%F23L · Air & draught supply16722.0%F23M · Furnace casings & linings719.3%F23N · Combustion control648.4%F23G · Incinerators & waste burning628.2%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…435.7%F02C · Gas-turbine plants374.9%Other42756.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 760 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flameless and low nox combustion in furnaces and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited records

Representative Filing
US6039560A2000-03-21

US6039560A — Low NOx burner and method of controlling recirculation of exhaust gas

SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD.

A low NOx burner having a burner body, to which an electric fan for supplying air for combustion is connected and which includes an exhaust gas recirculation passage for supplying combustion gas from the burner body to air for combustion, the low NOx burner including an exclusive exhaust-gas recirculation fan provided for the exhaust gas recirculation passage and arranged to forcibly recirculate exhaust gas, and a bypass passage formed between the exhaust gas recirculation passage and a passage for air for combustion formed in the burner body.Filed by Sanyo Electric, granted 2000-03-21 — a foundational architecture combining a dedicated recirculation fan with a bypass passage, still cited by later burner-design filings in this corpus.

US6039560A — patent drawing 1US6039560A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5154599AMethod for apparatus for combusting fuel in a combustion chamber220
2US7980312B1Integrated in situ retorting and refining of oil shale195
3US6168709B1Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke195
4US20020179493A1Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke179
5US20020069648A1Novel design of adiabatic combustors156
6US20090232729A1Steam-Hydrocarbon Reforming Method with Limited Steam Export118
7US20060032788A1Production and use of a premium fuel grade petroleum coke115
8US6773256B2Ultra low NOx burner for process heating109
9US20070254251A1Ultra-low NOx burner assembly104
10US8261823B1Integrated in situ retorting and refining of oil shale96

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to be cited within this searched set — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the concentration, composition and citation data above.

Concentration
31.3% / 238 of 760
top five assignees

The top is occupied, the tail is wide open

Five assignees hold 238 of the 760 records in scope, a meaningful but not overwhelming concentration. The other 522 records are spread across a long tail of the remaining ranked companies plus unranked filers, which means most of this space is not locked up by any single player.

Ranked leaders, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
Claim density
54.9% F23D
burner classifications

Burner hardware claims are the densest single band

Over half of all records touch F23D burner classifications, and nearly as many touch F23C combustion apparatus. New burner-geometry claims are filing into the most contested part of the field; combustion-control-specific claims under F23N, at 8.4%, face far less prior art.

Shares exceed 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Momentum
20 → 14
2021 to 2024 filings

Volume has pulled back from its 2023 peak

Filing peaked at 25 in 2023 before easing to 14 by 2024, a 30% drop across the last fully comparable three-year window. That is a real signal of cooling investment pace in the corpus, though the very newest years will revise upward as publications complete.

2025-2026 figures are provisional due to publication lag.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flameless and low nox combustion in furnaces, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare in this field
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Zeeco, Inc.ZINK DARTON J3
Zeeco, Inc.ROBERTS RYAN3
Zeeco, Inc.MCDONALD JOHN3
Zeeco, Inc.MARTY SETH3
Zeeco, Inc.LITTLE CODY L3
Zeeco, Inc.ISAACS REX K3
Zeeco, Inc.GUARCO JOHN PHILIP3
Zeeco, Inc.BEALE FR E3

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, with the strongest pairings repeating at three joint filings — combustion patents here are overwhelmingly filed by a single assignee rather than through joint ventures or co-development structures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranking covers 100 companies drawn from patent families across the full 760-record corpus. It is the complete list the dataset returns, not a curated top tier.

Leader
64 records
leading assignee

A clear leader, then a steep drop

The top-ranked assignee holds 64 records, more than double the fifth-place company's 27. That gap suggests one filer has built a genuinely broader combustion-hardware portfolio rather than a narrow set of related continuations.

Fifth place: 27 records; tenth place: 13 records.
Momentum
1 filing
latest-year activity, leading assignee

Even leaders have gone quiet in the latest year

The top-ranked assignee shows only a single filing in the most recent year captured, and several other ranked leaders show none. Read this cautiously given publication lag, but it is consistent with the broader cooling seen in the 2021-2024 trend.

Recent-year counts understate true filing activity due to the ~18-month publication lag.
Geography
215 US / 135 EP
top two receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in the US and Europe, with real Asian and Indian volume

The United States and the European Patent Office lead receiving-office counts, followed by WIPO PCT filings and then Japan, Canada and India. That spread indicates this is a technology being protected across major industrial furnace markets rather than in a single jurisdiction.

WIPO PCT filings often precede national-phase entry in these same offices.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core burner and combustion-apparatus classes.
Combustion-control feedback loops (F23N)Reaction-zone dilution stagingOxygen-enrichment metering for retrofit burnersIncinerator-specific NOx suppression (F23G)Gas-turbine adjacent flameless designs (F02C)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.1
Praxair Technology, Inc.0
Zeeco, Inc.0
ClearSign Technologies Corporation0
Edwards Ltd0
Babcock Hitachi K.K.0
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.0
Honeywell International Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing angle.

Check claim overlap before filing in F23D or F23C

With more than half of all records touching burner classifications and nearly as many touching combustion apparatus, a new burner-geometry or apparatus claim needs a careful prior-art read against the leading assignees' portfolios before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Track the leading assignee's next moves

A single assignee holds 64 of the 760 records with a steep drop to the rest of the field — worth monitoring for continuations or new filings even though its latest-year activity has slowed.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Explore combustion-control and gas-turbine adjacencies

F23N combustion control and F02C gas-turbine classes each sit under 10% of records, well below the burner and apparatus classes — a comparatively open band for a first claim.

Explore white space with Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Flameless and Low NOx Combustion in Furnaces in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole flameless and low nox combustion in furnaces corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.